Donepezil and Rivastigmine: Pharmacokinetic Profile and Brain-targeting After Intramuscular Administration in Rats

Exploring neuropharmacokinetics: mechanisms, models, and clinical implications

Neuropharmacokinetics is an emerging field dedicated to understanding the pharmacokinetics of drugs within the central nervous system (CNS), with a particular emphasis on overcoming the challenges posed by the blood-brain barrier. This paper reviews the latest advancements in drug delivery strategies, including nanoparticle-based systems, receptor-mediated transcytosis, and efflux transporter inhibition, which have been designed to enhance drug penetration into the brain. Additionally, the use of advanced imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging with contrast agents has provided critical insights into drug distribution, receptor occupancy, and the functional impact of therapeutic agents within the CNS. These innovations not only enhance our understanding of CNS drug action but also pave the way for more effective treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Drug Distribution in Brain and Cerebrospinal Fluids in Relation to IC50 Values in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease, Using the Physiologically Based LeiCNS-PK3.0 Model

Background

Very little knowledge exists on the impact of Alzheimer’s disease on the CNS target site pharmacokinetics (PK).

Aim

To predict the CNS PK of cognitively healthy young and elderly and of Alzheimer’s patients using the physiologically based LeiCNS-PK3.0 model.

Methods

LeiCNS-PK3.0 was used to predict the PK profiles in brain extracellular (brain_ECF) and intracellular (brain_ICF) fluids and cerebrospinal fluid of the subarachnoid space (CSF_SAS) of donepezil, galantamine, memantine, rivastigmine, and semagacestat in young, elderly, and Alzheimer’s patients. The physiological parameters of LeiCNS-PK3.0 were adapted for aging and Alzheimer’s based on an extensive literature search. The CNS PK profiles at plateau for clinical dose regimens were related to in vitro IC₅₀ values of acetylcholinesterase, butyrylcholinesterase, N-methyl-D-aspartate, or gamma-secretase.

Results

The PK profiles of all drugs differed between the CNS compartments regarding plateau levels and fluctuation. Brain_ECF, brain_ICF and CSF_SAS PK profile relationships were different between the drugs. Aging and Alzheimer’s had little to no impact on CNS PK. Rivastigmine acetylcholinesterase IC₅₀ values were not reached. Semagacestat brain PK plateau levels were below the IC₅₀ of gamma-secretase for half of the interdose interval, unlike CSF_SAS PK profiles that were consistently above IC_50.

Conclusion

This study provides insights into the relations between CNS compartments PK profiles, including target sites. CSF_SAS PK appears to be an unreliable predictor of brain PK. Also, despite extensive changes in blood-brain barrier and brain properties in Alzheimer’s, this study shows that the impact of aging and Alzheimer’s pathology on CNS distribution of the five drugs is insignificant.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11095-022-03281-3.

Memantine and Its Combination with Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors in Pharmacological Pretreatment of Soman Poisoning in Mice

Nerve agents pose a real threat to both the military and civil populations, but the current treatment of the poisoning is unsatisfactory. Thus, we studied the efficacy of prophylactic use of memantine alone or in combination with clinically used reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine, donepezil, rivastigmine) against soman. In addition, we tested their influence on post-exposure therapy consisting of atropine and asoxime. Pyridostigmine alone failed to decrease the acute toxicity of soman. But all clinically used acetylcholinesterase inhibitors administered alone reduced the acute toxicity, with donepezil showing the best efficacy. The combination of memantine with reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitors attenuated soman acute toxicity significantly. The pretreatment administered alone or in combinations influenced the efficacy of post-exposure treatment in a similar fashion: (i) pyridostigmine or memantine alone did not affect the antidotal treatment, (ii) centrally acting reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitors alone increased the antidotal treatment slightly, (iii) combination of memantine with reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitors increased the antidotal treatment more markedly. In conclusion, memantine alone failed to decrease the acute toxicity of soman or increase post-exposure antidotal treatment efficacy. The combination of memantine with donepezil significantly increased post-exposure effectiveness (together 5.12, pretreatment alone 1.72). Both drugs, when applied together, mitigate soman toxicity and boost post-exposure treatment.