MRI accuracy for tears of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament injury and the clinical relevance of missed tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:515-523. [PMID: 19620451 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.2146]

Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in evaluating meniscal abnormalities in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and recognize predictors of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) MRI diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four hundred twenty patients (mean age, 27.2 years; 326 males, 94 females) who underwent arthroscopy for ACL injury between January 2017 and August 2022, and had preoperative imaging within 4 months, were retrospectively included. Images were independently interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, noting the presence of medial and lateral meniscal tears including tear type and location. Results were correlated with arthroscopic findings. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to study risk factors (RF) for FP and FN MRI diagnosis.

RESULTS

The sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value/accuracy of MRI for medial meniscus tear was 97.5%/74.46%/65.63%/98.35%/82.15%; for lateral meniscus tear, it was 83.5%/93.70%/70.8%/94.55% /87.86%, with substantial interreader agreement. Female gender (odds ratio (OR), 0.434), posterior horn and posterior root tears (OR, 3.268/22.588), horizontal tear (OR, 3.134), and ramp lesion (OR, 4.964) were found RF for FP medial meniscus, and meniscal body tears (OR, 308.011) were found RF for FP lateral meniscus. RF for FN medial meniscus were meniscal tear at the posterior horn, body, and posterior root (OR, 12.371/123.000/13.045).

CONCLUSION

MRI is an effective screening tool for meniscal tears, but less accurate in detecting all medial meniscus injuries. Gender, meniscal tear location, and type increased the risk of FP medial meniscal tear on MRI, while meniscal tear location increased the risk of FP lateral meniscus and FN medial meniscus tears.

Clinical Examination in the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Blinded, Cross-sectional Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of clinical tests for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

This study prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and lever test in diagnosing ACL injury in 133 patients with knee pathology. The examiner was blinded to the patient's history, symptoms, and laterality of the pain at the time of examination. One hundred twenty-three patients in the study underwent MRI, and 90 went on to arthroscopy. The performance of the examination maneuvers and MRI was calculated.

RESULTS

This study showed notable differences in sensitivity and specificity between the Lachman test and the lever test and in specificity between the anterior drawer test and the lever test. The Lachman test was also found to be more sensitive than the anterior drawer. All ACL tears diagnosed by a composite of the physical examination maneuvers were confirmed by MRI. MRI findings were concordant with arthroscopic findings in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The Lachman test and the anterior draw test demonstrated clinical utility, but the results of the lever test should be interpreted with caution. Clinical examination was found to be highly specific but less sensitive than MRI.

Morphological changes in the superficial medial collateral ligament on knee MR imaging: association with medial meniscal extrusion and posterior root medial meniscus abnormality

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between morphological changes in the superficial medial collateral ligament and meniscal extrusion with medial meniscus posterior root tear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, 124 patients who underwent knee MRI within 90 days prior to knee surgery and whose medial meniscus surgically proved intact, with posterior root tear or posterior horn tear, were enrolled. Two radiologists who were blinded to the surgical results assessed the morphological changes in the superficial medial collateral ligament, including thickness, bowing angle, and presence of signal intensity alteration, and medial meniscus extrusion, according to the presence of tears in the posterior root of the medial meniscus or posterior horn of the medial meniscus using the chi-square test, one-way ANOVA, and Cohen's kappa test.

RESULTS

Thirty-six posterior root tears, 31 posterior horn tears, and 57 intact medial menisci were observed surgically. The mean values of thickness showed no significant differences among the three groups. The bowing angle was significantly higher in the posterior root tear than in the posterior horn tear (reader 1 = 0.001, reader 2 = 0.002) and normal meniscus groups (readers 1 and 2 < 0.001). The percentage of superficial medial collateral ligament signal intensity alteration and meniscal extrusion was highest in the group with posterior root of the medial meniscus tear (80.6% and 94.4%, respectively) and lowest in the group with normal medial meniscus (17.5% and 10.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Morphological changes in the superficial medial collateral ligament and meniscal extrusion were associated with medial meniscus posterior root tears.

Sensitivity and Specificity of MRI in Diagnosing Concomitant Meniscal Injuries With Pediatric and Adolescent Acute ACL Tears

Background:

Preoperative diagnosis of concomitant meniscal tears in pediatric and adolescent patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is challenging.

Purpose:

To investigate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting meniscal injuries for pediatric and adolescent patients with acute ACL tears.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

The authors retrospectively identified patients aged ≤18 years who underwent acute ACL reconstruction between 2006 and 2018 at 2 tertiary academic hospitals. The primary outcomes were arthroscopically confirmed medial, lateral, or any (defined as medial and/or lateral) meniscal tears. To control for chronically deficient knees, patients must have received their MRI study within 4 weeks of injury and must have undergone surgery no more than 8 weeks after their MRI study. Preoperative MRI reports were compared with the gold standard of arthroscopically confirmed tears to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. In a secondary analysis, patients were stratified by age into 2 groups (≤13 or ≥14 years), body mass index-for-age data from the Centers for Disease Control were used to classify patients as obese or nonobese, and differences between sensitivity and specificity proportions were analyzed using chi-square test for homogeneity.

Results:

Overall, 406 patients with a mean age of 15.4 years (range, 10-18 years) were identified. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were as follows: for lateral meniscal (LM) tears, 51.0%, 86.5%, 78.3%, and 65.0%; for medial meniscal tears, 83.2%, 80.6%, 62.3%, and 92.5%; and for any meniscal tear, 75.0%, 72.1%, 81.5%, and 63.8%, respectively. In the stratified analysis, MRI was less specific for the following diagnoses: any meniscal tear in patients aged ≤13 years (P = .048) and LM tears in obese patients (P = .020).

Conclusion:

The diagnostic ability of MRI to predict meniscal injuries present at acute ACL reconstruction was moderate. Performance was poorest at the lateral meniscus, where MRI failed to detect 97 tears that were found arthroscopically. Specificity was significantly lower in younger patients for any meniscal tear and in obese patients for LM tears.

Floating knee injuries - An analytical study using a conglomerated comprehensive classification

PURPOSE

Floating knee injuries are complex high velocity injuries with a simultaneous breach of skeletal integrity both above and below the knee joint. Intraarticular fractures, severe comminution, soft tissue insult, associated other skeletal and systemic injuries have been the most common factors influencing the outcome. With our previous experience we framed a conglomerated comprehensive classification, which includes important prognosticating factors that influences the outcome. Aim of this study is to analyse the efficacy of this classification system for floating knee injury by studying the duration of hospitalisation, number of procedures required for completion of treatment, prognosticating functional outcomes and complications.

METHODS

This classification is a conglomeration of the existing standard classifications (Fraser, AO, Gustilo and Andersons) along with modifiers like disruption of exensor mechanism M1, avulsion fractures around knee M2 and fractures around hip and ankle joints M3. This classification system was applied to all FKI cases presented to our institution between 2015 and 2018, it has 4 types, 3 subtypes and 3 modifiers. 92 cases were prospectively analysed, the standard treatment protocol was followed as per flowchart, only stable and borderline stable patients were included, functional outcome and recovery of these patients was assessed using modified Karlstrom and Olerud scoring after fracture union. Demographic data, duration of hospitalisation, number of procedures required for completion of treatment, functional outcomes and complications were collected and statistical analysis was done.

RESULTS

Statistical Analysis showed significant difference between groups I and IV of conglomerated comprehensive classification in the number of days of hospitalisation and number of procedures with p value 0.006 and 0.018 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conglomerated comprehensive classification using prognostic factors and existing standard classifications enables better prognostication of these complex floating knee injuries. Identifing and addressing these factors and modifiers included in this classification system will surely improve the outcome. A multicentric study will validate this classifaction in a better way.

Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Injury: MRI Findings in Children With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

BACKGROUND. Undiagnosed and unrepaired root tears are increasingly recognized as a preventable cause of accelerated osteoarthritis. Preoperative MRI findings of lateral meniscus posterior root tears in children with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are not well described. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of preoperative MRI for identifying concomitant lateral meniscus posterior root injuries in pediatric patients with ACL tears with arthroscopy as the reference standard. METHODS. Consecutively registered children who underwent MRI within 90 days before arthroscopic primary ACL reconstruction between March 2017 and December 2019 were included. Two radiologists assessed MRI examinations for direct signs involving the root proper and for findings associated with lateral meniscus posterior root tears. Kappa coefficients for MRI findings were computed. Findings in patients with root tears and intact roots were compared by independent-samples t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS. At arthroscopy, 39 children (18 boys, 21 girls; mean age, 15.2 ± 1.4 years) had lateral meniscus posterior root tears; 51 (22 boys, 29 girls; mean age, 15.7 ± 1.8 years) had intact roots. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 0.92, aside from tears involving the entheseal segment (κ = 0.55) or popliteomeniscal fascicles (κ = 0.45). MRI findings that were predictors of arthroscopically diagnosed root tear (p < .05) were lateral meniscus root tear in any segment (odds ratio [OR], 16.8; 95% CI, 5.6-50.1), degeneration in any segment (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6-9.6), coronal cleft sign (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.0-16.7), sagittal ghost sign (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.2-19.1), and axial radial defect sign (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 2.4-20.5). Tear involving any segment of the root proper had the highest PPV, 82%, with 79% NPV. The coronal cleft, sagittal ghost, and axial radial defect signs had specificities of 88%, 94%, and 88% but sensitivities of 44%, 23%, and 49%. The only significant independent predictor on preoperative MRI was root tear in any segment (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 2.7-137.5; p = .003). CONCLUSION. Among MRI findings evaluated for preoperative diagnosis of lateral meniscus posterior root tear, tear involving any segment of the root proper had the strongest performance; associated findings had high specificity but low sensitivity. CLINICAL IMPACT. Accurate identification of lateral meniscus posterior root tears on preoperative MRI can aid in operative planning and reduce treatment delay.

Five Overlooked Injuries on Knee MRI

This article highlights five knee injuries that, in the author's experience, are commonly overlooked by readers inexperienced in knee MRI: ramp lesions, meniscocapsular tears, meniscal root ligament tears, posterior capsular ligament tears, and partial anterior cruciate ligament tear. While these injuries are readily apparent when the images are assessed for the given abnormality, the author's belief is that these may be overlooked because either the injury is not considered, or the affected area is not closely inspected. While these injuries may not alter immediate clinical management or require surgical intervention, they may, nevertheless, result in patient symptoms and may potentially increase the risk of further knee injury. Further, these injuries are difficult to recognize clinically and arthroscopically. In this review, we present these five injuries, emphasising relevant anatomy, normal MRI appearances, common injury patterns, and tips to avoid their being overlooked. Routine review of these areas when interpreting knee MRI, with additional imaging as necessary, will allow these injuries to be recognized more regularly.

High prevalence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and concomitant posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of a deep lateral femoral notch sign (LFNS) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and concomitant posterior root tears of the lateral meniscus (PLRT).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients undergoing ACL reconstruction between 2016 and 2018. Based on the arthroscopic appearance of the lateral meniscus, patients were assorted to one of three groups: isolated ACL tear (ACL-Group), ACL tear with concomitant lateral meniscus tear not involving the posterolateral root (Meniscus-Group), and ACL tear with concomitant PLRT (PLRT-Group). Incidence and depth of a LFNS on preoperative MRI was compared between the three cohorts.

RESULTS

115 patients (mean age: 29.5 ± 11.3 years) were included in the study, with 58 patients (50.4%) assorted to the ACL-Group, 24 patients (20.9%) to the Meniscus-Group, and 33 patients (28.7%) to the PLRT-Group. The prevalence of a LFNS was significantly higher in the PLRT-Group (39.4%), when compared to the ACL- (5.2%) or Meniscus-Groups (25.0%; p < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients with PLRT were 5.3 times more likely to have a LFNS as compared to those without a lateral root tear (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACL tears, the presence of a LFNS on preoperative MRI may be predictive for a PLRT. As the LFNS occurs in almost 40% of the patients with combined ACL tears and PLRT, the LFNS may be a useful secondary diagnostic finding in early MRI diagnostic. Identifying PLRT on MRI is clinically relevant, as it prevents misdiagnosis and facilitates surgical decision-making, thus avoiding subsequent delayed treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Rates of Concomitant Meniscal Tears in Pediatric Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Increase With Age and Body Mass Index

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal injury. Risk factors for concomitant meniscal injuries have been studied in the adult population but less so in pediatric patients.

Purpose

To evaluate the relationship between age and body mass index (BMI) and the presence of a concomitant meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review was performed of patients aged <19 years who underwent primary ACLR over a 3.5-year period. Revision ACLR and multiligament knee reconstructions were excluded. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with having a meniscal tear at the time of surgery. Subgroup analysis was performed for medial and lateral meniscal tears.

Results

Included in this study were 453 patients (230 males, 223 females; median age, 15 years). Of these, 265 patients (58%) had a meniscal tear, including 150 isolated lateral meniscal tears, 53 isolated medial meniscal tears, and 62 patients with both lateral and medial meniscal tears. Median time from injury to surgery was 48 days. For every 1-year increase in age, there was a 16% increase in the adjusted odds of having any meniscal tear (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.27; P = .002), with a 20% increase in the odds of having a medial meniscal tear (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P = .002) and a 16% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .003). For every 2-point increase in BMI, there was a 12% increase in the odds of having any meniscal tear (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .016) and a 10% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .028).

Conclusion

Pediatric patients undergoing ACLR had a 58% incidence of concomitant meniscal pathology. Increasing age and BMI were independent risk factors for these injuries, while no association was found between time to surgery and meniscal pathology.

The popliteomeniscal fascicles: from diagnosis to surgical repair: a systematic review of current literature

Background

Popliteomeniscal fascicles (PMF) are considered the posterolateral meniscocapsular extensions which connect the lateral meniscus to the edge of the tibia. PMFs disruption leads to hypermobility of the lateral meniscus with pain and locking sensation. Recognition and treatment of PMFs tear remain very challenging. The aim of this systematic review is to collect and analyse the articles concerning popliteomeniscal fascicle disruption from diagnosis to surgical approach.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EMBASE were searched. Various combinations of the keywords “Popliteomeniscal Fascicles”, “Lateral Meniscus”, “Popliteal Hiatus”, “Posterolateral Corner”, “Tear” and “Surgical Repair” were used. The original literature search identified a total of 85 articles comprising of duplicates. The PRISMA guidilines were followed. Studies in English language and published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Articles with level of evidence I to IV were included

Results

A total of three articles were included in the qualitative analysis. All the articles included are retrospective case series, with a level of evidence IV. Studies concerning patients with pre-operative imaging MRI and clinical assessment, reporting surgical technique and clinical outcomes assessed by physical examination and/or subjective evaluation scales were analysed.

Conclusions

MRI and the Figure-4 test allow to assess PMF tears pre-operatively. Arthroscopic evaluation constitutes the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis. Although surgery is considered resolutive for symptoms, there is still controversy about the most appropriate technique. Further higher quality studies are required.

Efficacy of Arthroscopic Treatment for Concurrent Medial Meniscus Posterior Horn and Lateral Meniscus Anterior Horn Injury: A Retrospective Single Center Study

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery for combined tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM) and the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM).

Methods

Between September 2009 and December 2013, a retrospective investigation was performed on 48 patients (48 knees) with combined tears of PHMM and AHLM who underwent arthroscopic surgery. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis in the outpatient department. After admission, other basic examinations were performed. PHMM was treated with partial meniscectomy and AHLM was treated with external–internal suture or partial meniscectomy. Curative effect was evaluated according to Lysholm score and IKDC score. The differences of the functions as well as Lysholm and IKDC scores pre‐ and postoperatively were compared, while the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and arthroscopy for PHMM and AHLM were compared.

Results

Seven patients with combined tears of PHMM and AHLM were misdiagnosed during MRI examination when arthroscopy was used as the gold standard. All patients were followed up for an average of 34.58 months (range 10–52 months) and all incisions healed by first intention with no obvious complication. The preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores were 47.22 ± 2.77 and 87.36 ± 5.45, respectively. The IKDC scores are 54.73 ± 4.65 preoperatively and 89.62 ± 3.71 postoperatively. The positive rates of the diagnosis through MRI and arthroscopic surgery is 85.42% and 100%, respectively. At the last follow‐up, the patients had no pain, weakness, and instability, and tenderness in medial and lateral joint space disappeared. Mcmurray test was weakly positive in four patients. Excellent outcome was achieved in 39 cases, and a good outcome was achieved in five cases; the good to excellent rate was 91.67%.

Conclusion

MRI examination of combined tears of PHMM and AHLM may result in misdiagnosis. Arthroscopic primary repair seemed to be an effective surgical option for treatment of combined tears of PHMM and AHLM.

Knee and Leg Injuries

Knee and leg injuries are extremely common presentations to the emergency department. Understanding the anatomy of the knee, particularly the vasculature and ligamentous structures, can help emergency physicians (EPs) diagnose and manage these injuries. Use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography can further aid EPs through the diagnostic process. Proper use of knee immobilizers can also improve long-term patient outcomes.

Confirming the Presence of Unrecognized Meniscal Injuries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

BACKGROUND

Prior research has shown decreased accuracy of meniscal injury detection using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient adult patients as well as ACL-deficient pediatric and adolescent patients. The objectives of this study were the following: (1) assess the diagnostic ability of MRI in detecting meniscal injuries for pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and (2) characterize the unrecognized meniscal injuries.

METHODS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of meniscal tears (medial, lateral, or both) on MRI were calculated for the 107 patients in this cohort. Fisher exact tests were used to compare event frequencies between medial meniscal (MM) and lateral meniscal (LM) tears. One-way analysis of variance tests were performed to compare event rates between the location and type of unrecognized meniscal tears.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 15 (range: 7 to 18). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI in detecting meniscal tears (medial, lateral, or both) in ACL-deficient pediatric and adolescent patients was 62.3%, 68.4%, 78.2%, and 50.0%, respectively. There were 26 (24.3%) cases in which a meniscal injury was not detected on MRI, but was discovered arthroscopically (MM: 5 knees, LM: 20 knees, both: 1 knee). These unrecognized meniscal injuries were more commonly the LM than the MM (77.8%, P-value=0.100), a vertical/longitudinal tear type (77.8%, P-value <0.001), and located in the posterior horn (74.1%, P-value <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this ACL-deficient pediatric and adolescent cohort, there were 26 (24.3%) patients with unrecognized meniscal injuries. A vertical tear in the posterior horn was the most commonly unrecognized meniscal injury, supporting the findings of prior research postulating that the location and configuration of a tear influence the accuracy of MRI in detecting these injuries. More research is needed to investigate strategies to improve the detection of meniscal tears in pediatric and adolescent patients preoperatively. These findings have implications with regard to patient counseling, operative planning, anticipatory guidance with regard to postoperative rehabilitation, recovery expectations, and surgical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A Prospective, Blinded, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Accuracy, and Safety of In-Office Diagnostic Arthroscopy With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Surgical Diagnostic Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy, accuracy, and safety of in-office diagnostic arthroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical diagnostic arthroscopy.

METHODS

A prospective, blinded, multicenter, clinical trial was performed on 110 patients, ages 18 to 75 years, who presented with knee pain. The study period was April 2012 to April 2013. Each patient underwent a physical examination, an MRI, in-office diagnostic imaging, and a diagnostic arthroscopic examination in the operating room. The attending physician completed clinical report forms comparing the in-office arthroscopic examination and surgical diagnostic arthroscopy findings on each patient. Two blinded experts, unaffiliated with the clinical care of the study's subjects, reviewed the in-office arthroscopic images and MRI images using the surgical diagnostic arthroscopy images as the "control" group comparison. Patients were consecutive, and no patients were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

In this study, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of in-office arthroscopy was equivalent to surgical diagnostic arthroscopy and more accurate than MRI. When comparing in-office arthroscopy with surgical diagnostic arthroscopy, all kappa statistics were between 0.766 and 0.902. For MRI compared with surgical diagnostic arthroscopy, kappa values ranged from a low of 0.130 (considered "slight" agreement) to a high of 0.535 (considered "moderate" agreement). The comparison of MRI to in-office arthroscopy showed very similar results as the comparison of MRI with surgical diagnostic arthroscopy, ranging from a low kappa of 0.112 (slight agreement) to a high of 0.546 (moderate agreement). There were no patient-related or device-related complications related to the use of in-office arthroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Needle-based diagnostic imaging that can be used in the office setting is statistically equivalent to surgical diagnostic arthroscopy with regard to the diagnosis of intra-articular, nonligamentous knee joint pathology. In-office diagnostic imaging can provide a more detailed and accurate diagnostic assessment of intra-articular knee pathology than MRI. Based on the study results, in-office diagnostic imaging provides a safe, accurate, real-time, minimally invasive diagnostic modality to evaluate intra-articular pathology without the need for surgical diagnostic arthroscopy or high-cost imaging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, comparative prospective trial.

In-office arthroscopy for the evaluation of chronic knee pain: A case report

This is a case report detailing the use of in-office needle arthroscopy (mi-eye 2™) in a patient with chronic knee pain and inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging findings. The patient is a 40-year-old male who presented to our clinic after an extended history of right knee pain along the medial aspect with previous failed treatments. Magnetic resonance imaging without contrast had demonstrated full-thickness chondral fissuring of the lateral patellar facet, mild abnormal signals of the proximal patellar tendon and Hoffa’s fat pad, and intact anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament. The patient was previously treated with an ultrasound-guided injection of 2 cm³ of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and 1 cm³ of Kenalog-40 and scheduled for follow-up. At follow-up, clinical examination showed antalgic gait, minimal tenderness along medial joint line, medial pain in deep flexion, and no pain when in varus or valgus. Due to continued discomfort with a negative magnetic resonance imaging, in-office diagnostic arthroscopy was performed using mi-eye 2 revealing a tear of the mid-body of the medial meniscus. The patient subsequently underwent arthroscopic repair and is recovering well with complete resolution of medial joint pain. This report highlights the clinical utility of in-office diagnostic arthroscopy in the management of patients with persistent knee pain and negative or equivocal findings on magnetic resonance imaging.

Imaging of Athletic Injuries of Knee Ligaments and Menisci: Sports Imaging Series

Acute knee injuries are a common source of morbidity in athletes and if overlooked may result in chronic functional impairment. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the knee has become the most commonly performed musculoskeletal MR examination and is an indispensable tool in the appropriate management of the injured athlete. Meniscal and ligamentous tearing are the most frequent indications for surgical intervention in sports injuries and an understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, mechanisms of injury, and patterns of injury are all critical to accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. These will be discussed in reference to meniscal tears and injuries of the cruciate ligaments as well as injuries of the posterolateral and posteromedial corners of the knee. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Intra-articular pathology associated with isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury on MRI

OBJECTIVE

Unlike with anterior cruciate ligament injury, little is known about the prevalence of intra-articular pathology associated with isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury in the knee. The objectives of this study were to characterize and identify the frequency of meniscal tears and osteochondral injuries in these patients, and to see if management might be affected.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Altogether, 48 knee MRI exams with isolated PCL tears were evaluated for the presence of: grade and location of PCL tear, meniscal tear, articular chondral lesion, bone bruise, and fracture. Comparisons between PCL tear grade and location, as well as mechanism of injury when known, with the presence of various intra-articular pathologies, were made using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate.

RESULTS

In all, 69 % of isolated PCL tears occur in the midsubstance, 27 % proximally. Meniscal tears were seen in 25 % of knees, involving all segments of both menisci, except for the anterior horn medial meniscus. Altogether, 23 % had focal cartilage lesions, usually affecting the central third medial femoral condyle and medial trochlea, while 12.5 % of knees had fractures, and 48 % demonstrated bone bruises, usually involving the central to anterior tibiofemoral joint. The presence of a fracture (p = 0.0123) and proximal location of PCL tear (p = 0.0016) were both associated with the hyperextension mechanism of injury. There were no statistically significant associations between PCL tear grade and presence of intra-articular abnormality.

CONCLUSION

Potentially treatable meniscal tears and osteochondral injuries are relatively prevalent, and demonstrable on MRI in patients with isolated acute PCL injury of the knee.

Bone Contusions After Acute Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Are Associated With Knee Joint Laxity, Concomitant Meniscal Lesions, and Anterolateral Ligament Abnormality

PURPOSE

To examine the associated findings with bone contusions in patients after acute noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

METHODS

From January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, patients who underwent ACL reconstructions performed by the senior author (H.F.) were retrospectively analyzed. Presence and severity of bone contusion were determined from preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRIs) for each anatomic site including the lateral femoral condyle (LFC), lateral tibial plateau (LTP), medial femoral condyle (MFC), and medial tibial plateau (MTP). Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associated findings (demographic data, preoperative physical examinations, concomitant meniscal lesions, intra-articular cartilage damages, and anterolateral ligament [ALL] abnormality) with bone contusions. Outcomes included the presence of bone contusions at each anatomic site (LFC, LTP, MFC, and MTP) and severity of lateral bone contusions (moderate/severe vs none/minimal).

RESULTS

Among the 697 consecutive cases, 193 were finally selected. Prevalence of bone contusions seen on MRI was as follows: 60.6% LFC, 73.1% LTP, 6.2% MFC, and 21.2% MTP. Presence of bone contusions at LFC and LTP were significantly associated with high-grade (grade II and III) pivot-shift (OR_LFC, 7.39; 95% CI, 1.99, 27.44; OR_LTP, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.02, 6.24), concomitant lateral meniscal lesions (OR_LFC, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.93, 11.31; OR_LTP, 10.17; 95% CI, 1.86, 55.47), and ALL abnormality (OR_LFC, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.46, 9.84; OR_LTP, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.28, 15.58). However, none of the above associated findings was correlated with the presence of bone contusions at MFC and MTP. Furthermore, moderate/severe lateral bone contusions were still found to be significantly associated with high-grade (grade II and III) pivot-shift (OR_LFC, 14.89; 95% CI, 2.71, 82.11; OR_LTP, 6.76; 95% CI, 1.27, 36.06), concomitant lateral meniscal lesions (OR_LFC, 17.34; 95% CI, 3.91, 76.87; OR_LTP, 22.01; 95% CI, 5.08, 95.42), and ALL abnormality (OR_LFC, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.33, 12.09; OR_LTP, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.09, 6.04).

CONCLUSIONS

For acute noncontact ACL injury, both the presence and the severity of lateral bone contusions are associated with high-grade (grade II and III) pivot-shift, concomitant lateral meniscal lesions, and ALL abnormality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Accuracy of MRI evaluation of meniscus tears in the setting of ACL injuries

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the pre-operative detection of meniscus tears requiring operative intervention, and identify factors that determined accuracy of diagnosing meniscus tears, in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. A meniscus tear was classified as requiring treatment if it was debrided or repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of pre-operative MRIs were determined for medial and lateral meniscus tears.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI were 0.90, 0.75, 0.58, and 0.95 for medial meniscus tears, respectively, and 0.67, 0.81, 0.65, and 0.82 for lateral meniscus tears. MRI-diagnosed medial meniscus tears were associated with a longer time interval between initial injury and imaging compared to ACL tears without concomitant meniscus injury on MRI (p=0.038). Vertical medial meniscus tears were less likely than other tear patterns to require treatment at the time of ACL reconstruction (p=0.03). MRI showed a higher diagnostic performance for lateral meniscus tears when surgery was performed within 30days of imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates only moderate sensitivity and specificity of pre-operative MRI in the detection of meniscus tears requiring operative treatment in the setting of ACL injury. High rates of false diagnoses were observed, suggesting MRI may not be as accurate in predicting positive or negative meniscus findings at the time of ACL reconstruction as previously reported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Risk Factors of False-Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis for Meniscal Tear Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors that predict false-negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis for meniscal tear coincident with anterior cruciate ligament injury using multivariate logistic regression.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from January 2006 through December 2014. Exclusion criteria were no meniscal tear or incomplete tear less than 10 mm in length, delay to surgery from initial injury more than 1 year, delay to surgery from preoperative MRI more than 4 weeks, revisions, fracture histories, and multiple ligament injuries. According to preoperative MRI diagnosis, the meniscal tears were sorted into true-positive MRI and false-negative MRI groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors including age, gender, body mass index, time from injury to MRI, knee instability, concomitant ligament injury, intra-articular effusion, bone contusion, cartilage injury, meniscal tear location, and meniscal tear pattern.

RESULTS

Enrolled 249 meniscal tears (159 medial and 90 lateral menisci) were sorted into true-positive MRI (n = 136) and false-negative MRI (n = 113) groups. As time from injury to MRI diagnosis increased, the risk of the false-negative MRI diagnosis decreased (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.859; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.802-0.921). Meniscal tear location within the posterior one-third was a significant risk factor compared with tear within the anterior one-third (adjusted OR, 11.823; 95% CI, 2.272-61.519). Peripheral longitudinal tear pattern was also a significant risk factor (adjusted OR, 3.522; 95% CI, 1.256-9.878).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant risk factors for false-negative MRI included short time from injury to MRI diagnosis, meniscal tear location within the posterior one-third, and peripheral longitudinal tear pattern.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

A Current Review of the Meniscus Imaging: Proposition of a Useful Tool for Its Radiologic Analysis

The main objective of this review was to present a synthesis of the current literature in order to provide a useful tool to clinician in radiologic analysis of the meniscus. All anatomical descriptions were clearly illustrated by MRI, arthroscopy, and/or drawings. The value of standard radiography is extremely limited for the assessment of meniscal injuries but may be indicated to obtain a differential diagnosis such as osteoarthritis. Ultrasound is rarely used as a diagnostic tool for meniscal pathologies and its accuracy is operator-dependent. CT arthrography with multiplanar reconstructions can detect meniscus tears that are not visible on MRI. This technique is also useful in case of MRI contraindications, in postoperative assessment of meniscal sutures and the condition of cartilage covering the articular surfaces. MRI is the most accurate and less invasive method for diagnosing meniscal lesions. MRI allows confirming and characterizing the meniscal lesion, the type, the extension, its association with a cyst, the meniscal extrusion, and assessing cartilage and subchondral bone. New 3D-MRI in three dimensions with isotropic resolution allows the creation of multiplanar reformatted images to obtain from an acquisition in one sectional plane reconstructions in other spatial planes. 3D MRI should further improve the diagnosis of meniscal tears.

Associated tears of the lateral meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors for different tear patterns

Background

The pattern of lateral meniscus tears observed in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured subjects varies greatly and determines subsequent management. Certain tear patterns with major biomechanical consequences should be repaired in a timely manner. Knowledge about risk factors for such tears may help to identify patients in the early posttraumatic phase and subsequently may improve clinical results.

Methods

A database of 268 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction was used to identify all patients with isolated ACL tears and patients with an associated tear of the lateral meniscus. Patients who underwent surgery >6 months after the injury were excluded. Based on the arthroscopic appearance of the lateral meniscus, patients were assorted to one of three groups: ‘no tear,’ ‘minor tear,’ and ‘major tear.’ Tear patterns defined as major included root tears, complete radial tears, and unstable longitudinal tears including bucket-handle tears. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing the three groups with regard to gender, age, height, weight, BMI, type of injury (high-impact sport, low-impact sport, and not sports related), and mechanism of injury (non-contact vs. contact). Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify independent risk factors for minor and major meniscal tears and to calculate odds ratios (OR).

Results

Two hundred fifteen patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 56% had isolated ACL tears, 27% had associated minor tears, and 17% had associated major tears of the lateral meniscus. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the three groups for gender (p = 0.002), age groups (p = 0.026), and mechanism of injury (p < 0.001). A contact injury mechanism was a risk factor for minor tears (OR: 4.28) and major tears (OR: 18.49). Additional risk factors for major tears were male gender (OR: 7.38) and age <30 years (OR: 5.85).

Conclusion

Male patients, patients <30 years, and particularly patients who sustained a contact injury have a high risk for an associated major lateral meniscus tear. Special attention is therefore necessary in those patients and early referral to magnetic resonance imaging and/or arthroscopy is recommended to allow meniscus repair in a timely manner.

Increased meniscal loading after anterior cruciate ligament transection in vivo: a longitudinal study in sheep

INTRODUCTION

Meniscal injury has been well documented as a frequent consequence of both acute and chronic ACL deficiency. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ACL deficiency on meniscal loads in vivo and determine how these loads would change over time after ACL injury.

METHODS

The in vivo kinematics of the stifle joint of five sheep were measured during normal gait, as well as 4 and 20 weeks after ACL transection. A unique robotic testing platform was then programmed to reproduce all the previously recorded kinematics and the loads carried by medial and lateral menisci during gait were estimated.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated a significant increase in both medial and lateral meniscal loads 20 weeks following ACL transection, mainly during mid-stance phase of gait (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003, respectively), with interesting inter-subject variability. A moderate correlation (R(2) ≥ 0.5) between in situ meniscal loads and anterior tibial translations was also detected over time after injury, increased translations post injury generally corresponded to larger meniscal loads.

CONCLUSION

The dramatic increase in meniscal loads long term post ACL transection probably explains the meniscal changes or injuries reported clinically in many chronic ACL-deficient knees.

Risk factors for posterior lateral meniscus root tears in anterior cruciate ligament injuries

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for posterior lateral meniscus root tears (PLRT) in patients with a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS

A database of 268 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between 2011 and 2013 was used to identify all patients with isolated ACL tears and patients with an associated PLRT. Patients with other concomitant injuries and patients who underwent surgery >6 months after the injury were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing the two groups with regard to gender, age, age groups (<30 vs. >30 years), height, weight, body mass index (BMI), BMI groups (<24.9, 25-29.9, and >30), type of injury (high-impact sports, low-impact sports, and not sports-related), and mechanism of injury (non-contact vs. contact). Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify independent risk factors for PLRT and to calculate odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-two patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 120 (85%) had an isolated ACL tear and 22 (15%) had an associated PLRT. No significant differences between patients with and without a PLRT were found for age, age groups, height, weight, BMI, BMI groups, and type of injury (p > 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between both groups for gender distribution (p = 0.034) and mechanism of injury (p < 0.001), with male gender and a contact mechanism being more common in patients with PLRT. The sole independent risk factor for an associated PLRT identified in the multivariate logistic regression analysis was a contact mechanism with an OR of 17.52.

CONCLUSION

An associated PLRT is more common in male patients and patients who sustained a contact injury. Patients with a contact injury mechanism have an approximately 17-fold increased risk for a PLRT compared to patients with a non-contact injury. Special attention for this injury pattern is therefore necessary in those patients, and early referral to magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopy is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of meniscus posterior root pathology

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 3 T MRI, including sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, for detection of posterior medial and lateral meniscus root tears and avulsions.

METHODS

All patients who had a 3 T MRI of the knee, followed by arthroscopic surgery, were included in this study. Arthroscopy was considered the gold standard. Meniscus root tears diagnosed at arthroscopy and on MRI were defined as a complete meniscus root detachment within 9 mm of the root. All surgical data were collected prospectively and stored in a data registry. MRI exams were reported prospectively by a musculoskeletal radiologist and reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 287 consecutive patients (156 males, 131 females; mean age 41.7 years) in this study. Prevalence of meniscus posterior root tears identified at arthroscopy was 9.1, 5.9% for medial and 3.5% for lateral root tears (one patient had both). Sensitivity was 0.770 (95% CI 0.570, 0.901), specificity was 0.729 (95% CI 0.708, 0.741), positive predictive value was 0.220 (95% CI 0.163, 0.257) and negative predictive value was 0.970 (95% CI 0.943, 0.987). For medial root tears, sensitivity was 0.824 (95% CI 0.569, 0.953), specificity was 0.800 (95% CI 0.784, 0.808), positive predictive value was 0.206 (95% CI 0.142, 0.238) and negative predictive value was 0.986 (95% CI 0.967, 0.996). For lateral meniscus posterior root tears, sensitivity was 0.600 (95% CI 0.281, 0.860), specificity was 0.903 (95% CI 0.891, 0.912), positive predictive value was 0.181 (95% CI 0.085, 0.261) and negative predictive value was 0.984 (95% CI 0.972, 0.994).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity of 3 T MRI to detect posterior meniscus root tears. The negative predictive value of 3 T MRI to detect posterior meniscus root tears was high; however, the positive predictive value was low. Sensitivity was higher for medial root tears, indicating a higher risk of missing lateral root tears on MRI. Imaging has an important role in identifying meniscus posterior horn root tears; however, some root tears may not be identified until arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study (diagnostic), Level II.

Diagnostic accuracy of an iPhone DICOM viewer for the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of viewing magnetic resonance (MR) images on a handheld mobile device compared with a conventional radiology workstation for the diagnosis of intra-articular knee pathology.

DESIGN

Prospective comparison study.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Fifty consecutive subjects who had MR imaging of the knee followed by knee arthroscopy were prospectively evaluated.

INTERVENTIONS

Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed each MR study using 2 different viewers: the OsiriX DICOM viewer software on an Apple iPhone 3GS device and eFilm Workstation software on a conventional picture archiving and communications system workstation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Sensitivity and specificity of the iPhone and workstation interpretations was performed using knee arthroscopy as the reference standard. Intraobserver concordance and agreement between the iPhone and workstation interpretations were determined.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 devices for each paired comparison of diagnostic performance. For the iPhone interpretations, sensitivity ranged from 77% (13 of 17) for the lateral meniscus to 100% (17 of 17) for the anterior cruciate ligament. Specificity ranged from 74% (14 of 19) for cartilage to 100% (50 of 50) for the posterior cruciate ligament. There was a very high level of interobserver and intraobserver agreement between devices and readers. The iPhone reads took longer than the corresponding workstation reads, with a significant mean difference between the iPhone and workstation reads of 3.98 minutes (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of interpreting MR images on a handheld mobile device for the assessment of intra-articular knee pathology is similar to that of a conventional radiology workstation, however, requires a longer viewing time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Timely and accurate interpretation of complex medical images using mobile device solutions could result in new workflow efficiencies and ultimately improve patient care.

Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging evaluation for meniscal tear in acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic rates of meniscal injuries combined with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, as well as traumatic meniscal injuries without ACL injuries.

METHODS

From January 2005 through April 2013, 208 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and 1,334 patients with traumatic meniscal tear injuries were examined by MRI and arthroscopy. Patients with chronic ACL injuries, revisions, fracture histories, or multiple-ligament injuries and patients with Outerbridge degenerative changes of grade 3 or greater were excluded, yielding 159 patients and 621 patients in the 2 groups, respectively. The medial meniscus (MM) and lateral meniscus (LM) examined by MRI and arthroscopy for findings of tears were compared in each group. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for MM and LM tears by MRI were compared and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The diagnostic sensitivity of MRI in the group with ACL injury was significantly lower than that in the ACL-intact group for the MM (P < .001) and LM (P = .040). The negative predictive value was also lower in the group with ACL injury for both the MM (P = .008) and LM (P < .001). There was no statistical difference in specificity and positive predictive value between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that if a patient had an acute ACL tear, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of MRI for a meniscal tear were less than if there was no ACL tear, which led to the low diagnostic accuracy of MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Meniscal injury after adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injury: how long are patients at risk?

BACKGROUND

Delay of as much as 5 months between ACL injury and surgery is known to be associated with increased risk of a medial meniscal tear, but the risk of additional meniscal tear progression with a longer delay to surgery is unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined the (1) times of injury, MRI, and surgery in adolescents with ACL tears, and whether (2) timing of surgery, or (3) initial integrity of the meniscus seen on MR images predicted development of meniscal tears.

METHODS

We reviewed 112 adolescents who were 15 ± 1 years old (mean ± SD) (range, 11-16 years) with a torn ACL. These patients underwent surgical repair from 2005 to 2011 in a Canadian city. We compared dates of injury, MRI, and surgery. A pediatric and musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologist reread the MR images, and meniscal injuries were graded according to severity. This was compared with surgical findings described in the operative report.

RESULTS

Time after injury to MRI and surgery averaged 77 days (range, 1-377 days) and 342 days (range, 42-1637 days), respectively. Patients with new or worsened medial meniscal tears had waited longer for surgery (445 versus 290 days; p = 0.002). Bucket handle medial meniscal tears were more common in patients with surgery more than 1 year after injury than others (15 of 34 versus 14 of 75; p = 0.013). A medial meniscal tear observed on MR images was a significant covariate for a torn meniscus at surgery (relative risk, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.8-11.6). Medial meniscal survival continued to decline sharply greater than 1 year after injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Medial meniscal tears, especially bucket handle tears, increased steadily in frequency more than 1 year after ACL injury. Timely ACL reconstruction may be warranted to reduce the risk of further medial meniscal damage even in patients whose original injury occurred more than 1 year before.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee

Context:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) affords high-resolution visualization of the soft tissue structures (menisci, ligaments, cartilage, etc) and bone marrow of the knee.

Evidence Acquisition:

Pertinent clinical and research articles in the orthopaedic and radiology literature over the past 30 years using PubMed.

Results:

Ligament tears can be accurately assessed with MRI, but distinguishing partial tears from ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be challenging. Determining the extent of a partial tear is often extremely difficult to accurately assess. The status of the posterolateral corner structures, menisci, and cartilage can be accurately evaluated, although limitations in the evaluation of certain structures exist. Patellofemoral joint, marrow, tibiofibular joint, and synovial pathology can supplement physical examination findings and provide definitive diagnosis.

Conclusions:

MRI provides an accurate noninvasive assessment of knee pathology.

Correlation of clinical examination, ultrasound sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings with arthroscopic findings in relation to acute and chronic lateral meniscus injuries

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound sonography (USS) performed by orthopedic surgeons is a reliable method of investigating lateral meniscus (LM) knee lesions as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and arthroscopy, which is the gold standard in clinical practice.

METHODS

In total, 107 patients were involved in this study. They were hospitalized for arthroscopy due to LM injury of the knee. Clinical examination (McMurray's, Apley's, and joint line tenderness tests), USS, and MRI were performed prior to arthroscopy. We compared the results of clinical examination, USS, and MRI with the arthroscopic findings for the knee, which were considered the reference values.

RESULTS

McMurray's clinical test, which is the most sensitive method of detecting lateral meniscus lesions, gave the same sensitivity rate for both acute and chronic LM injuries: 65%. USS was observed to be more sensitive and specific for chronic LM injuries (85 and 90%, respectively) than for acute LM injuries (71 and 87%). MRI also yielded higher values of sensitivity and specificity for chronic lateral meniscus injuries (75 and 95%, respectively) than for acute LM injuries (68 and 87%).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of ultrasound examination is demonstrated by the high reliability of this method in the diagnosis of lateral meniscus lesions of the knee, and the evaluation performed in this study showed that ultrasound is a useful clinical tool for diagnosing knee pathology.

Magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic appearance of the menisci of the knee

The menisci are critical for normal function of the knee, providing shock absorption and load transmission that reduce stress on the articular cartilage. When torn, a meniscus may require surgery to restore function, reduce pain, and eliminate mechanical symptoms. Patterns of meniscal tears include longitudinal and bucket-handle, which are often reparable; and horizontal, radial, vertical flap, horizontal flap, and complex. Root tears are usually radial and occur in the posterior roots. When reviewing magnetic resonance images, one must be aware of normal variants and imaging pitfalls that may simulate pathology.

Spectrum of injuries associated with paediatric ACL tears: an MRI pictorial review

OBJECTIVE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are well known, but most published reviews show obvious examples of associated injuries and give little focus to paediatric patients. Here, we demonstrate the spectrum of MRI appearances at common sites of associated injury in adolescents with ACL tears, emphasising age-specific issues.

METHODS

Pictorial review using images from children with surgically confirmed ACL tears after athletic injury.

RESULTS

ACL injury usually occurs with axial rotation in the valgus near full extension. The MRI findings can be obvious and important to management (ACL rupture), subtle but clinically important (lateral meniscus posterior attachment avulsion), obvious and unimportant to management (femoral condyle impaction injury), or subtle and possibly important (medial meniscocapsular junction tear). Paediatric-specific issues of note include tibial spine avulsion, normal difficulty visualising a thin ACL and posterolateral corner structures, and differentiation between incompletely closed physis and impaction fracture.

CONCLUSION

ACL tear is only the most obvious sign of a complex injury involving multiple structures. Awareness of the spectrum of secondary findings illustrated here and the features distinguishing them from normal variation can aid in accurate assessment of ACL tears and related injuries, enabling effective treatment planning and assessment of prognosis.

TEACHING POINTS

• The ACL in children normally appears thin or attenuated, while thickening and oedema suggest tear. • Displaced medial meniscal tears are significantly more common later post-injury than immediately. • The meniscofemoral ligaments merge with the posterior lateral meniscus, complicating tear assessment. • Tibial plateau impaction fractures can be difficult to distinguish from a partially closed physis. • Axial MR sequences are more sensitive/specific than coronal for diagnosis of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury.

Coronal oblique imaging of the knee: can it increase radiologists' confidence in diagnosing posterior root meniscal tears?

AIM

To investigate the utility of the coronal oblique sequence in the interrogation of posterior root meniscal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following international review board approval, 62 consecutive knee arthroscopy cases were referred to the musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists from the same orthopaedic surgeon for imaging/surgical correlation of the posterior meniscal roots. Of 62 cases, 45 lateral and 46 medial menisci met the inclusion criteria. Imaging evaluation was performed with standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, including a coronal oblique proton density sequence. Two blinded fellowship-trained MSK radiologists independently evaluated the menisci on standard sequences indicating whether a tear was identified and then specifying a confidence score using a scale of 1-3 on each study interpreted. Immediately thereafter, the coronal oblique sequence was evaluated using the same method. Statistics were performed on meniscal lesions involving the posterior horn/root junction or isolated root tears comparing confidence scores.

RESULTS

Reader A identified nine posterior horn/root junction tears and 14 isolated root tears. Following the addition of the coronal oblique sequence, confidence scores increased in three of 14 (21.4%) isolated root tears. All three final reads were concordant with arthroscopy. Reader B identified 10 posterior horn/root junction tears and 19 isolated root tears. The confidence score increased in six cases: five of 19 (26.3%) isolated root tears and one of 10 (10%) posterior horn/root junction tears. All six final reads were concordant with arthroscopy. Kappa coefficients indicated near perfect agreement.

CONCLUSION

The coronal oblique sequence increased reader confidence in nearly 24% of the posterior root cases identified in this series.

How I diagnose meniscal tears on knee MRI

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article is to summarize the literature about the diagnosis of meniscal tears on MRI including the normal appearance of the meniscus and the appearance of the various types of meniscal tears. In addition, I discuss my experience with the causes of errors in the MR diagnosis of meniscal abnormalities and the nuances of meniscal abnormalities that can mimic a meniscal tear.

CONCLUSION

MRI is a highly accurate imaging method for diagnosing meniscal tears. To avoid errors in diagnosing meniscal tears, those interpreting MR examinations of the knee need to be aware of the attachments of the menisci and the normal variations in meniscal anatomy that may resemble a meniscal tear. In addition, by being aware of the patterns of meniscal tears, it is easier to diagnose the less common tears.

Snapping knee caused by a popliteomeniscal fascicle tear of the lateral meniscus in a professional Taekwondo athlete

A 19-year-old male professional Taekwondo athlete presented with a 2-year history of pain-free snapping of his right knee. He reported that his right knee joint gave way during games and training and that he could induce pain-free snapping between the proximal-to-fibular head and the lateral knee joint line. None of these physical findings suggested a meniscal pathology or ligamentous instability. Routine radiographs were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging of his right knee joint showed that the shape of the lateral meniscus was normal, and no lateral meniscus tears existed. On arthroscopic examination, popliteal hiatus view showed a posterosuperior popliteomeniscal fascicle tear between the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus and the posterior joint capsule just posteromedial to the popliteus tendon. With medial traction by probing, this popliteomeniscal tear made visible the significant subluxation of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus to the center or anterior half of the tibial plateau. Based on the diagnosis of a posterosuperior popliteomeniscal tear of the right knee, Fast-Fix (Smith & Nephew, Andover, Massachusetts) was used for the direct repair of the peripheral portion of the lateral meniscus and joint capsule, targeting the popliteomeniscal junction. At 24 months postoperatively, the patient was performing athletic exercises relevant to his profession and was taking part in Taekwondo games, with no pain or recurrence of snapping. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of snapping of the lateral aspect of the knee due to a popliteomeniscal fascicle tear.

Imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an important structure in maintaining the normal biomechanics of the knee and is the most commonly injured knee ligament. However, the oblique course of the ACL within the intercondylar fossa limits the visualization and assessment of the pathology of the ligament. This pictorial essay provides a comprehensive and illustrative review of the anatomy and biomechanics as well as updated information on different modalities of radiological investigation of ACL, particularly magnetic resonance imaging.

Chronic anterior cruciate ligament tears and associated meniscal and traumatic cartilage lesions: evaluation with morphological sequences at 3.0 T

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of morphological sequences at 3.0 T MR imaging in detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), meniscal pathology and traumatic cartilage legions in young patients with chronic deficient anterior cruciate ligament knees.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective study included 43 patients (39 male) between the age of 15 and 37 years (mean age 22.6 years) with a history of knee injury sustained at least 3 months prior to the decision to repair a torn ACL. All patients underwent a 3.0 T MR scan with the same standard protocol, including intermediate-weighted and three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled T1-weighted sequences with fat saturation and subsequently surgical reconstruction of the ACL, along with meniscal and cartilage repair, when necessary.

RESULTS

All ACL tears were correctly interpreted by 3.0 T MR images. The sensitivity of the MR scans regarding tears of the medial meniscus was 93.7%, the specificity 92.6%, the positive predictive value 88.2% and the negative predictive value 95.8%. The sensitivity of the MR scans regarding tears of lateral meniscus was 85.7%, the specificity was 93.1%, the positive predictive value 85.7% and the negative predictive value 93.1%. With regard to the grading of the cartilage lesions, Cohen's kappa coefficient indicated moderate agreement for grade I and II cartilage lesions (0.5), substantial agreement for grade III and IV cartilage lesions (0.70 and 0.66) and substantial agreement for normal regions (0.75). Regarding location of the cartilage lesions, Cohen's kappa coefficient varied between almost perfect agreement in the lateral femoral condyle and no agreement in the trochlea.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of chronic ACL deficiency, MR imaging at 3.0 T achieves satisfactory diagnostic performance regarding meniscal and ligamentous pathology. In the detection of cartilage lesions MRI is less successful.

Knee and leg injuries

The knee plays a significant role in ambulation and the activities of daily living. During the course of these activities and its role in weight bearing, the knee is susceptible to a variety of different forces and the emergency physician should be familiar with the diagnosis and treatment of the injuries that result. In addition to following basic trauma protocols, thorough neurovascular and musculoskeletal examinations should be performed and supplemented with appropriate imaging. Emergency physicians should also consider recent developments in knee anatomy and function when evaluating the patient with an acutely injured knee.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the meniscus

Magnetic resonance imaging has evolved into a highly accurate modality in detecting meniscal injuries and provides the essential anatomic detail to help guide treatment options in this age of meniscal preservation. Accurate interpretation requires a thorough understanding of meniscal anatomy and function, anatomic variants, technical factors, typical appearance of tear patterns on magnetic resonance imaging, associated ligamentous injuries, causes of misdiagnoses, and the importance of correlation with the clinical examination.