A Case Report: Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis Presenting as Chest Pain in a Patient on a Low Carbohydrate Diet

Clinical research framework proposal for ketogenic metabolic therapy in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, with a universally lethal prognosis despite maximal standard therapies. Here, we present a consensus treatment protocol based on the metabolic requirements of GBM cells for the two major fermentable fuels: glucose and glutamine. Glucose is a source of carbon and ATP synthesis for tumor growth through glycolysis, while glutamine provides nitrogen, carbon, and ATP synthesis through glutaminolysis. As no tumor can grow without anabolic substrates or energy, the simultaneous targeting of glycolysis and glutaminolysis is expected to reduce the proliferation of most if not all GBM cells. Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) leverages diet-drug combinations that inhibit glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and growth signaling while shifting energy metabolism to therapeutic ketosis. The glucose-ketone index (GKI) is a standardized biomarker for assessing biological compliance, ideally via real-time monitoring. KMT aims to increase substrate competition and normalize the tumor microenvironment through GKI-adjusted ketogenic diets, calorie restriction, and fasting, while also targeting glycolytic and glutaminolytic flux using specific metabolic inhibitors. Non-fermentable fuels, such as ketone bodies, fatty acids, or lactate, are comparatively less efficient in supporting the long-term bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands of cancer cell proliferation. The proposed strategy may be implemented as a synergistic metabolic priming baseline in GBM as well as other tumors driven by glycolysis and glutaminolysis, regardless of their residual mitochondrial function. Suggested best practices are provided to guide future KMT research in metabolic oncology, offering a shared, evidence-driven framework for observational and interventional studies.

Ketogenic diet in clinical populations-a narrative review

Ketogenic diet (KD) is a high-fat, low-carbohydrate (CHO) diet, designed to induce a metabolic state of ketosis in which the body metabolizes primarily lipids for energy production. Various forms of KD are being promoted as promising treatments for numerous health conditions from chronic headaches to weight-loss and even different forms of cancer and are becoming increasingly more popular. KD appears to be an efficacious approach for weight-loss, and maintenance, improved glycemia, cognitive function and cancer prognosis. However, there is a controversy regarding the safety of KD, and the potential health risks that might be associated with long-term exposure to KD. There is a gap between the acceptance and utilization of KD in individuals with health conditions and the criticism and negative attitudes toward KD by some clinicians. Many individuals choose to follow KD and are encouraged by the positive results they experience. Although the medical establishment does not endorse KD as a first line of treatment, clinicians need to be informed about KD, and offer support and medical supervision for patients who self-select to follow KD. This can ensure that within the boundaries of KD, patients will make good and healthy dietary choices and prevent clinical disengagement in extreme cases. To that end, there is an urgent need for good quality research to address the issues of long-term safety of KD in different clinical populations and for standardization of KD both in research and in the clinic.

Life-threatening coronary vasospasm in patients with type 2 diabetes with SGLT2 inhibitor-induced euglycemic ketoacidosis: a report of two consecutive cases

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (eDKA) has emerged as an adverse event associated with sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). We present two consecutive cases of SGLT2i-induced eDKA, both manifested as life-threatening coronary vasospastic angina (VSA). Case 1: A 64-year-old male overweight patient with type 2 diabetes (BMI 28.2 kg/m2), treated with dapagliflozin 5 mg daily for 6 months and a restricted diet for 2 months, experienced loss of consciousness following severe chest pain while driving, resulting in a traffic accident: plasma glucose, 163 mg/dL; urine ketones, (+++); bicarbonate (HCO3-), 13.2 mmol/L; and total ketone body, 1539 µmol/L. Coronary angiography (CAG) performed on day 5 revealed diffusely spastic coronary arteries with 90% stenosis in the right coronary artery, leading to the diagnosis of VSA in the presence of coronary atherosclerosis. Case 2: A 63-year-old male patient with type 2 diabetes (BMI 22.2 kg/m2) experienced severe chest discomfort and faintness following 2 months of chest pain while on dapagliflozin 10 mg daily for 1 year: plasma glucose, 112 mg/dL; urine ketones, (+++); HCO3-, 15.3 mmol/L; and total ketone body, 10,883 µmol/L. CAG performed on day 10 revealed no organic stenosis but diffusely spastic coronary arteries in response to coronary ergonovine infusion, confirming the diagnosis of VSA. SGLT2i has the potential to inhibit acetylcholine and butyrylcholine esterase activities, leading to reduced scavenging of acetylcholine and possible induction of coronary vasospasm. These cases highlight the association between life-threatening VSA and SGLT2i-induced eDKA.

Adverse events and drug-drug interactions of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in patients treated for heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2-inhibitors (SGLT2-I), antihyperglycemic agents, are increasingly prescribed in chronic heart failure (CHF). Their risk for drug-drug interactions (DDI) seems low. Safety-data derive mainly from diabetes-patients. This review aims to summarize adverse-events (AE) and DDI of the SGLT2-I dapagliflozin, empagliflozin and sotagliflozin in patients with CHF.

AREAS COVERED

Literature-search-terms in PubMed were 'adverse event/drug-drug interaction' and 'heart failure AND 'dapagliflozin' OR 'empagliflozin' OR 'sotagliflozin.'AEreported in randomized controlled trials (RCT) comprisegenitaland urinary-tract infections, hypotension, ketoacidosis, renal impairment, hypoglycemia, limb-amputations, Fournier's gangrene, bone-fractures, hepatopathy, pancreatitis, diarrhea, malignancy and venous thromboembolism. Their incidence is largely unknown, since they were not consistently evaluated in RCT of CHF. Further AE from meta-analyses, pharmacovigilance reports, case-series and case-reports include erythrocytosis, hypertriglyceridemia, myopathy, sarcopenia, skin problems, ventricular tachycardia, and urinary retention. The maximal observation period of RCT in CHF was 26 months.DDI were mainly studied in healthy volunteers for 3-8 days. In CHF or diabetes-patients, DDI were reported with interleukin-17-inhibitors, linezolid, lithium, tacrolimus, valproate, angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin-inhibitors and intravenous iron.

EXPERT OPINION

Guidelines recommend treatment with SGLT2-I for CHF but no data on AE during long-term therapy and only little information on DDI are available, which stresses the need for further research. Evidence-based recommendations for ketoacidosis-prevention are desirable.

A Case of Severe Metabolic Acidosis in the Setting of a Strict Ketogenic Diet

Patients with metabolic acidosis often present with obscure, multifactorial etiologies, making efficient diagnosis and treatment key to preventing poor clinical outcomes. This case report describes a patient with severe metabolic acidosis in which the underlying cause was not immediately apparent. After a thorough work-up and history taking, the patient's strict ketogenic diet was identified as the most likely source of his illness. Over multiple days, the patient improved as he resumed a normal diet and was treated for refeeding syndrome. This case highlights the importance of taking a comprehensive social and diet history when assessing a patient with metabolic acidosis. It also highlights the need for physicians to understand and be ready to counsel on the possible effects of fad diets, such as the ketogenic diet.

Empagliflozin-Associated Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a Patient With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (euDKA) is an uncommon condition, which is characterized by an elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis with ketonemia/ketonuria, in the presence of normal blood glucose levels. Common risk factors for the development of this condition include pregnancy, prolonged fasting, acute pancreatitis, and bariatric surgery. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been identified as a rare cause of euDKA. A recent literature review on PubMed found only 86 case reports of euDKA secondary to SGLT inhibitors published in the medical literature up to December 2022. Here, we present the case of a 43-year-old man who was taking empagliflozin, an SGLT-2 inhibitor. The patient was found to have euDKA, which was likely an adverse effect of his medication.

Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis after Discontinuing SGLT2 Inhibitor

Background

Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been proven to be very effective in the management of type II diabetes. These medications can cause adverse drug reactions such as genital mycotic infections. Another critical adverse drug reaction is euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (EDKA) under the setting of other contributing risk factors for developing diabetic ketoacidosis. Case Presentation. We report a case of a 45-year-old gentleman with type 2 diabetes mellitus on empagliflozin, metformin, and glimepiride who presented with abdominal pain, fatigue, and vomiting. Of note, he started a ketogenic diet three days before his presentation and self-stopped his antidiabetic medications two days before his presentation. The patient was found to have euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis and was treated as per the protocol. He was discharged on metformin and pioglitazone. Two weeks following discharge, canagliflozin was added.

Conclusion

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis could still be precipitated despite discontinuation of SGLT2I under a ketogenic diet. Discussion related to the initiation of a ketogenic diet should occur between the care provider and the patient.

Diabetic ketoacidosis in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors: experience at a tertiary hospital

PURPOSE

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a rare and life-threatening complication in patients with diabetes. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have rarely been associated with ketoacidosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate DKA episodes occurring after SGLT2i treatment and to compare them to DKA episodes due to other causes.

METHODS

The medical records of the years 2018-2020 related to clinical and biochemical characteristics and to treatment of six patients with DKA due to SGLT2i were reviewed. They were compared to those of 12 patients with DKA due to other causes.

RESULTS

On admission, the most common symptom was abdominal pain. Glucose levels (median, min-max) were lower in patients with SGLT2i-induced DKA compared to those with DKA due to other causes (229 (150-481) vs. 458.5 (332-695) mg/dl, p = 0.007), whereas no statistical difference was observed in HbA1c and in the severity of DKA (pH, HCO₃, CO₂, and anion gap). The duration of insulin infusion (41 (33-124) vs. 21.50 (11-32) h, p < 0.001) and the time required until DKA resolution (39 (31-120) vs. 19 (9-28) h, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with SGLT2i-induced DKA than those with DKA due to other causes. In addition, there were increased fluid requirements (14 (8-22.75) vs. 5.5 (2-24) L, p = 0.013) and longer hospitalization time (11 (6-22) vs. 5.5 (2-14) days, p = 0.024) in patients with SGLT2i-induced DKA. No statistically significant differences were observed in total intravenous insulin and potassium administration until DKA resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SGLT2i-induced DKA had lower serum glucose levels on admission and required increased fluid administration and longer time to recover from acidosis compared to patients with DKA from other causes.

SGLT-2 inhibitors associated euglycemic and hyperglycemic DKA in a multicentric cohort

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (EuDKA) secondary to Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a rare but increasingly reported phenomenon. Not much is known about the burden of EuDKA in patients on SGLT2i or the associated factors. This retrospective cohort study tries to delineate the differences in factors associated with the development of EuDKA as compared to hyperglycemic DKA. We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study across three tertiary care centers under Weill Cornell affiliated-Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. The cohort comprised of T2D patients on SGLT2i who developed DKA between January 2015 to December 2020. The differences between the subjects who developed EuDKA or hyperglycaemic DKA (hDKA) were analyzed. A total of 9940 T2D patients were on SGLT2i during 2015-2020, out of which 43 developed DKA (0.43%). 25 developed EuKDA, whereas 18 had hDKA. The point prevalence of EuDKA in our cohort was 58.1%. EuDKA was most common in patients using canagliflozin, followed by empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin (100%, 77%, and 48.3%, respectively). Overall, infection (32.6%) was the most common trigger for DKA, followed by insulin non-compliance (13.7%). Infection was the only risk factor with a significant point estimate between the two groups, being more common in hDKA patients (p-value 0.006, RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.07-5.98). Canagliflozin had the strongest association with the development of EuDKA and was associated with the highest medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission rates (66.6%). In T2D patients on SGLT2i, infection is probably associated with an increased risk of developing EuDKA. The differential role of individual SGLT2i analogs is less clear and will need exploration by more extensive prospective studies.

Nutrition Management in Older Adults with Diabetes: A Review on the Importance of Shifting Prevention Strategies from Metabolic Syndrome to Frailty

The increasing prevalence of older adults with diabetes has become a major social burden. Diabetes, frailty, and cognitive dysfunction are closely related to the mechanisms of aging. Insulin resistance, arteriosclerosis, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction may be common mechanisms shared by frailty and cognitive impairment. Hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, obesity, vascular factors, physical inactivity, and malnutrition are important risk factors for cognitive impairment and frailty in older adults with diabetes. The impact of nutrients on health outcomes varies with age; thus, shifting diet therapy strategies from the treatment of obesity/metabolic syndrome to frailty prevention may be necessary in patients with diabetes who are over 75 years of age, have frailty or sarcopenia, and experience malnutrition. For the prevention of frailty, optimal energy intake, sufficient protein and vitamin intake, and healthy dietary patterns should be recommended. The treatment of diabetes after middle age should include the awareness of proper glycemic control aimed at extending healthy life expectancy with proper nutrition, exercise, and social connectivity. Nutritional therapy in combination with exercise, optimal glycemic and metabolic control, and social participation/support for frailty prevention can extend healthy life expectancy and maintain quality of life in older adults with diabetes mellitus.

Scientific evidence underlying contraindications to the ketogenic diet: An update

First identified as a feasible treatment for intractable epilepsy, the ketogenic diet (KD) has recently gained popularity thanks to growing evidence on applications such as weight loss, most importantly, but also NAFLD, cancer, neurologic conditions and chronic pain. As with any treatment, whether pharmacologic or not, the KD might not be an appropriate intervention for every individual, and a number of contraindications have been proposed, now deeply rooted into clinical practice, excluding de facto many patients that could benefit from its use. However, many of these concerns were expressed due to the absence of clinical studies conducted on fragile populations, and an assessment of lately emerged evidence relative to KD safety is currently lacking and much needed. We herein provide a critical revision of the literature behind each safety alert, in order to guide through the treatment options in the case of subjects with an indication to the KD and a borderline safe situation. Based on available evidence, the possible use of this diet as a therapeutic intervention should be assessed on a patient-to-patient basis by adequately skilled medical doctors, keeping in mind current recommendations, but reading them through the knowledge of the current state of the art.