JOURNAL CLUB: Preoperative MRI Evaluation of Primary Rectal Cancer: Intrasubject Comparison With and Without Rectal Distention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207:32-39. [PMID: 27144835 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.15383]

MRI of early rectal cancer; bisacodyl micro-enema increases submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of a micro-enema on diagnostic performance, submucosal width, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity using MRI to stage early rectal cancers (ERC).

METHODS

In this single-center study, we consecutively included 50 participants with assumed ERC who all completed MRI with (MRin) and without (MRex) a micro-enema. The diagnostic performance was recorded for two experienced radiologists using histopathology as the gold standard. In addition, the width of the submucosa in the tumor-bearing wall, reader confidence for T-staging, and tumor conspicuity were assessed. Significance levels were calculated using McNemar's test (diagnostic performance) and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test (reader confidence, submucosal width, and conspicuity). Interreader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Sensitivity/specificity were for Reader1 91%/87% for both MRex and MRin and for Reader2 74%/87% and 89%/87%, both readers p > 0.05. The micro-enema induced a significant widening of the submucosa, p < 0.001, with a mean increase of 2.2/2.8 mm measured by Reader1/Reader2. Reader confidence in T-staging and tumor conspicuity increased for both readers, p < 0.005. The proportion of tumors with both correct staging and high reader confidence increased from 58% (29/50) to 80% (40/50) (p = 0.04) for Reader1 and from 42% (21/50) to 72% (36/50) (p = 0.002) for Reader2. Interreader agreement increased from moderate (kappa 0.58) to good (kappa 0.68).

CONCLUSION

The micro-enema significantly increased the submucosal width in the tumor-bearing wall, reader confidence, and tumor conspicuity and improved interreader agreement from moderate to good. Sensitivity and specificity in T-staging did not improve, but there was a significant increase in the proportion of tumors staged with both high confidence and correct T-stage.

MR staging of rectal cancer: Comparison between the 2012 and 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guidelines

PURPOSE

To compare the adherence of the interpretation and reporting staging system, respectively proposed in the 2012 and 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) staging of rectal cancer, focusing on the improvement offered by the criteria introduced by 2016 ESGAR guidelines.

METHOD

Fifty-six patients affected by rectal cancer were included; 25/56 patients underwent upfront surgery; 31 underwent to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy before surgery. All patients underwent 3 T MRI examination for local staging. All MR exams were evaluated by two radiologists with 20- and 4-years' experience, who were blinded to each other; the T and N stages, the Mesorectal Fascia (MRF) status and the Extramural Vascular Invasion (EMVI) were assessed according to both 2012 and 2016 ESGAR guidelines. The correlation between radiological and pathological findings, as well as the MRI staging were evaluated.

RESULTS

As to the expert reviewer, no significant differences were found by comparing the MR T and N stages, T and N restaging, MRF status and EMVI according to 2012 and 2016 ESGAR guidelines. As to the 4-years' experience radiologist the MR staging agreement between 2012 and 2016 guidelines was "moderate" in N-stage evaluation and "fair" in T-restaging evaluation. No significant discrepancies were found for other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is a reliable method in rectal cancer staging/restaging. The assessment of T-restaging is improved by adopting the 2016 ESGAR guidelines, especially for non-expert readers; this result could be justified by the introduction of diffusion-weighted imaging. On the contrary, the newest guidelines do not improve the diagnostic performance in assessing nodal staging and restaging.

MRI in rectal cancer: An institutional real life analysis of technical parameters

INTRODUCTION

MRI plays a key role in the preoperative staging of rectal cancers and choice of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Yet, the acquisition and interpretation of rectum magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) turn out to be unequal, impacting patients'care. The present study aims at evaluating the quality of the acquisition of technical parameters of the rectal MRI performed by comparing them according to the various guidelines.

METHODS

The medical MRI reports of all consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated in a curative intent, by preoperative RCT and completion surgery were retrospectively reviewed over two periods (January 2010-December 2014 and January 2018 and December 2020) according to international 2012 and 2016 ESGAR and 2017 SAR MRI recommendation reports.

RESULTS

During the first period (69 MRI performed), 58% of these MRI abided by the recommendations and 75% of essential criteria could be found in 25.5% of MRI reportings. During the second period (73 MRI performed), the protocol used by 6.8% of MR images abided by the 2016 Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) recommendations and 39.7% abided by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) recommendations. 75% of essential criteria could be found in 52.3% of MRI reportings and 90% of essential criteria could be found in 6.2% of MRI reportings.

DISCUSSION

In an era of increasing individualized patient care and conservative treatment focused on tumour response and prognostic factors, the present study showed that compliance to MRI protocols and reporting guidelines needs improving to upgrade patient care.

Diagnostic Performance of Rectal CT for Staging Rectal Cancer: Comparison with Rectal MRI and Histopathology

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of rectal CT with that of high-resolution rectal MRI and histopathology in assessing rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-seven patients with rectal cancer who underwent rectal CT with rectal distension using sonographic gel and high-resolution MRI were enrolled in this study. The distance from the anal verge/anorectal junction, distance to the mesorectal fascia (MRF), extramural depth (EMD), extramesorectal lymph node (LN) involvement, extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and T/N stages in rectal CT/MRI were analyzed by two gastrointestinal radiologists. The CT findings of 20 patients who underwent radical surgery without concurrent chemoradiotherapy were compared using histopathology. Interclass correlations and kappa statistics were used.

Results

The distance from the anal verge/anorectal junction showed an excellent intraclass correlation between CT and MRI for both reviewers. For EMD, the distance to the MRF, presence of LNs, extramesorectal LN metastasis, EMVI, T stage, and intermodality kappa or weighted kappa values between CT and MRI showed excellent agreement. Among the 20 patients who underwent radical surgery, T staging, circumferential resection margin involvement, EMVI, and LN metastasis on rectal CT showed acceptable concordance rates with histopathology.

Conclusion

Dedicated rectal CT may be on par with rectal MRI in providing critical information to patients with rectal cancer.

MRI restaging of rectal cancer: The RAC (Response-Anal canal-CRM) analysis joint consensus guidelines of the GRERCAR and GRECCAR groups

PURPOSE

To develop guidelines by international experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer restaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evidence-based data and experts' opinions were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts provided recommendations for reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analysed and classified as "RECOMMENDED" versus "NOT RECOMMENDED" (if ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if < 80% consensus among experts).

RESULTS

Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed.

CONCLUSION

These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer restaging with MRI.

An MRI-based pelvimetry nomogram for predicting surgical difficulty of transabdominal resection in patients with middle and low rectal cancer

Objective

The current work aimed to develop a nomogram comprised of MRI-based pelvimetry and clinical factors for predicting the difficulty of rectal surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (RC).

Methods

Consecutive mid to low RC cases who underwent transabdominal resection between June 2020 and August 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out for identifying factors (clinical factors and MRI-based pelvimetry parameters) independently associated with the difficulty level of rectal surgery. A nomogram model was established with the selected parameters for predicting the probability of high surgical difficulty. The predictive ability of the nomogram model was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

A total of 122 cases were included. BMI (OR = 1.269, p = 0.006), pelvic inlet (OR = 1.057, p = 0.024) and intertuberous distance (OR = 0.938, p = 0.001) independently predicted surgical difficulty level in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The nomogram model combining these predictors had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.801 (95% CI: 0.719–0.868) for the prediction of a high level of surgical difficulty. The DCA suggested that using the nomogram to predict surgical difficulty provided a clinical benefit.

Conclusions

The nomogram model is feasible for predicting the difficulty level of rectal surgery, utilizing MRI-based pelvimetry parameters and clinical factors in mid to low RC cases.

Is rectal filling optimal for MRI-based radiomics in preoperative T staging of rectal cancer?

PURPOSE

To determine whether rectal filling with ultrasound gel is clinically more beneficial in preoperative T staging of patients with rectal cancer (RC) using radiomics model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A total of 94 RC patients were assigned to cohort 1 (leave-one-out cross-validation [LOO-CV] set) and 230 RC patients were assigned to cohort 2 (test set). Patients were grouped according to different pathological T stages. The radiomics features were extracted through high-resolution T2-weighted imaging for all volume of interests in the two cohorts. Optimal features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Model 1 (without rectal filling) and model 2 (with rectal filling) were constructed. LOO-CV was adopted for radiomics model building in cohort 1. Thereafter, the cohort 2 was used to test and verify the effectiveness of the two models.

RESULTS

Totally, 204 patients were enrolled, including 60 cases in cohort 1 and 144 cases in cohort 2. Finally, seven optimal features with LASSO were selected to build model 1 and nine optimal features were used for model 2. The ROC curves showed an AUC of 0.806 and 0.946 for model 1 and model 2 in cohort 1, respectively, and an AUC of 0.783 and 0.920 for model 1 and model 2 in cohort 2, respectively (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model with rectal filling showed an advantage for differentiating T1 + 2 from T3 and had less inaccurate categories in the test cohort, suggesting that this model may be useful for T-stage evaluation.

Structured and shared MRI staging lexicon and report of rectal cancer: A consensus proposal by the French Radiology Group (GRERCAR) and Surgical Group (GRECCAR) for rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To develop French guidelines by experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer staging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evidence-based data and opinions of experts of GRERCAR (Groupe de REcherche en Radiologie sur le CAncer du Rectum [i.e., Rectal Cancer Imaging Research Group]) and GRECCAR (Groupe de REcherche en Chirurgie sur le CAncer du Rectum [i.e., Rectal Cancer Surgery Research Group]) were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts scoring of reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analyzed and classified as "Recommended" versus "Not recommended" (when ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (when < 80% consensus among experts).

RESULTS

Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed.

CONCLUSION

These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer staging with MRI.

Quantitative T2 Mapping to Discriminate Mucinous from Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma in Rectal Cancer: Comparison with Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Purpose: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) is associated with worse clinicopathological characteristics and a poorer prognosis than non-MA. Moreover, MA is related to worse tumor regression grade and tumor downstaging than non-MA. This study investigated whether lesions in MA and non-MA can be quantitatively assessed by T2 mapping technique and compared with the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

Methods: High-resolution MRI, DWI, and T2 mapping were performed on 81 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer via biopsy. Afterward, T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were manually measured by a senior and a junior radiologist independently. By examining surgical specimens, the patients with MA and non-MA were identified. Inter-observer reproducibility was tested, and T2 and ADC values were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to determine the cut-off value.

Results: Of the 81 patients, 11 patients with MA were confirmed by pathology. The inter-observer reproducibility of T2 and ADC values showed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.993 and 0.913, respectively. MA had higher T2 (87.9 ± 5.11 ms) (P = 0.000) and ADC (2.03 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) (P = 0.000) values than non-MA (66.6 ± 6.86 ms and 1.17 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, respectively). The area under the ROC curves (AUC) of the T2 and ADC values were 0.999 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.953–1) and 0.979 (95% CI: 0.920–0.998), respectively. When the cutoff value in T2 mapping was 80 ms, the Youden index was the largest, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 97%.

Conclusion: As a stable quantitative sequence, T2 mapping of MRI is useful in differentiating MA from non-MA. Compared to ADC values, T2 values are also diagnostically effective and non-inferior to ADC values.

Prognostic risk factors and survival models for T3 locally advanced rectal cancer: what can we learn from the baseline MRI?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the baseline MRI characteristics for predicting survival outcomes and construct survival models for risk stratification to facilitate personalized treatment and follow-up strategies in patients with MRI-defined T3 (mrT3) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 256 mrT3 LARC patients evaluated between 2008 and 2012 in our institution, with an average follow-up period of 6.8 ± 1.2 years. The baseline MRI characteristics, clinical data, and follow-up information were evaluated. The patients were randomized into a training cohort (TC, 186 patients) and validation cohort (VC, 70 patients). The TC dataset was used to develop multivariate nomograms for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), while the VC dataset was used for independent validation of the models. Harrell concordance (C) indices and Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration were used to evaluate the performances of the models.

RESULTS

Baseline mrT3 substage, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) grading, mucinous adenocarcinoma, mesorectal fascia involvement, elevated pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) were independent predictors of DFS. T3 substage, EMVI grading, and NCRT were also independent predictors of OS. The nomograms constructed permitted the individualized prediction of 3-year and 5-year DFS and 5-year OS with high discrimination (C-index range, 0.833-0.892) and good calibration in the TC and VC.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified baseline MRI characteristics that help independently predict survival outcomes in patients with mrT3 LARC. The survival models based on these characteristics allow for the individualized pretreatment risk stratification in patients with mrT3 LARC.

KEY POINTS

• Baseline MRI characteristics can independently stratify risk and predict survival outcomes in patients with mrT3 LARC. • The nomograms built using selected baseline MRI characteristics facilitate the individualized pretreatment risk stratification and help with clinical decision-making in patients with mrT3 LARC. • MR-defined risk factors should, therefore, be carefully reported in the baseline MRI evaluation.

Importance and Qualitative Requirements of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Therapy Planning in Rectal Cancer - Interdisciplinary Recommendations of AIO, ARO, ACO and the German Radiological Society

Due to its excellent intrinsic soft tissue contrast, magnetic resonance imaging allows excellent visualization and anatomical separation of therapy-relevant risk structures such as the mesorectal fascia, local lymph nodes, and vascular structures in patients with rectal carcinoma. This makes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a valuable evaluation method for further therapeutic stratification. In particular, MRI is indispensable for the decision to refrain from neoadjuvant therapy and to choose a primary surgical approach. In addition to the oncologically generally relevant T-, N-, and M-criteria, two further parameters are included: the extramural vascular infiltration and the circumferential resection margin. Due to the significant impact of MRI on further therapeutic decision-making, standardized MR image quality is considered essential. KEY POINTS::   · Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable evaluation method for further therapeutic stratification.. · Critical anatomic landmarks for evaluation are circumferential resection margins.. CITATION FORMAT: · Attenberger UI, Clasen S, Ghadimi M et al. Importance and Qualitative Requirements of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Therapy Planning in Rectal Cancer - Interdisciplinary Recommendations of AIO, ARO, ACO and the German Radiological Society. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 513 - 520.

Watch and wait approach in rectal cancer: Current controversies and future directions

According to the main international clinical guidelines, the recommended treatment for locally-advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. However, doubts have been raised about the appropriate definition of clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and the role of surgery in patients who achieve a cCR. Surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life (QoL), which is especially relevant given the favourable prognosis in this patient subset. Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in alternative approaches with less morbidity, including the organ-preserving watch and wait strategy, in which surgery is omitted in patients who have achieved a cCR. These patients are managed with a specific follow-up protocol to ensure adequate cancer control, including the early identification of recurrent disease. However, there are several open questions about this strategy, including patient selection, the clinical and radiological criteria to accurately determine cCR, the duration of neoadjuvant treatment, the role of dose intensification (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy), optimal follow-up protocols, and the future perspectives of this approach. In the present review, we summarize the available evidence on the watch and wait strategy in this clinical scenario, including ongoing clinical trials, QoL in these patients, and the controversies surrounding this treatment approach.

Rectal cancer MR staging: pearls and pitfalls at baseline examination

In recent years, rectal MRI has become a central diagnostic tool in rectal cancer staging. Indeed, rectal MR has the ability to accurately evaluate a number of important findings that may impact patient management, including distance of the tumor to the mesorectal fascia, presence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), presence of lymph nodes, and involvement of the peritoneum/anterior peritoneal reflection. Many of these findings are difficult to assess in nonexpert hands. In this review, we present a practical approach for radiologists to provide high-quality interpretations at initial baseline exams, based on recent guidelines from the Society of Abdominal Radiology, Rectal and Anal Cancer Disease Focused Panel. Practical pearls and pitfalls are discussed, focusing on optimization of technique including, patient preparation and protocol recommendations, interpretation, and essentials of reporting.

Guidelines for MR imaging in rectal cancer: Europe versus United States

The aim of this study was to compare and contrast recently published guidelines for staging and reporting of MR imaging in rectal cancer from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and the North American Society of Abdominal Radiology. These guidelines were assessed on the presence of consensus and disagreement. Items were compared by two reviewers, and items with agreement and disagreement between the guidelines were identified and are presented in the current paper. Differences between guidelines are discussed to offer insights in practice variations between both continents and among expert centers, which to some extent may explain the differences between guidelines.

Current controversy, confusion, and imprecision in the use and interpretation of rectal MRI

There has been a rapid increase in the utilization of MRI in rectal cancer staging in the USA essentially replacing endorectal ultrasound and mimicking the trend in Europe seen in the 1990s and 2000s. Accompanying this trend, there is a demand, and recognized need, for greater precision and clarification of confusing, misunderstood and poorly understood concepts, facts, statements and nomenclature regarding rectal cancer and the use of pelvic MRI for diagnosis. As such, this Review, part evidence-based and part expert opinion, will attempt to elucidate and clarify several concepts the authors have encountered in 25 years of imaging rectal cancer, focusing on MRI.

MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management

Rectal cancer is prone to local recurrence and systemic metastasis. However, owing to improvements in TNM staging and treatment, including a more widespread use of rectal MRI and increased radiologist awareness of the key rectal cancer TNM staging features, the mortality rate of rectal cancer has been declining over the past few decades in adults over 50 years of age. Currently, rectal MRI plays a key role in the pre- and posttreatment evaluation of rectal cancer, assisting the multidisciplinary team in tailoring the most appropriate treatment option. The benefits achieved with rectal MRI are strictly dependent on obtaining good-quality images, which is important for the characterization of the main anatomic structures and their relationship with the tumor. In primary staging, rectal MRI helps the radiologist (a) describe the tumor location and morphology, (b) provide its T and N categories, (c) detect the presence of extramural vascular invasion, and (d) identify its relationship with surrounding structures, including the sphincter complex and involvement of the mesorectal fascia. These features help diagnose locally advanced rectal tumors (categories T3c-d, T4, N1, and N2), for which neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is indicated. In restaging after neoadjuvant CRT, in addition to reassessing the features noted during primary staging, rectal MRI can help in the assessment of treatment response, especially with the emergence of nonsurgical approaches such as "watch and wait." ^©RSNA, 2019.

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

PURPOSE

To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma.

METHODS

A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed.

CONCLUSION

These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

Rectal MRI for Cancer Staging and Surveillance

MRI is an integral part of the multidisciplinary treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma. Staging MRI is performed to establish TNM stage and assess for prognostic factors, including circumferential resection margin status and presence of extramural vascular invasion. The results of staging MRI determine which patients will undergo preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation before resection. Restaging MRI is performed to evaluate for treatment response and may identify patients with no residual visible tumor who are candidates for a "watch and wait" strategy in lieu of resection. In addition, the results of MRI in conjunction with endoscopy determine the surgical technique used to remove the tumor.

The influence of endorectal filling on rectal cancer staging with MRI

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of endorectal filling (EF) on rectal cancer staging.

METHODS

47 patients who underwent a staging MRI of rectal cancer in the period from 2011 to 2014 were included. The MRI protocol included T₂ weighted fast spin echo sequences without and with EF at 3 T (EF-MRI). Images were scored by two readers for T-stage, distance of the lower pole of the tumour to the anorectal junction, distance to the mesorectal fascia (MRF), and number of (suspicious) lymph nodes. Agreement in T-staging was calculated using the Cohen's κ value. Comparison of continuous variables was performed using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement for T-staging with and without EF-MRI showed a poor agreement between both readers (weighted κ = 0.156, weighted κ = 0.037, respectively). Tumours tended to be overstaged more prominently with EF-MRI. The accuracy of predicting the pathological T-stage slightly improved from 55% with EF to 64% without EF for Reader 1 and from 59 to 68% for Reader 2, respectively. The distance of the tumour to the anorectal junction increased from 33.9 to 49.3 mm (p < 0.001) after EF for Reader 2. EF-MRI did not significantly influence the number of (suspicious) lymph nodes and distance to the mesorectal fascia.

CONCLUSION

EF-MRI did not lead to an improved tumour staging and it has the potential to influence the distance to a key anatomical landmark. EF-MRI is therefore not recommended in primary staging rectal cancer. Advances in knowledge: EF-MRI may not be used as an additional tool to stage rectal cancer patients, as it does not seem to facilitate in locoregionally staging the disease.

Pelvic MRI: Is Endovaginal or Rectal Filling Needed?

Magnetic resonance imaging is the optimal modality for pelvic imaging. It is based on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequences allowing uterine and vaginal cavity assessment as well as rectal evaluation. Anatomical depiction of these structures may benefit from distension, and conditions either developing inside the lumen of cavities or coming from the outside may then be better delineated and localized. The need for distension, either rectal or vaginal, and the way to conduct it are matters of debate, depending on indication for which the MR examination is being conducted. In this review, we discuss advantages and potential drawbacks of this technique, based on literature and our experience, in the evaluation of various gynecological and rectal diseases.

Morphologic predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the value of morphological parameters that can be obtained conveniently by MRI for predicting pathologically complete response (pCR) in patients with rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

A cohort of 101 patients was examined using MRI before and after Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Morphological parameters including maximum tumor area (MTA), maximum tumor length (MTL) and maximum tumor thickness (MTT), as well as cylindrical approximated tumor volume (CATV), distance to anal verge (DTA), and the reduction rates were evaluated by two experienced readers independently.

Results

Post-nCRT MTA and MTL, reduction rates and pre-nCRT DTA were proved to be significantly different between pCR and non-pCR with the AUCs of 0.672-0.853. The sensitivity and specificity for assessing pCR were 61.1-89.9% and 59.0-80.7% respectively. No significant correlation between pre-nCRT size measurements and pCR was obtained.

Conclusion

The convenient morphological measurements may be useful for predicting pCR with moderate sensitivity and specificity. Combining these predictors with the aim of building diagnostic model should be explored.