Relationship between mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and the individual differences in aerobic performance

Is mitochondrial DNA profiling predictive for athletic performance?

Mitochondrial DNA encodes some proteins of the oxidative phosphorylation enzymatic complex, playing an important role in aerobic ATP production; therefore, it can contribute to the ability to respond to endurance exercise training. The accumulation of mitochondrial mutations and the migratory processes of populations have given a great contribution to the development of haplogroups with a different distribution in the world. Several studies have shown the important role of gene polymorphisms in aerobic performance. In this review, some mitochondrial haplogroups and multiple rare alleles were taken into consideration and could be linked to the athlete's physical performance of different ethnic groups.

Genes to predict VO2max trainability: a systematic review

Background

Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO_2max) is an excellent predictor of chronic disease morbidity and mortality risk. Guidelines recommend individuals undertake exercise training to improve VO_2max for chronic disease reduction. However, there are large inter-individual differences between exercise training responses. This systematic review is aimed at identifying genetic variants that are associated with VO_2max trainability.

Methods

Peer-reviewed research papers published up until October 2016 from four databases were examined. Articles were included if they examined genetic variants, incorporated a supervised aerobic exercise intervention; and measured VO_2max/VO_2peak pre and post-intervention.

Results

Thirty-five articles describing 15 cohorts met the criteria for inclusion. The majority of studies used a cross-sectional retrospective design. Thirty-two studies researched candidate genes, two used Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), and one examined mRNA gene expression data, in addition to a GWAS. Across these studies, 97 genes to predict VO_2max trainability were identified. Studies found phenotype to be dependent on several of these genotypes/variants, with higher responders to exercise training having more positive response alleles than lower responders (greater gene predictor score). Only 13 genetic variants were reproduced by more than two authors. Several other limitations were noted throughout these studies, including the robustness of significance for identified variants, small sample sizes, limited cohorts focused primarily on Caucasian populations, and minimal baseline data. These factors, along with differences in exercise training programs, diet and other environmental gene expression mediators, likely influence the ideal traits for VO_2max trainability.

Conclusion

Ninety-seven genes have been identified as possible predictors of VO_2max trainability. To verify the strength of these findings and to identify if there are more genetic variants and/or mediators, further tightly-controlled studies that measure a range of biomarkers across ethnicities are required.

Mitochondrial haplogroup T is negatively associated with the status of elite endurance athlete

Mitochondrial function is absolutely necessary to supply the energy required for muscles, and germ line mutations in mitochondrial genes have been related with impaired cardiac function and exercise intolerance. In addition, alleles at several polymorphic sites in mtDNA define nine common haplogroups, and some of these haplogroups have been implicated in the risk of developing several diseases. In this study, we analysed the association between mtHaplogroups and the capacity to reach the status of elite endurance athlete. DNA was obtained from blood leukocytes of 95 Spanish elite endurance athletes and 250 healthy male population controls. We analysed eight mitochondrial polymorphisms and the frequencies were statistically compared between elite athletes and controls. Haplogroup T, specifically defined by 13368A, was significantly less frequent among elite endurance athletes (p =0.012, Fisher's exact test). Our study suggests that allele 13368A and mitochondrial haplogroup T might be a marker negatively associated with the status of elite endurance athlete. This mitochondrial variant could be related with a lower capacity to respond to endurance training, through unknown mechanisms involving a less efficient mitochondrial workload.

Mitochondrial myopathies: diagnosis, exercise intolerance, and treatment options

Mitochondrial myopathies are caused by genetic mutations that directly influence the functioning of the electron transport chain (ETC). It is estimated that 1 of 8,000 people have pathology inducing mutations affecting mitochondrial function. Diagnosis often requires a multifaceted approach with measurements of serum lactate and pyruvate, urine organic acids, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), muscle histology and ultrastructure, enzymology, genetic analysis, and exercise testing. The ubiquitous distribution of the mitochondria in the human body explains the multiple organ involvement. Exercise intolerance is a common but often an overlooked hallmark of mitochondrial myopathies. The muscle consequences of ETC dysfunction include increased reliance on anaerobic metabolism (lactate generation, phosphocreatine degradation), enhanced free radical production, reduced oxygen extraction and electron flux through ETC, and mitochondrial proliferation or biogenesis (see article by Hood in current issue). Treatments have included antioxidants (vitamin E, alpha lipoic acid), electron donors and acceptors (coenzyme Q10, riboflavin), alternative energy sources (creatine monohydrate), lactate reduction strategies (dichloroacetate) and exercise training. Exercise is a particularly important modality in diagnosis as well as therapy (see article by Taivassalo in current issue). Increased awareness of these disorders by exercise physiologists and sports medicine practitioners should lead to more accurate and more rapid diagnosis and the opportunity for therapy and genetic counseling.

The search for genotypes that underlie human performance phenotypes

For a species spread throughout the world, humans are remarkably invariant; yet there has always been more interest in the slight differences between individuals than in the great commonality. This is especially true in athletic endeavours, where nearly immeasurable differences in performance can separate the winner from the rest of the competitors. There is little doubt that performance is influenced by environment, as the effects of diet and training on athletic ability have long been known, if not completely understood; however, the contribution of an individual's genetic make-up is less clear. The dominance of particular nationalities, ethnic groups, or families in various sporting events is often perceived as evidence that heritage (biological or cultural), plays a role in the development of athletic skills. Further complicating the issue are the interactions between genetic background and environment, as both of these fundamental arbiters of development rarely act independently. Despite the complexity of the problem, numerous researchers have attempted to elucidate the effects of genetic background on physical performance and, more recently, to identify the specific genetic variants that contribute to performance. This article reviews some of these studies with a focus on the methodologies employed.

The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2001 update

This review presents the 2001 update of the human gene map for physical performance and health-related phenotypes. It is based on scientific papers published by the end of 2001. Association studies with candidate genes, genome-wide scans with polymorphic markers, and single gene defects causing exercise intolerance to variable degrees are included. The genes and markers with evidence of association or linkage with a performance or fitness phenotype in sedentary or active people, in adaptation to acute exercise or for training-induced changes are positioned on the genetic map of all autosomes and the X chromosome. Negative studies are reviewed, but a gene or locus must be supported by at least one positive study before being inserted on the map. By the end of 2000, there were 29 loci depicted on the map. The 2001 map includes 71 loci on the autosomes and two on the X chromosome. Among these genes or markers, 24 are from prior publications on exercise intolerance and four relate to other pathologies. Finally, 13 sequence variants in mitochondrial DNA have been shown to influence relevant fitness and performance phenotypes.

Polymorphisms in control region of mtDNA relates to individual differences in endurance capacity or trainability

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the polymorphisms in the control region of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) related to individual difference in the endurance capacity or trainability. Fifty-five sedentary males participated in this study and were submitted to an 8-week endurance training program. The VO(2 max) was determined before and after training. Total DNA was extracted from the blood, and the sequence of the mtDNA control region was determined. The polymorphism in the mtDNA control region was decided based on the "Cambridge sequence." In 29 of the 55 subjects, vastus lateralis muscle biopsy samples were taken at rest before and after the training program. MtDNA content and CS (citrate synthase) activity in skeletal muscle was measured as the phenotype of the polymorphisms in the mtDNA control region. The VO(2 max) increased to 48.2 +/- 6.3 ml/min/kg from 42.1 +/- 6.0 as a result of the 8-week training (p < 0.05). The numbers of polymorphisms in determined 1,122 bp were 11.1 +/- 2.9 variable sites per person, and the total numbers of polymorphisms were 125 variable sites. The subjects were classified into two groups at each variable site, the Cambridge sequence (Cam) group and the non-Cambridge sequence (non-Cam) group. There were significant differences in pre-VO(2 max) between the two groups at each mtDNA nucleotide positions 16298, 16325, and 199, and in % Delta VO(2 max) at 16223 and 16362. Twenty-nine subjects who underwent the biopsy revealed significant differences in pre-CS activity at 194 and pre-mtDNA content at 514. Also, significant differences were found in the change rate of VO(2 max )and CS activity as a result of training between the two groups at 16519. In conclusion, it suggested that mtDNA polymorphisms in the control region might result in individual differences in endurance capacity or trainability.