Insomnia, Fatigue, and Depression: Theoretical and Clinical Implications of a Self-reinforcing Feedback Loop in Cancer

"It Was a Downward Spiral": A Qualitative Study of Young Adult Cancer Survivors' Experiences with Cognitive and Mental Health

Background/Objectives: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is common and distressing for young adult (YA) cancer survivors; however, subjective CRCI is often attributed to psychological distress rather than true cognitive change. Thus, we aimed to generate hypotheses regarding potential common biobehavioral mechanisms of CRCI and psychological distress. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with YA cancer survivors in peak years for frontal neurocognitive development (ages 18-30), and we asked them to describe their experiences with cognitive and mental health changes during and after treatment for their cancer. An applied thematic analysis was used to identify themes. Results: The participants were 20 YA cancer survivors who were, on average, 23 years old at diagnosis and 26 years old when interviewed. Five themes emerged regarding the connection between cognitive and mental health: depressed mood after diagnosis that decreased mental engagement, cancer-related anxiety consumed cognitive resources during treatment, a bidirectional "downward spiral" during treatment, frustration with forgetfulness, and self-criticism about long-term cognitive limitations. Additionally, participants described receiving minimal information about evidence-based strategies for managing CRCI. Conclusions: Future research is needed to examine common neurological mechanisms among symptoms of depression, anxiety, and CRCI and to address gaps in survivorship care for YA survivors with CRCI. Cognitive-behavioral interventions may address both cognitive and mental health.

Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related insomnia: a study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related insomnia (CRI), a significant concurrent symptom of cancer, profoundly impacts patients. Non-pharmacological interventions include cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction programmes, bright light, acupuncture, exercise and music therapies and tai chi. These approaches, unlike pharmacological treatments, exhibit minimal adverse effects, without drug-drug interactions. They are a promising treatment strategy for CRI patients. However, a comprehensive comparative study evaluating the efficacy and safety of all non-pharmacological interventions for CRI is lacking. Accordingly, we aim to conduct a relatively comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct an extensive search across various databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang and Vip databases (VIP). The search will focus on non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions related to CRI in randomised controlled trials published from the inception of these databases until 15 May 2024. The primary outcomes of this study will encompass the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), while the secondary outcomes will evaluate sleep parameters, fatigue levels, anxiety-depressive mood, quality of life and any potential adverse effects. Paired meta-analyses and network meta-analyses will be conducted utilising ADDIS V.1.16.8, Stata V.14.2 and V.R4.1.2. Bias risk will be independently assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB V.2.0), and the evidence quality will be evaluated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

There are no ethical issues as this study did not conduct any experiments, surveys, or human trials. We will ensure that the findings are shared through pertinent channels.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023427752.

Proposal for Managing Cancer-Related Insomnia: A Systematic Literature Review of Associated Factors and a Narrative Review of Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Insomnia is common in patients with cancer. It has a multifactorial etiology that may include the disease process, adverse effects of anticancer therapies, and/or an association with other comorbidities. The purpose of this review was to identify risk factors for insomnia and suggest optimal management strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to elucidate the risk factors for insomnia and sleep disturbances in patients with solid tumors. The effects of sleep medications in this population were also described.

RESULTS

A total of 75 publications were evaluated, including those on breast, lung, gynecologic, brain, head and neck, gastrointestinal, prostate, thyroid, and mixed cancers. We classified the factors related to insomnia or sleep disturbance in cancer into four categories: (1) patient demographic characteristics (e.g., age, marital or socioeconomic status); (2) mental state (e.g., depression or anxiety); (3) physical state (e.g., fatigue, pain, or restless legs syndrome); and (4) anticancer treatment-related (e.g., use of chemotherapy, opioids, or hormone therapy). Overall, literature on the pharmacologic treatment of insomnia is extremely limited, although some efficacy data for zolpidem and melatonin have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic characteristics, physical and mental distress, and anticancer treatments are all risks for insomnia in patients with cancer. The limited evidence base for pharmacologic therapy in this patient population means that healthcare professionals need to implement a comprehensive and multidisciplinary pathway from screening to management.

Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep quality in patients with cancer-related insomnia: a network meta-analysis

Objective

Despite the widespread application of non-pharmacological therapies in treating cancer-related insomnia, a comprehensive assessment of these methods is lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 11 non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related insomnia, providing a theoretical basis for clinicians in choosing treatment methods.

Methods

We searched five databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, Wiley Library, and Web of Science, for relevant randomized controlled trials. Included studies involved patients diagnosed with cancer-related insomnia, employed non-pharmacological treatments, and reported outcomes using the PSQI and ISI. Bayesian statistical methods were used for the network meta-analysis, and statistical processing was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14.0 software. The results were thoroughly analyzed and evaluated, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plot tests.

Results

Our study included 41 randomized controlled trials, comprising 11 different non-pharmacological interventions (3,541 participants), the network analysis identifying Electroacupuncture as the most effective, with a SUCRA value of 92.2% in ISI, this was followed by Professionally administered Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia(PCBT-I) and Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy(MBCT), with SUCRA values of 78.4 and 64.1%, respectively. Traditional Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia(CBT-I) and VCBT-I showed lower efficacy with SUCRA values of 55.9 and 55.2%, respectively. Exercise interventions and control groups had the lowest efficacy, with SUCRA values of 24.0 and 16.1%. Using PSQI as the outcome measure, Massage therapy ranked highest in improving sleep quality with a SUCRA value of 92.2%, followed by Professionally administered Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (PCBT-I) and Electroacupuncture. League tables indicated significant improvements in sleep outcomes for Electroacupuncture and MT compared to control groups, with Electroacupuncture (EA) showing an MD of -7.80 (95% CI: -14.45, -1.15) and MT an MD of -4.23 (CI: -8.00, -0.46).

Conclusion

Considering both outcome indicators, Electroacupuncture was significantly effective in alleviating the severity of insomnia, while MT was most effective in improving sleep quality. Therefore, in the non-pharmacological interventions for cancer-related insomnia, Electroacupuncture and MT May be particularly effective choices. Future research should further explore the specific mechanisms of action of these interventions and their efficacy in different patient groups.

Mi Sleep Coach Mobile App to Address Insomnia Symptoms Among Cancer Survivors: Single-Arm Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Rates of sleep disturbance among survivors of cancer are more than 3 times higher than the general population. Causes of sleep disturbance among survivors are many and multifaceted, including anxiety and fear related to cancer diagnosis and treatments. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is considered a first-line treatment for insomnia; However, a lack of access to trained professionals and limited insurance coverage for CBT-I services has limited patient access to these effective treatments. Evidence supports digital delivery of CBT-I (dCBT-I), but there is only limited evidence to support its use among survivors of cancer. Broad adoption of smartphone technology provides a new channel to deliver dCBT-I, but no prior studies have evaluated mobile dCBT-I interventions for survivors. To address the need for accessible and efficacious CBT-I for survivors of cancer, the Mi Sleep Coach program was developed to adapt CBT-I for delivery to survivors of cancer as a self-directed mobile health app.

OBJECTIVE

This single-arm feasibility study assessed the adherence, attrition, usefulness, and satisfaction of the Mi Sleep Coach app for insomnia.

METHODS

A 7-week, single-arm study was conducted, enrolling adult survivors of breast, prostate, or colon cancer reporting sleep disturbances.

RESULTS

In total, 30 participants were enrolled, with 100% completing the study and providing data through week 7. Further, 9 out of 10 app features were found to be useful by 80% (n=24) to 93% (n=28) of the 30 participants. Furthermore, 27 (90%) participants were satisfied with the Mi Sleep Coach app and 28 (93%) would recommend the use of the Mi Sleep Coach app for those with insomnia. The Insomnia Severity Index showed a decrease from baseline (18.5, SD 4.6) to week 7 (10.4, SD 4.2) of 8.1 (P<.001; Cohen d=1.5). At baseline, 25 (83%) participants scored in the moderate (n=19; 15-21) or severe (n=6; 22-28) insomnia range. At week 7, a total of 4 (13%) patients scored in the moderate (n=4) or severe (n=0) range. The number of patients taking prescription sleep medications decreased from 7 (23%) at baseline to 1 (3%; P<.001) at week 7. The number of patients taking over-the-counter sleep medications decreased from 14 (47%) at baseline to 9 (30%; P=.03) at week 7.

CONCLUSIONS

The Mi Sleep Coach app demonstrated high levels of program adherence and user satisfaction and had large effects on the severity of insomnia among survivors of cancer. The Mi Sleep Coach app is a promising intervention for cancer-related insomnia, and further clinical trials are warranted. If proven to significantly decrease insomnia in survivors of cancer in future randomized controlled clinical trials, this intervention would provide more survivors of cancer with easy access to evidence-based CBT-I treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04827459; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04827459.

Co-occurrence of symptoms after radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer patients: a cluster analysis

BACKGROUND

State of the art combined radiochemotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has shown improved disease control and survival as well as a significant reduction of organ related morbidity. However, LACC cancer survivors are still experiencing a spectrum of symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify co-occurring symptoms in cervix cancer survivors by using patient-reported outcome and physician assessed morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

EMBRACE I is a multicenter prospective observational study with 1416 LACC patients (2008-2015). Information on physician-assessed morbidity and patient-reported outcome was assessed at baseline and at regular follow-ups up with the CTCAE v.3 and EORTC-C30/CX24, respectively. Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were included and data from 3 months to 2 years was used in the analysis. Factor analysis was used on both EORTC and CTCAE data with symptoms and follow-ups as observations. The extracted factors represent clusters of symptoms. Subsequently, regression models were built to investigate associations between the symptom clusters and QOL.

RESULTS

The analysis included 742 patients. Despite the differences in the definition of physician-assessed and patient-reported symptoms, similar clusters are identified by the two assessment methods. Three main organ-related clusters are recognized for urinary, gastro-intestinal and vaginal morbidity. Furthermore, a general symptoms cluster where fatigue, pain, insomnia, neuropathy, and hot flashes have large weights is found. Lastly, a cluster with nausea, vomit and lack of appetite is also identified. The general, gastrointestinal and nausea clusters show significant associations with general QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis on both PRO and physician-assessed morbidity found a cluster associated with general symptoms and organ-related symptom clusters (urinary, gastrointestinal, vaginal). This shows that LACC survivors experience a variety of co-occurring symptoms. Our analysis also shows that the cluster of general symptoms is associated with a decrease in QOL.

Patients with Chronic Pain: Are Mindfulness Traits Protective Against Distress, Anxiety and Depression?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate mindfulness traits/attitudes as protective factors against chronic pain related distress, depression and anxiety.

METHOD

Fifty patients (25 with chronic non-oncologic pain-NOP; 25 with chronic oncologic pain-COP) were administered with the following scales: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Italian Questionnaire for Pain (QUID), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), State and Trait Anxiety Scale (STAY-y1 module), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Psychological General Well Being Index (PGWBI), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS).

RESULTS

MAAS value ≥ 4.38 was adopted as cut-off to compare 'high level of mindfulness' (HM) vs. 'normal level of mindfulness' (NM) attitudes. Twenty-six patients (52%) scored ≥4.38, with no different distribution between NOP and COP. HM patients scored significantly lower than NM patients on PDI 'family/home responsibilities' domain (4.5±3.2 vs. 6.4±2.8; p<.037), and on PSS (17.8±2.6 vs. 20.9±2.5; p<.0001), STAY-y1 (9.4±1.8 vs. 10.3±2.1; p<.0001), BDI-II (7.8±5.0 vs. 17.6±8.6; p<.0001) total scores. HM scored significantly higher than NM patients in all PGWBI domains. A multiple regression analysis was carried out to analyze the predictor variables of PGWB. The most complete model considered the variables MAAS, STAIy and VAS (F=42.21; p<.0001), that accounted for the 71.6% of PGWB variance. MAAS score was the only variable positively predicting for PGWB; STAIy and VAS scores predicted negatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pain patients with high levels of mindfulness attitudes experienced less distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and more physical and general wellbeing than patients with low levels of mindfulness attitudes.

An Overview of the International Literature on Health-Related Quality of Life, Mental Health and Psychosocial Issues in People with Cancer

Background

Cancer is one of the most important leading causes of death worldwide. Early detection, screening and diagnosis have been demonstrated to significantly improve patients' survival rates and increase awareness of the benefit of prompt therapies and healthy lifestyles. In this context, Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and several psychosocial difficulties are of relevance as prognostic factors for the trajectory of the diseases of people living with cancer.

Methods

This Special Issue aims to present a set of systematic reviews and research studies focusing on several psychosocial aspects in people suffering from hematologic and solid cancer.

Results

Three systematic reviews regard HRQoL, the quality of patient-physician communication, depression and other stress-related difficulties, respectively. One review pointed out the difficulties in diagnosing depression in the elderly with solid cancer; another one regards the risk of cancer in severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and severe depressive disorders. One additional review regards HRQoL in people with cancer in the present era of COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, some research studies pointed out the usefulness of a validated instrument to assess satisfaction with care in the oncology field, as well as of the self-reinforcing feedback loop to improve fatigue, insomnia and depression in people with cancer. Other two research studies evaluate, respectively, the attributable burden in worsening HRQoL in people suffering both from cancer and depression and the Type D personality as a risk factor for stress-related difficulties in women with breast cancer.

Conclusion

This Special Issue is a contribution to enhance future research mainly about such interventions useful to assess and improve HRQoL and overall well-being in people with cancer.