Experiences and Perceptions of Telehealth Visits in Diabetes Care During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Their Providers: Qualitative Study

Capillary blood self-collection for high-throughput proteomics

In this study, we sought to compare protein concentrations obtained from a high-throughput proteomics platform (Olink) on samples collected using capillary blood self-collection (with the Tasso+ device) versus standard venipuncture (control). Blood collection was performed on 20 volunteers, including one sample obtained via venipuncture and two via capillary blood using the Tasso+ device. Tasso+ samples were stored at 2°C-8°C for 24-hs (Tasso-24) or 48-h (Tasso-48) prior to processing to simulate shipping times from a study participant's home. Proteomics were analyzed using Olink (384 Inflammatory Panel). Tasso+ blood collection was successful in 37/40 attempts. Of 230 proteins included in our analysis, Pearson correlations (r) and mean coefficient of variation (CV) between Tasso-24 or Tasso-48 versus venipuncture were variable. In the Tasso-24 analysis, 34 proteins (14.8%) had both a correlation r > 0.5 and CV < 0.20. In the Tasso-48 analysis, 68 proteins (29.6%) had a correlation r > 0.5 and CV < 0.20. Combining the Tasso-24 and Tasso-48 analyses, 26 (11.3%) proteins met these thresholds. We concluded that protein concentrations from Tasso+ samples processed 24-48 h after collection demonstrated wide technical variability and variable correlation with a venipuncture gold-standard. Use of home capillary blood self-collection for large-scale proteomics should be limited to select proteins with good agreement with venipuncture.

Determinants of implementation for group medical visits for patients with chronic pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite the critical need for comprehensive and effective chronic pain care, delivery of such care remains challenging. Group medical visits (GMVs) offer an innovative and efficient model for providing comprehensive care for patients with chronic pain. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify barriers and facilitators (determinants) to implementing GMVs for adult patients with chronic pain.

METHODS

The review included peer-reviewed studies reporting findings on implementation of GMVs for chronic pain, inclusive of all study designs. Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies of individual appointments or group therapy were excluded. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to determine risk of bias. Data related to implementation determinants were extracted independently by two reviewers. Data synthesis was guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles reporting on 25 studies met criteria for inclusion and included qualitative observational (n = 8), randomized controlled trial (n = 6), quantitative non-randomized (n = 9), quantitative descriptive (n = 3), and mixed methods designs (n = 7). The studies included in this review included a total of 2364 participants. Quality ratings were mixed, with qualitative articles receiving the highest quality ratings. Common multi-level determinants included the relative advantage of GMVs for chronic pain over other available models, the capability and motivation of clinicians, the cost of GMVs to patients and the health system, the need and opportunity of patients, the availability of resources and relational connections supporting recruitment and referral to GMVs within the clinic setting, and financing and policies within the outer setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-level factors determine the implementation of GMVs for chronic pain. Future research is needed to investigate these determinants more thoroughly and to develop and test implementation strategies addressing these determinants to promote the scale-up of GMVs for patients with chronic pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021231310 .

Experiences of Motivational Interviewing in Virtual Health-care Visits for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Qualitative Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this qualitative study is to identify barriers minimizing the effectiveness of motivational interviewing during virtual clinic encounters for individuals with type 2 diabetes based on the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behaviour (COM-B) model.

METHODS

One-on-one semistructured interviews were conducted from March to June 2023, with 17 adults with type 2 diabetes (64.7% female; median age 69 years, range 47 to 83 years) followed at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada). Themes from transcribed interviews were identified through descriptive analysis using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

The following main themes were identified: 1) face-to-face appointments strengthen provider-patient rapport and collaboration; 2) virtual encounters reduce patient accountability and hinder health-seeking behaviour; and 3) individuals with physical disabilities and/or low technological proficiency experience decreased provider accessibility. Protective factors that can mitigate these negative impacts include establishing rapport during in-person appointments before transitioning to virtual appointments and incorporating a video component during virtual encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

Several barriers of virtual appointments currently limit the effectiveness of motivational interviewing for individuals with type 2 diabetes and make it difficult to provide person-centred care, especially by phone. However, there are protective factors that help to maintain healthy lifestyle behaviours, even after transitioning to virtual settings, and are areas for optimization moving forward.

Experiences of people with diabetes mellitus of telehealth for diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to explore the experiences of people with diabetes who utilized telehealth for diabetes management due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols rather than traditional in-person consultations.

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 intensified globally from January 2020, eliciting a multinational response to infection control for health preservation, including social distancing in public areas and health care settings. The outcome had significant impact on the health care system, where people with chronic diseases, such as those with diabetes, were required to transition a majority of their care to telehealth to align with social restrictions.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will include qualitative and mixed methods studies and theses of any research design and in any language that examine the experiences of adults with diabetes who transitioned from in-person consultations to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusions include pre-COVID-19 data; quantitative studies; secondary, tertiary, and all other gray literature.

METHODS

A search of CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Emcare (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NCBI), and several ProQuest databases will be conducted. Studies from January 2020 onwards in any language will be assessed for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will retrieve and screen titles and abstracts and full-text studies and assess the methodological quality of the included studies utilizing the JBI qualitative critical appraisal tool. The included studies will be synthesized utilizing JBI meta-aggregation, and the certainty of the findings will be assessed with ConQual.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023424667.