1
|
Chaudhary A, Nayak D, Pandey S, Shastri V, Kamble M, Pendse V, Prajapati V, Vaidya B, Rohit H, Beedmani S, Presswala N, Patole T, Bawaskar R, Shinde V, Datta M, Rai G, Prusty U, Pal PP, Goli SP, Sahoo AR, Muraleedharan KC, Prakash P, Mahajan A, Singh A, Krishnan R, Pawaskar N, Srivastava A, Ningthoujam GD, Sadarla RK, Sonny R, Karso L, Sarkar S, Prasad S, Shrivastava AK, Kumar A, Kumar N, Raveendar C, Kumar BSJR, Sastry VSPK, Dasari A, Sundeep KS, Kaushik S, Rath P, Gautam S, Shil RC, Swain TL, Reddy GRC, Pradeep S, Stevenson S, Choubey G, Debata L, Khurana A. Association between Usage of Prophylactic AYUSH Medicines and Disease Severity in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. HOMEOPATHY 2024; 113:211-222. [PMID: 38714214 PMCID: PMC11493470 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior vaccination is often studied for its impact on individuals' post-infection prognosis. Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH) medicines, advised by the Government of India as prophylaxis during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, were consumed by the masses in 2020. A study was therefore undertaken to observe any association between the prior usage of AYUSH prophylactic medicines and post-infection severity as reported by recovered COVID-19 individuals. METHODS This was a retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study conducted in 21 cities of India from 5th August to 30th November 2020. Data from recovered COVID-19 patients, of either sex or any age, captured information about AYUSH prophylactic medicines intake prior to infection, disease severity, symptomatology, duration of complaints, etc. The study participants were grouped into AYUSH intake and non-intake. Primary composite outcome was the disease clinical course. Secondary clinical outcomes were the rate of and time to clinical recovery. RESULTS Data of 5,023 persons were analysed. Ayurveda or homeopathic prophylactic medicines were consumed by more than half of the study participants: that is, 56.85% (n = 1,556) and 56.81% (n = 1,555) respectively. The overall adjusted protective effect (PE) of AYUSH prophylactic intake against moderate/severe forms of COVID-19 disease was 56.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 63.50; p < 0.001). Adjusted PE for homeopathy and Siddha was 52.9% (95% CI, 42.30 to 61.50; p < 0.001) and 59.8% (95% CI, 37.80 to 74.10; p < 0.001), respectively. A statistically significant association was found between AYUSH prophylactic medicine intake and clinical recovery more frequently by the 3rd day of illness (χ2 = 9.01; p = 0.002). Time to resolution of symptoms in the AYUSH intake group was on average 0.3 days earlier than in the non-intake group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION AYUSH prophylactics were associated with statistically significant levels of protection against COVID-19 disease severity. Amongst these, previous intake of homeopathy or Siddha medicines was associated with some protection against moderate/severe illness and with a somewhat quicker clinical recovery. Prospective studies with experimental research design are needed to validate the findings of this study. STUDY REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2020/08/027000).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupriya Chaudhary
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India
| | - Debadatta Nayak
- Epidemic Cell, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India
| | - Swati Pandey
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India
| | - Vipul Shastri
- Department of Pathology, Vidhyadeep Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Madhuri Kamble
- Department of Gynaecology, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Vidya Pendse
- Department of F.M.T, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Vismay Prajapati
- Department of Organon and Homeopathic Philosophy, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Brijesh Vaidya
- Department of Physiology, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Heenal Rohit
- Department of Anatomy, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Swaroopa Beedmani
- Department of Gynaecology, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Nutan Presswala
- Department of Community Medicine, C.D. Pachchigar Homeopathic Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India
| | - Tejaswini Patole
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute (Homeopathy), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ramesh Bawaskar
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute (Homeopathy), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vaishali Shinde
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute (Homeopathy), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mohua Datta
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India
| | - Gunjan Rai
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India
| | - Umakanta Prusty
- Department of Clinical Research, Drug Proving Unit (H), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Partha Pratim Pal
- Department of Clinical Research, Dr Anjali Chatterjee Regional Research Institute (H), Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Siva Prasad Goli
- Department of Clinical Research, Homeopathy Research Institute for Disabilities, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Amulya Ratna Sahoo
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute (Homeopathy), Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - K. C. Muraleedharan
- Department of Clinical Research, National Homeopathy Research Institute in Mental Health, Kottayam, Kerala, India
| | - Pooja Prakash
- Department of Clinical Research, National Homeopathy Research Institute in Mental Health, Kottayam, Kerala, India
| | - Ashish Mahajan
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Research Institute Homeopathy, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Anuradha Singh
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Research Institute Homeopathy, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Reetha Krishnan
- Department of Homeopathy, Ariv Integrative Healthcare, Yashoda Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Navin Pawaskar
- Department of Practice of Medicine, JIMS Homeopathic Medical College, Telangana, India
| | - Amit Srivastava
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Imphal, Manipur, India
| | - Gouri Devi Ningthoujam
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Imphal, Manipur, India
| | - Ravi Kumar Sadarla
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit for Homeopathy, Puducherry, India
| | - Ranjit Sonny
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Siliguri, West Bengal, India
| | - Liyi Karso
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute (Homeopathy), Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Subhamoy Sarkar
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute (Homeopathy), Guwahati, Assam, India
| | - Sunil Prasad
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit for Homeopathy, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Ashish Kumar Shrivastava
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit for Homeopathy, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Avinash Kumar
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit for Homeopathy, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Nitesh Kumar
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit for Homeopathy, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Ch. Raveendar
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Gudivada, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - BSJ Raja Kumar
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Gudivada, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - VSPK Sastry
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Gudivada, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Asha Dasari
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Gudivada, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - K. Samson Sundeep
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Gudivada, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Subhash Kaushik
- Department of Clinical Research, Central Council for Research in Homeopathy Headquarters, Delhi, India
| | - Padmalaya Rath
- Department of Clinical Research, Dr DP Rastogi Central Research Institute for Homeopathy, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shweta Gautam
- Department of Clinical Research, Dr DP Rastogi Central Research Institute for Homeopathy, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ratan Chandra Shil
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute of Homeopathy, Agartala, Tripura, India
| | - Trupti Laxmi Swain
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute of Homeopathy, Agartala, Tripura, India
| | - G. Ravi Chandra Reddy
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit Homeopathy, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - S. Pradeep
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit Homeopathy, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - S. Stevenson
- Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Research Unit Homeopathy, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Gurudev Choubey
- Department of Clinical Research, Regional Research Institute for Homeopathy, Siliguri, West Bengal, India
| | - Lipipushpa Debata
- Department of Clinical Research, Homeopathic Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Anil Khurana
- National Commission for Homeopathy, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Srivastava N, Rathia SK, Dey C, Shukla A, T P, Singh S, Anand V. The Assessment of the Spectrum of Preventive Measures Taken by Healthcare Providers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in India: A Survey-Based Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e41073. [PMID: 37519624 PMCID: PMC10375825 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created havoc and confusion in choosing appropriate treatment, as well as prophylaxis, due to its rapid surge, disease novelty, and lack of evidence-based literature. It was even more concerning among the healthcare workers (HCWs), who had to take care of patients, themselves, and their own families. OBJECTIVE This online survey-based study targeted finding the various options for COVID-19 precautionary or prophylactic measures opted for by HCWs. METHODOLOGY This was an observational study based on a predesigned questionnaire, which was floated online for three months after institutional ethical approval, just after the first wave of COVID-19 in 2021, targeting HCWs of different cadres (doctors, nurses, paramedics/laboratory technicians, etc.), ages, and sexes and HCWs hailing from across the country. Questions were focused on HCW's adopted measures, the order of preference and its reasons, and concerns related to safety and efficacy. Data was collected through Google Forms (Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA) into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA) and analyzed by the latest Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) using appropriate statistics. RESULTS The routine practice of standard precautionary measures (face mask, hand hygiene, and social distancing) and wearing a personal protective equipment (PPE) kit during the care of COVID-19-positive or COVID-19-suspected patients was adopted by the majority of HCWs, i.e., 306/312 (>98%) irrespective of cadre (p = 0.001). After the "routine measures," the most adopted measure by participant HCWs irrespective of profession, age, and gender was the consumption of allopathic drugs (n = 188; 60.26%). Anti-COVID-19 measures in the category of drugs used by healthcare providers (HCPs) were prophylactic allopathic drugs (60.26%), homeopathic drugs (11.86%), and other Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy (AYUSH)/traditional medical system drugs (11.86%). Vitamin C was the most consumed among all of the drugs for COVID-19 prophylaxis purposes. Non-drug measures espoused by the HCPs were physical exercises (46.47%), increased sleep duration (35.89%), change in dietary habits (42.62%), and spiritual measures (19.23%). CONCLUSION The fear of COVID-19 imposed on the HCPs the obligation to use all the available preventive measures in spite of the lack of evidence on actual benefits. After the routine infection preventive measures, the most adopted measure by participant HCWs irrespective of profession, age, and gender was the consumption of prophylactic allopathic drugs (>60%), and the most non-drug preventive measures were the initiation of physical exercises and change in dietary habits. Adapting some form of physical exercise was more noted with males than females (p = 0.001), and it significantly increased with HCPs of higher age of >25 and >40 years than younger HCPs (58.6% versus 29.3%; p = 0.016). Females preferred more dietary and nutritional modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraj Srivastava
- General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, IND
| | - Santosh K Rathia
- Trauma and Emergency (Pediatric Emergency Medicine), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND
| | - Chandan Dey
- Trauma and Emergency Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND
| | - Arvind Shukla
- Community and Family Medicine/Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND
| | - Pugazhenthan T
- Pharmacology and Therapeutics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND
| | - Sunita Singh
- Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, IND
| | - Varun Anand
- Trauma and Emergency (Pediatric Emergency Medicine), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chopra A, Tillu G, Chuadhary K, Reddy G, Srivastava A, Lakdawala M, Gode D, Reddy H, Tamboli S, Saluja M, Sarmukaddam S, Gundeti M, Raut AK, Rao BCS, Yadav B, Srikanth N, Patwardhan B. Co-administration of AYUSH 64 as an adjunct to standard of care in mild and moderate COVID-19: A randomized, controlled, multicentric clinical trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282688. [PMID: 36928877 PMCID: PMC10019690 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the efficacy of AYUSH 64, a standard polyherbal Ayurvedic drug in COVID-19. METHODS During the first pandemic wave, 140 consenting and eligible hospitalized adult participants with mild-moderate symptomatic disease (specific standard RT-PCR assay positive) were selected as per a convenience sample, and randomized (1:1 ratio) to an open-label (assessor blind) two-arm multicentric drug trial; standard of care (SOC as per Indian guidelines) versus AYUSH 64 combined with SOC (AYUSH plus). Participants were assessed daily and discharged once clinical recovery (CR, primary efficacy) was achieved which was based on a predetermined set of criteria (resolution of symptoms, normal peripheral oximetry, and negative specific RT-PCR assay). Each participant was followed using an indigenous software program(mobile phone) and completed a 12-week study period. The dose of AYUSH 64 was 2 tablets oral, 500 mg each, bid for 12 weeks (AYUSH plus only). Significant P was <0.05 (two-sided). On randomization, the groups were found well matched. RESULTS The mean interval time from randomization to CR was significantly superior in the AYUSH plus group [mean 6.45 days versus 8.26 days, 95% Confidence Interval of the difference -3.02 to -0.59 (P = 0.003, Student's 't test] as per-protocol analysis (134 participants); significant (P = 0.002) on an intention to treat analysis. 70% of the participants in AYUSH plus recovered during the first week (P = 0.046, Chi-square) and showed a significantly better change in physical health, fatigue, and quality of life measures. 48 adverse events, mostly mild and gut related, were reported by each group. There were 20 patient withdrawals (8 in AYUSH plus) but none due to an AE. There were no deaths. Daily assessment (hospitalization) and supervised drug intake ensured robust efficacy data. The open-label design was a concern (study outcome). CONCLUSIONS AYUSH 64 in combination with SOC hastened recovery, reduced hospitalization, and improved health in COVID-19. It was considered safe and well-tolerated. Further clinical validation (Phase III) is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI/2020/06/025557.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Girish Tillu
- Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
| | | | - Govind Reddy
- Regional Ayurveda Research Institute, Nagpur, India
| | | | | | - Dilip Gode
- Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India
| | | | - Sanjay Tamboli
- Target Institute of Medical Education & Research, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | | | | - B. C. S. Rao
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Babita Yadav
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Bhushan Patwardhan
- Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Srikanth N, Kumar A, Chandrasekhararao B, Singhal R, Yadav B, Khanduri S, Jameela S, Rai AK, Tripathi A, Rana R, Ahmad A, Sharma BS, Jaiswal A, Kotecha R. Disease Characteristics, Care-Seeking Behavior, and Outcomes Associated With the Use of AYUSH-64 in COVID-19 Patients in Home Isolation in India: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis. Front Public Health 2022; 10:904279. [PMID: 35900336 PMCID: PMC9310753 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.904279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India, the Ministry of Ayush conducted a community study to provide therapeutic care to patients with asymptomatic, mild, and moderate COVID-19 in home isolation based on the empirical evidence generated on the efficacy of AYUSH-64 in COVID-19. OBJECTIVE To document disease characteristics, care-seeking behavior, and outcomes in patients with asymptomatic, mild, or moderate COVID-19 in home isolation who used AYUSH-64 for COVID-19. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of the data generated through a community study conducted in India from 08 May to 31 August 2021 was performed to study the disease characteristics, care-seeking behavior during home isolation, clinical outcomes, adverse events, and the association between various risk factors and clinical recovery during the study period. The data were collected through semi-structured questionnaires, available in electronic data collection format at the baseline, 7, 14, and 21 days. A logistic regression was performed to explore the relationship between relevant variables and clinical recovery. RESULTS Data from 64,642 participants were analyzed for baseline assessment, and final analysis was done for 49,770 participants. The mean age of the enrolled participants was 38.8 ± 11.7 years, and 8.4% had co-morbidities. AYUSH-64 was utilized as an add-on to the standard care by 58.3% of participants. Comparable clinical outcomes were observed in participants utilizing AYUSH-64 either as a standalone or as an add-on to standard care, in terms of clinical recovery, disease progression, the requirement for oxygen supplementation, hospitalization, ICU admission, and need for ventilator support. Younger age, having no co-morbidities or substance abuse, and having been vaccinated were associated with early clinical recovery than those who were older and not vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS The study findings suggest that AYUSH-64 use, either standalone or as an adjunct to standard care, in asymptomatic, mild, or moderate COVID-19 is associated with good clinical outcomes. Ayush services and interventions can be effectively integrated into the mainstream public health architecture to serve public health goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adarsh Kumar
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Richa Singhal
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Babita Yadav
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shruti Khanduri
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sophia Jameela
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Amit Kumar Rai
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Arunabh Tripathi
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Rana
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Azeem Ahmad
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Ankit Jaiswal
- Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rajesh Kotecha
- Ministry of Ayush, Government of India, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bendezu-Quispe G, Benites-Meza JK, Urrunaga-Pastor D, Herrera-Añazco P, Uyen-Cateriano A, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Toro-Huamanchumo CJ, Hernandez AV, Benites-Zapata VA. Consumption of Herbal Supplements or Homeopathic Remedies to Prevent COVID-19 and Intention of Vaccination for COVID-19 in Latin America and the Caribbean. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022; 7:tropicalmed7060095. [PMID: 35736974 PMCID: PMC9229216 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7060095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Users of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) have a lower intention to receive vaccines. Furthermore, Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region are among the most affected areas by the COVID-19 pandemics and present a high proportion of CAM users. Therefore, this study evaluates the association between the consumption of herbal supplements or homeopathic remedies to prevent COVID-19 and the intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the LAC region. We conducted a secondary data analysis of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) survey with Facebook to assess COVID-19 beliefs, behaviours, and norms. Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using generalized linear models of the Poisson family with the log link function. The prevalence of the use of products to prevent COVID-19 was the following: consumption of herbal supplements (7.2%), use of homeopathic remedies (4.8%), and consumption of garlic, ginger, and lemon (11.8%). An association was found between using herbal supplements (19.0% vs. 12.8%; aPR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.30–1.58), the use of homeopathic remedies (20.3% vs. 12.3%; aPR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.25–1.98), and the consumption of garlic, ginger, and lemon (18.9% vs. 11.9%; aPR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.50–1.61) and non-intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. In the LAC population, there is an association between using herbal supplements, using homeopathic remedies and consuming garlic, ginger, and lemon to prevent infection by COVID-19 and non-intention to vaccinate against this disease. Therefore, it is necessary to design targeted strategies for groups that consume these products as preventive measures against COVID-19 to increase vaccination coverage and expand the information regarding transmission and prevention strategies for SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Bendezu-Quispe
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad César Vallejo, Trujillo 13001, Peru;
- Red Internacional en Salud Colectiva y Salud Intercultural, Mexico City 56690, Mexico;
| | - Jerry K. Benites-Meza
- Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru;
- Grupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15012, Peru
| | - Diego Urrunaga-Pastor
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru
- Correspondence: (D.U.-P.); (V.A.B.-Z.)
| | - Percy Herrera-Añazco
- Red Internacional en Salud Colectiva y Salud Intercultural, Mexico City 56690, Mexico;
- Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación—IETSI, EsSalud, Lima 14072, Peru
- Escuela de Enfermería, Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima 15067, Peru
| | | | - Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales
- Latin American Network of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Research (LANCOVID), Pereira 660003, Colombia;
- Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira 660003, Colombia
| | | | - Adrian V. Hernandez
- Health Outcomes, Policy, and Evidence Synthesis (HOPES) Group, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA;
- Unidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis, Guías de Práctica Clínica y Evaluaciones Tecnológicas Sanitarias, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL), Lima 15024, Peru
| | - Vicente A. Benites-Zapata
- Red Internacional en Salud Colectiva y Salud Intercultural, Mexico City 56690, Mexico;
- Unidad para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL), Lima 15012, Peru
- Correspondence: (D.U.-P.); (V.A.B.-Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ponnam HB, Akondi BR. Telemedicine Health Care Delivery in India: A Boon During COVID-19 Pandemic. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND HEALTH CARE 2021. [DOI: 10.18311/ajprhc/2021/28020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
No Abstract.
Collapse
|