Implementation of a computed tomography dose management program across a multinational healthcare organization

OBJECTIVES

Radiation dose index monitoring (RDIM) systems may help identify CT dose reduction opportunities, but variability and complexity of imaging procedures make consistent dose optimization and standardization a challenge. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility to standardize and optimize CT protocols through the implementation of a Dose Excellence Program within a European healthcare network.

METHODS

The Dose Excellence Program consisted of a multidisciplinary team that developed standardized organizational adult CT protocols and thresholds for relevant radiation dose indices (RDIs). Baseline data were collected retrospectively from the RDIM (Phase I, 2015). Organization's protocols were implemented and monitored from the RDIM for deviations (Phase II, 2016). Following standardization, radiation dose optimization was initiated (Phase III, 2017). Data from the three most used protocols were retrospectively extracted and grouped by country for all phases. The mean number of series (RS) and RDIs were compared between phases and with organizational reference levels. A Mann-Whitney test was conducted; p < .05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

Data from 9588, 12638, and 6093 examinations were analyzed from General Chest, General Head, and Thorax/Abdomen/Pelvis (TAP) multiphase respectively. Overall, after Phase III, mean RS and CTDI_vol p⁷⁵ were below the organizational reference levels in all countries for the three protocols. The CTDI_vol decreased by 45% in Switzerland (p < .00001), 32% in Turkey (p < .00001), and 28% in Switzerland (p = .0027) for General Chest, General Head, and TAP multiphase respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a Dose Excellence Program within a large-scale healthcare organization allowed unifying protocols and optimizing radiation dose across countries.

KEY POINTS

• Engaging a multidisciplinary team can enhance the use of an RDIM system for CT dose management in a multinational healthcare environment. • Deep dive of baseline data and standardization of CT practices by defining organizational clinical indication CT protocols with RPIDs is an essential step before optimization of radiation dose. • Following the implementation of the program, the mean RS and CTDIvol were below or equal to the organizational reference levels in all countries.

Variability of quantitative measurements of metastatic liver lesions: a multi-radiation-dose-level and multi-reader comparison

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variability of quantitative measurements of metastatic liver lesions by using a multi-radiation-dose-level and multi-reader comparison.

METHODS

Twenty-three study subjects (mean age, 60 years) with 39 liver lesions who underwent a single-energy dual-source contrast-enhanced staging CT between June 2015 and December 2015 were included. CT data were reconstructed with seven different radiation dose levels (ranging from 25 to 100%) on the basis of a single CT acquisition. Four radiologists independently performed manual tumor measurements and two radiologists performed semi-automated tumor measurements. Interobserver, intraobserver, and interdose sources of variability for longest diameter and volumetric measurements were estimated and compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Inter- and intraobserver variabilities for manual measurements of the longest diameter were higher compared to semi-automated measurements (p < 0.001 for overall). Inter- and intraobserver variabilities of volume measurements were higher compared to the longest diameter measurement (p < 0.001 for overall). Quantitative measurements were statistically different at < 50% radiation dose levels for semi-automated measurements of the longest diameter, and at 25% radiation dose level for volumetric measurements. The variability related to radiation dose was not significantly different from the inter- and intraobserver variability for the measurements of the longest diameter.

CONCLUSION

The variability related to radiation dose is comparable to the inter- and intraobserver variability for measurements of the longest diameter. Caution should be warranted in reducing radiation dose level below 50% of a conventional CT protocol due to the potentially detrimental impact on the assessment of lesion response in the liver.

Building a dual-energy CT service line in abdominal radiology

As the access of radiology practices to dual-energy CT (DECT) has increased worldwide, seamless integration into clinical workflows and optimized use of this technology are desirable. In this article, we provide basic concepts of commercially available DECT hardware implementations, discuss financial and logistical aspects, provide tips for protocol building and image routing strategies, and review radiation dose considerations to establish a DECT service line in abdominal imaging. KEY POINTS: • Tube-based and detector-based DECT implementations with varying features and strengths are available on the imaging market. • Thorough assessment of financial and logistical aspects is key to successful implementation of a DECT service line. • Optimized protocol building and image routing strategies are of critical importance for effective use and seamless inception of DECT in routine clinical workflows.

Higher patient doses through X-ray imaging procedures

Medical imaging using X-rays has been one of the most popular imaging modalities ever since the discovery of X-rays 125 years ago. With unquestionable benefits, concerns about radiation risks have frequently been raised. Computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopic guided interventional procedures have the potential to impart higher radiation exposure to patients than radiographic examinations. Despite technological advances, there have been instances of increased doses per procedure mainly because of better diagnostic information in images. However, cumulative dose from multiple procedures is creating new concerns as effective doses >100 mSv are not uncommon. There is a need for action at all levels. Manufacturers must produce equipment that can provide a quality diagnostic image at substantially lesser dose and better implementation of optimization strategies by users. There is an urgent need for the industry to develop CT scanners with sub-mSv radiation dose, a goal that has been lingering. It appears that a new monochromatic X-ray source will lead to replacement of X-ray tubes all over the world in coming years and will lead to a drastic reduction in radiation doses. This innovation will impact all X-ray imaging and will help dose reduction. For interventional procedures, the likely employment of robotic systems in practice may drastically reduce radiation exposures to operators- but patient exposure will still remain an issue. Training needs always need to be emphasized and practiced.

Computed tomography diagnostic reference levels for adult brain, chest and abdominal examinations: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Radiation dose variation within and among Computed Tomography (CT) centres is commonly reported. This work systematically reviewed published articles on adult Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for the brain, chest and abdomen to determine the causes and extent of variation. A systematic literature search and review was performed in selected databases containing leading journals in radiography, radiology and medical physics using carefully defined search terms related to CT and DRLs. The quality of the included articles was determined using the Effective Public Health Practise Project tool for quantitative studies.

KEY FINDINGS

The 54 articles reviewed include: 45 studies using human data, 8 studies using phantom data, and one study with both human and phantom data. The main comparator in between studies was the dose indices used in reporting DRLs. DRL variations of up to a factor of 2 for the same procedure were noted in phantom studies, and up to a factor of 3 in human studies. Sources of variation include the type of scanner, the age of the scanner, differences in protocols, variations in patients, as well as variations in study design. Different combinations of dose indices were reported: volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) (59%); DLP only (11%); weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDIw) and DLP (9%); CTDIvol only (7%); CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose (ED) (6%); CTDIw only (4%); CTDIvol, DLP and size specific dose estimate (SSDE) (1%) and CTDIw, CTDIvol and DLP (1%). The use of different dose indices limited dose comparison between studies.

CONCLUSION

The study noted a 2-3 fold variation in DRLs between studies for the same procedure. The causes of variation are reported and include study design, scanner technology and the use of different dose indices.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need for standardisation of CT DRLs in line with the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations to reduce dose variation and facilitate dose comparison.

A Simulation Paradigm for Evaluation of Subtle Liver Lesions at Pediatric CT: Performance and Confidence

PURPOSE

To create and validate a systematic observer performance platform for evaluation of simulated liver lesions at pediatric CT and to test this paradigm to measure the effect of radiation dose reduction on detection performance and reader confidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty normal pediatric (from patients aged 0-10 years) contrast material-enhanced, de-identified abdominal CT scans obtained from July 1, 2012, through July 1, 2016, were retrospectively collected from the clinical database. The study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Zero to three simulated, low-contrast liver lesions (≤6 mm) were digitally inserted by using software, and noise was added to simulate reductions in volume CT dose index (representing radiation dose estimation) of 25% and 50%. Pediatric, abdominal, and resident radiologists (three of each) reviewed 90 data sets in three sessions using an online interface, marking each lesion location and rating confidence (scale, 0-100). Statistical analysis was performed by using software.

RESULTS

Mixed-effects models revealed a significant decrease in detection sensitivity as radiation dose decreased (P < .001). The mean confidence of the full-dose and 25% dose reduction examinations was significantly higher than that of the 50% dose reduction examinations (P = .011 and .012, respectively) but not different from one another (P = .866). Dose was not a significant predictor of time to complete each case, and subspecialty was not a significant predictor of sensitivity or false-positive results.

CONCLUSION

Sensitivity for lesion detection significantly decreased as dose decreased; however, confidence did not change between the full-dose and 25% reduced-dose scans. This suggests that readers are unaware of this decrease in performance, which should be accounted for in clinical dose reduction efforts.Keywords: Abdomen/GI, CT, Liver, Observer Performance, Pediatrics, Perception Image© RSNA, 2019.

Radiation Dose for Multiregion CT Protocols: Challenges and Limitations

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to devise a method for classification of individual chest and abdomen-pelvis CT doses for multiregion CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective analysis of volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose-length product (DLP) associated with chest (150 adult patients), abdomen-pelvis (150 patients), and multiregion combined chest-abdomen-pelvis CT (210 patients; 60 single-run chest-abdomen-pelvis CT; 150 split-run with separate chest and abdomen-pelvis CT). All 510 CT examinations were performed with one of four MDCT scanners (64-, 64-, 128-, 256-MDCT). CTDI_vol, DLP, and scan length were recorded. Scan lengths were obtained for these 510 CT examinations and for an additional 7745 examinations of patients at another institution. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and ROC analysis. RESULTS. The respective DLPs (chest, 258-381 mGy · cm; abdomen-pelvis, 360-433 mGy · cm; single-run chest-abdomen-pelvis, 595-636 mGy · cm) and scan lengths (chest, 31-33 cm; abdomen-pelvis, 45-46 cm; single-run chest-abdomen-pelvis, 63-65 cm) for chest, abdomen-pelvis, and multiregion combined chest-abdomen-pelvis CT were significantly different (p < 0.0001). For split-run, chest-abdomen-pelvis CT, scan lengths and dose indexes for individual body regions were not different from those of single-body-region CT (p > 0.05). ROC analysis of chest and abdomen examinations showed an ideal scan length threshold of 38 cm to differentiate abdomen-pelvis CT from chest CT with accuracy of 97.39% and an AUC of 0.9764. CONCLUSION. Despite interscanner variabilities in CT radiation doses, shorter scan length for chest than for abdomen-pelvis CT enables accurate binning of radiation doses for split-run combined chest-abdomen-pelvis CT.

Tailoring CT Dose to Patient Size: Implementation of the Updated 2017 ACR Size-specific Diagnostic Reference Levels

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To use an automatic computed tomography (CT) dose monitoring system to analyze the institutional chest and abdominopelvic CT dose data as regards the updated 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) based on water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) to detect patient-size subgroups in which CT dose can be optimized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All chest CT examinations performed between July 2016 and April 2017 with and without contrast material, CT of the pulmonary arteries, and abdominopelvic CT with and without contrast material were included in this retrospective study. Dw and SSDE were automatically calculated for all scans using a previously validated in-house developed Matlab software and stored into our CT dose monitoring system. CT dose data were analyzed as regards the updated ACR DRLs (size groups: 21-25 cm, 25-29 cm, 29-33 cm, 33-37 cm, 37-41 cm). SSDE and volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) were used as CT dose parameter.

RESULTS

Overall, 30,002 CT examinations were performed in the study period, 3860 of which were included in the analysis (mean age 62.1 ± 16.4 years, Dw 29.0 ± 3.3 cm; n = 577 chest CT without contrast material, n = 628 chest CT with contrast material, n = 346 CT of chest pulmonary, n = 563 abdominopelvic CT without contrast material, n = 1746 abdominopelvic CT with contrast material). Mean SSDE and CTDIvol relative to the updated DRLs were 43.3 ± 26.4 and 45.1 ± 27.9% for noncontrast chest CT, 52.3 ± 23.1 and 52.0 ± 23.1% for contrast-enhanced chest CT, 68.8 ± 29.5 and 70.0 ± 31.0% for CT of pulmonary arteries, 41.9 ± 29.2 and 43.3 ± 31.3% for noncontrast abdominopelvic CT, and 56.8 ± 22.2 and 58.8 ± 24.4% for contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. Lowest dose compared to the DRLs was found for the Dw group of 21-25 cm in noncontrast abdominopelvic CT (SSDE 30.4 ± 21.8%, CTDIvol 30.8 ± 21.4%). Solely the group of patients with a Dw of 37-41 cm undergoing noncontrast abdominopelvic CT exceeded the ACR DRL (SSDE 100.3 ± 59.0%, CTDIvol 107.1 ± 63.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

On average, mean SSDE and CTDIvol of our institutional chest and abdominopelvic CT protocols were lower than the updated 2017 ACR DRLs. Size-specific subgroup analysis revealed a wide variability of SSDE and CTDIvol across CT protocols and patient size groups with a transgression of DRLs in noncontrast abdominopelvic CT of large patients (Dw 37-41 cm).