MR Enterography Assessment of Bowel Inflammation Severity in Crohn Disease Using the MR Index of Activity Score: Modifying Roles of DWI and Effects of Contrast Phases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1022-1029. [PMID: 28225669 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.17324]

Assessment of activity and severity of inflammatory bowel disease in cross-sectional imaging techniques: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including intestinal ultrasonography (IUS), computed tomography enterography (CTE), magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), are increasingly used for the evaluation of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We aimed to systematically review literature evidence on the assessment of disease activity, and/or severity through cross-sectional imaging in IBD patients, and to offer guidance on their most effective utilization.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify citations pertaining to the assessment of disease activity and/or severity at cross-sectional imaging techniques compared to a reference standard (ie, other radiological techniques, endoscopy, histopathology, and surgery) in IBD patients published until December 2023.

RESULTS

Overall, 179 papers published between 1990 and 2023 were included, with a total of 10 988 IBD patients (9304 Crohn's disease [84.7%], 1206 ulcerative colitis [11.0%], 38 IBD-U [0.3%], 440 unspecified [4.0%]). Of the 179 studies, 39 investigated IUS, 22/179 CTE, and 101/179 MRE. In the remaining papers, 2 techniques were addressed together. In 81.6% of the papers, endoscopy (with or without histopathology) was used as a reference standard. All studies included evaluated disease activity, while just over half (100/179, 55.8%) also evaluated disease severity of the addressed cross-sectional methodology. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of IUS, MRE, and CTE compared to the reference standard were 60%-99%, 60%-100%, and 70%-99%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All cross-sectional imaging techniques demonstrated moderate-to-good accuracy in assessing disease activity and severity of IBD. This finding highlights the potential, especially for MRE and IUS to be widely utilized in managing IBD in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

Validation of the simplified magnetic resonance index of activity by using DWI without gadolinium enhancement to evaluate bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVES

To validate the modified simplified magnetic resonance index of activity (sMARIA) score using DWI on non-contrast magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) to evaluate active inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), compared to the original sMARIA scoring system, with and without contrast enhancement.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 275 bowel segments from 55 CD patients who underwent ileocolonoscopy and MRE within a 2-week period. Two blinded radiologists evaluated original sMARIA on both conventional MRE (CE-sMARIA) and non-contrast MRE (T2-sMARIA). Modified sMARIA was then evaluated using non-contrast MRE, replacing ulcerations with DWI grades. Three scoring systems were compared for diagnostic accuracy of active inflammation, correlation with simple endoscopic score (SES)-CD, and interobserver reproducibility.

RESULTS

The AUC of modified sMARIA for detecting active inflammation (0.863, 95% confidence interval [0.803-0.923]) was significantly higher than T2-sMARIA (0.827 [0.773-0.881], p = 0.017), and comparable to CE-sMARIA (0.908 [0.857-0.959], p = 0.122). CE-sMARIA, T2-sMARIA, and modified sMARIA all showed moderate correlation with SES-CD (r = 0.795, 0.722, and 0.777, respectively). Interobserver reproducibility of diffusion restriction (κ, 0.686 [0.602-0.770]) was significantly better than ulcers on conventional MRE (κ, 0.382 [0.212-0.552]; p = 0.001) and T2-weighted image (κ, 0.312 [0.034-0.590]; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Modified sMARIA using DWI can improve the diagnostic performance of sMARIA on non-contrast MRE, showing comparable performance to sMARIA using contrast-enhanced MRE.

KEY POINTS

• DWI can improve the diagnostic performance of non-contrast magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) for assessing active inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease. • Modified simplified magnetic resonance index of activity (sMARIA) using DWI grades in place of ulcers showed comparable diagnostic performance to sMARIA using conventional MRE with contrast-enhanced sequences.

Apparent diffusion coefficient for assessing Crohn's disease activity: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze relationships betweenapparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and activity parameters of Crohn's disease, e.g., length and wall thickness, CRP, FCP, MaRIA, CDAI, SES-CD, histologic inflammatory activity score, and the histological fibrotic score, based upon published data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE library, Scopus, and Embase databases were screened for association between ADC and activity parameters of Crohn's disease in patients with Crohn's disease up to Mai 2021. Overall, 21 studies with 1053 patients were identified. The following data were extracted from the literature: number of patients, correlation coefficients between ADC and length as well as wall thickness, CRP, FCP, MaRIA, CDAI, and SES-CD, inflammatory activity score, and fibrotic score. Associations between ADC and activity parameters were analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficient. The studies' methodologic quality was evaluated by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS 2) instrument, revealing a low risk of bias.

RESULTS

In the overall sample, the pooled correlation coefficient between ADC and CDAI was -0.8 (95% CI = [-0.94; -0.65]), between ADC and MaRIA -0.66 (95% CI = [-0.79; -0.53]). A strong association was observed between ADC and SES-CD with a pooled correlation of -0.66 (95% CI = [-0.87; -0.46]). The pooled sensitivity to discriminate between involved and non-involved bowel segments was 0.89, with an area under the curve of 0.89 CONCLUSIONS: ADC showed strong inverse correlations with CDAI, MaRIA, and SES-CD scores. However, the role of ADC in assessing fibrotic changes in the bowel wall is limited. ADC can reflect acute inflammatory reactions but not systemic inflammation.

KEY POINTS

• ADC value can reflect acute inflammatory reactions but not systemic inflammation. • ADC is inversely correlated with CDAI, MaRIA, and SES-CD. • The role of ADC in assessing fibrotic changes in the bowel wall is limited.

Use of imaging modalities for decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease

Cross-sectional magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasonography (IUS) provide valuable and noninvasive information to accurately assess disease activity, severity, and extent; detect complications; and monitor the response to treatment, as well as predict the postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease and a negative disease course. Therefore, both imaging modalities are emerging as pivotal diagnostic tools to achieve the emerging therapeutic target of transmural healing associated with better disease outcomes. Despite its numerous potential advantages over endoscopy and even MRE and its good availability, IUS is still widely underused to monitor and manage inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and help in making clinical decisions in routine practice. This situation is clearly due to the absence of validated, reliable, and responsive indices, as well as the lack of trained gastroenterologists and radiologists, as IUS is a component of radiologist expertise in several countries but not yet integrated into the training program of gastroenterologists. However, there is an increasing body of evidence in the literature that IUS and MRE are both becoming essential imaging resources to help clinicians in making reliable decisions. Here, we discuss the up-to-date evidence about the usefulness and performance of cross-sectional imaging, focusing on the ability of bowel US and MRE to aid clinical decision-making for the optimal management and monitoring of IBD.

Poor Concordance Between Clinical Activity and Endoscopic Severity in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: Before and After Induction Therapy

OBJECTIVES AND STUDY

Endoscopic assessments of disease activity are important to diagnose and evaluate treatment responses in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the invasiveness of endoscopy limits the application of this technique in routine examination. Thus, interest has been increasing in identifying noninvasive surrogate markers to predict endoscopic CD activity.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients with new-onset CD from January 2013 to December 2018 at Zhejiang University Affiliated Children's Hospital. The disease severity was scored according to the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS). Routine blood tests were determined individually. Clinical activity was assessed based on the Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI).

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients with CD had undergone one or more ileocolonoscopies (n = 146), the mean CDEIS for all the pediatric patients with CD was 7.0 (95% CI 5.7-8.2), and the mean PCDAI was 20.9 (95% CI 18.3-23.5). Pearson's linear analysis of the CDEIS and PCDAI in pediatric patients with CD showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.508, P < 0.001). Weak correlations were found between the PCDAI and CDEIS at the first diagnosis (r = 0.408, P < 0.001) and after completing induction therapy (r = 0.286, P < 0.05). Routine blood tests also did not correlate well with the CDEIS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified weak correlations between the PCDAI and CDEIS in assessing pediatric patients with CD severity both at first diagnosis and after induction therapy. A comprehensive assessment of PCDAI, CDEIS and multiple laboratory factors should be performed at diagnosis and during the follow-up of patients with CD.

Comparison of Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) and Compressed Sensing-SENSE for Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Crohn Disease Undergoing MR Enterography

Please see the Editorial Comment by Tyler J. Fraum discussing this article. Background: Long acquisition times for breath-hold contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) imaging in MR enterography (MRE) protocols result in reduced image quality. Objective: To compare CE-T1W imaging performed using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed-sensing SENSE (CS-SENSE) in terms of image quality and diagnostic performance for active inflammation in Crohn disease (CD). Methods: This retrospective study included 41 patients (31 men, 10 women; mean age, 34±12 years) who underwent MRE for known or suspected CD between June 2020 and September 2020. MRE was performed in one of two scanning rooms based on scheduling availability. Per institutional protocol, in one room, the enteric phase was acquired using SENSE (acceleration factor 3), and the portal phase was acquired using CS-SENSE (acceleration factor 5); this order was reversed in the other room. Two radiologists independently assessed sequences for subjective image quality measures at the patient level and for active inflammation at the bowel-segment level. Mean image quality scores between readers were computed. Diagnostic performance for active inflammation was compared using generalized estimating equations; a separate experienced radiologist reviewed the full MRE protocol to establish the reference standard. Results: The mean acquisition time of CE-T1W imaging was 17.2 ± 1.1 seconds for SENSE versus 11.5 ± 0.8 seconds for CS-SENSE (P<.001). CS-SENSE was significantly better than SENSE in overall image quality (4.2±0.7 vs 3.7±1.1; P=.02), motion artifacts (4.0±0.8 vs 3.6±1.2; P=.006), and aliasing artifacts (4.8±0.4 vs 4.2±0.6; P<.001). CSSENSE was significantly worse than SENSE in synthetic appearance (4.6±0.5 vs 4.8±0.4; P=.003). Contrast, sharpness, and blurring were not different between sequences (P>.05). For reader 1, CS-SENSE, compared with SENSE, demonstrated sensitivity of 86% versus 81% (P=.09), specificity of 88% versus 83% (P=.08), and accuracy of 87% versus 82% (P=.56). For reader 2, CS-SENSE, compared with SENSE, demonstrated sensitivity of 92% versus 80% (P=.006), specificity of 91% versus 98% (P=.16), and accuracy of 91% versus 86% (P=.002). Conclusion: Use of CS-SENSE for CE-T1W imaging in MRE protocols results in reduced scan times with reduced artifact and improved image quality. Clinical impact: The benefits of CS-SENSE in MRE protocols may improve the diagnostic performance for active inflammation in CD.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a condition that can occur in any part of the gastrointestinal tract, although usually forms in the colon and terminal ileum. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a beneficial modality in the evaluation of small bowel activity. This study reports on a systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance enterography for the prediction of CD activity and evaluation of outcomes and possible complications.

Methods

Following the PRISMA guidelines, a total of 25 low-risk studies on established CD were selected, based on a QUADAS-II score of ≥ 9.

Results

A sensitivity of 90% was revealed in a pooled analysis of the 19 studies, with heterogeneity of χ² = 81.83 and I² of 80.3%. Also, a specificity of 89% was calculated, with heterogeneity of χ² = 65.12 and I² of 70.0%.

Conclusion

It was concluded that MRI provides an effective alternative to CT enterography in the detection of small bowel activity in CD patients under supervision of radiologist for assessment of disease activity and its complications. Its advantages include the avoidance of radiation exposure and good diagnostic accuracy.

Magnetic resonance enterography in Crohn's disease patients: current state of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is a major concern due to relatively high incidence and major complications like stricture or fistulas, often requiring surgical treatment. In recent years, magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) became a popular method of diagnosis and disease surveillance. The purpose of this review is to summarize and discuss the major and most recent advances in various aspects of MRE usage in diagnosong Crohn's disease, and to discuss advances in technique, disease activity monitoring and response to treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was performed and relevant publications were included, with emphasis on articles from the past decade.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we have presented articles with major advances in the field of MRE of CD patients such as proper sequence selection, recent advances in scoring of disease activity, differentiation between inflammation and fibrosis, response to treatment and technological advances such as the use of AI.

EXPERT OPINION

The main goal in improving MRE performance will be sequence selection aimed at differenting between inflammation and stricture while shortening the study length adjusted to patient compliance, and developing a standardized scoring system for MRE reporting assisted by artificial intelligence.

Crohn disease: magnetic resonance enterocolonography features of endoscopic ulcer stages reclassified with the healing process and the relationships to prognoses

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare magnetic resonance enterocolonography (MREC) features among the endoscopic ulcer stages reclassified to include healing ulcers and to assess the prognoses in Crohn disease (CD).

METHODS

Altogether, 89 consecutive patients with CD who had undergone MREC and ileocolonoscopy or balloon-assisted enteroscopy were retrospectively studied. Patients were reclassified into 38 patients with no deep ulcer, seven with healing deep ulcer, and 44 with active deep ulcer stage. MREC score derived from a 5-point MR classification and MR index of activity (MaRIA) were evaluated, and patients were followed-up. The primary endpoint was hospitalization.

RESULTS

Healing deep ulcers had higher values in MREC score and MaRIA than no deep ulcers (p < 0.001), and lower values than active deep ulcers (p < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative rates of hospitalization for no deep ulcer, healing deep ulcer, and active deep ulcers were 24.9, 0, and 52.4% (p < 0.05), respectively. MREC score or MaRIA-positive patients had a higher 5-year cumulative rate of hospitalization than the negative patients (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

MREC could reflect the healing stages, and the identification was revealed to be important because of the good prognosis. MREC might be useful to predict prognosis of CD.

Clinical-stage Approaches for Imaging Chronic Inflammation and Fibrosis in Crohn's Disease

The number of imaging-based indices developed for inflammatory bowel disease as research tools, objectively measuring ileocolonic and perianal activity and treatment response, has expanded in the past 2 decades. Created primarily to assess Crohn's disease (CD), there is increasing adoption of these indices into the clinical realm to guide patient care. This translation has been facilitated by validation in adult and pediatric populations, prompted by simplification of score calculations needed for practical application outside the research environment. The majority of these indices utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specifically MR enterography (MRE) and pelvic MRI, and more recently ultrasound. This review explores validated indices by modality, anatomic site and indication, including for documentation of the presence and extent of CD, disease progression, complications, and treatment response, highlighting those in clinical use or with the potential to be. As well, it details index imaging features used to quantify chronic inflammatory activity, severity, and to lesser extent fibrosis, in addition to their reference standards and any modifications. Validation in the pediatric population of indices primarily developed in adult cohorts such as the Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA), the Simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MARIAs), and the MRE global score (MEGS), together with newly developed pediatric-specific indices, are discussed. Indices that may be predictive of disease course and investigational techniques with the potential to provide future imaging biomarkers, such as multiparametric MRI, are also briefly considered.

Evaluating inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease by cross-sectional imaging techniques

The evaluation of inflammatory bowel activity in patients with Crohn’s disease has traditionally been a challenge, mainly because of the difficulty in gaining endoscopic access to the small bowel. Historically, barium-based contrast studies were the only option for the evaluation of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease. They were gradually replaced by cross-sectional imaging techniques, computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) now being the modalities of choice for such evaluations. Those two imaging methods have provided important information regarding intestinal wall involvement and extra-intestinal manifestations of Crohn’s disease, not only assessing lesion characteristics and complications but also quantifying inflammatory bowel activity. The objective of this article is to review the main technical aspects of CTE and MRE, together with their indications, contraindications, and limitations, as well as the CTE and MRE imaging characteristics of inflammatory activity in Crohn’s disease.

[Preparation, Technique, and Imaging of Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Enterography]

CT enterography and magnetic resonance (MR) enterography are widely used imaging modalities used to examine the small bowel. These radiologic tests are distinguished from routine abdominopelvic CT and MRI by the oral ingestion of a large amount of neutral contrast to distend the small bowel before scanning. For achievement of high quality, diagnostic images and proper technique are required. Conducted protocols still vary in patient preparation, enteric contrast, and CT and MRI acquisition sequences, resulting in heterogeneous diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this article is to review the processes and techniques that optimize CT/MR enterography for patients with suspected Crohn's disease or other small bowel diseases.

Quantitative evaluation of Crohn's disease using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in children and young adults

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in children and young adults with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

From August 2017 to October 2018, 30 patients with Crohn's disease (21 males and 9 females; mean age 15.1 ± 2.5 years) underwent DCE-MRI with MRI enterography. We assessed the endoscopic finding, pediatric Crohn's disease activity index (PCDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP) level (mg/dL), Crohn's disease MR index (CDMI) score, and the perfusion parameters of DCE-MRI (K^trans, K^ep, and V^e) at the ileocecal region between the inactive and active groups based on the histopathologic status.

RESULTS

The active Crohn's disease group showed higher PCDAI, CRP, and CDMI scores than the inactive group (22.2 ± 18.8 vs. 6.3 ± 6.4, p = 0.027; 1.32 ± 1.79 vs. 0.10 ± 0.13, p = 0.005; 7.4 ± 3.9 vs. 4.5 ± 3.0, p = 0.047, respectively). The active Crohn's disease group showed a higher K^trans value than the inactive group (0.31  ±  0.12 vs. 0.16 ±  0.46 min^-1, p = 0.002). Endoscopic finding; PCDAI, CRP, and CDMI scores; and K^trans value were significant parameters in the identification of the active Crohn's disease (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p = 0.029, p = 0.006, and p < 0.001, respectively). K^trans value was the most significant value for identifying active Crohn's disease in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

K^trans value could discriminate between inactive and active Crohn's diseases. K^trans value may have the potential to monitor the pediatric Crohn's disease activity.

KEY POINTS

• With dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, we can quantitatively monitor the Crohn's disease status in pediatric patients and provide proper management plans to clinicians. • The K^transvalue of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameter, as well as the clinical pediatric Crohn's disease activity index, C-reactive protein level, the endoscopic score, and the Crohn's disease MR index, was higher in the active Crohn's disease than in the inactive group based on the histopathologic status. • The K^transvalue among the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters was the most significant differentiating parameter for the active Crohn's disease from inactive status among those parameters (p = 0.013).

Crohn's disease activity before and after medical therapy evaluated by MaRIA score and others parameters in MR Enterography

AIM

Aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the response to therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) patients studied by MR Enterography (MRE) in comparison with Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI).

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients with histological proved CD have undergone MRE in the last years. Forty-six patients who repeated MRE after medical therapy within six months were selected for the study. Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) was evaluated for each patient and used to define the MR judgment. In MRE we also evaluated wall thickening, longitudinal extension of wall thickening, presence of stratified mural hyperenhancement and extraintestinal signs. The clinical response to therapy was judged based on HBI and classified as improved, worsened or stable disease. Clinical judgment was correlated with MRE findings and the agreement was analysed using the Cohen Kappa test.

RESULTS

Among 46 enrolled patients, 18 (39%) improved clinically, 4 (10%) worsened, 24 (51%) remained stable. MR judgment was in agreement with clinical assessment in 33 patients (72%), showing moderate significant concordance (Kappa = 0.49; p < 0.01). No agreement was observed in 13 (28%) patients. Moreover, clinical improvement was significantly correlated to reduction of wall thickening, reduction of longitudinal extension of the disease and reduction of engorged vasa recta (p < 0.05). Worsening conditions were significantly correlated to increased wall thickening (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MRE is useful in evaluating the response to therapy in CD patients.

Lemann Index for Assessment of Crohn's Disease: Correlation with the Quality of Life, Endoscopic Disease Activity, Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity and C- Reactive Protein

AIM

Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by continuing inflammation and progressive gut damage. Despite many scoring indices of CD, there is a lack of more global assessment tools for the evaluation of the total disease impact on the gut.

METHODS

Fift y-three adult patients with proven CD underwent magnetic resonance enterocolonography (MR-EC), colonoscopy, and clinical activity assessment, including CRP. Quality of life was assessed using IBDQ. MR-EC was used to evaluate the Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA- global (G)) and the Lemann Index (LI). The CD Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) was used to score the endoscopic activity of the disease.

RESULTS

A signifi cant correlation between the LI and IBDQ was found (r=-0.812, P<0.01). LI and MaRIA-G correlated moderately, while the LI did not correlate significantly with CRP and CDEIS. For the detection of endoscopically active CD, MaRIA-G was more sensitive and specific (83.3%; 73.3%) compared to the LI (66.7%; 60.0%). There was a moderate correlation between CRP and MaRIA-G, as well as CRP and CDEIS (r=0.496; r=0.527,<0.01).

CONCLUSION

A signifi cant negative correlation between the LI and quality of life, measured by IBDQ, was found in our study, suggesting that the LI could resemble more global features of the disease, besides inflammatory activity of the gut.

Use of magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) in the preoperative assessment of small bowel Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Accurate quantification of the inflammatory activity in Crohn's Disease is essential to determine adequate treatment for each patient. The aim of the present study is to assess the correlation between the pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA) and the histologic degree of inflammation from surgically resected intestinal Crohn's Disease lesions.

METHODS

This is a prospective study including a consecutive case series of patients with small bowel Crohn's Disease, who underwent surgical resection. Magnetic resonance enterography was performed in the 3months prior to surgery, applying a pre-established protocol. Relative contrast enhancements, wall thickness, presence of edema or ulcerations were the parameters used to calculate the MaRIA Index. All patients underwent surgery and every specimen was analyzed. The modified Chiorean classification was applied for the histological analysis and an ordinal regression analysis was used to correlate MaRIA and the grade of inflammation for each lesion.

RESULTS

59 lesions from 35 different patients were analyzed. The degree of inflammation of the lesions was statistically correlated to the MaRIA values (P=.002). The MaRIA index was significantly different (P<.001) between the different histological types of the Crohn's Disease lesions (inflammatory/ fibrotic). The best cut-off for detecting severe inflammation using MaRIA was 20 (AUC: 0.741; 74.1% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity).

CONCLUSION

MaRIA is a reliable tool to distinguish inflammatory from fibrotic lesions. Therefore, it could be considered essential for determining the most appropriate Crohn's Disease treatment for each patient.

Development and Validation of a Simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity for Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The magnetic resonance index of activity (MARIA) for Crohn's disease (CD) is used to assess the activity of luminal CD. However, it has a number of practical limitations. We aimed to develop and validate a simplified MARIA to more easily and quickly assess CD activity and response to therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging data from 98 participants in 2 studies. We used logistic regression analysis to identify magnetic resonance imaging parameters independently associated with CD endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) scores (the reference standard). We validated the responsiveness and reliability of the simplified MARIA in an independent cohort of 37 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy before and after a therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis showed that dichotomous qualitative assessment of wall thickening (>3 mm), presence of mural edema, perienteric fat stranding, and ulcers were independently associated with CDEIS scores; we used these factors to create a simplified MARIA. Simplified MARIA scores greater than 1 identified segments with active CD with 90% sensitivity and 81% specificity (area under the curve 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.94). Simplified MARIA scores of 2 or more detected severe lesions (ulcers) with 85% sensitivity and 92% specificity (area under the curve 0.94; 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.96). For each patient, there was a high level of correlation between simplified MARIA scores and CDEIS scores (r = 0.83) and simplified MARIA scores and original MARIA scores (and r = 0.93) (P < .001). The simplified MARIA score accurately detected changes in lesion severity in response to therapy and was as reliable as endoscopy for the assessment of mucosal healing.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a simplified MARIA for easier and faster assessment of CD activity and severity. This index identifies patients with a response to therapy with a high level of accuracy. These findings require confirmation in independent, multireader studies.

Diagnostic pathways in Crohn's disease

The management of Crohn's disease (CD) is shifting from a stepwise, incremental approach based on symptom control to more aggressive early combined immunosuppression in an attempt to induce remission more rapidly and avoid long-term bowel damage. Accurately defining disease activity is a major challenge, as there is often a disconnect between symptomatology and underlying disease status. The role of imaging in CD has evolved such that it now plays a central role establishing the initial diagnosis, characterising disease phenotype, activity assessment, disease surveillance, and assessing response to therapy. Furthermore, the "treat-to-target" approach is being investigated in CD, with resolution of transmural inflammation on cross-sectional imaging being the treatment goal. In this review, we summarise the principal imaging techniques available to the radiologist, the key findings, and provide some guidance on the preferred imaging option in the diagnostic pathway. We consider the relative merits and drawbacks of each imaging technique before offering a brief discussion of some current developments and research avenues in CD imaging. We discuss how imaging may be useful in a "treat-to-target" approach. Finally, we highlight some practical considerations around service configuration and delivery to optimise imaging in CD in an accurate, cost-effective manner.

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and ultrasonography (US) in the study of the small bowel in Crohn's disease: state of the art and review of the literature

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic idiopathic disease and its diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, laboratory tests and imaging data. There isn’t a diagnostic gold standard: the ileocolonoscopy with mucosal biopsies represents the standard for luminal disease, while cross-sectional imaging such as Ultrasound (US), Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can show transmural alterations and extraintestinal manifestations. CD is usually diagnosed in the young age and after baseline diagnosis, the patients have to undergo to variable follow-up depending on remission or active disease. The aim of our review is to compare Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) to Ultrasonography (US) in the follow-up of CD. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Indian guidelines on imaging of the small intestine in Crohn's disease: A joint Indian Society of Gastroenterology and Indian Radiology and Imaging Association consensus statement

The Indian Society of Gastroenterology (ISG) Task Force on Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Indian Radiological and Imaging Association (IRIA) developed combined ISG-IRIA evidence-based best-practice guidelines for imaging of the small intestine in patients suspected to have or having Crohn's disease. The 29 consensus statements, developed through a modified Delphi process, are intended to serve as reference for teaching, clinical practice, and research.

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Assessment of the Activity of Crohn Disease: 1.5 or 3 T

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in assessment of the activity of Crohn disease (CD) and to explore differences between DWI in 3 T and 1.5 T.

Methods

Postcontrast magnetic resonance enterography with DWI of 72 patients with pathological proof of CD was retrospectively evaluated for restricted diffusion qualitatively and quantitavely in 3 T (n = 40) and 1.5 T (n = 32). Magnetic resonance activity score of 7 or higher was used as reference of activity.

Results

Fifty-five patients had active lesions. Diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensity showed sensitivity (100%, 100%) and specificity (88.89%, 100%) in 1.5/3 T for activity assessment. Mean ± SD apparent diffusion coefficient for active lesions was 1.21 ± 0.42 and 1.28 ± 0.59 × 10⁻³ mm²/s in 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. The proposed cutoff values of 1.35 and 1.38 × 10⁻³ mm²/s in 1.5 and 3 T, respectively, had sensitivity (80%, 93%), specificity (100%, 90%), accuracy (88%, 93%), and no significant difference in accuracy between 1.5/3 T (P = 0.48).

Conclusions

Diffusion-weighted imaging hypersensitivity and apparent diffusion coefficient values accurately assessed the activity of CD. No significant statistical difference in diagnostic accuracy was detected between 1.5 and 3 T.

Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Small Bowel Enterography: Current Status and Future Trends Focusing on Crohn's Disease

Computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are presently state-of-the-art radiologic tests used to examine the small bowel for various indications. This article focuses on CTE and MRE for the evaluation of Crohn disease. The article describes recent efforts to achieve more standardized interpretation of CTE and MRE, summarizes recent research studies investigating the role and impact of CTE and MRE more directly for several different clinical and research issues beyond general diagnostic accuracy, and provides an update on progress in imaging techniques. Also addressed are areas that need further exploration in the future.

Magnetic resonance imaging and Crohn’s disease endoscopic index of severity: Correlations and concordance

AIM

To examine the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic index of severity (CDEIS) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 104 patients with CD that were treated at the Ruijin Hospital between March 2015 and May 2016. Among them, 61 patients with active CD were evaluated before/after treatment. MRI and endoscopy were performed within 7 d. CDEIS was evaluated. MRI parameters included MaRIA scores, total relative contrast enhancement (tRCE), arterial RCE (aRCE), portal RCE (pRCE), delay phase RCE (dRCE), and apparent diffusion coefficient. The correlation and concordance between multiple MRI findings and CDEIS changes before and after CD treatment were examined.

RESULTS

Among the 104 patients, 61 patients were classified as active CD and 43 patients as inactive CD. Gender, age, disease duration, and disease location were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CRP levels were higher in the active group than in the inactive group (25.12 ± 4.12 vs 5.14 ± 0.98 mg/L, P < 0.001). Before treatment, the correlations between CDEIS and MaRIAs in all patients were r = 0.772 for tRCE, r = 0.754 for aRCE, r = 0.738 for pRCE, and r = 0.712 for dRCE (all MaRIAs, P < 0.001), followed by MRI single indexes. Among the active CD patients, 44 cases were remitted to inactive CD after treatment. The correlations between CDEIS and MaRIAs were r = 0.712 for aRCE, r = 0.705 for tRCE, r = 0.685 for pRCE, and r = 0.634 for dRCE (all MaRIAs, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Arterial MaRIA should be an indicator for CD follow-up and dynamic assessment. CD treatment assessment was not completely concordant between CDEIS and MRI.

Small bowel imaging in Crohn's disease patients

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a lifelong, chronic inflammatory bowel disorder. The small bowel (SB) is involved to varying extents, and the clinical course may vary from an inflammatory type to a more complicated one with stricture, fistula, and abscess formation. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy with biopsies are the conventional endoscopic techniques that usually establish the diagnosis. On the other hand, CD may affect SB segments that cannot be reached through these procedures. Video capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy are additional endoscopic techniques that may allow further SB evaluation in such circumstances. Computed tomographic enterography, magnetic resonance enterography, and ultrasonography are radiologic techniques that serve as a crucial adjunct to endoscopic assessment. They enable the assessment of parts of the bowel that may be difficult to reach with conventional endoscopy; this allows for the detection of active inflammation, penetrating or stricturing disease, and the appreciation of extraintestinal complications. Both endoscopic and radiologic modalities play a role in establishing the diagnosis of CD, as well as determining the disease extent, activity and response to therapy. This review is intended to evaluate these modalities in terms of specificity, sensitivity, potential side-effects, and limiting factors. This should serve as a guide to the clinician for establishing the most appropriate and reliable test within a particular clinical context.

A review of magnetic resonance enterography-based indices for quantification of Crohn's disease inflammation

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is a leading radiological modality in Crohn's disease (CD) and is used together with laboratory findings and endoscopic examinations for the evaluation of patients during initial diagnosis and follow up. Over the years, there has been great progress in the understanding of CD and there is a continuous strive to achieve better monitoring of patients and to develop new modalities which will predict disease course and thus help in clinical decisions making. An objective evaluation of CD using a quantification score is not a new concept and there are different clinical, endoscopies, radiological and combined indices which are used in clinical practice. Such scores are a necessity in clinical trials on CD for evaluation of disease response, however, there is no consensus of the preferred MRE score and they are not routinely used. This review presents MRE-based indices in use in the last decade: the Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity (MaRIA), the Clermont score, the Crohn's Disease Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Index (CDMI), the Magnetic Resonance Enterography Global Score (MEGS) and the Lemann index. We compare the different indices and evaluate the clinical research that utilized them. The aim of this review is to provide a reference guide for researchers and clinicians who incorporate MRE indices in their work. When devising future indices, accumulated data of the existing indices must be taken into account, as each of the current indices has its own strengths and weakness.

Imaging of the small intestine in Crohn's disease: Joint position statement of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology and Indian Radiological and Imaging Association

The Indian Society of Gastroenterology (ISG) Task Force on Inflammatory Bowel Disease and the Indian Radiological and Imaging Association (IRIA) developed combined ISG-IRIA evidence-based best-practice guidelines for imaging of the small intestine in patients with suspected or known Crohn's disease. These 29 position statements, developed through a modified Delphi process, are intended to serve as reference for teaching, clinical practice, and research.

Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal

Objective

To evaluate the frequency and adequacy of statistical analyses in a general radiology journal when reporting a reliability analysis for a diagnostic test.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-three studies of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) and 36 studies reporting reliability analyses published in the Korean Journal of Radiology between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed. Studies were judged using the methodological guidelines of the Radiological Society of North America-Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (RSNA-QIBA), and COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) initiative. DTA studies were evaluated by nine editorial board members of the journal. Reliability studies were evaluated by study reviewers experienced with reliability analysis.

Results

Thirty-one (49.2%) of the 63 DTA studies did not include a reliability analysis when deemed necessary. Among the 36 reliability studies, proper statistical methods were used in all (5/5) studies dealing with dichotomous/nominal data, 46.7% (7/15) of studies dealing with ordinal data, and 95.2% (20/21) of studies dealing with continuous data. Statistical methods were described in sufficient detail regarding weighted kappa in 28.6% (2/7) of studies and regarding the model and assumptions of intraclass correlation coefficient in 35.3% (6/17) and 29.4% (5/17) of studies, respectively. Reliability parameters were used as if they were agreement parameters in 23.1% (3/13) of studies. Reproducibility and repeatability were used incorrectly in 20% (3/15) of studies.

Conclusion

Greater attention to the importance of reporting reliability, thorough description of the related statistical methods, efforts not to neglect agreement parameters, and better use of relevant terminology is necessary.