Summary of Meta-Analyses Dealing with Single-Row versus Double-Row Repair Techniques for Rotator Cuff Tears

Medium-sized rotator cuff tears repaired with transosseous-equivalent technique plus bone marrow stimulation yielded similar short-term outcomes regardless of whether complete or incomplete footprint coverage was achieved

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and re-tear rates of medium-sized rotator cuff tears repaired with incomplete footprint coverage using the transosseous-equivalent technique versus those with complete footprint coverage plus bone marrow stimulation.

METHODS

The retrospective study, conducted from March 2019 to December 2021, included consecutive patients with medium-sized (1-3cm) posterosuperior rotator cuff tears repaired using the transosseous-equivalent technique and bone marrow stimulation, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups based on the degree of footprint coverage achieved: Group C (complete coverage) and Group I (incomplete coverage). Functional outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the two-year follow-up. The outcomes collected included the visual analog scale pain score, subjective shoulder value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder score, and active range of motion. The structural integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans six months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients (42 in Group I and 52 in Group C) were enrolled. Both groups showed significant improvement in all functional outcome measures at two years after surgery, without significant differences between the groups in any variable. Furthermore, the percentage of participants exceeding the MCID was comparable for both groups across all variables. The re-tear rate for Group I was 9.5% (6/42, one type I re-tear and five type II re-tears), and that for Group C was 7.7% (5/52, all five type II re-tears). There was no significant difference in re-tear rates between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite incomplete footprint coverage, repair using a transosseous-equivalent technique with bone marrow stimulation in both groups yielded clinical outcomes and re-tear rates similar to those of complete coverage in medium-sized rotator cuff tears at short term follow-up LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

Statin Use Not Linked to Rotator Cuff Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk factors, including hyperlipidemia and statin use, on rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected cases who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was conducted. Total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides levels, and the presence or absence of statin use and type of statins used (type 1 naturally derived statins and type 2 synthetic statins) were reviewed. Repair integrity was determined according to the Sugaya classification, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (types 4 and 5 were considered retear). Including serum lipid levels and statin use, potential risk factors for retear were tested using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Six hundred twenty cases were evaluated. The mean age was 66.9 years; 348 were male, and 272 were female. The overall retear rate was 16.1%. There was no statistically significant difference in serum lipid levels among the categories of the Sugaya classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no association between serum lipid levels and odds ratio for retear: total cholesterol (odds ratio [OR] 1.00; P = .72), low-density lipoprotein (OR 0.99; P = .44), and triglycerides (OR 1.00; P = .88). Statins did not have a statistically significant increase or decrease in odds: type 1 statin (OR 0.3; P = .061) and type 2 statin (OR 1.4; P = .26). Older age (OR 1.1; P < .0001), male sex (OR 1.8; P = .021), and large-to-massive cuff tear size (OR 3.4; P < .0001) were significant risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found between serum lipid levels and retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Statin use was not a statistically significant factor for retears, but different trends were seen for type 1 and type 2 statins. Older age, male sex, and large to massive tears were significant risks for retears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort design, prognosis study.

The Relationship Between All-Suture and Solid Medial-Row Anchors and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Double-Row Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair

Background

The use of all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair is increasing. Potential benefits include decreased bone loss and decreased damage to the chondral surface. Minimal evidence exists comparing outcomes among medial-row anchor fixation methods in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes between all-suture and solid medial-row anchors in double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 352 patients (mean age at surgery, 60.3 years) underwent double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair at our institution. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on whether they underwent all-suture (n = 280) or solid (n = 72) anchor fixation for the medial row. Outcomes data were collected via an ongoing longitudinal data repository or through telephone calls (minimum follow-up time, 2.0 years; mean follow-up time, 3.0 years). Outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) standardized shoulder assessment form and the visual analog scale (VAS). The same rehabilitation protocol was administered to all patients. The proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds were calculated for the outcome measures, and outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds between groups were compared using linear and logistic regression, respectively.

Results

The groups did not differ in terms of age at surgery, sex distribution, rotator cuff tear size, or number of medial-row anchors used. The solid anchor group had a longer follow-up time compared with the all-suture anchor group (3.6 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.8 years, respectively; P < .01). After controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in ASES scores (89.6 ± 17.8 vs 88.8 ± 16.7, respectively; P = .44) or VAS scores (1.1 ± 2.1 vs 1.2 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .37). Similarly, after controlling for follow-up time, the solid and all-suture anchor groups did not differ in the proportions of patients meeting PASS cutoffs for the ASES (84.7% vs 80.7%, respectively; P = .44) or the VAS (80.6% vs 75.0%, respectively; P = .83).

Conclusion

Double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair using all-suture anchors for medial-row fixation demonstrated similar excellent clinical outcomes to rotator cuff repair using solid medial-row anchors.

Single-row or Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair

Rotator cuff tears are potentially a career-ending injury for athletes. The surgeon must identify which patients will benefit from surgical repair. The factors to consider are age, type of sport, time since injury, athlete's level, and the patient's expectations. An essential and independent fact determining the surgical treatment is whether the damage is due to overuse or from a traumatic/collision injury. Some sports are more demanding than others resulting in different return-to-participation (RTP) rates. This RTP return rate can present a real challenge and more so by a desire to reach the pre-injury level of play. The incidence of rotator cuff tearing varies from one sport to another. In football players this can be 12% whereas for tennis players this incidence is 4% to 17%. The RTP rate must be considered when making treatment decisions and is influenced by the level of the athlete: for professional athletes, the rate is 61%, and for recreational 73%. When the surgeon and the patient decide on the surgical treatment, the surgeon must consider whether to perform a double-row or a single-row rotator cuff tendon repair. The decision-making and the surgical technique will be addressed.

[Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears. A systematic review.]

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review of the scientific literature to compare single and double row techniques for rotator cuff tears in terms of functional, pain improvement and structural healing of the tendon.

Methods

In order to carry out the research, a systematic selection of scientific articles has been made by consulting PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases. The articles included in the present study compare the single-row and double-row techniques, with publication date between 2016 and 2021.

Results

Diverse results are observed in the UCLA, SST, Constant and ASES assessment scales and in the range of mobility, therefore, the superiority of one technique in terms of functional results is not established. The double row technique may show superiority in the strength variable, although there is a methodological variability in its measurement. The double-row technique may be related to more intense postoperative pain, while the single-row technique to residual shoulder pain. However, the variables strength and pain show non-homogeneous or coincident data. The superiority of the double row repair in the structural healing of the tendon and a lower re-tear rate than the single row technique is established with statistically significant results, being the most homogeneous and coincident studies.

Outcomes of Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Novel All-Suture Soft Anchor Medial Row

Background

Few studies have examined the short-term clinical outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) with all-suture anchors for medial row anchor fixation.

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes of double-row suture bridge RCR using a novel all-suture medial row anchor.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We enrolled 179 patients before double-row suture bridge RCR (mean age at surgery, 60.0 years; 63% male patients) at a single institution. All patients underwent RCR with all-suture anchor fixation for the medial row and solid anchor fixation for the lateral row. Preoperative (baseline) and follow-up (minimum follow-up time of 2 years; mean, 2.5 years) clinical outcomes were compared using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and a 10-point numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). We calculated the proportions of patients meeting previously published Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the ASES (≥78.0) and NPRS (≤1.7). We further compared baseline and follow-up outcome scores and the proportions of patients meeting PASS thresholds using paired t tests and McNemar tests, respectively, and calculated effect size to quantify the magnitude of change from baseline to follow-up.

Results

Values significantly improved from baseline to follow-up for ASES (from 45.3 ± 19.8 to 87.3 ± 17.1) and NPRS (from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 1.4 ± 2.1). The proportion of patients meeting PASS thresholds also significantly improved for the ASES (from 6% to 77%) and the NPRS (from 7% to 72%). The magnitude of baseline to follow-up change for all measures was large (all effect sizes ≥1.5).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial improvements for patients undergoing double-row suture bridge RCR with all-suture anchors for medial row fixation.

Two-year outcomes with a bioinductive collagen implant used in augmentation of arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: final results of a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs) represent a common shoulder injury that, if untreated, can progress in size, become increasingly painful, and inhibit function. These lesions are often surgically repaired, with double-row arthroscopic repair often preferred for larger tears. Biological augmentation technologies have been developed to improve rates of postoperative radiographic retear and enhance patient-reported outcomes after surgical FTRCT repair. This study sought to confirm that augmented repair with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant results in favorable retear rates and patient outcomes with follow-up to 2 years.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter cohort study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of augmenting single- or double-row arthroscopic repair of FTRCTs with a bioinductive bovine collagen implant. Of 115 adult patients participating, 66 (57.4%) had medium (1-3-cm) tears and 49 (42.6%) had large (3-5-cm) tears. Magnetic resonance imaging and patient-reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES] and Constant-Murley Score [CMS]) were performed and recorded at baseline, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean duration of follow-up was 2.1 years (range, 1.5-2.9 years). Between baseline and 2-year follow-up, mean total thickness of the supraspinatus tendon increased by 12.5% for medium tears and by 17.1% for large tears. Radiographic retear was noted in 7 of 61 available patients (11.5%) with medium tears, and in 14 of 40 patients (35.0%) with large tears. In both groups, these tears primarily occurred before the 3-month follow-up visit (13 of 21 [61.9%]). Radiographic retear with the supplemented double-row (DR) repair technique was 13.2% overall (12 of 91 DR patients; 11.3% for medium tears and 15.8% for large tears). The minimal clinically important difference was achieved by >90% of patients with both medium and large tears for both ASES and CMS. There were 2 serious adverse events classified by the treating surgeon as being possibly related to the device and/or procedure (1 case of swelling/drainage and 1 case of intermittent pain). Nine patients (7.8%; 4 medium tears and 5 large tears) required reoperation of the index rotator cuff surgery.

CONCLUSION

Final 2-year data from this study confirm that using this implant in augmentation of arthroscopic double-row repair of FTRCTs provides favorable rates of radiographic retear and substantial functional recovery. The relative safety of the device is also further supported.

Knotted Versus Knotless Medial-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs Have Similar Clinical and Functional Outcomes

Purpose

To retrospectively investigate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients who underwent knotted medial-row rotator cuff repair (KT-RCR) compared with patients who underwent knotless medial-row rotator cuff repair (KL-RCR).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair in 2016 was performed at a single institution with 2-year follow-up. Information regarding demographic characteristics, preoperative tear size (magnetic resonance imaging), surgical variables (including method of suture stabilization), preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and all complications (e.g., cuff failure, adhesive capsulitis, and persistent pain) was compiled.

Results

A total of 189 patients met the inclusion criteria: 72 in the KL-RCR group and 117 in the KT-RCR group. No significant difference in preoperative ASES scores was found between the KL-RCR and KT-RCR groups (48.3 vs 45.4, P = .327). Postoperative ASES scores did not differ between the groups (82.4 for KL-RCR vs 78.8 for KT-RCR, P = .579). We found no significant difference in cuff failure rates after 2 years, determined by magnetic resonance imaging (5.6% for KL-RCR vs 6.1% for KT-RCR, P > .999), or complication rates (11.1% for KL-RCR vs 8.6% for KT-RCR, P = .743).

Conclusions

The knotted approach and knotless approach to double-row rotator cuff repair showed similar outcome scores, cuff failure rates, and complication rates at minimum 2-year follow-up.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative trial.

Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for calcific tendonitis: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Outcomes following arthroscopic excision of calcific tendonitis and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (CT-ARCR) are relatively limited without comparison analysis to standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after CT-ARCR compared against a matched cohort who received standard ARCR.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed for patients aged 18-80 years receiving CT-ARCR by a single surgeon from 2006-2018. These were matched 1:3 with patients receiving ARCR. Patients with concurrent labral repair, subscapularis repair, or glenohumeral joint arthritis procedures; refusal to participate; deceased; inadequate contact information; or those with inadequate records were excluded. PROs included Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS) score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE); Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH); patient satisfaction; activity level/symptoms; and sport participation scores.

RESULTS

21 CT-ARCR patients (mean age 50 years, range 36-62) and 54 ARCR patients (mean age 52 years, range 19-77) were included. Minimum 2-year follow-up was obtained in 18 of 21 (86%) CT-ARCR (mean 5.9 years) and 45 of 54 (83%) ARCR patients (mean 5.6 years). CT-ARCR patients improved pre- to postoperation in mean SF-12 PCS (41.1 to 50.0), ASES (54.2 to 94.0), and QuickDASH (54.2 to 94.0). SANE score improvements (57.6 to 82.8) were not significant. ARCR controls improved pre- to postoperation in mean SF-12 PCS (41.4 to 49.0), ASES (59.4 to 88.0), QuickDASH (35.1 to 13.8), and SANE scores (52.6 to 80.8). Pre- to postoperative pain during recreation and sport participation similarly improved in both groups. The only postoperative difference observed between CT-ARCR and ARCR was better patient satisfaction with CT-ARCR (9.7 vs. 8.3).

CONCLUSION

CT-ARCR results in excellent PROs, activity symptoms, and sports participation at final follow-up. CT-ARCR results were comparable to patients who received conventional ARCR for similar-sized rotator cuff tears that did not have calcific tendonitis.

Assessing the accuracy of arthroscopic and open measurements of the size of rotator cuff tears: A simulation-based study

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic procedures are commonly performed for rotator cuff pathology. Repair of rotator cuff tears is a commonly performed procedure. The intraoperative evaluation of the tear size and pattern contributes to the choice and completion of the technique and the prognosis of the repair.

AIM

To compare the arthroscopic and open measurements with the real dimensions of three different patterns of simulated rotator cuff tears of known size using a plastic shoulder model.

METHODS

We created three sizes and patterns of simulated supraspinatus tears on a plastic shoulder model (small and large U-shaped, oval-shaped). Six orthopaedic surgeons with three levels of experience measured the dimensions of the tears arthroscopically, using a 5 mm probe, repeating the procedure three times, and then using a ruler (open technique). Arthroscopic, open and computerized measurements were compared.

RESULTS

A constant underestimation of specific dimensions of the tears was found when measured with an arthroscope, compared to both the open and computerized measurements (mean differences up to -7.5 ± 5.8 mm, P < 0.001). No differences were observed between the open and computerized measurements (mean difference -0.4 ± 1.6 mm). The accuracy of arthroscopic and open measurements was 90.5% and 98.5%, respectively. When comparing between levels of experience, senior residents reported smaller tear dimensions when compared both to staff surgeons and fellows.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that arthroscopic measurements of full-thickness rotator cuff tears constantly underestimate the dimensions of the tears. Development of more precise arthroscopic techniques or tools for the evaluation of the size and type of rotator cuff tears are necessary.

Rotator Cuff Healing

The present article broadly addresses the aspects that interfere with the healing process of the rotator cuff. Life habits, such as smoking and alcoholism, are considered, systemic factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity, as well as local factors, among which are those related to the pre, peri, and postoperative periods. From an extensive literature review, with the citation of 60 scientific articles from both Western and Eastern literature, the authors intend to deepen the theme by bringing to medical practice conducts based on new established concepts.

Editorial Commentary: Cost Associated With Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Can Be Largely Controlled by the Surgeon

Surgeons must rely on cost and charge data to inform a patient outcome-optimized value-based approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Using biologic and regenerative procedures to augment repairs only when necessary and optimizing anchor number are 2 obvious ways surgeons can help control cost of these procedures. Addition of biologics, such as patches and tissue augmentation, nearly doubled the charges for the procedure.

Cost of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs Is Primarily Driven by Procedure-Level Factors: A Single-Institution Analysis of an Ambulatory Surgery Center

PURPOSE

To identify intraoperative drivers of cost associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) through analysis of an institutional database.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective review of arthroscopic RCRs performed at an ambulatory surgical center between November 2016 and July 2019. Patient-level factors analyzed included age, sex, insurance type (private, Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, and other government), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (I, II, III, and missing), and Charlson comorbidity index (0, 1, 2, and ≥3). Procedure-level factors included use of biologics (decellularized dermal allograft or bioinductive healing implant), anesthesia type (regional block, monitored anesthesia care, or general), number of anchors and sutures, additional procedures (biceps tenodesis, distal clavicle resection, subacromial decompression), and operative time. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify factors significantly associated with higher or lower charges.

RESULTS

A total of 712 arthroscopic RCRs were included. The risk-adjusted operative charges were $19,728 (95% confidence interval $16,543 to $22,913). The above factors predicted nearly 65% of the variability in operative charges. The only patient-level factor significantly associated with lower charges was female sex (- $1,339; P = .002). Procedure-level factors significantly associated with higher charges were use of biologics (+ $17,791; P < .001), concurrent open biceps tenodesis (+ $4,027; P < .001), distal clavicle resection (+ $2,266; P = .039), use of regional block (+ $1,256; P = .004), number of anchors (+ $2,245/anchor; P < .001), and increasing operative time ($26/min). Other factors had no significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedural factors are the most significant drivers of operative cost in arthroscopic RCRs, such as quantity and type of implants; additional procedures such as biceps tenodesis and distal clavicle resection; and perioperative conditions such as type of anesthesia and total operating room time. Overall, patient-level factors were not shown to correlate well with operative costs, other than lower charges with female sex.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, economic study.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. Studies investigating SCR with reported surgical techniques were included. Animal studies, cadaveric studies, review studies, and letters to the editor were excluded. The technical aspects of the surgical techniques for SCR were analyzed in each article, which included graft type, glenoid fixation method, greater tuberosity fixation method, graft passage technique, suture management, margin convergence, concomitant procedures, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Clinical outcomes, when available, were also analyzed.

RESULTS

We screened 365 articles, of which 29 described surgical techniques for SCR. According to the Modified Coleman Methodology Score, 24 articles were rated as poor (score < 55), 4 were rated as fair (score between 55 and 69), and 1 was rated as good (score between 70 and 84), with an average score of 25.8 ± 20.9. The most commonly performed technique for SCR used the following: an acellular dermal allograft, 2 biocomposite suture anchors for glenoid fixation, transosseous-equivalent double-row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fixation with 2 biocomposite medial-row anchors and 2 biocomposite lateral-row anchors, the double-pulley technique combined with an arthroscopic grasper and/or pull suture to pass the graft into the shoulder, the performance of both anterior and posterior margin convergence, and a native rotator cuff repair when possible. Only 8 studies reported clinical outcomes, and they showed that SCR provides significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, significant improvement in shoulder range of motion, variable graft failure rates, low complication rates, and variable reoperation rates. There were no studies comparing outcomes among the various surgical techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Many surgical techniques exist for arthroscopic SCR. However, no superior technique was shown because there were no studies comparing clinical outcomes among these various techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, systematic review of Level III, IV, and V studies.

Holding on by a thread: the continuing story of rotator cuff tears

Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder pain. The incidence of these tears has increased significantly over the years, with the demands of an increasingly active elderly population. Therefore, a detailed understanding of rotator cuff tears will help doctors manage their patients' condition. This field has rapidly advanced over the past decade and this review provided an insight into the latest developments.

Outcomes Following Double-Row and Medial Double-Pulley Rotator Cuff Repair

Multiple arthroscopic double-row repair techniques have been developed to treat full-thickness rotator cuff tears. However, healing rates and functional outcomes vary among these repair methods. A suture tape and medial double-pulley (STDP) technique that incorporated 2-mm suture tape for a knotless double-row with a broad double-mattress suture medially was developed as an alternative method to other double-row repair techniques. This prospective study reviewed the functional outcomes and healing rates of full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears repaired using an STDP technique. Of 33 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with an STDP construct, 24 patients with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were included in the study. Preoperative fatty atrophy was recorded. Ultrasound imaging was used to assess rotator cuff healing at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. Range of motion and functional outcome scores were evaluated at final follow-up. Mean active forward elevation improved from 124° preoperatively to 160° postoperatively. Comparing preoperative and postoperative values, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 45.9 to 90.8, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score improved from 34.6 to 87.1, and the visual analog scale score decreased from 5.3 to 1.3. Twenty-one of 24 patients (88%) were satisfied with their outcomes. Ultrasound evaluation demonstrated complete healing in 88% of the cohort. The STDP technique is a technically efficient method of obtaining medial fixation in a double-row repair and appears to demonstrate clinically acceptable results. Healing was observed in 88% of cases, and functional outcome showed a statistically significant improvement. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e125-e130.].

Maximum Bridging Suture Tension Provides Better Clinical Outcomes in Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: A Clinical, Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Some studies reporting clinical outcomes after transosseous-equivalent (TOE) repair have attributed type II rotator cuff failure to excessive bridging suture tension, as it can cause overloading on the medial row. In a previous biomechanical cadaveric study, increasing bridging suture tension over 90 N did not improve the contact area and ultimate failure load of the TOE construct, despite increasing the contact force and contact pressure.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of different bridging suture tensions after TOE rotator cuff repair based on the results of a previous biomechanical study.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for medium- to large-sized tears were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups according to the applied bridging suture tension: optimum tension group (96.3 ± 4.9 N) and maximum tension group (199.0 ± 20.3 N). Bridging suture tension was measured with a customized tensiometer, as used in the previous biomechanical study. The functional outcome was measured at the final follow-up (27.4 ± 5.9 months [range, 24-45 months]) using the visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant score, and the anatomic outcome was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography at least 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 64 patients (32 in each group) were analyzed. The functional outcomes improved significantly compared with preoperative values (all P < .05) but did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (all P > .05). Regarding the anatomic outcomes, the maximum tension group (n = 1; 3.1%) had a significantly lower healing failure rate than the optimum tension group (n = 9; 28.1%) (P = .013). One patient in the maximum tension group had a type II failure.

CONCLUSION

Maximum bridging suture tension in TOE repair for medium- to large-sized rotator cuff tears provided better anatomic healing with less risk of medial rotator cuff failure, which differs from the results of a previous time-zero biomechanical study.

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Suture Bridge and Medially Based Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair in Medium-Sized Supraspinatus Tears

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and imaging outcomes between the suture bridge technique (SB) and the medially based single-row technique (medSR) in patients with 1- to 3-cm tear sizes.

METHODS

All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (at 12 and 24 months) using the modified University of California, Los Angeles scoring system; active range of motion (flexion and external rotation); and a visual analog scale for pain. Healing status was examined by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Clinical and imaging evaluations were completed by 92 patients at 1-year follow-up and by 74 patients at 2 years. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups across all measures at final follow-up: The University of California, Los Angeles scores were 33.4 points in SB patients and 33.0 points in medSR patients (P = .58); the visual analog scale scores were 6 mm and 7 mm, respectively (P = .38); the active flexion angles were 161° and 159°, respectively (P = .34); and the external rotation angles were 49° and 52°, respectively (P = .37). Retears were observed in 6.5% of SB patients and 2.1% of medSR patients (P = .31). Medial cuff failure was observed only in SB patients (4.3%, 2 cases), whereas incomplete healing (deep-layer retraction pattern) was observed only in medSR patients (8.7%, 4 cases). Neo-tendon regeneration in the medSR group was observed in 93% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show any significant differences in the clinical outcomes and cuff integrity between the 2 treatment groups at final follow-up; however, medial cuff failure was observed only in the SB group, and incomplete healing was more frequent in the medSR group. One should consider the risk of medial cuff failure and incomplete healing of the repaired cuff before choosing the repair technique for medium-sized supraspinatus tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic, prospective, randomized trial.

Acute Cuff Tear Repair Trial (ACCURATE): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

INTRODUCTION

Rotator cuff tear is a very common and disabling condition that can be related to acute trauma. Rotator cuff tear surgery is a well-established form of treatment in acute rotator cuff tears. Despite its widespread use and almost a gold standard position, the efficacy of an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is still unknown. The objective of this trial is to investigate the difference in outcome between arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and inspection of the shoulder joint defined as placebo surgery in patients 45-70 years of age with an acute rotator tear related to trauma.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Acute Cuff Tear Repair Trial (ACCURATE) is a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre efficacy trial with sample size of 180 patients. Concealed allocation is done in 1:1 ratio. The randomisation is stratified according to participating hospital, gender and baseline Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC). Both groups receive the same standardised postoperative treatment and physiotherapy. The primary outcome measure is the change in WORC score from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include Constant-Murley Score, the Numerical Rating Scale for pain, subjective patient satisfaction and the health-related quality of life instrument 15 dimensions (15D). Patients and outcome assessors are blinded from the allocated intervention. The primary analysis of results will be conducted according to intention-to-treat analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol for this clinical trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland and Regional Ethics Committee in Linköping Sweden and Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics South East in Norway. Every recruiting centre will apply local research approvals. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02885714; Pre-results.

The Clinical Effect of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair techniques: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Rotator cuff tears are common and are associated with shoulder pain, disability, and dysfunction. Previous studies that have reported different arthroscopic techniques are controversial. A network meta-analysis with indirect and direct evidence was performed to compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. PUBMED, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and Scopus were searched based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and related studies that evaluated arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of rotator cuff tears were identified in May 2018. The primary outcome measure was the retear rate. The secondary outcome measures included the constant score and the range of motion (forward flexion and external rotation). Twenty-one trials comprising 1815 shoulders were included in the study. This study indicated that single-row (SR) repair resulted in a higher retear rate than suture bridge (SB) and double-row (DR) repairs. Moreover, the SR and DR repairs resulted in higher incidences of retear than SB repair. The ranking of the treatments based on the constant score and external rotation was SB repair, SR repair and DR repair, whereas the treatment ranking according to forward flexion was SB repair, DR repair and SR repair. In summary, this network meta-analysis provides evidence that SB repairs might be the best choice to improve the postoperative recovery of function and decrease the retear rate.

Tear characteristics and surgeon influence repair technique and suture anchor use in repair of superior-posterior rotator cuff tendon tears

BACKGROUND

The factors that associate with surgical decisions about repair technique and the number of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair have not been previously investigated. This study investigated the extent to which patient, surgeon, and surgical factors associate with performing single-row vs. double-row repair technique and ultimately with the number of suture anchors used.

METHODS

Our institution's prospective surgical cohort was queried for patients undergoing suture anchor repair of superior-posterior rotator cuff tendon tears between February 2015 and August 2017. Exclusion criteria were patients with isolated subscapularis tears, tears that were not repaired, repairs without suture anchors, repairs involving graft augmentation, and repairs by surgeons with fewer than 10 cases. Multivariable statistical modeling was used to investigate associations between patient and surgical factors and the choice of repair technique and number of suture anchors used.

RESULTS

A total of 925 cases performed by 13 surgeons met inclusion criteria. Tear type (full thickness), tear size (medium, large, and massive), a greater number of torn tendons, repair type (arthroscopic), and surgeon were significantly associated with performing a double-row over a single-row repair. Tear size, a greater number of torn tendons, double-row repair technique, and surgeon were significantly associated with a greater number of anchors used for repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that in the absence of data to conclusively support a clinical benefit of one repair technique over another, surgeons' training, experience, and inherent practice patterns become the primary factors that define their surgical methods.

Clinical and Structural Outcomes after Arthroscopic Repair of Medium- to Massive-Sized Delaminated and Nondelaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

INTRODUCTION

Current evidence is controversial about the outcomes after the repair of the delaminated versus nondelaminated rotator cuff tears. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delamination of the cuff and clinical and structural outcomes after en masse arthroscopic repair of delaminated versus nondelaminated cuff of varying sizes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 233 patients with full-thickness posterosuperior cuff tears were divided in two groups: Group 1: Delaminated tears (n = 131) and Group 2: Nondelaminated tears (n = 102) of medium, large, and massive sizes. Both groups were evaluated by clinical scores (Constant-Murley [CM], American shoulder and elbow score [ASES]) and ultrasonography (USG), at a minimum followup of 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean followup was 45.47 months. There was a weak but statistically significant linear correlation (P = 0.02) between the increasing size of tear and delamination, whereas increasing age and duration of symptoms did not correlate with increasing tendency of delamination. Final followup USG analysis revealed that there was no significant difference (P = 0.55) between healing rates of Group 1 and Group 2. Further taking various tear sizes into account, USG revealed no significant difference between the healing rates of two groups. The mean overall final postoperative CM and ASES scores of two groups did not show any significant difference (CM; P = 0.36, ASES; P = 0.4). However, the clinical outcome was significantly better in the completely healed group as compared to partially healed or retear group.

CONCLUSIONS

A weak linear correlation between delamination and increasing size of the tear was noted. Although overall structural and clinical outcome is no different between two groups, the clinical outcomes of completely healed tear are better than partially healed ones.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective comparative.

A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Rotator Cuff

BACKGROUND

The number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the rotator cuff (RC) has increased markedly.

PURPOSE

To quantify the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the RC and to provide a qualitative summary of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic search for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to the RC published between January 2007 and September 2017 was performed with PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Narrative reviews and non-English language articles were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 1078 articles were found, of which 196 met the inclusion criteria. Included articles were summarized and divided into 15 topics: anatomy and function, histology and genetics, diagnosis, epidemiology, athletes, nonoperative versus operative treatment, surgical repair methods, concomitant conditions and surgical procedures, RC tears after total shoulder arthroplasty, biological augmentation, postoperative rehabilitation, outcomes and complications, patient-reported outcome measures, cost-effectiveness of RC repair, and quality of randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

A qualitative summary of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the RC can provide surgeons with a single source of the most current literature.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row vs. double-row - clinical results after one to four years

Objective

Evaluate and compare the results of single-row (SR) vs. double-row (DR) arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Methods

From December 2009 to May 2013, 115 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed using suture anchors. After applying the exclusion criteria, there were 75 patients (79 shoulders) to be evaluated, retrospectively, of whom 53 (56 shoulders) attended re-evaluation. The patients were divided into two groups: SR with 29 shoulders, and DR) with 27 shoulders. The scoring systems for clinical evaluation were those of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES).

Results

The mean follow-up period in the SR group was 37.8 months vs. 41.0 months in the DR group. The average UCLA score was 30.8 in the SR group vs. 32.6 in the DR group. This difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The averages measured by the ASES score also showed no significant difference – 82.3 and 88.8 in the SR and DR groups, respectively.

Conclusion

No statistically significant difference was found between SR and DR arthroscopic rotator cuff repair performed by a single surgeon in the comparative analysis of UCLA and ASES scores.

Do functional outcomes and cuff integrity correlate after single- versus double-row rotator cuff repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available level I prospective randomized controlled trials comparing arthroscopic single-row (SR) with double-row (DR) rotator cuff repairs by both clinical outcomes and radiological re-tear rates.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases search was done for level I RCTs comparing clinical and radiological outcomes after SR versus DR rotator cuff repair. Clinical outcomes included UCLA, ASES, Constant, WORC, and SANE scores; structural outcomes included MRI, MRA, or US.

RESULTS

Seven level I studies were included (5 mid-term and 2 short-term). Postoperative ASES, Constant, WORC, and SANE scores showed nonsignificant slightly better function of DR groups. Only, UCLA score showed significantly better scores with DR repair (p = 0.007). Full-thickness re-tear incidence was reported in 15/174 (8.6%) in DR group and 20/175 (11.4%) in SR group (p = 0.44). Partial-thickness re-tear rate was reported in 18/174 patients (10.3%) in DR group and 41/175 patients (23.4%) in SR group (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Within the domain of level I mid-term and short-term studies, DR repair showed significant better UCLA score only. (ASES, Constant, WORC, and SANE scores showed no significance.) This may correlate weakly with the significant lower partial-thickness re-tear rates of DR repairs. In contrary, long-term level III studies showed a direct correlation of both functional outcomes and cuff structural integrity, with significant superiority of DR over SR repair techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and double-row (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid- to long-term clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [ P < .05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [ P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [ P < .05]).

CONCLUSION

The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.

The timing of retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the time dependence of the failure rate of surgically repaired rotator cuffs. Retears are significant, as they are common and may lead to less satisfactory outcomes and additional operations. Their timing is critical foundational information for understanding failure mechanisms. However, this remains unclear. Currently, there exist a number of studies that have reported retear rates at specific time points. Combining data from these publications can reveal when cuffs retear, which will help inform expectations and guidelines for progression of activity after surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, and Embase were searched for studies relating to rotator cuff repair. Abstracts and articles were evaluated on the basis of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from those publications that satisfied all requirements, and regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included in the final meta-analysis. Retear rates for medium tears increased for approximately 15 months and leveled off at approximately 20%. Retear rates for large tears progressed steadily for about 12 months and approached an upper limit of approximately 40%. Retear rates for massive tears ranged from 20% to 60%, but the distribution of retear rate over time for these cuff tears is not clear from these data.

CONCLUSION

Retear rates for medium and large tears generally increase until at least 10-15 months after surgery, after which they are likely to level off. Retear rates for massive tears are variable and may follow a time course different from that of other tear sizes. Retear rates depend on size of the original tear.

All-Suture Repair for Compressive Rotator Cuff Tears: Reducing the Traction of the Tissue

Tears of the rotator cuff are a frequent pathology, but the best surgical procedure remains unclear. The arthroscopic approach has become the gold standard, but there are many different suture configurations that can be used. We describe an all-suture repair system with which the anatomical reduction of the rotator cuff is achieved performing traction from the anchor of the lateral row to subsequently performing a suture bridge suture from the medial row. The major advantage of this technique is that it creates compression forces and minimizing tensioning of the tissue.