Survival Rate and Shunt Infection Incidence Following Gastrostomy in Adult Patients with an Existing Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Enteral Access: Commentary

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update is to facilitate understanding and improve the clinical practice of endoscopic enteral access.

METHODS

This expert commentary was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology.

Combination of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Lumboperitoneal Shunt: A Case Report

The combination of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery presents unique challenges in managing shunt-related infections. Although the association between PEG and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery is well documented, studies on the combination of PEG and lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt surgeries are limited. We report the case of a 70-year-old man who developed hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for ischemic stroke. The patient required PEG for nutritional support and an LP shunt for CSF drainage. PEG was initially performed. After 16 days, an LP shunt was placed using the lateral approach to maximize the distance between the PEG site and abdominal incision. Subcutaneous CSF leakage was resolved without any shunt infection at the three-month follow-up. This case highlights the importance of strategically combining PEG and LP shunts to minimize infection risk. Maximizing the distance between the PEG site and abdominal incision for the LP shunt may help prevent shunt-related infections, warranting further clinical investigation.

Gastrostomy Sequence With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting-Does It Matter?

BACKGROUND

Neurological injury requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement often necessitates gastrostomy for nutritional support. The sequence of these procedures is debated over concerns for shunt infection and displacement requiring revisional surgery as a consequence of gastrostomy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal sequence of VPS shunt and gastrostomy tube placement in adults.

METHODS

In an all-payer database, adult patients undergoing gastrostomy and VPS placement were identified within 15 days between January 2010 and October 2021. Patients were categorized as receiving gastrostomy before, on the same day as, or after shunt placement. The primary outcomes of this study were rates of revision and infection. All outcomes were evaluated within 30 months after index shunting.

RESULTS

In total, 3015 patients were identified as undergoing VPS and gastrostomy procedures within 15 days. After a 1:1:1 match, 1080 patient records were analyzed. Revision rates at 30 months were significantly lower among patients who received VPS and gastrostomy procedures on the same day compared with gastrostomy after VPS (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). In addition, patients who received gastrostomy before VPS compared with those after had lower revision rates (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96) and infection (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.99). No significant differences were noted in mechanical complication or shunt displacement rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients requiring VPS and gastrostomy may benefit from undergoing both procedures concurrently or with gastrostomy before VPS placement, secondary to lower revision rates. Patients undergoing gastrostomy before VPS have the added benefit of decreased infection rates.

Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with a cerebrospinal fluid shunt in the peritoneal cavity

INTRODUCTION

The management of patients with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt located in the peritoneal cavity undergoing laparoscopic surgery is an issue that has not yet been settled. These patients are at risk of increased intracranial pressure caused by peritoneal insufflation, shunt dysfunction, and shunt infection/retrograde meningitis. This study aimed to determine the need for perioperative shunt intervention in CSF shunt patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We reviewed and analyzed five shunt patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution between 2012 and 2022, as well as 17 patients described in previous reports.

RESULTS

Among the 22 patients, shunt type was ventriculoperitoneal in 14 and lumboperitoneal in eight. The most common indication for CSF shunt was hydrocephalus caused by cerebral vascular accident (50.0%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed for cholecystolithiasis in 13 patients (59.1%), acute cholecystitis in eight (36.4%), and gallbladder polyp in one (4.5%). Shunt clamping or externalization was performed in six patients. Two patients in the group that did not undergo shunt clamping or externalization experienced complications (intra abdominal abscess and subcutaneous emphysema). However, the incidence of short-term complications (both overall and shunt-related) and median length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Routine shunt clamping, externalization, or removal might not be necessarily required in patients with a ventriculoperitoneal or lumboperitoneal shunt undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The Role of G-tube Placement for Neurologic Injury Patients

Neurologic injury often influences various bodily functions associated with digestion. It is imperative for an individual to obtain proper nutrients to maintain a healthy lifestyle and recover from injury. In this review, we explore variables and methods of enteral tube placement in neurologic injury patients influencing recovery, specifically G- and J-tubes. We will first review the patient population by identifying leading causes for enteral tube placement among both pediatric and adult neurologic patients. We will then discuss the general procedures for placement and safety considerations for specified patient populations. We will explore interventions limiting placement of the G- and J-tubes by focusing on two interventions: ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and intrathecal baclofen (ITB). Then, we will highlight nutritional enhancers that may influence general treatment. Finally, we discuss proper weaning procedures and eJective methods fitting patient needs.

Gastrostomy and internal cerebrospinal fluid shunt in adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of infection

BACKGROUND

Hydrocephalus is a frequent neurological condition, commonly treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS), a neurosurgical procedure with significant risk of infection. Some severely brain-injured hydrocephalic patients with swallowing dysfunction may require percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). There are few data on the safety of PEG in patients with VPS, with contradictory results reported.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the rate of VPS infection in the setting of PEG.

METHODS

Six databases were searched for the period January 1990 to June 2022. Only original articles reporting the rate of shunt infection in the setting of PEG in adults were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to assess the rate of infection.

RESULTS

Fifteen of the 1,703 identified articles were selected, reporting 701 internal cerebrospinal fluid shunts, with 63 infections. The pooled rate of infection in patients with both PEG and VPS was 7.41% (95% CI [3.67-14.38]). There was a significantly higher risk of VPS infection in the PEG group vs. the control group with VPS without PEG: relative risk (RR)=2.33 (95% CI [1.11-4.89]). On the other hand, the risk of infection was the same whether the PEG was placed before or after the VPS surgery: RR=1.05 (95% CI [0.57-1.92]).

CONCLUSION

Gastrostomy tube placement is a significant risk factor for VPS infection. However, onset of infection was not related to the sequence of or interval between VPS and PEG.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis is registered in https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, PROSPERO ID: CRDCRD42022326774.