Renal Function Impairment in Patients Undergoing Elective EVAR vs. Elective Open Repair During Follow up Period: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Open Conversion with Explantation of Stent Grafts After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is widely used worldwide, the fact that it is associated with increased rates of reintervention has been considered a problem. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of primary open AAA repair and open conversion with explantation of stent grafts after EVAR.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 1,120 patients (open repair, n = 664; EVAR, n = 456) who underwent AAA repair at Kobe University from 1999 to 2019. Of the 664 patients who underwent open repair, 121 (patients who underwent primary open repair (POR) as a concomitant procedure and patients with ruptured AAA) were excluded from the study. The outcomes of POR were compared with those of open conversion with explantation of stent grafts.

RESULTS

Of the 543 patients who underwent open repair, 513 underwent POR and 30 underwent open conversion with explantation of stent grafts. The operation time for POR was significantly less than that for open conversion with explantation. During surgery, patients who underwent open conversion with explantation required significantly more transfusions of red cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate than those who underwent POR. Overall, 30 patients who underwent open conversion with explantation required a total of 48 reinterventions before surgery. Hospital mortality rates were 0.7% and 0% in the POR and open conversion with explantation groups, respectively (P = 0.62). Although overall survival at 5 years in the POR group was significantly better than that in the open conversion with explantation group (89.3 ± 1.7% vs. 79.5 ± 9.6%; P = 0.01), there were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the freedom from aortic event (hospital death, reintervention, and aortic death). According to the multivariate analysis, open conversion with explantation was not an independent risk factor for late death. There were 20 patients who were hesitant to undergo OCE, although we recommended OCE. In a subgroup analysis, the overall mean cost borne by patients who underwent EVAR was approximately 2.3 times higher compared with that borne by patients who underwent POR.

CONCLUSIONS

Although demanding, both early and long-term outcomes of OCE have been favorable in our present study. OCE is highly recommended in patients with persistent sac enlargement after EVAR.

Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta

BACKGROUND

The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.

METHODS

An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I² = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I² = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I² = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I² = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I² = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I² = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I² = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.

Comparison of renal function after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Aneurysm Repair in patients treated with abdominal aortic aneurysm below the renal artery

INTRODUCTION

In addition to open endoaneurysmorrhaphy (EA) for treating the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), other approaches such as endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is gaining attention. Renal dysfunction could be a complication of these surgical techniques. We decided to compare renal function in EVAR vs. EA in patients operated for infrarenal AAAs.

METHODS

Two groups of patients with AAA were included in this retrospective study. The first group (28 cases) consisted of patients who underwent AAA repair by EA technique and the second group included 12 patients who underwent EVAR for AAA repair. Serum creatinine levels measured one week, one month, three months, six months, and one year after the surgeries were documented. Through calculating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and scoring by the RIFLE criteria (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease), the patients' renal function was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 40 patients included, three cases had diabetes mellitus (7.5%), 16 cases had hypertension (40%), 16 were smokers (40%), and 12 cases had a ruptured AAA (30%). The mean time of onset or increase of renal dysfunction compared to baseline in both groups was 6.45 days. The lowest time for patients with renal dysfunction (GFR less than 60) was from the onset and the highest time was 90 days after surgery. GFR of patients before surgery (76.9 in the EVAR group, vs. 56.2 in the EA group; P = 0.015) and one year after the surgery (84.1 in the EVAR group, vs. 57.7 in the EA group; P = 0.027) was differed significantly. The RIFLE criterion also was significantly different at the end of the first year in the two groups (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, we concluded that the changes in renal function in EA group were more than EVAR group during one year. It may be necessary to follow patients undergoing these surgeries for a longer period to understand the prognosis of these patients better.

Time-to-Event Analysis of the Impact of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair on Chronic Renal Decline

BACKGROUND

Although randomized studies have revealed the long-term outcomes of the endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) compared to open repair (OR), there is controversy surrounding chronic renal decline (CRD) after ER. This study reviewed our propensity-matched cohorts of ER and OR to compare CRD rates using a time-to-event analysis. The ER groups undergoing suprarenal (SR) or infrarenal (IR) proximal fixation were also compared with the OR group.

METHODS

This retrospective review of infrarenal AAA repair was conducted from June 2007-December 2017. Patients with ≥1 year of follow-up were included. Cases of supra/pararenal AAAs, infectious AAAs, rupture, or severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73 m² or dependence on renal replacement therapy) were excluded. CRD was defined as eGFR decline of >20% or de novo hemodialysis during follow-up. Patients treated with ER (ER group) and OR (OR group) were propensity-score matched for age, sex, comorbidities, ejection fraction, respiratory function, and baseline eGFR. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared the freedom from CRD rates of the matched cohorts (mER and mOR groups). Patients treated with SR and IR fixation devices (SR and IR groups) were also separately matched to the OR group, followed by analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 1087 patients underwent elective AAA repair. Among them, 944 (512 ER and 432 OR) were enrolled. The ER group was older than the OR group (median age 79 vs 71; P<0.001). The ER group had significantly lower baseline eGFR and more comorbidities than the OR group. Among 187 propensity-score matched pairs (187 mER and 187 mOS patients), background characteristics, including age and baseline eGFR, were comparable, but median renal function follow-up was significantly longer in the mER group than in the mOR group (48 vs 26 months; P<0.001). CRD was observed in 57 patients in the mER group and 30 patients in the mOR group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the freedom from CRD showed no significant difference between the matched groups (P=0.268); however, in the later follow-up of >4 years, CRD was more common in the mER group. The matched analyses between the OR group and specific fixation groups, comprising 102 OR-SR and 73 OR-IR pairs, demonstrated no significant differences in CRD.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to OR, there was no significant impact of ER on CRD at up to 4 years, supporting the safety of ER in terms of the mid-term renal outcome of our present clinical practice.

Renal Dysfunction Following Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a degenerative disease of the aortic wall with potentially fatal complications. Open repair (OR) was considered the gold standard, until the emergence of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), which is less invasive and equally (if not more) effective. As the popularity of endovascular procedures grows, related complications become more evident, with kidney damage being one of them. Although acute kidney injury (AKI) following EVAR is relatively common, its true incidence is still uncertain. Also, there is insufficient data concerning long-term renal outcomes after EVAR, especially with repeated contrast agent exposure. Despite the lack of firm evidence on the effectiveness of individual strategies, it is evident that prevention of AKI following EVAR requires a multifactorial approach. This review focuses on recent findings based on human studies regarding the current evidence of renal impairment after EVAR, its quantification and strategies for its prevention.

The effect of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Renal Function in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Aim:

The effect of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm has not been clearly defined. The objective of the present article was to provide a contemporary literature review and perform an analysis to determine the effect of EVAR on renal function in the early post-operative period and during follow-up.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies reporting the effect of EVAR on renal function. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed or random-effects models.

Results:

Thirty-two studies reporting on 24846 patients were included. Acute renal failure after EVAR occurred with an estimated frequency of 9% (95%CI: 5-16%; I2=97%). Median follow-up period was 19.5 months (range 1-60 months). The estimated frequency of chronic renal failure during follow-up was 7% (95%CI: 3-17%; I2=98%). Hemodialysis was required in 2% (1-3%; I2=97%) of the cases.

Conclusion:

High-level evidence demonstrating the effect of EVAR on the incidence of acute and chronic renal failure is lacking. Based on the current available data, nearly 10% of patients undergoing EVAR for AAA have an increased risk for renal dysfunction after the procedure. Whether this deterioration may lead to a worse outcome has not been adequately proved.

GRADE-Based Recommendations for Surgical Repair of Nonruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

The objective of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) for patients with a nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement and adhered to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Both low- and high surgical risk patients treated with EVAR showed decreased 30-day mortality, but the low-risk group had no differences in 4-year mortality. Compared with friendly anatomy, patients with hostile anatomy had an increased risk of type I endoleak. Young patients may prefer OSR. Endovascular aneurysm repair was not cost-effective in Europe. Four conditional recommendations were formulated: (1) OSR for low-risk patients up to 80 years old, (2) EVAR for low-risk patients older than 80 years, (3) EVAR for high-risk patients as long as is anatomically feasible, and (4) OSR in patients in whom it is not anatomically feasible to perform EVAR. Based on GRADE criteria, either OSR or EVAR can be suggested to patients with nonruptured AAA taking into account their surgical risk, hostile anatomy, and age. Given the weakness of the recommendations, personal preferences are determinant.