Does Presence of a Median Lobe Affect Perioperative Complications, Oncological Outcomes and Urinary Continence Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy?

Outcomes of robotic modified Freyer's prostatectomy in an Australian patient cohort

Introduction

The study aims to demonstrate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP) using the modified Freyer's approach in an Australian patient cohort. Although RSP is performed in several Australian centres, there is a paucity of published Australian data.

Methods

We reviewed prospectively collected perioperative and outcomes data for patients who underwent a robotic modified Freyer's prostatectomy (RMFP) from June 2019 to March 2022. Statistics were completed using SPSS statistics v27.0 and reported as mean and range with a p value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

There were 27 patients who underwent RMFP over the study period with a mean age of 67 years and prostate volume of 159.74 cc (100-275). The mean console time was 168 min (122-211), blood loss of 233 ml (50-600) and average length of hospital stay of 3.8 days (3-8). The preoperative versus postoperative outcome means were as follows: serum prostate-specific antigen was 9.69 versus 1.2 ng/mL, IPPS score was 17.1 versus 1.25, quality of life (QOL) score 3.4 versus 0.4, postvoid residual volume: 223.6 versus 55.9 ml, Q-max 7.86 versus 29.6 ml/s. These were all statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean weight of resected tissue was 74 g (43-206) with 25 patients having benign histopathology and two being diagnosed with prostate cancer (Gleason 3 + 3 = 6 and 3 + 4 = 7). No patients returned to theatre or required a blood transfusion.

Conclusions

Data from our patient cohort demonstrate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RMFP for benign prostatic hyperplasia in an Australian patient cohort. Our outcomes compare favourably with published studies on RSP.

Radical Prostatectomy: Sequelae in the Course of Time

Objective: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a frequent treatment for men suffering from localized prostate cancer (PCa). Whilst offering a high chance for cure, it does not come without a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Herein we review the common adverse effects RP may have over the course of time. Methods: A collaborative narrative review was performed with the identification of the principal studies on the topic. The search was executed by a relevant term search on PubMed from 2010 to February 2021. Results: Rates of major complications in patients undergoing RP are generally low. The main adverse effects are erectile dysfunction varying from 11 to 87% and urinary incontinence varying from 0 to 87% with a peak in functional decline shortly after surgery, and dependent on definitions. Different less frequent side effects also need to be taken into account. The highest rate of recovery is seen within the first year after RP, but even long-term improvements are possible. Nevertheless, for some men these adverse effects are long lasting and different, less frequent side effects also need to be taken into account. Despite many technical advances over the last two decades no surgical approach can be clearly favored when looking at long-term outcome, as surgical volume and experience as well as individual patient characteristics are still the most influential variables. Conclusions: The frequency of erectile function and urinary continence side effects after RP, and the trajectory of recovery, need to be taken into account when counseling patients about their treatment options for prostate cancer.

Impact of protruded median lobe on perioperative, urinary continence and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Background

To investigate the effect of protruded median lobe (PML) on the perioperative, oncological, and urinary continence (UC) outcomes among patients underwent Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP).

Methods

231 consecutive patients who had undergone RS-RARP were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the PML degree: PML<5 mm (n=99); 5≤ PML <10 mm (n=91); PML ≥10 mm (n=41). The perioperative outcomes, short-term oncological, and UC outcomes were compared among the three groups. Those outcomes were also compared in patients with significant PML (>10 mm) who underwent the traditional or Retzius-sparing RARP.

Results

The median PML was significantly associated age (P<0.001) and prostate volume (P<0.001). Perioperative characteristics including console time, estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative transfusion rate, and complications were not statistically different among the three groups (P=0.647, 0.574, 0.231, 0.661, respectively). The rate of positive surgical margin (PSM) were not significantly different in the three groups (P=0.065). No significant difference regarding UC and biochemical recurrence (BCR) at 12-month follow-up was observed in the three groups (P>0.05). Comparison between the two approaches in men with significant PML showed better recovery of UC (HR =1.83, 95% CI: 1.117-3.01, log-rank P=0.002) and similar BCR (log-rank P=0.072) after RS-RARP.

Conclusions

RS-RARP is an oncologically and functionally equivalent approach for patients with PML. Compared with the traditional approach, RS-RARP offers benefits regarding UC for cases with significant PML.