Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP): Current Therapies and Future Approaches

Efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab regimen for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab with conventional therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) treatment.

METHODS

Total 73 patients with CIDP were enrolled for the retrospective cohort study, and divided into conventional first-line therapy cohort (n = 40) and combined low-dose rituximab (100 mg per infusion) cohort (n = 33). The outcome measures include scores of I-RODS, mRS, INCAT, ONLS, TSS, and COMPASS 31 scale at baseline and regular four visits (4, 16, 28, and 52 weeks), as well as proportion of favorable response and outcome, corticosteroids dosage, and deterioration occurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional therapy cohort, combined rituximab cohort presented better improvements and higher proportion of favorable response in scales assessments at each visit, as well as significantly reduced corticosteroids dosage and deterioration occurrence during the follow-up. Analyses of subgroups showed better improvements in both typical CIDP and CIDP variants in combined rituximab cohort than those in conventional therapy cohort, but had no differences between each other. Early initiating combined rituximab regimen (<10 weeks) showed better improvements than delayed initiation (≥10 weeks) at the first three visits within 28 weeks, while had no difference in favorable prognoses at the last visit of 52 weeks after once reinfusion. No rituximab correlated serious adverse events were reported in our patients.

INTERPRETATION

Our simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab has been firstly demonstrated for the better efficacy and safety than conventional therapy in CIDP treatment.

Antibodies in immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies. Where are we in 2024?

Over the past 30 years, about 20 antibodies have been identified in immune-mediated neuropathies, recognizing membrane or intracellular proteins or glycolipids of neuron and Schwann cells. This article reviews the different methods used for their detection, what we know about their pathogenic role, how they have helped identify several disorders, and how they are essential for diagnosis. Despite sustained efforts, some immune-mediated disorders still lack identified autoantibodies, notably the classical form of Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. The reasons for this are discussed. The article also tries to determine potential future developments in antibody research, particularly the use of omic approaches and the search for other types of biomarkers beyond diagnostic ones, such as those that can identify patients who will respond to a given treatment.

Treatment response amplitude and timing in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with routine care: Study of a UK cohort

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The amplitude, timing, and determinants of improvement with available treatments are uncertain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Our primary objective was to quantify categorized outcomes with routine care.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied treatment response within 36 months from initiation in 112 consecutive subjects with CIDP. Response was classified into a proposed new "CIDP treatment-response category" (CT-RC), based on achieved endpoints. Determinants of the CT-RC, of timing of maximum improvement, and of treatment discontinuation were ascertained.

RESULTS

The CT-RC demonstrated high concurrent validity with current outcome measures. Thirty-six subjects (32.1%) achieved a "complete response," 37 (33%) a "good partial response," 10 (8.9%) a "moderate partial response," and 15 (13.4%) a "poor partial response." Fourteen subjects (12.5%) were "nonresponsive." The CT-RC was independently predicted only by age. Mean time to maximum improvement was 12.1 months (range = 1-36) and was not associated with any pretreatment covariate. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 24 of 62 (38.2%) partial responders and was only associated with shorter pretreatment disease duration. Nonresponders were older and received a similar number of treatments compared to responders.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-RC classification indicates persistent disability in >60% of treatment responders in CIDP. Timing of maximum improvement is variable, frequently delayed, and unpredictable. Treatment withdrawal without deterioration is achievable in approximately 40% of subjects and may be more likely with prompt treatment. Treatment withdrawal in partial responders and limited escalation in nonresponders suggest implication of physician- and patient-related factors in suboptimal response. More effective treatments/treatment methods and better understanding of other factors influencing response are needed in CIDP.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with pulmonary nocardiosis: A case report

RATIONALE

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated motor sensory peripheral neuropathy that is rare in clinical practice. This treatment method aims to suppress potential immunopathology. Nocardiosis is a rare, destructive, opportunistic disease. We report a case of failed treatment of CIDP combined with pulmonary nocardiosis, and for the first time, we link these 2 diseases together.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old man developed symmetrical limb weakness. Four months later, he was diagnosed with CIDP and started receiving glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. The disease progressed slowly and was treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination. He did not follow the doctor requirements for monthly follow-up visits, and the preventive medication for sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim was not strictly implemented. Two months after the combination therapy, the patient developed fever, coughing and sputum production, as well as fatigue and poor appetite. Based on imaging and etiological results, he was diagnosed with pulmonary nocardiosis.

DIAGNOSES

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, pulmonary nocardiosis.

INTERVENTIONS

After treatment with antibiotics, the patient lung infection temporarily improved. However, the patient CIDP condition progressed, limb weakness worsened, respiratory muscle involvement occurred, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered. However, there was no significant improvement in the condition, and the patient died.

OUTCOMES

In this report, we present a case of a patient with CIDP and pulmonary nocardiosis. It is worth noting that in order to avoid the progression and recurrence of CIDP, we did not stop using related therapeutic drugs during the treatment process, the patient had repeatedly refused to use IVIG. Despite this, the patient condition worsened when lung inflammation improved, leading to persistent respiratory failure and ultimately death. Treatment contradictions, medication issues, and patient compliance issues reflected in this case are worth considering.

LESSONS

For patients with CIDP receiving immunosuppressive therapy, attention should be paid to the occurrence and severity of Nocardia infection. Therefore, early detection and treatment are necessary. We need to pay attention to the compliance of patients with prophylactic use of antibiotics, strengthen the follow-up, and urge them to return to their appointments on time.

Immunomodulatory effects of intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: An observational study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is not known whether the route of administration affects the mechanisms of action of therapeutic immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the immunomodulatory effects of intravenous (IVIg) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with CIDP and in IVIg-treated common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients.

METHODS

Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples were obtained from 30 CIDP patients receiving IVIg, 10 CIDP patients receiving SCIg, and 15 patients with CVID receiving IVIg. Samples and clinical data were obtained prior to IVIg/SCIg and at 3 days, 7 days, and, in CIDP patients receiving IVIg, 21 days post-administration. Serum cytokines were assessed by Luminex-based multiplex assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immune cells were characterized by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Immune cell profiles of CIDP and CVID patients differed in frequencies of myeloid dendritic cells and cytotoxic natural killer cells. During treatment with IVIg or SCIg in CIDP patients, cellular immunomarkers were largely similar. CIDP patients receiving IVIg had higher macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α (p = 0.01), interleukin (IL)-4 (p = 0.04), and IL-33 (p = 0.04) levels than SCIg recipients. IVIg treatment more broadly modulated cytokines in CIDP than SCIg treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the modulation of cellular immunomarkers in CIDP is independent of the application route of therapeutic immunoglobulin. Minor differences were observed between CIDP and CVID patients. In contrast, cytokines were differentially modulated by IVIg and SCIg in CIDP.

The gut microbiome in intravenous immunoglobulin-treated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The gut microbiome is involved in autoimmunity. Data on its composition in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), the most common chronic autoimmune disorder of peripheral nerves, are currently lacking.

METHODS

In this monocentric exploratory pilot study, stool samples were prospectively collected from 16 CIDP patients (mean age 58 ± 10 years, 25% female) before and 1 week after administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Gut microbiota were analyzed via bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and compared to 15 age-matched healthy subjects (mean age 59 ± 15 years, 66% female).

RESULTS

The gut microbiota of CIDP patients showed an increased alpha-diversity (p = 0.005) and enrichment of Firmicutes, such as Blautia (p = 0.0004), Eubacterium hallii (p = 0.0004), or Ruminococcus torques (p = 0.03), and of Actinobacteriota (p = 0.03) compared to healthy subjects. IVIg administration did not alter the gut microbiome composition in CIDP in this short-term observation (p = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

The gut microbiome in IVIg-treated CIDP shows distinct features, with increased bacterial diversity and enrichment of short-chain fatty acid producing Firmicutes. IVIg had no short-term impact on the gut microbiome in CIDP patients. As the main limitation of this exploratory pilot study was small cohort size, future studies also including therapy-naïve patients are warranted to verify our findings and to explore the impact of long-term IVIg treatment on the gut microbiome in CIDP.