Does Deep Learning Reconstruction Improve Ureteral Stone Detection and Subjective Image Quality in the CT Images of Patients with Metal Hardware?

Introduction: Diagnosing ureteral stones with low-dose CT in patients with metal hardware can be challenging because of image noise. The purpose of this study was to compare ureteral stone detection and image quality of low-dose and conventional CT scans with and without deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and metal artifact reduction (MAR) in the presence of metal hip prostheses. Methods: Ten urinary system combinations with 4 to 6 mm ureteral stones were implanted into a cadaver with bilateral hip prostheses. Each set was scanned under two different radiation doses (conventional dose [CD] = 115 mAs and ultra-low dose [ULD] = 6.0 mAs). Two scans were obtained for each dose as follows: one with and another without DLR and MAR. Two blinded radiologists ranked each image in terms of artifact, image noise, image sharpness, overall quality, and diagnostic confidence. Stone detection accuracy at each setting was calculated. Results: ULD with DLR and MAR improved subjective image quality in all five domains (p < 0.05) compared with ULD. In addition, the subjective image quality for ULD with DLR and MAR was greater than the subjective image quality for CD in all five domains (p < 0.05). Stone detection accuracy of ULD improved with the application of DLR and MAR (p < 0.05). Stone detection accuracy of ULD with DLR and MAR was similar to CD (p > 0.25). Conclusions: DLR with MAR may allow the application of low-dose CT protocols in patients with hip prostheses. Application of DLR and MAR to ULD provided a stone detection accuracy comparable with CD, reduced radiation exposure by 94.8%, and improved subjective image quality.

Advanced Imaging of Total Knee Arthroplasty

The prevalence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing with the aging population. Although long-term results are satisfactory, suspected postoperative complications often require imaging with the implant in place. Advancements in computed tomography (CT), such as tin prefiltration, metal artifact reduction algorithms, dual-energy CT with virtual monoenergetic imaging postprocessing, and the application of cone-beam CT and photon-counting detector CT, allow a better depiction of the tissues adjacent to the metal. For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), high bandwidth (BW) optimization, the combination of view angle tilting and high BW, as well as multispectral imaging techniques with multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination or slice encoding metal artifact correction, have significantly improved imaging around metal implants, turning MRI into a useful clinical tool for patients with suspected TKA complications.

Improving the quality of computed tomography brain images in the presence of cochlear implant induced metal artefacts through the additional use of tissue mimicking materials alongside metal artefact reduction software

INTRODUCTION

Metal artefact reduction software (MAR) can be used to improve Computed Tomography (CT) image quality in the presence of implanted metalwork; however, this software is not effective for superficial metallic structures such as cochlear implants (CI). This study aimed to investigate whether the effectiveness of MAR software could be improved for brain scans with CI present through the use of tissue mimicking materials (TMM) placed exteriorly to the implant.

METHODS

In this two-part study, a CI was positioned on the surface of water and anthropomorphic phantoms and imaged using a helical CT brain protocol. Three TMM, Superflab, Sure Thermal heat packs, and Bart's Bolus, were utilised and images were acquired to assess the resulting artefact reduction in terms of CT numbers, noise and artefact index (Aind). Changes in CTDIvol were assessed for the anthropomorphic phantom scans.

RESULTS

In the water phantom, statistically significant reductions in CT number (p = 0.038) and noise (p = 0.033) were observed for Superflab, whilst the heat packs produced similar significant reductions in CT number (p < 0.001) and noise (p = 0.001) for the anthropomorphic phantom images. Aind values were significantly reduced through the use of Superflab (p = 0.009) and the heat packs (p < 0.001). No significant effects were observed for Bart's Bolus. CTDIvol increases of generally less than 5% were observed for scans with TMM in place.

CONCLUSION

The additional use of TMM alongside MAR software yielded statistically significant reductions in CI induced metal artefacts on both water and anthropomorphic phantom scans with minimal dose increases.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The extent of metal artefacts in clinical head scans with CI in place could be significantly reduced through combined use of TMM and MAR software, consequently providing greater diagnostic confidence in the images.

Addressing CT metal artifacts using photon-counting detectors and one-step spectral CT image reconstruction

PURPOSE

The constrained one-step spectral CT image reconstruction (cOSSCIR) algorithm with a nonconvex alternating direction method of multipliers optimizer is proposed for addressing computed tomography (CT) metal artifacts caused by beam hardening, noise, and photon starvation. The quantitative performance of cOSSCIR is investigated through a series of photon-counting CT simulations.

METHODS

cOSSCIR directly estimates basis material maps from photon-counting data using a physics-based forward model that accounts for beam hardening. The cOSSCIR optimization framework places constraints on the basis maps, which we hypothesize will stabilize the decomposition and reduce streaks caused by noise and photon starvation. Another advantage of cOSSCIR is that the spectral data need not be registered, so that a ray can be used even if some energy window measurements are unavailable. Photon-counting CT acquisitions of a virtual pelvic phantom with low-contrast soft tissue texture and bilateral hip prostheses were simulated. Bone and water basis maps were estimated using the cOSSCIR algorithm and combined to form a virtual monoenergetic image for the evaluation of metal artifacts. The cOSSCIR images were compared to a "two-step" decomposition approach that first estimated basis sinograms using a maximum likelihood algorithm and then reconstructed basis maps using an iterative total variation constrained least-squares optimization (MLE+TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ ). Images were also compared to a nonspectral TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ reconstruction of the total number of counts detected for each ray with and without normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) applied. The simulated metal density was increased to investigate the effects of increasing photon starvation. The quantitative error and standard deviation in regions of the phantom were compared across the investigated algorithms. The ability of cOSSCIR to reproduce the soft-tissue texture, while reducing metal artifacts, was quantitatively evaluated.

RESULTS

Noiseless simulations demonstrated the convergence of the cOSSCIR and MLE+TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ algorithms to the correct basis maps in the presence of beam-hardening effects. When noise was simulated, cOSSCIR demonstrated a quantitative error of -1 HU, compared to 2 HU error for the MLE+TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ algorithm and -154 HU error for the nonspectral TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ +NMAR algorithm. For the cOSSCIR algorithm, the standard deviation in the central iodine region of interest was 20 HU, compared to 299 HU for the MLE+TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ algorithm, 41 HU for the MLE+TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ +Mask algorithm that excluded rays through metal, and 55 HU for the nonspectral TVmin $_{\text{min}}$ +NMAR algorithm. Increasing levels of photon starvation did not impact the bias or standard deviation of the cOSSCIR images. cOSSCIR was able to reproduce the soft-tissue texture when an appropriate regularization constraint value was selected.

CONCLUSIONS

By directly inverting photon-counting CT data into basis maps using an accurate physics-based forward model and a constrained optimization algorithm, cOSSCIR avoids metal artifacts due to beam hardening, noise, and photon starvation. The cOSSCIR algorithm demonstrated improved stability and accuracy compared to a two-step method of decomposition followed by reconstruction.

End-to-End Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction for Metal Artifact Reduction

Metal artifacts are common in CT-guided interventions due to the presence of metallic instruments. These artifacts often obscure clinically relevant structures, which can complicate the intervention. In this work, we present a deep learning CT reconstruction called iCTU-Net for the reduction of metal artifacts. The network emulates the filtering and back projection steps of the classical filtered back projection (FBP). A U-Net is used as post-processing to refine the back projected image. The reconstruction is trained end-to-end, i.e., the inputs of the iCTU-Net are sinograms and the outputs are reconstructed images. The network does not require a predefined back projection operator or the exact X-ray beam geometry. Supervised training is performed on simulated interventional data of the abdomen. For projection data exhibiting severe artifacts, the iCTU-Net achieved reconstructions with SSIM = 0.970±0.009 and PSNR = 40.7±1.6. The best reference method, an image based post-processing network, only achieved SSIM = 0.944±0.024 and PSNR = 39.8±1.9. Since the whole reconstruction process is learned, the network was able to fully utilize the raw data, which benefited from the removal of metal artifacts. The proposed method was the only studied method that could eliminate the metal streak artifacts.

Low-Dose MDCT of Patients With Spinal Instrumentation Using Sparse Sampling: Impact on Metal Artifacts

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate simulated sparse-sampled MDCT combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) for low-dose imaging of patients with spinal instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-eight patients with implanted hardware after spinal instrumentation (24 patients with short- or long-term instrumentation-related complications [i.e., adjacent segment disease, screw loosening or implant failure, or postoperative hematoma or seroma] and 14 control subjects with no complications) underwent MDCT. Scans were simulated as if they were performed with 50% (P50), 25% (P25), 10% (P10), and 5% (P5) of the projections of the original acquisition using an in-house-developed SIR algorithm for advanced image reconstructions. Two readers performed qualitative image evaluations of overall image quality and artifacts, image contrast, inspection of the spinal canal, and diagnostic confidence (1 = high, 2 = medium, and 3 = low confidence). RESULTS. Although overall image quality decreased and artifacts increased with reductions in the number of projections, all complications were detected by both readers when 100% of the projections of the original acquisition (P100), P50, and P25 imaging data were used. For P25 data, diagnostic confidence was still high (mean score ± SD: reader 1, 1.2 ± 0.4; reader 2, 1.3 ± 0.5), and interreader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (weighted Cohen κ = 0.787-0.855). The mean volumetric CT dose index was 3.2 mGy for P25 data in comparison with 12.6 mGy for the original acquisition (P100 data). CONCLUSION. The use of sparse sampling and SIR for low-dose MDCT in patients with spinal instrumentation facilitated considerable reductions in radiation exposure. The use of P25 data with SIR resulted in no missed complications related to spinal instrumentation and allowed high diagnostic confidence, so using only 25% of the projections is probably enough for accurate and confident diagnostic detection of major instrumentation-related complications.

Clinical evaluation of a new adaptive iterative metal artifact reduction method in whole-body low-dose CT skeletal survey examinations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a new adaptive iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (AiMAR) in whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) skeletal survey examinations.

METHODS

Projection data were retrospectively obtained from 25 clinical WBLDCT skeletal survey patients, each with two types of metal implants. Images were reconstructed with bone and soft tissue kernels using four settings-original and AiMAR with strengths of 2, 4, and 5. All images were anonymized and randomized for a reader study, where three musculoskeletal radiologists independently determined the overall ranking of all series based on diagnostic quality, and local scoring of metal artifact and anatomy visualization for each implant. Quantitative image noise analysis was performed in areas close to the implants. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Krippendorff's alpha were computed for inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

AiMAR 4 was ranked the highest for 64.3% of the series across eight types of implants. For local scoring task, AiMAR 4 showed better metal artifact and anatomy visualization than the original and AiMAR 2. AiMAR 4 was comparable in anatomy visualization but inferior to AiMAR 5 in metal artifact scores. AiMAR 4 led to 56.3% noise reduction around the implant areas compared with the original images, and AiMAR 5 68.1% but also resulted in anatomy blurring in 40% of the implants. ICC and Krippendorff's alpha revealed at least substantial reliability in the local scores among the readers.

CONCLUSIONS

AiMAR was evaluated in WBLDCT skeletal surveys. AiMAR 4 demonstrated the highest overall quality ranking and improved local scores with noise reduction around implant areas.

Improvement of image quality and diagnostic confidence using Smart MAR - a projection-based CT protocol in patients with orthopedic metallic implants in hip, spine, and shoulder

BACKGROUND

In computed tomography (CT) scans, artifacts caused by metallic orthopedic implants still hamper the visualization of important, periprosthetic tissues. Smart MAR metal artifact reduction tool is a promising three-stage, projection-based, post-processing algorithm.

PURPOSE

To determine whether the Smart MAR tool improves subjective and objective image quality and diagnostic confidence in patients with orthopedic implants of the hip, spine, and shoulder.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-two patients with orthopedic screws, hip/shoulder replacement, or spine spondylodesis were included. CT scans were performed on a single-source multislice CT scanner, raw data were post-processed using Smart MAR. Image quality was evaluated both quantitatively (ROI-based) and qualitatively (rater-based) and compared to iterative reconstructions (ASIR V). As comparative standard for artificial prosthetic breaks or loosening, follow-up examinations were used.

RESULTS

Smart MAR reconstructions of the hip (n = 23), spine (n = 26), and shoulder (n = 23) showed a significantly reduced attenuation and noise of regions adjacent to metallic implants (P<0.002). Subjective image quality (P<0.005, shoulder P = 0.038/P = 0.046) and overall diagnostic confidence were higher in Smart MAR (all regions P<0.002). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; P = 0.72/P = 0.96) was not improved. Compared to standard ASIR V new, artificial metal extinctions (up to 50%) or periprosthetic hem lines (48%-73%) were introduced by Smart MAR.

CONCLUSION

Smart MAR improved image quality of the hip, spine, and shoulder CT scans resulting in higher diagnostic confidence in evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissues. As shown for spine implants, it should be used with caution and as a complementary tool for evaluation of periprosthetic loosening or integrity of metal implant, as in many cases it introduced new artifacts.

Combination of dual-energy computed tomography and iterative metal artefact reduction to increase general quality of imaging for radiotherapy patients with high dense materials. Phantom study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the use of pseudo-monoenergetic reconstructions (PMR) from dual-energy computed tomography, combined with the iterative metal artefact reduction (iMAR) method.

METHODS

Pseudo-monoenergetic CT images were obtained using the dual-energy mode on the Siemens Somatom Definition AS scanner. A range of PMR combinations (70-130 keV) were used with and without iMAR. A Virtual Water™ phantom was used for quantitative assessment of error in the presence of high density materials: titanium, alloys 330 and 600. The absolute values of CT number differences (AD) and normalised standard deviations (NSD) were calculated for different phantom positions. Image quality was assessed using an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom with an embedded hip prosthesis. Image quality was scored blindly by five observers.

RESULTS

AD and NSD values revealed differences in CT number errors between tested sets. AD and NSD were reduced in the vicinity of metal for images with iMAR (p < 0.001 for AD/NSD). For ROIs away from metal, with and without iMAR, 70 keV PMR and pCT AD values were lower than for the other reconstructions (p = 0.039). Similarly, iMAR NSD values measured away from metal were lower for 130 keV and 70 keV PMR (p = 0.002). Image quality scores were higher for 70 keV and 130 keV PMR with iMAR (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The use of 70 keV PMR with iMAR allows for significant metal artefact reduction and low CT number errors observed in the vicinity of dense materials. It is therefore an attractive alternative to high keV imaging when imaging patients with metallic implants, especially in the context of radiotherapy planning.

Metal artifact reduction of orthopedics metal artifact reduction algorithm in total hip and knee arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to investigate metal artifact reduction effect of orthopedics metal artifact reduction (O-Mar) algorithm in computer tomography (CT) image of patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).35 cases of patients who underwent TKA or THA have been recruited in this study. CT image of hip or knee joint was obtained with Philips 256-row CT scanner. Tube voltages of 120 and 140 kilovolt peak (KVP) were set. Afterwards, CT image was reconstructed by O-Mar algorithm to reduce metal artifact. Grade of image quality and severity of metal artifact would be taken into qualitative evaluation. While, quantitative evaluation mainly included measurement of metal artifact volume and 2D measurement of average CT value in region of interest (ROI). The visibility of interface between bone-prostheses was also estimated.Result of qualitative analysis indicated that score of CT quality was improved and grade of metal artifact was decreased significantly with O-Mar. Quantitative analysis illustrated that volume of beam-hardening (B-H) metal artifact decreased remarkably after reconstruction of O-Mar (P < .001). In addition, O-Mar algorithm reduced 83.3% to 83.7% volume of photon-starvation (P-S) metal artifact. As for result of 2D measurement, CT value in ROI was closer to standard value in O-Mar group CT image (P < .001). Meanwhile, error of CT value also decreased significantly after reconstruction of O-Mar algorithm. Visibility rate of bone-prosthesis interface improved from 34.3% (Non-O-Mar) to 66.7% (O-Mar).O-Mar algorithm could significantly reduce metal artifact in CT image of THA and TKA in both 2D and three-dimensional (3D) level. Therefore, better image quality and visibility of bone-prostheses interface could be presented. In this study, O-Mar was proved as an efficient metal artifact reduction method in CT image of THA and TKA.

Evaluation of geometrical uncertainties on localized prostate radiotherapy of patients with bilateral metallic hip prostheses using 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT: A planning study

OBJECTIVE

Since most radiation treatment plans are based on computed tomography (CT) images, which makes it difficult to define the targeted tumor volume located near a metal implant, this study aims to evaluate and compare three treatment plans in order to optimally reduce geometrical uncertainty in external radiation treatment of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Experimental subjects were three prostate patients with bilateral hip prosthesis who had undergone radical radiotherapy. The treatment plans were five-field three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), fixed 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using similar gantry angles, and single-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The monitor units (MUs), dose volume histograms (DVHs), the dose indices of planning target volume (PTV), clinical target volume (CTV) and rectum were compared among the three techniques. The geometrical uncertainties were evaluated by shifting the iso-center (2- 10 mm in the anterior, posterior, left, right, superior, and inferior directions). The CTV and rectum dose indexes with and without the iso-center shifts were compared in each plan.

RESULTS

The Conformity Index of PTV were 1.35 in 3D-CRT, 1.12 in IMRT, and 1.04 in VMAT, respectively. The rectum doses in 3D-CRT are also higher than those in IMRT and VMAT. The iso-center shift little affected the CTV dose when smaller than the margin size. The rectum dose increased especially after a posterior shift. Additionally, this dose increase was larger in the VMAT plan than in the 3D- CRT plan. However, the VMAT achieved a superior rectum DVH to that of 3D- CRT, and this effect clearly exceeded the rectum-dose increase elicited by the iso-center shift.

CONCLUSION

For radiotherapy treatment of localized prostate cancer in patients with hip prosthesis, the dose distribution was better in the VMAT and Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR)-CT image methods than the conventional methods. Because the anatomical structure of the male pelvic region is relatively constant among individuals, we consider that VMAT is a valid treatment plan despite analyzing just three cases.

Application of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to CT Urography for Patients With Hip Prostheses

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the impact of iterative metal artifact reduction (IMAR) with iterative reconstruction (IR) on the image quality and diagnostic performance of CT urography in the evaluation of patients with hip prostheses, compared with IR alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS. CT urography examinations that were reconstructed using IR with and without IMAR were analyzed for 57 patients (29 women and 28 men; mean age, 74 years [range, 22-94 years]) with hip prostheses (40 unilateral and 17 bilateral). For quantitative analysis, image noise within the bladder was measured. Two radiologists (radiologist 1 [RAD1] and radiologist 2 [RAD2]) qualitatively evaluated the images using both a 5-point scale to assess the degree of visualization of artifacts and a 6-point scale to determine diagnostic confidence in visualization of the bladder, ureters, prostate or uterus, pelvic calcifications, and genitourinary abnormalities involving the bladder, distal ureters, prostate, uterus, and ovaries. RESULTS. The combination of IMAR and an IR technique provided improvement in quantitative and qualitative measurements (p < 0.05). Forty-three genitourinary abnormalities were detected in 29 patients. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons of scans obtained with and without the use of IMAR, respectively, revealed image noise of 99.6 versus 173.3 HU and the following radiologist scores: for improvement of artifacts, 3.2 versus 1.6 (for RAD1) and 3.1 versus 1.6 (for RAD2); for visualization of the bladder, 3.6 versus 1.5 (RAD1) and 3.8 versus 1.6 (RAD2); visualization of the ureters, 3.8 versus 1.6 (RAD1) and 3.9 versus 1.7 (RAD2); visualization of the uterus, 4.3 versus 2.8 (RAD1) and 4.3 versus 2.6 (RAD2); visualization of the prostate, 4.5 versus 2.3 (RAD1) and 4.5 versus 2.2 (RAD2); diagnostic confidence for calcifications, 4.7 versus 3.5 (RAD1) and 4.7 versus 3.3 (RAD2); and diagnostic confidence for genitourinary abnormalities, 5.0 versus 3.2 (RAD1) and 4.8 versus 2.9 (RAD2), respectively. CONCLUSION. The addition of IMAR to IR led to statistically significant improvement in the retrospective diagnostic performance and image quality of CT urography for patients with hip prostheses, compared with IR alone.

Orthopaedic metallic artefact reduction algorithm facilitates CT evaluation of the urinary tract after hip prosthesis

AIM

To examine the improvement in the visualisation of bladder and ureteric pathologies next to a hip prosthesis with metallic artefact reduction for orthopaedic implants (O-MAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent pelvic computed tomography (CT) for non-prosthesis-related causes were enrolled retrospectively. Portal venous phase scans were reconstructed both with standard iterative reconstruction (ITR) and with O-MAR. The density of the ureters and the bladder was measured at both sides in the plane of the prosthesis. A semi-quantitative score was also used to assess visibility. The R (version 3.4.1) package was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The average (μ) density of the 41 prosthesis side ureters was significantly lower on ITR images (μ=-94.76±150.48 [±SD] HU) than on O-MAR images (μ=-13.40±36.37 HU; p<0.0004). The difference between the ITR and O-MAR (μ=-138.62±182.64 versus -35.55±40.21 HU; p<0.0003) was also significant at the prosthesis side of the bladder. The visibility of the prosthesis side ureters was improved: 53.7% was obscured on ITR series compared to 4.9% on O-MAR. The visibility score was also better across all levels (p<0.001) with O-MAR. In four cases (13%), the O-MAR images significantly changed the diagnosis: in two cases ureteric stones, in one case each a bladder stone and a bladder tumour were discovered.

CONCLUSIONS

O-MAR reconstruction of CT images significantly improves the visibility of the urinary tract adjacent to metallic hip implants. Thus, O-MAR is essential for detecting ureteric and bladder pathologies in patients with a hip prosthesis.

Metallic dental artifact reduction in computed tomography (Smart MAR): Improvement of image quality and diagnostic confidence in patients with suspected head and neck pathology and oral implants

PURPOSE

We determined whether the Smart MAR metal artifact reduction tool - a three-stage, projection-based, post processing algorithm - improves subjective and objective image quality and diagnostic confidence in patients with dental artifacts and suspected head and neck pathology compared to standard adaptive statistical iterative reconstructions (ASIR V) alone.

METHOD

The study included 100 consecutive patients with nonremovable oral implants or dental fillings and suspected oropharyngeal cancer or abscess. CT raw data of a single-source multislice CT scanner were postprocessed using ASIR V alone and with additional Smart MAR reconstruction. Image quality of baseline ASIR V and Smart MAR-based reconstruction series was compared both quantitatively (5 regions of interest, ROIs) and qualitatively (two independent raters).

RESULTS

Additional Smart MAR reconstruction significantly seems to improve both attenuation and noise adjacent to implants and in more distant areas (all p < 0.001) compared to standard ASIR V reconstructions alone. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; p = 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio were improved significantly (CNR; p = 0.001). Smart MAR improved visualization of tumor/abscess (detected in 36 of 100 patients, 36%) and representative oropharyngeal tissue (p < 0.001). In 8 of 36 patients (22%), tumor was only detected in Smart MAR series. Mean total DLP was 506.8mGy*cm; average CTDIvol was 5.5 mGy.

CONCLUSIONS

The supplementary use of the Smart MAR post-processing tool seems to significantly improve both subjective and objective image quality as well as diagnostic confidence and lesion detection in CT of the head and neck. In 22% of cases, the tumor was detected only in Smart MAR reconstructed images.

Metal artifact reduction techniques for single energy CT and dual-energy CT with various metal materials

Objective:

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of reduction metal artifacts using kV-CT image with the single-energy based metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) technique by single-energy reconstruction, monochromatic CT and rED reconstructed by dual-energy reconstruction.

Methods:

Seven different metal materials (brass, aluminum, copper, stainless, steel, lead and titanium) were placed inside the water-based PMMA phantom. After DECT-based scan, the artefact index (AI) were evaluated with the kV-CT images with and without SEMAR by single-energy reconstruction, and raw-data based electron density (rED), monochromatic CT images by dual-energy reconstruction. Moreover, the AI with evaluated with rED and the converted ED images from the kV-CT and monochromatic CT images.

Results:

The minimum average value of the AI with all-metal inserts was approximately 80 keV. The AI without SEMAR was larger than that with SEMAR for the 80 kV and 135 kV CT images. In the comparison of the AI for the rED and ED images that were converted from 80 kV and 135 kV CT images with and without SEMAR, the monochromatic CT images of the PMMA phantom with inserted metal materials at 80 keV revealed that the kV-CT with SEMAR reduced the metal artefact substantially.

Conclusion:

The converted ED from the kV-CT and monochromatic CT images could be useful for a comparison of the AI using the same contrast scale. The kV-CT image with SEMAR by single-energy reconstruction was found to substantially reduce metal artefact.

Advances in knowledge:

The effectiveness of reduction of metal artifacts using single-energy based metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) technique and dual-energy CT (DECT) was evaluated the electron density conversion techniques.

Orthopedic metallic hardware in routine abdomino-pelvic CT scans: occurrence and clinical significance

PURPOSE

To study the occurrence of orthopedic metallic hardware in routine abdomen/pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans and their impact on image quality (IQ) and diagnostic evaluation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective single institution study, we analyzed 3500 consecutive abdomen/pelvis CT scans for occurrence of orthopedic metallic hardware. In the cohort of patients with metallic hardware detected on CT scans, subjective and objective IQ analysis was performed to estimate diagnostic acceptability (DA, 4-point scale), subjective noise (SN, 3-point scale), presence of artifacts (PA, 4-point scale) and objective noise. The clinical significance of metallic hardware was determined by evaluating the impact of artifacts on radiological diagnosis according to the clinical indication and disease type.

RESULTS

Orthopedic metallic hardware was encountered in 4.97% of abdomino-pelvic CT scans (n = 174/3500), and artifacts related to the hardware in the region of clinical interest were identified in 82% (n = 144/174) of scans. The overall mean DA was 2.66 (n = 174), and it was severely limited (score < 2) in 32% of cases particularly affecting patients with bilateral hip implants (92.6%, n = 25/27). The artifacts due to hardware significantly limited diagnostic evaluation in 58.6% of cases (PA score ≥ 3), and the image noise was unacceptable in 71% of cases (SN score > 2) in the region of clinical interest.

CONCLUSION

Orthopedic metallic hardware is encountered in nearly 5% of abdomino-pelvic CT scans and causes significant image degradation limiting diagnostic evaluation in the region of clinical interest.

Combined application of virtual monoenergetic high keV images and the orthopedic metal artifact reduction algorithm (O-MAR): effect on image quality

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is any additional metal artifact reduction when virtual monochromatic images (VMI) and metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) are applied together compared to their separate application in both phantom and clinical abdominopelvic CT studies.

METHODS

An agar phantom containing a spinal prosthesis was scanned using a dual-layer, energy CT scanner (IQon, Philips Healthcare), and reconstructed with the filtered back-projection algorithm without O-MAR (FBP), filtered back-projection algorithm with O-MAR (O-MAR), VMI₁₄₀ without O-MAR (VMI₁₄₀), and VMI₁₄₀ with O-MAR (VMI₁₄₀ + O-MAR). Abdominopelvic CT images of 47 patients with metallic prostheses were also reconstructed in the same manner for clinical study. Noise measured as the standard deviation of CT Hounsfield units was compared between the four reconstruction methods in both phantom and clinical studies. Improvements in metal artifact reduction, image quality, and diagnostic improvement were further analyzed in the clinical study.

RESULTS

Noise was significantly decreased when both VMI and O-MAR were applied in conjunction compared to their separate application in both phantom (16.3 HU vs. 25.0 and 26.4 HU) and clinical studies (15.8 HU vs. 19.2 and 26.2 HU). In the clinical study, the qualitative degree of artifacts was also significantly reduced with VMI₁₄₀ + O-MAR (2.85 and 2.87) compared to VMI₁₄₀ (2.36 and 2.26) or O-MAR (2.13 and 2.04) alone for both reviewers (P < 0.001) and improvements in image quality were observed in all 47 patients, with actual diagnostic improvements observed in three.

CONCLUSIONS

Metal artifacts can be additionally reduced by applying O-MAR and VMI in conjunction, compared to their separate application, thereby improving diagnostic performance.

Metallic artifact reduction by evaluation of the additional value of iterative reconstruction algorithms in hip prosthesis computed tomography imaging

To evaluate iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) technique in images data of hip prosthesis on computed tomography (CT) and the added value of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) compared with standard filtered back projection (FBP).Twenty-eight patients addressed to CT examinations for hip prosthesis were included prospectively. Images were reconstructed with iMAR algorithm in addition to FBP and ADMIRE techniques. Measuring image noise assessed objective image quality and attenuation values with standardized region of interest (ROI) in 4 predefined anatomical structures (gluteus medius and rectus femoris muscles, inferior and anterior abdominal fat, and femoral vessels when contrast media was present). Subjective image quality was graded on a 5-point Likert scale, taking into account the size of artifacts, the metal-bone interface and the conspicuity of pelvic organs, and the diagnostic confidence.Improvement in overall image quality was statistically significant using iMAR (P<.001) compared with ADMIRE and FBP. ADMIRE did not show any impact in image noise, attenuation value, or global quality image. iMAR showed a significant decrease in image noise in all ROIs (Hounsfield Unit) as compared with FBP and ADMIRE. Interobserver agreement was high in all reconstructions (FBP, FBP+iMAR, ADMIRE, and ADMIRE + iMAR) more than 0.8. iMAR reconstructions showed emergence of new artifacts in bone-metal interface.iMAR algorithm allows a significant reduction of metal artifacts on CT images with unilateral or bilateral prostheses without additional value of ADMIRE. It improves the analysis of surrounding tissue but potentially generates new artifacts in bone-metal interface.

Feasibility of radiation dose reduction with iterative reconstruction in abdominopelvic CT for patients with inappropriate arm positioning

Background

The arms-down position increases computed tomography (CT) radiation dose. Iterative reconstruction (IR) could enhance image quality without increasing radiation dose in patients with arms-down position.

Aim

To investigate the feasibility of reduced-dose CT with IR for patients with inappropriate arm positioning

Methods

Twenty patients who underwent two-phase abdominopelvic CT including standard-dose and reduced-dose CT (performed with 80% of the radiation dose of the standard protocol) with their arms positioned in the abdominal area were included in this study. Reduced-dose CT images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid IR, and iterative model reconstruction (IMR). These images were compared with standard-dose CT images reconstructed with FBP. Objective image noise in the liver and subcutaneous fat was measured by standard deviation for the quantitative analysis. Then, two radiologists qualitatively assessed beam hardening artifacts, artificial texture, noise, sharpness, and overall image quality in consensus.

Results

Reduced-dose CT with all IR levels had lower objective image noise compared to standard-dose CT with FBP reconstruction (P < 0.05). Quantitatively measured beam hardening artifacts were similar in reduced-dose CT with iDose levels 5–6 and fewer with IMR compared to standard-dose CT. In the qualitative analysis, beam hardening artifacts and noise decreased as the IR levels increased. However, artificial texture was significantly aggravated with iDose 5–6 and IMR, and overall image quality significantly worsened with IMR.

Conclusions

IR algorithms can reduce beam hardening artifacts in a reduced-dose CT setting in patients with arms-down position, and an intermediate level of hybrid IR allows radiologists to obtain the best image quality. Because the retrospective and single-center nature of our study limited the number of patients, multicenter prospective clinical studies are required to validate our results.

Clinical Assessment of Metal Artifact Reduction Methods in Dual-Energy CT Examinations of Instrumented Spines

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of three metal artifact reduction methods in dual-energy CT (DECT) examinations of instrumented spines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with instrumented spines who underwent spine DECT were retrospectively identified. All scans were obtained on a dual-source 128-MDCT scanner. In addition to the original DE mixed images, DECT images were reconstructed using an iterative metal artifact reconstruction algorithm (DE iMAR), virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) algorithm (DE Mono+), and a combination of the two algorithms DE iMAR and DE Mono+, which we refer to here as "DE iMAR Mono+." The four image series were anonymized and randomized for a reader study. Four experienced neuroradiologists rated the images in terms of artifact scores of four anatomic regions and overall image quality scores in both bone and soft-tissue display window settings. In addition, a quantitative analysis was performed to assess the performance of the three metal artifact reduction methods.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in the artifact scores and overall image quality scores among the four methods (both, p < 0.001). DE iMAR Mono+ showed the best artifact scores and quality scores (all, p < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall image quality score was 0.779 using the bone display window and 0.892 using the soft-tissue display window (both, p < 0.001). In addition, DE iMAR Mono+ reduced the artifacts by the greatest amount in the quantitative analysis.

CONCLUSION

The method that used DE iMAR Mono+ showed the best performance of spine metal artifact reduction using DECT data. These results may be specific to this CT vendor and implant type.

Iterative algorithms for metal artifact reduction in children with orthopedic prostheses: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Increased computational power allows computed tomography (CT) software to process very advanced mathematical algorithms to generate better quality images at lower doses. One such algorithm, iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) has proven to decrease metal artifacts seen in CT images of adults with orthopedic implants.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate artifact reduction capability of the algorithm in lower-dose pediatric CT compared to our routine third-generation advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen children (11-17 years old) with metal implants underwent routine clinically indicated CT. Data sets were reconstructed with an iMAR algorithm. Hounsfield units and image noise were measured in bone, muscle and fat in the streak artifact (near the implant) and at the greatest distance from the artifact (far from the implant). A regression model compared the effects of the algorithm (standard ADMIRE vs. iMAR) near and far from the implant.

RESULTS

Near the implant, Hounsfield units with iMAR were significantly different in our standard ADMIRE vs. iMAR for bone, muscle and fat (P<0.001). Noise was significantly different in standard ADMIRE vs. iMAR in bone (P<0.003). Far from the implant, Hounsfield units and noise were not significantly different for ADMIRE vs. iMAR, for the three tissue types.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results demonstrate that iMAR algorithms improves Hounsfield units near the implant and decreases image noise in bone in low-dose pediatric CT. It does this without changing baseline tissue density or noise far from the implant.

Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants: Brain CT Angiography in Patients with Intracranial Metallic Implants

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the effects of a metal artifact reduction for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) for brain computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in patients with aneurysm clips and coils.

METHODS

The study included 36 consecutive patients with 47 intracranial metallic implants (42 aneurysm clips, 5 coils) who underwent brain CTA. The computed tomographic images with and without the O-MAR were independently reviewed both quantitatively and qualitatively by two reviewers. For quantitative analysis, image noises near the metallic implants of non-O-MAR and O-MAR images were compared. For qualitative analysis, image quality improvement and the presence of new streak artifacts were assessed.

RESULTS

Image noise was significantly reduced near metallic implants (P < 0.01). Improvement of implant-induced streak artifacts was observed in eight objects (17.0%). However, streak artifacts were aggravated in 11 objects (23.4%), and adjacent vessel depiction was worsened in eight objects (17.0%). In addition, new O-MAR-related streak artifacts were observed in 32 objects (68.1%). New streak artifacts were more prevalent in cases with overlapping metallic implants on the same axial plane than in those without (P = 0.018). Qualitative assessment revealed that the overall image quality was not significantly improved in O-MAR images.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the use of the O-MAR in patients with metallic implants significantly reduces image noise. However, the degree of the streak artifacts and surrounding vessel depiction were not significantly improved on O-MAR images.

Evaluation of projection- and dual-energy-based methods for metal artifact reduction in CT using a phantom study

Objectives

Both projection and dual‐energy (DE)‐based methods have been used for metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT. The two methods can also be combined. The purpose of this work was to evaluate these three MAR methods using phantom experiments for five types of metal implants.

Materials and Methods

Five phantoms representing spine, dental, hip, shoulder, and knee were constructed with metal implants. These phantoms were scanned using both single‐energy (SE) and DE protocols with matched radiation output. The SE data were processed using a projection‐based MAR (iMAR, Siemens) algorithm, while the DE data were processed to generate virtual monochromatic images at high keV (Mono+, Siemens). In addition, the DE images after iMAR were used to generate Mono+ images (DE iMAR Mono+). Artifacts were quantitatively evaluated using CT numbers at different regions of interest. Iodine contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was evaluated in the spine phantom. Three musculoskeletal radiologists and two neuro‐radiologists independently ranked the artifact reduction.

Results

The DE Mono+ at high keV resulted in reduced artifacts but also lower iodine CNR. The iMAR method alone caused missing tissue artifacts in dental phantom. DE iMAR Mono+ caused wrong CT numbers in close proximity to the metal prostheses in knee and hip phantoms. All musculoskeletal radiologists ranked SE iMAR > DE iMAR Mono+ > DE Mono+ for knee and hip, while DE iMAR Mono+ > SE iMAR > DE Mono+ for shoulder. Both neuro‐radiologists ranked DE iMAR Mono+ > DE Mono+ > SE iMAR for spine and DE Mono+ > DE iMAR Mono+ > SE iMAR for dental.

Conclusions

The SE iMAR was the best choice for the hip and knee prostheses, while DE Mono+ at high keV was best for dental implants and DE iMAR Mono+ was best for spine and shoulder prostheses. Artifacts were also introduced by MAR algorithms.

Evaluation of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction Application in Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction of Spinal Instrumentation: A Single Saudi Center Experience

Aim of the Study:

The aim of the study was to evaluate the commercially available orthopedic metal artifact reduction (OMAR) technique in postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) reconstruction studies after spinal instrumentation and to investigate its clinical application.

Materials and Methods:

One hundred and twenty (120) patients with spinal metallic implants were included in the study. All had 3DCT reconstruction examinations using the OMAR software after obtaining the informed consents and approval of the Institution Ethical Committee. The degree of the artifacts, the related muscular density, the clearness of intermuscular fat planes, and definition of the adjacent vertebrae were qualitatively evaluated. The diagnostic satisfaction and quality of the 3D reconstruction images were thoroughly assessed.

Results:

The majority (96.7%) of 3DCT reconstruction images performed were considered satisfactory to excellent for diagnosis. Only 3.3% of the reconstructed images had rendered unacceptable diagnostic quality.

Conclusion:

OMAR can effectively reduce metallic artifacts in patients with spinal instrumentation with highly diagnostic 3DCT reconstruction images.

Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants (O-MAR): Usefulness in CT Evaluation of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the metal artifact reduction algorithm for orthopedic implants (O-MAR) on CT image quality for patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), with emphasis placed on the evaluation of bone in the vicinity of prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients who underwent CT scanning after RTSA were enrolled in the study. Two radiologists analyzed the images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) with or without O-MAR processing. Images were evaluated to determine the degree of streaking artifacts, the confidence in depicting various structures around the prosthesis, and the presence of pseudolesions. The mean CT number and SD of the selected ROIs placed in the greater tuberosity, glenoid bone, and deltoid muscle were recorded. For measurements from the greater tuberosity and glenoid bone, the frequency with which the measurement met the typical CT number of bone was calculated.

RESULTS

O-MAR images showed less metal streak artifact and noise and provided better visualization of the axillary neurovascular bundle compared with FBP images, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001 for all). FBP images were found to be statistically significantly better than O-MAR images, offering better visualization of bone cortex, bone trabeculae, and the bone-prosthesis interface (p < 0.001 for all). Scapular pseudonotching was observed on 4.6% of FBP images and 36.9% of O-MAR images. The pseudocemented appearance was noted on 47.7% of O-MAR images but was not seen on FBP images.

CONCLUSION

The use of O-MAR improved CT image quality for patients with RTSA in the aspect of metal artifact reduction and soft-tissue profile. However, O-MAR tends to degrade depiction of the bone trabeculae and bone cortex and generate new artifacts, including a pseudocemented appearance and scapular pseudonotching.

Value and Clinical Application of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in CT Scans after Orthopedic Metal Implantation

Objective

To evaluate orthopedic metal artifact reduction algorithm (O-MAR) in CT orthopedic metal artifact reduction at different tube voltages, identify an appropriate low tube voltage for clinical practice, and investigate its clinical application.

Materials and Methods

The institutional ethical committee approved all the animal procedures. A stainless-steel plate and four screws were implanted into the femurs of three Japanese white rabbits. Preoperative CT was performed at 120 kVp without O-MAR reconstruction, and postoperative CT was performed at 80–140 kVp with O-MAR. Muscular CT attenuation, artifact index (AI) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared between preoperative and postoperative images (unpaired t test), between paired O-MAR and non-O-MAR images (paired Student t test) and among different kVp settings (repeated measures ANOVA). Artifacts' severity, muscular homogeneity, visibility of inter-muscular space and definition of bony structures were subjectively evaluated and compared (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). In the clinical study, 20 patients undertook CT scan at low kVp with O-MAR with informed consent. The diagnostic satisfaction of clinical images was subjectively assessed.

Results

Animal experiments showed that the use of O-MAR resulted in accurate CT attenuation, lower AI, better SNR, and higher subjective scores (p < 0.010) at all tube voltages. O-MAR images at 100 kVp had almost the same AI and SNR as non-O-MAR images at 140 kVp. All O-MAR images were scored ≥ 3. In addition, 95% of clinical CT images performed at 100 kVp were considered satisfactory.

Conclusion

O-MAR can effectively reduce orthopedic metal artifacts at different tube voltages, and facilitates low-tube-voltage CT for patients with orthopedic metal implants.

Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography After Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement Using Iterative Reconstructions

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) after deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode placement is limited due to artifacts induced by the metallic hardware, which can potentially mask intracranial postoperative complications. Different metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques have been introduced to reduce artifacts from metal hardware in CT. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a novel iterative MAR technique on image quality and diagnostic performance in the follow-up of patients with DBS electrode implementation surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients who had received routine intraoperative CT of the head after implantation of DBS electrodes between March 2015 and June 2015 were retrospectively included. Raw data of all patients were reconstructed with standard weighted filtered back projection (WFBP) and additionally with a novel iterative MAR algorithm. We quantified frequencies of density changes to assess quantitative artifact reduction. For evaluation of qualitative image quality, the visibility of numerous cerebral anatomic landmarks and the detectability of intracranial electrodes were scored according to a 4-point scale. Furthermore, artifact strength overall and adjacent to the electrodes was rated.

RESULTS

Our results of quantitative artifact reduction showed that images reconstructed with iterative MAR (iMAR) contained significantly lower metal artifacts (overall low frequency values, 1608.6 ± 545.5; range, 375.5-3417.2) compared with the WFBP (overall low frequency values, 4487.3 ± 875.4; range, 2218.3-5783.5) reconstructed images (P < 0.004). Qualitative image analysis showed a significantly improved image quality for iMAR (overall anatomical landmarks, 2.49 ± 0.15; median, 3; range, 0-3; overall electrode characteristics, 2.35 ± 0.16; median, 2; range, 0-3; artifact characteristics, 2.16 ± 0.08; median, 2.5; range, 0-3) compared with WFBP (overall anatomical landmarks, 1.21 ± 0.64; median, 1; range, 0-3; overall electrode characteristics, 0.74 ± 0.37; median, 1; range, 0-2; artifact characteristics, 0.51 ± 0.15; median, 0.5; range, 0-2; P < 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructions of cranial CT images with the novel iMAR algorithm in patients after DBS implantation allows an efficient reduction of metal artifacts near DBS electrodes compared with WFBP reconstructions. We demonstrated an improvement of quantitative and qualitative image quality of iMAR compared with WFBP in patients with DBS electrodes.

The value of spectral imaging to reduce artefacts in the body after 125 I seed implantation

INTRODUCTION

To explore the value of gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and metal artefact reduction sequence (MARs) to reduce the artefacts of metal seeds.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with ¹²⁵ I seed implantation in their abdomens underwent GSI CT. Six types of monochromatic images and the corresponding MARs images at 60-110 keV (interval of 10 keV) were reconstructed. The differences in the quality of the images of three imaging methods were subjectively assessed by three radiologists. Length of artefacts, the CT value and noise value of tissue adjacent to ¹²⁵ I seeds, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artefact index (AI) were recorded.

RESULTS

The differences in subjective scoring were statistically significant (t = 10.87, P < 0.001). Images at 70 keV showed the best CNR (0.84 ± 0.17) of tissues adjacent to ¹²⁵ I seeds, and received the highest subjective score (2.82 ± 0.18). Images at 80 keV had the lowest AI (70.67 ± 19.17). Images at 110 keV had the shortest artefact lengths. High-density metal artefacts in the MARs spectral images were reduced. The length of metal artefacts in images at 110 keV was shorter than that of the polychromatic images and MARs spectral images (t = 3.35, 3.89, P < 0.05). The difference in CNR between MARs spectral images and polychromatic images, and images at 70 keV was statistically significant (t = 3.57, 4.16, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemstone spectral imaging technique can reduce metal artefacts of ¹²⁵ I seeds effectively in CT images, and improve the quality of images, and improve the display of tissues adjacent to ¹²⁵ I seeds after implantation. MARs technique cannot reduce the artefacts caused by radioactive seeds effectively.

Orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic applications of a single-energy iterative metal artefact reduction technique and other metal artefact reduction techniques explained

Metal within the CT field of view causes artefact that degrades the diagnostic quality of the processed images. This is related to the high atomic number of most metals and is due to a combination of beam hardening, scatter, edge effects and photon starvation. Both software and hardware metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques have been developed. Iterative reconstruction software MAR techniques can be applied on raw CT data sets and show improved image quality in the setting of sparse projection data when compared with filtered back-projection methods. Recently, a novel single-energy iterative metal artefact reduction technique (IMART) was released for use with large orthopaedic devices. The aim of this pictorial essay was to demonstrate the usefulness of IMART in the setting of both orthopaedic and non-orthopaedic metallic objects and devices.

[Quantitative Evaluation of Metal Artifacts on CT Images on the Basis of Statistics of Extremes]

It is well-known that metal artifacts have a harmful effect on the image quality of computed tomography (CT) images. However, the physical property remains still unknown. In this study, we investigated the relationship between metal artifacts and tube currents using statistics of extremes. A commercially available phantom for measuring CT dose index 160 mm in diameter was prepared and a brass rod 13 mm in diameter was placed at the centerline of the phantom. This phantom was used as a target object to evaluate metal artifacts and was scanned using an area detector CT scanner with various tube currents under a constant tube voltage of 120 kV. Sixty parallel line segments with a length of 100 pixels were placed to cross metal artifacts on CT images and the largest difference between two adjacent CT values in each of 60 CT value profiles of these line segments was employed as a feature variable for measuring metal artifacts; these feature variables were analyzed on the basis of extreme value theory. The CT value variation induced by metal artifacts was statistically characterized by Gumbel distribution, which was one of the extreme value distributions; namely, metal artifacts have the same statistical characteristic as streak artifacts. Therefore, Gumbel evaluation method makes it possible to analyze not only streak artifacts but also metal artifacts. Furthermore, the location parameter in Gumbel distribution was shown to be in inverse proportion to the square root of a tube current. This result suggested that metal artifacts have the same dose dependence as image noises.

[Effect of Reconstruction Technique for Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography by Changing Display Field of View]

We evaluated the effect of orthopedic-metal artifact reduction (O-MAR) for metal artifact in computed tomography with 73 simulated seeds for brachytherapy in different sizes of display field of view (DFOV) obtained by helical scan under the same clinical scan condition. The metal artifacts were analyzed with the Gumbel's method by changing DFOV sizes 80 mm, 160 mm, and 320 mm. Gumbel distribution, scale parameter (γ), and location parameter (β) of the metal artifacts with O-MAR were compared with that of the metal artifacts with filtered back projection (FBP). In conclusion, it was considered that the effect of metal artifact reduction with O-MAR was influenced by DFOV size in this study. The reduction rates of scale parameter (γ) were 22.3%, 21.3%, and 10.0% in DFOV 80 mm, 160 mm, and 320 mm, respectively. The reduction rates of location parameter (β) were 27.4%, 23.4 %, and 9.8%. Therefore, the effect of metal artifact reduction with O-MAR showed the tendency of increasing with decreasing DFOV size.

Reduction of metallic coil artefacts in computed tomography body imaging: effects of a new single-energy metal artefact reduction algorithm

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of a single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm for metallic coil artefact reduction in body imaging.

METHODS

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed in 30 patients with metallic coils (10 men, 20 women; mean age, 67.9 ± 11 years). Non-SEMAR images were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction alone, and SEMAR images were reconstructed with the iterative reconstruction plus SEMAR algorithms. We compared image noise around metallic coils and the maximum diameters of artefacts from coils between the non-SEMAR and SEMAR images. Two radiologists visually evaluated the metallic coil artefacts utilizing a four-point scale: 1 = extensive; 2 = strong; 3 = mild; 4 = minimal artefacts.

RESULTS

The image noise and maximum diameters of the artefacts of the SEMAR images were significantly lower than those of the non-SEMAR images (65.1 ± 33.0 HU vs. 29.7 ± 10.3 HU; 163.9 ± 54.8 mm vs. 10.3 ± 19.0 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). Better visual scores were obtained with the SEMAR technique (3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.0, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SEMAR algorithm significantly reduced artefacts caused by metallic coils compared with the non-SEMAR algorithm. This technique can potentially increase CT performance for the evaluation of post-coil embolization complications.

KEY POINTS

• The new algorithm involves a raw data- and image-based reconstruction technique. • The new algorithm mitigates artefacts from metallic coils on body CT images. • The new algorithm significantly reduced artefacts caused by metallic coils. • The metal artefact reduction algorithm improves CT image quality after coil embolization.