1
|
Stephenson C, Moghimi E, Shao Y, Kumar A, Yee CS, Miller S, Stefatos A, Gholamzadehmir M, Abbaspour Z, Jagayat J, Shirazi A, Gizzarelli T, Gutierrez G, Khan F, Patel C, Patel A, Yang M, Omrani M, Alavi N. Comparing the efficacy of electronic cognitive behavioral therapy to medication and combination therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: a quasi-experimental clinical trial. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1194955. [PMID: 38125282 PMCID: PMC10732166 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1194955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a debilitating mental health disorder with first-line treatments include cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy. CBT is costly, time-consuming, and inaccessible. Electronic delivery (e-CBT) is a promising solution to address these barriers. However, due to the novelty of this intervention, more research testing the e-CBT efficacy independently and in conjunction with other treatments is needed. Objective This study investigated the efficacy of e-CBT compared to and in conjunction with pharmacotherapy for GAD. Methods This study employed a quasi-experimental design where patients selected their preferred treatment modality. Patients with GAD were enrolled in either e-CBT, medication, or combination arms. The 12-week e-CBT program was delivered through a digital platform. The medications followed clinical guidelines. The efficacy of each arm was evaluated using questionnaires measuring depression, anxiety, and stress severity, as well as quality of life. Results There were no significant differences between arms (N e-CBT = 41; N Medication = 41; N Combination = 33) in the number of weeks completed or baseline scores. All arms showed improvements in anxiety scores after treatment. The medication and combination arms improved depression scores. The e-CBT and Combination arms improved quality of life, and the combination arm improved stress scores. There were no differences between the groups in depression, anxiety, or stress scores post-treatment. However, the combination arm had a significantly larger improvement in quality of life. Gender and treatment arm were not predictors of dropout, whereas younger age was. Conclusion Incorporating e-CBT on its own or in combination with pharmaceutical interventions is a viable option for treating GAD. Treating GAD with e-CBT or medication appears to offer significant improvements in symptoms, with no meaningful difference between the two. Combining the treatments also offer significant improvements, while not necessarily superior to either independently. The findings suggest that all options are viable. Taking the patient's preferred treatment route based on their lifestyle, personality, and beliefs into account when deciding on treatment should be a priority for care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callum Stephenson
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Elnaz Moghimi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Yijia Shao
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anchan Kumar
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Caitlin S. Yee
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Shadé Miller
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anthi Stefatos
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Maedeh Gholamzadehmir
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Zara Abbaspour
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jasleen Jagayat
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Amirhossein Shirazi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- OPTT Inc., Digital Media Zone, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tessa Gizzarelli
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Gilmar Gutierrez
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Ferwa Khan
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Charmy Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Archana Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Megan Yang
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mohsen Omrani
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- OPTT Inc., Digital Media Zone, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nazanin Alavi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stephenson C, Moghimi E, Gutierrez G, Jagayat J, Layzell G, Patel C, Omrani M, Alavi N. User experiences of an online therapist-guided psychotherapy platform, OPTT: A cross-sectional study. Internet Interv 2023; 32:100623. [PMID: 37273941 PMCID: PMC10235428 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In the last few years, online psychotherapy programs have burgeoned since they are a more accessible and scalable treatment option compared to in-person therapies. While these online programs are promising, understanding the user experience and perceptions of care is essential for program optimization. Methods This study investigated the experiences of end-users who had previously received online psychotherapy through a web-based platform. A 35-item multiple-choice survey was developed by the research team and distributed to past users to capture their perceptions of the program. Results The survey yielded 163 responses, with a 90 % completion rate. Participants were predominantly white and female, with an average age of 42 years. While most participants preferred in-person therapy, they also reported the benefits of the online psychotherapy program. Participants had positive perceptions of the platform, the quality and interaction of their therapist, and the homework assignments and skills covered. Lack of motivation to complete weekly homework assignments was cited as a common struggle. Discussion The findings support online psychotherapy as a beneficial digital mental health tool and highlight some areas for improvement. Scalability and accessibility are key benefits of the platform. At the same time, improvements in participant engagement, including those from equity-seeking and equity-deserving groups, may enhance the efficacy of the programs offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callum Stephenson
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 166 Brock Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5G2, Canada
| | - Elnaz Moghimi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 166 Brock Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5G2, Canada
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, 500 Church Street, Penetanguishene, Ontario L9M 1G3, Canada
| | - Gilmar Gutierrez
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 166 Brock Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5G2, Canada
| | - Jasleen Jagayat
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Georgina Layzell
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Charmy Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 166 Brock Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5G2, Canada
| | - Mohsen Omrani
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 166 Brock Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5G2, Canada
- OPTT Inc., DMZ 10 Dundas Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2G9, Canada
| | - Nazanin Alavi
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 166 Brock Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5G2, Canada
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
- OPTT Inc., DMZ 10 Dundas Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2G9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|