Potent Non-Peptide Thrombin Receptor Antagonists

Multitargeting nature of muscarinic orthosteric agonists and antagonists

Muscarinic receptors (mAChRs) are typical members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and exist in five subtypes from M₁ to M₅. Muscarinic receptor subtypes do not sufficiently differ in affinity to orthosteric antagonists or agonists; therefore, the analysis of receptor subtypes is complicated, and misinterpretations can occur. Usually, when researchers mainly specialized in CNS and peripheral functions aim to study mAChR involvement in behavior, learning, spinal locomotor networks, biological rhythms, cardiovascular physiology, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal tract functions, schizophrenia, and Parkinson’s disease, they use orthosteric ligands and they do not use allosteric ligands. Moreover, they usually rely on manufacturers’ claims that could be misleading. This review aimed to call the attention of researchers not deeply focused on mAChR pharmacology to this fact. Importantly, limited selective binding is not only a property of mAChRs but is a general attribute of most neurotransmitter receptors. In this review, we want to give an overview of the most common off-targets for established mAChR ligands. In this context, an important point is a mention the tremendous knowledge gap on off-targets for novel compounds compared to very well-established ligands. Therefore, we will summarize reported affinities and give an outline of strategies to investigate the subtype’s function, thereby avoiding ambiguous results. Despite that, the multitargeting nature of drugs acting also on mAChR could be an advantage when treating such diseases as schizophrenia. Antipsychotics are a perfect example of a multitargeting advantage in treatment. A promising strategy is the use of allosteric ligands, although some of these ligands have also been shown to exhibit limited selectivity. Another new direction in the development of muscarinic selective ligands is functionally selective and biased agonists. The possible selective ligands, usually allosteric, will also be listed. To overcome the limited selectivity of orthosteric ligands, the recommended process is to carefully examine the presence of respective subtypes in specific tissues via knockout studies, carefully apply “specific” agonists/antagonists at appropriate concentrations and then calculate the probability of a specific subtype involvement in specific functions. This could help interested researchers aiming to study the central nervous system functions mediated by the muscarinic receptor.

Newer antithrombotic drugs

Thromboembolic disorders are one of the disorders for which we are still on the look out for a safe and efficient drug. Despite the widespread use of antithrombotic drugs for the prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis, thromboembolic diseases continue to be a major cause of death and disability worldwide. This shows our inefficiency in searching efficacious and safe antithrombotic drugs. We have reached the basic mechanism of thrombus formation and by interrupting various steps of this mechanism, we can prevent as well as treat thromboembolic disorders. In continuation of Aspirin, now, we are using Clopidogrel, Ticlopidine and GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors (Abciximab, Tirofiban and Eptifibatide). Warfarin is an old antithrombotic drug which is still being used; but due to various side effects and drug interactions, we are bound to use newer drugs. Newer antiplatelet drugs include Prasugrel, Ticagrelor and Cangrelor, whereas newer thrombin inhibitors are Ximelgatran and Dabigatran. Apixaban is also a newer entry in this category as factor Xa inhibitor. Idrabiotaparinux is an indirect inhibitor of Xa as it accelerates the activity of antithrombin. Moreover, researches and trials for better and safe drugs are ongoing.

New antithrombotic drugs

Thrombosis, both venous and arterial, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Consequently, there is an ongoing search for new antithrombotic drugs, particularly novel antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants. A better understanding of the biochemical pathways involved in platelet activation and coagulation and of the links between these systems and the impact of thrombosis on inflammation has led to the identification of new targets for antithrombotic drugs. This paper focuses on these new targets and new antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants and describes the major advances in the continuing search for more potent antithrombotic drugs that have limited effects on hemostasis.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of non-peptide PAR1 thrombin receptor antagonists based on small bifunctional templates: arginine and phenylalanine side chain groups are keys for receptor activity

In the present study, we report the synthesis and biological evaluation of a series of new non-peptide PAR(1) mimetic receptor antagonists, based on conformational analysis of the S(42)FLLR(46) tethered ligand (TL) sequence of PAR(1). These compounds incorporate the key pharmacophore groups in the TL sequence, guanidyl, amino and phenyl, which are essential for triggering receptor activity. Compounds 5 and 15 (50-100 microM) inhibited both TFLLR-amide (10 microM) and thrombin-mediated (0.5 and 1 U/ml; 5 and 10 microM) calcium signaling in a cultured human HEK cell assay.

1-Isopropyl-4-nitro-6-meth-oxy-1H-benzimidazole

There are two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₁₁H₁₃N₃O₃. The inter­planar angles for the two rings of the benzimidazole ring system is 2.21 (12)° in one mol­ecule and 0.72 (12)° in the other. The nitro group is twisted in the same direction relative to the least-squares plane through its attached benzene ring in both mol­ecules, with inter­planar angles of 15.22 (9) and 18.02 (8)°. In the crystal structure, mol­ecules are stacked along the a axis through π–π inter­actions (centroid–centroid distance 4.1954 Å). C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are also present.

Antiplatelet drug nonresponsiveness

The response to most medication, including antiplatelet drugs, is highly variable between individuals. Observational studies have shown that nonresponders to antiplatelet agents appear to have an increased incidence of vascular events. This review article reviews the background, mechanisms, and evidence in support of the clinical significance of this phenomenon.

Himbacine derived thrombin receptor (PAR-1) antagonists: Structure–activity relationship of the lactone ring

The structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the lactone ring of himbacine derived thrombin receptor (PAR-1) antagonists (e.g., 2-5) is described. The effect of the lactone carbonyl group on binding to PAR-1 is dependent on the substitution pattern of the pyridine ring. A stereoselective intramolecular Michael addition reaction to the vinyl pyridine group was observed for these pyridine analogs of himbacine in basic conditions at elevated temperature.