The Role of Double-balloon Enteroscopy in the Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Small Bowel Tumors

Small bowel metastasis from endometrial cancer presenting as a bowel obstruction: A case report with literature review

This report describes a rare case of small bowel metastasis from endometrial cancer, diagnosed six years after initial treatment. A 62-year-old woman with a history of grade 2 stage IA endometrial cancer, previously treated with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, presented with intermittent abdominal pain and nausea. Imaging studies revealed small bowel obstruction and balloon-assisted enteroscopy identified an annular ulcer with luminal narrowing in the jejunum. Histopathological examination of the biopsy specimen suggested carcinoma; however, its primary origin remained unclear. Subsequent surgical resection confirmed metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma based on immunohistochemical analysis, which demonstrated positivity for estrogen receptor and paired box gene 8, while CK7, CK20, and CDX2 were negative. Following surgery, the patient experienced symptomatic relief, and no additional metastatic lesions were detected, leading to a conservative follow-up strategy. This case highlights the diagnostic utility of balloon-assisted enteroscopy in detecting rare small bowel metastases. Given that such metastases often remain asymptomatic until reaching an advanced stage, early identification is critical. Furthermore, immunohistochemical profiling plays a crucial role in distinguishing metastatic endometrial cancer from other primary small bowel malignancies. Endoscopists should maintain a high index of suspicion for metastatic involvement in patients with a history of endometrial cancer who present with unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms.

The Role of Small-Bowel Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are relatively rare neoplasms but represent one of the most frequent types of primary small-bowel tumours. Their incidence is rising, and this is most likely because of their more frequent early-stage detection, physician awareness, and increasing availability and use of imaging and small-bowel endoscopic techniques, such as video capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy, which enable the detection, localisation, and histological sampling of previously inaccessible and underdiagnosed small-bowel lesions. This review summarises the role of small-bowel endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel NETs to assist clinicians in their practice. Small-bowel endoscopy may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of these tumours alongside other diagnostic tests, such as biomarkers, conventional radiology, and functional imaging. In addition, small-bowel enteroscopy may play a role in the preoperative setting for the identification and marking of these tumours for surgical resection and the management of rare complications, such as small-bowel variceal bleeding, in cases of portal hypertension due to the encasement of mesenteric vessels in fibrotic small-bowel NETs.

[Use of Device-Assisted Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: An Expert Consensus Statement by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases]

The introduction of device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) in the beginning of the 21st century has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the small intestine. In contrast to capsule endoscopy, the other main diagnostic modality of small bowel diseases, DAE has the unique advantages of allowing the observation of the region of interest in detail and enabling tissue acquisition and therapeutic intervention. As DAE becomes an essential procedure in daily clinical practice, there is an increasing need for correct guidelines on when and how it is to be performed and what technical factors should be taken into consideration. In response to these needs, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases has developed an expert consensus statement on the performance of DAE by reviewing current evidence. This expert consensus statement particularly focuses on the indications, choice of insertion route, therapeutic intervention, complications, and relevant technical points.

Endoscopic and histological characteristics of small bowel tumors diagnosed by double-balloon enteroscopy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) allows for the diagnoses and treatment of small bowel tumors (SBTs). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of DBE for the diagnosis and treatment of SBTs.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SBTs who underwent DBE were included in this study. According to their endoscopic appearances, they were categorized as polyps or masses, and according to their histological characteristics, they were categorized as benign or malignant SBTs.

RESULTS

A total of 704 patients were retrospectively analyzed, and 90 (12.8%) were diagnosed with SBTs. According to their endoscopic appearance, 48 (53.3%) had polyps and 42 (46.7%) had masses. Additionally, 53 (58.9%) and 37 (41.1%) patients had malignant and benign SBTs, respectively, depending on their histological characteristics. Patients diagnosed with polyps were younger than those diagnosed with masses (p<0.001). Patients diagnosed with benign SBTs were younger than those diagnosed with malignant SBT (p<0.001). Overall, histological diagnosis was determined using DBE in 73 (81.1%) patients.

CONCLUSION

DBE is a useful method for diagnosing SBTs. Additionally, the histological type of the lesion can be determined using DBE.

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022

MR1: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3: ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8: ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9: ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn's disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11: ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

Use of device-assisted enteroscopy in small bowel disease: an expert consensus statement by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases

The introduction of device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) in the beginning of 21st century has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the small intestine. In contrast to capsule endoscopy, the other main diagnostic modality of the small bowel diseases, DAE has the unique advantages of observing the region of interest in detail and enabling tissue acquisition and therapeutic intervention. As DAE becomes an essential procedure in daily clinical practice, there is an increasing need for correct guidelines on when and how to perform it and what technical factors should be considered. In response to these needs, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases developed an expert consensus statement on the performance of DAE by reviewing the current evidence. This expert consensus statement particularly focuses on the indications, choice of insertion route, therapeutic intervention, complications, and relevant technical points.

Clinical Features and Management of Small Bowel Masses Detected During Device-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Multi-Center Experience

Background

Small bowel mass lesions (SBMLs) are rare, span a range of different histologies and phenotypes, and our understanding of them is limited. Some lesions occur in patients with recognized polyposis syndromes and others arise sporadically. The current literature regarding SBMLs is limited to small retrospective studies, case reports, and small case series. This large multi-center study aims to understand the various clinical presentations, histologies and management options for SBMLs.

Methods

After obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, electronic records were used to identify all device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) performed for luminal small bowel evaluation in adult patients at three US referral centers (Duke, LSU and UMass) from January 1, 2014, to October 1, 2020. We identified all patients within this cohort in whom a SBML was detected. Using a focused electronic medical record chart review, we collected patient, procedure, and lesion-related data and used descriptive statistics to explore relationships between these data and outcomes.

Results

A total of 218 patients (49 at Duke, 148 at LSU, and 21 at UMass) in this cohort had at least one SBML found on DAE. The most common presenting symptoms were iron-deficiency anemia/bleeding (73.3%) and abnormal imaging (33.6%). Thirty-five percent of patients had symptoms for more than a year prior to their diagnosis. Most patients (71.6%) underwent video capsule endoscopy (VCE) prior to DAE and 84% of these exams showed the lesion. The lesion was seen less frequently (48.9%) on computed tomography (CT) scan performed prior to DAE. The majority of lesions were found on antegrade (56%) or retrograde (29.8%) double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). The most common lesion phenotypes were submucosal (41.3%) and pedunculated (33%) with a much smaller number being sessile (14.7%) or obstructing/invasive (11%). They were found equally as commonly in the jejunum (46.3%) and ileum (49.5%). Most lesions were 10 - 20 mm in size (47%) but 22.1% were larger than 20 mm. The most common histologies were neuroendocrine tumors (NETs, 20.6%) and hamartomas (20.6%). Primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel was rare, constituting only 5% of lesions. The majority of polyps (78.4%) were sporadic, compared to 21.7% associated with a polyposis or hereditary cancer syndrome, most commonly Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (18.3%). After DAE, 37.6% were advised to undergo surgical resection and 48% were advised to undergo endoscopic surveillance or no further management because of benign histology or successful endoscopic resection.

Conclusions

In this multi-center retrospective study we found that SBMLs are more likely to be sporadic than syndromic, medium in size and either pedunculated or submucosal. NETs and hamartomas predominated and symptoms, most commonly anemia, can be present for more than a year prior to diagnosis. Close to one half of lesions required either no further intervention or only endoscopic surveillance.

Adenocarcinoma of the Jejunum: A Case Report and Literature Review

Small intestine cancers account for 1-3% of all gastrointestinal tumors, with only 11-25% of these tumors located in the jejunum. We report the case of a woman who has been experiencing abdominal pain for the last six months, accompanied by nausea, vomiting and appearance of dark-colored stools, who has lost 20 kg in weight during the last few months. Laboratory findings indicated anemia and no significant changes were identified in the abdominal ultrasound. By endoscopic examination of the stomach and duodenum and by colonoscopy, no infiltrations were found. Serum markers were elevated and CT scan of the abdomen showed thickening of a part of the jejunum wall with swollen lymph nodes in the mesentery, along the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta, in the retroperitoneal space. By opening the abdominal cavity, we observed an infiltration in the initial part of the jejunum with an infiltration of the entire wall. Resection of the jejunum with related mesenthery, vessels and lymph nodes therein was performed. Histopathology revealed an invasive adenocarcinoma of the small intestine, with an invasion of all layers of the wall and mesentery. Adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy was introduced, 6 cycles in total, and following each cycle, tumor markers have been constantly decreasing. No relapse has been identified after nine months. Due to often deep position in the small intestine, atypical symptomatology and lack of screening, an early diagnosis is difficult. Surgical resection of the affected small intestine followed by an additional chemotherapy is the optimal treatment strategy.

Endoscopic characteristics of small intestinal malignant tumors observed by balloon-assisted enteroscopy

BACKGROUND

Capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) enable visualization of rare small bowel conditions such as small intestinal malignant tumors. However, details of the endoscopic characteristics of small intestinal malignant tumors are still unknown.

AIM

To elucidate the endoscopic characteristics of small intestinal malignant tumors.

METHODS

From March 2005 to February 2017, 1328 BAE procedures were performed at Keio University Hospital. Of these procedures, malignant tumors were classified into three groups, Group 1: epithelial tumors including primary small intestinal cancer, metastatic small intestinal cancer, and direct small intestinal invasion by an adjacent organ cancer; Group 2: small intestinal malignant lymphoma; and Group 3, small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We systematically collected clinical and endoscopic data from patients' medical records to determine the endoscopic characteristics for each group.

RESULTS

The number of patients in each group was 16 (Group 1), 22 (Group 2), and 6 (Group 3), and the percentage of solitary tumors was 100%, 45.5%, and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients' clinical background parameters including age, symptoms, and laboratory data were not significantly different between the groups. Seventy-five percent of epithelial tumors (Group 1) were located in the upper small intestine (duodenum and ileum), and approximately 70% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (Group 3) were located in the jejunum. Solitary protruding or mass-type tumors were not seen in malignant lymphoma (Group 2) (P < 0.001). Stenosis was seen more often in Group 1, (68.8%, 27.3%, and 0%; Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P = 0.004). Enlarged white villi inside and/or surrounding the tumor were seen in 12.5%, 54.5%, and 0% in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis of small intestinal malignant tumors could be tentatively made based on BAE findings.