Exploring the Correlation Between Multiparameters Detected in Primary Prostate Cancer using F‑18 PSMA‑1007 PET/MRI and their Potential for Predicting Metastasis

Purpose

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) surpasses conventional MRI (cMRI) in prostate cancer (PCa) evaluation. Our objective is to evaluate correlation of quantitative parameters in PCa using Fluorine-18 (F-18) PSMA-1007 PET/MRI and their potential for predicting metastases.

Methods

This retrospective study included 51 PCa patients. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), PSMA total lesion uptake (PSMA-TLU), and PSMA total volume (PSMA-TV) were calculated in primary tumor. Correlation of ADC with other parameters was analyzed. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was conducted to determine optimal cut-off values for predicting metastases.

Results

ADC inversely correlated with SUVmax, PSMA-TLU, and PSMA-TV (p < 0.0001, < 0.0001, 0.0050, respectively). Lower ADC was associated with metastatic disease (p < 0.001). SUVmax, PSMA-TLU, PSMA-TV, SUVmax/ADC, PSMA-TLU/ADC, and PSMA-TV/ADC were higher in patients with metastases (p = 0.033 to < 0.001). PSMA-TLU/ADC and PSMA-TV/ADC best predicted metastases (sensitivity: 73.91% and 82.61%; specificity: 89.29% and 71.43%). PSMA-TLU, PSMA-TV, PSMA-TLU/ADC, and PSMA-TV/ADC were higher in patients with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001 to 0.005). PSMA-TLU/ADC and PSMA-TV/ADC best predicted lymph node metastasis (sensitivity: 77.78% and 100%; specificity: 89.29% and 71.43%). SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC were higher in bone metastasis cases (p = 0.045), but their predictive value for bone metastasis was limited (Area under the curve (AUC): 0.634 and 0.652).

Conclusion

F-18 PSMA-1007 PET/MRI may improve diagnostic accuracy for primary PCa lesions by utilizing the inverse relationship between ADC and other parameters. Moreover, a strong correlation between such parameters and presence of metastasis holds prognostic value of this modality.

Correlations Between MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and PET Standard Uptake Values in Simultaneous MR-PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer

This study evaluated the hypothesis that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET SUV, obtained via an advanced DL approach, correlates better with MR ADC maps than values from conventional PET-MR. Additionally, we aimed to identify the optimal SUV threshold for maximum correlation with ADC values. A cohort of 32 prostate cancer patients underwent CT and corresponding PET-MR imaging. The dataset underwent K-fold cross-validation, dividing it into four folds. In each fold, 24 patients were used for training, and 8 for validation to create DL models. ADC maps from 27 out of 32 patients were successfully aligned with T2 images for detailed analysis, revealing an inverse correlation (ρ = -0.20 to -0.51) between ADC and SUV values in prostate cancer zones. Statistically significant differences in mean SUV values were observed between PETMRI and PETDL. DL-based SUV values show a stronger correlation with ADC than conventional PET-MR values in our investigation.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Molecular Imaging Techniques for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Molecular imaging modalities show valuable non-invasive techniques capable of precisely and selectively addressing molecular markers associated with prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review provides an overview of imaging markers utilized in positron emission tomography (PET) methods, specifically focusing on the pathways and mediators involved in PCa. This systematic review aims to evaluate and analyse existing literature on the diagnostic accuracy of molecular imaging techniques for detecting PCa. The PubMed, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases were searched, identifying 32 studies that reported molecular imaging modalities for detecting PCa. Numerous imaging modalities and radiotracers were used to detect PCa, including 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/computed tomography (CT), 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, 18F-DCFPyL PET/MRI, 18F-choline PET/MRI, and 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/MRI. Across 11 studies, radiolabelled 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging had a pooled sensitivity of 80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35-93), specificity of 90 (95% CI: 71-98), and accuracy of 86 (95% CI: 64-96). The PSMA-ligand 68Ga-PET/CT showed good diagnostic performance and appears promising for detecting and staging PCa.

Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages.

RESULTS

We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18).

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging.

KEY POINTS

• Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET.

A Clinical Role of PET-MRI in Prostate Cancer?

PET/MRI is a relevant application field for prostate cancer management, offering advantages in early diagnosis, staging, and therapy planning. Despite drawbacks such as higher costs, longer acquisition time, and the need for skilled personnel, the technical integration of PET and MRI provides valuable information for detecting primary tumors, identifying metastases, and characterizing the disease, leading to more accurate staging and personalized treatment strategies. However, PET/MRI adoption has been slow, but ongoing technological advancements and AI integration might overcome challenges and improve clinical utility. As precision medicine gains importance in oncology, PET/MRI's multiparametric data can tailor treatment plans to individual patients, providing a comprehensive assessment of tumor biology and aggressiveness for more effective therapeutic strategies.

Improving diagnostic efficacy of primary prostate cancer with combined 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and multiparametric-MRI and quantitative parameters

Purpose

This prospective study aimed to evaluate the difference between 99mTc-PSMA single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of primary prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

Fifty-six men with suspected PCa between October 2019 and November 2022 were prospectively enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 29-87 years). Patients were divided into high-(Gleason score>7, n=31), medium- (Gleason score=7, n=6) and low-risk groups (Gleason score < 7, n=6). All patients underwent 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and mpMRI at an average interval of 3 days (range, 1-7 days). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin), and their ratio (SUVmax/ADCmin) were used as imaging parameters to distinguish benign from malignant prostatic lesions.

Results

Of the 56 patients, 12 were pathologically diagnosed with a benign disease, and 44 were diagnosed with PCa. 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and mpMRI showed no significant difference in the detection of primary PCa (kappa =0.401, P=0.002), with sensitivities of 97.7% (43/44) and 90.9% (40/44), specificities of 75.0% (9/12) and 75.0% (9/12), and AUC of 97.4% and 95.1%, respectively. The AUC of SUVmax/ADCmin was better than those of SUVmax or ADCmin alone. When SUVmax/ADCmin in the prostatic lesion was >7.0×103, the lesion was more likely to be malignant. When SUVmax/ADCmin in the prostatic lesion is >27.0×103, the PCa patient may have lymph node and bone metastases. SUVmax was positively correlated with the Gleason score (r=0.61, P=0.008), whereas ADCmin was negatively correlated with the Gleason score (r=-0.35, P=0.023). SUVmax/ADCmin was positively correlated with the Gleason score (r=0.59, P=0.023). SUVmax/ADCmin was the main predictor of the high-risk group, with an optimal cut-off value of 15.0×103.

Conclusions

The combination of 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT and mpMRI can improve the diagnostic efficacy for PCa compared with either modality alone; SUVmax/ADCmin is a valuable differential diagnostic imaging parameter.

Direct Patlak Reconstruction of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET for the Evaluation of Primary Prostate Cancer Prior Total Prostatectomy: Results of a Pilot Study

To investigate the use of kinetic parameters derived from direct Patlak reconstructions of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to predict the histological grade of malignancy of the primary tumor of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Thirteen patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years) with a primary, therapy-naïve PCa (median PSA 9.3 [range: 6.3-130 µg/L]) prior radical prostatectomy, were recruited in this exploratory prospective study. A dynamic whole-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan was performed for all patients. Measured quantification parameters included Patlak slope (Ki: absolute rate of tracer consumption) and Patlak intercept (Vb: degree of tracer perfusion in the tumor). Additionally, the mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax) of the tumor were determined from a static PET 60 min post tracer injection. In every patient, initial PSA (iPSA) values that were also the PSA level at the time of the examination and final histology results with Gleason score (GS) grading were correlated with the quantitative readouts. Collectively, 20 individual malignant prostate lesions were ascertained and histologically graded for GS with ISUP classification. Six lesions were classified as ISUP 5, two as ISUP 4, eight as ISUP 3, and four as ISUP 2. In both static and dynamic PET/CT imaging, the prostate lesions could be visually distinguished from the background. The average values of the SUVmean, slope, and intercept of the background were 2.4 (±0.4), 0.015 1/min (±0.006), and 52% (±12), respectively. These were significantly lower than the corresponding parameters extracted from the prostate lesions (all p < 0.01). No significant differences were found between these values and the various GS and ISUP (all p > 0.05). Spearman correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between static and dynamic PET/CT parameters (all r ≥ 0.70, p < 0.01). Both GS and ISUP grading revealed only weak correlations with the mean and maximum SUV and tumor-to-background ratio derived from static images and dynamic Patlak slope. The iPSA demonstrated no significant correlation with GS and ISUP grading or with dynamic and static PET parameter values. In this cohort of mainly high-risk PCa, no significant correlation between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 perfusion and consumption and the aggressiveness of the primary tumor was observed. This suggests that the association between SUV values and GS may be more distinctive when distinguishing clinically relevant from clinically non-relevant PCa.

Prostate MRI and PSMA-PET in the Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Over the last years, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has gained a key role in the primary diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). While a negative MRI can avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies and the overdiagnosis of indolent cancers, a positive examination triggers biopsy samples targeted to suspicious imaging findings, thus increasing the diagnosis of csPCa with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of around 90%. The limitations of MRI, including suboptimal positive predictive values, are fueling debate on how to stratify biopsy decisions and management based on patient risk and how to correctly estimate it with clinical and/or imaging findings. In this setting, "next-generation imaging" imaging based on radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is expanding its indications both in the setting of primary staging (intermediate-to-high risk patients) and primary diagnosis (e.g., increasing the sensitivity of MRI or acting as a problem-solving tool for indeterminate MRI cases). This review summarizes the current main evidence on the role of prostate MRI and PSMA-PET as tools for the primary diagnosis of csPCa, and the different possible interaction pathways in this setting.

Comparing the Detection Performance Between Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been promoted as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy. However, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) including 68 Ga-PSMA-11, 18 F-DCFPyL, and 18 F-PSMA-1007 applied PET/CT imaging was an emerging diagnostic tool in prostate cancer patients for staging or posttreatment follow-up, even early detecting. Many studies have used PSMA PET for comparison with mpMRI to test the diagnostic ability for early prostate cancer. Unfortunately, these studies have shown conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the differences in diagnostic performance between PSMA PET and mpMRI for detecting and T staging localized prostatic tumors.

METHODS

This meta-analysis involved a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. The pooling sensitivity and specificity of PSMA and mpMRI verified by pathological analysis were calculated and used to compare the differences between the 2 imaging tools.

RESULTS

Overall, 39 studies were included (3630 patients in total) from 2016 to 2022 in the current meta-analysis and found that the pooling sensitivity values for localized prostatic tumors and T staging T3a and T3b of PSMA PET were 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.86), 0.61 (95% CI, 0.39-0.79), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76), respectively, whereas those of mpMRI were found to be 0.84 (95% 0.78-0.89), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.80), and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively, without significant differences ( P > 0.05). However, in a subgroup analysis of radiotracer, the pooling sensitivity of 18 F-DCFPyL PET was higher than mpMRI (relative risk, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that whereas 18 F-DCFPyL PET was superior to mpMRI at detecting localized prostatic tumors, the detection performance of PSMA PET for localized prostatic tumors and T staging was comparable to that of mpMRI.

A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies

Context

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported.

Objective

In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup.

Evidence acquisition

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review.

Evidence synthesis

Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used.

Conclusions

This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa.

Patient summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.

A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide

The development of prostate cancer imaging is rapidly evolving, with many changes to the way patients are diagnosed, staged, and monitored for recurrence following treatment. New developments, including the potential role of imaging in screening and the combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of theranostics, are underway. In this paper, we aim to outline the current landscape in prostate cancer imaging and look to the future at the potential modalities and applications to come.

The Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) is a novel imaging technique with several potential applications in the prostate cancer (PCa) setting.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the current evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of PSMA PET/MRI in patients with primary and recurrent PCa.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive bibliographic search on the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in October 2020. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they assessed patients with primary or recurrent PCa (P) undergoing PSMA PET/MRI (I) with or without comparison with other imaging techniques (C) in order to evaluate its diagnostic performance (O). Retrospective and prospective primary clinical studies were included. Results of previous meta-analyses were reported.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 23 original articles and three meta-analyses were included. Limited evidence on PSMA PET/MRI is available, especially in the setting of partial gland ablation. PET/MRI can be an effective imaging modality for detecting primary PCa, showing higher accuracy than multiparametric MRI alone. It provides accurate local staging of primary PCa; however, there are contradictory results in this context when its performance is compared with other imaging techniques. PET/MRI also shows high performance for restaging and detecting tumor recurrence, even at low prostate-specific antigen levels.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA PET/MRI could represent a valuable tool in the management of patients with primary and recurrent PCa. No specific recommendations can be provided.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Encouraging data regarding the benefits of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prostate cancer are emerging from the literature.

Correlation Between Quantitative PSMA PET Parameters and Clinical Risk Factors in Non-Metastatic Primary Prostate Cancer Patients

Background

PSMA PET is frequently used for staging of prostate cancer patients. Furthermore, there is increasing interest to use PET information for personalized local treatment approaches in surgery and radiotherapy, especially for focal treatment strategies. However, it is not well established which quantitative imaging parameters show highest correlation with clinical and histological tumor aggressiveness.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 135 consecutive patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer and PSMA PET before any treatment. Clinical risk parameters (PSA values, Gleason score and D'Amico risk group) were correlated with quantitative PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), tumor asphericity (ASP) and PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV).

Results

Most of the investigated imaging parameters were highly correlated with each other (correlation coefficients between 0.20 and 0.95). A low to moderate, however significant, correlation of imaging parameters with PSA values (0.19 to 0.45) and with Gleason scores (0.17 to 0.31) was observed for all parameters except ASP which did not show a significant correlation with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristics for the detection of D'Amico high-risk patients showed poor to fair sensitivity and specificity for all investigated quantitative PSMA PET parameters (Areas under the curve (AUC) between 0.63 and 0.73). Comparison of AUC between quantitative PET parameters by DeLong test showed significant superiority of SUVmax compared to SUVmean for the detection of high-risk patients. None of the investigated imaging parameters significantly outperformed SUVmax.

Conclusion

Our data confirm prior publications with lower number of patients that reported moderate correlations of PSMA PET parameters with clinical risk factors. With the important limitation that Gleason scores were only biopsy-derived in this study, there is no indication that the investigated additional parameters deliver superior information compared to SUVmax.

Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer

Molecular imaging of prostate cancer continues to grow, with recent inclusion of several positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers into the recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the US Food and Drug Administration approval of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radiotracers. While much of the work for many of these radiotracers is focused on systemic staging and restaging in both newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer and biochemically recurrent disease patients, the potential role of molecular imaging for the detection of localized prostate cancer has not yet been fully established. The primary aim of this article will be to present the potential role for molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer and discuss potential advantages and disadvantages to utilization of both PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for this clinical indication of use.

Clinical Applications of PET/MR Imaging

PET/MR imaging is in routine clinical use and is at least as effective as PET/CT for oncologic and neurologic studies with advantages with certain PET radiopharmaceuticals and applications. In addition, whole body PET/MR imaging substantially reduces radiation dosages compared with PET/CT which is particularly relevant to pediatric and young adult population. For cancer imaging, assessment of hepatic, pelvic, and soft-tissue malignancies may benefit from PET/MR imaging. For neurologic imaging, volumetric brain MR imaging can detect regional volume loss relevant to cognitive impairment and epilepsy. In addition, the single-bed position acquisition enables dynamic brain PET imaging without extending the total study length which has the potential to enhance the diagnostic information from PET.

Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI

The role of molecular imaging in initial evaluation of men with presumed or established diagnosis of prostate cancer and work up of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease is rapidly evolving due to superior diagnostic performance compared to anatomic imaging. However, variable tumor biology and expression of transmembrane proteins or metabolic alterations poses a challenge. We review the evidence and controversies with emphasis on emerging PET radiopharmaceuticals and experience on clinical utility of PET/CT and PET/MRI in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

MRI/PET Imaging in elevated PSA and localized prostate cancer: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To review the recent milestones in MRI and PET based imaging and evaluate their evolving role in the setting of elevated PSA as well as localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND

The importance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PET based imaging for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer cannot be understated. Accurate staging has become another significant milestone with the use of PET scans, particularly with prostate specific radiotracers like 68-Gallium Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (68Ga-PSMA). Integrated PET/MRI systems are commercially available and can be modulated to evaluate the unique needs of localized as well as recurrent prostate cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar using the MeSH compliant and other keywords that included prostate cancer, PSA, mpMRI, PET CT, PET/MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

mpMRI has now established itself as the gold-standard of local prostate imaging and has been incorporated into international guidelines as part of the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT has shown superiority over conventional imaging even in staging of localized prostate cancer based on recent randomized control data. Imaging parameters from PET/MRI have been shown to be associated with malignancy, Gleason score and tumour volume. As mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT become more ubiquitous and established; we can anticipate more high-quality data, cost optimization and increasing availability of PET/MRI to be ready for primetime in localized prostate cancer.

Optimized Application of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-617 Whole-Body PET/CT and Pelvic PET/MR in Prostate Cancer Initial Diagnosis and Staging

Purpose: To analyze ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT or PET/MR and delayed PET/MR images in patients diagnosed with or suspicion of prostate cancer, and to explore the optimal use of PET/CT and PET/MR for initial diagnosis and staging in prostate cancer.

Methods: Images from conventional scan by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA whole-body PET/CT or PET/MR followed by delayed pelvic PET/MR were retrospectively analyzed. Prostatic ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA uptake was measured as SUVmax1 (conventional scan 1 h post injection) and SUVmax2 (delayed scan 3 h post injection). Age, PSA levels, and SUVmax were compared between benign and malignant cases. The correlation of SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 was analyzed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by ROC analysis.

Results: Fifty-six patients with 41 prostate cancers and 15 benign prostate lesions were enrolled. Fifty-three patients had paired conventional and delayed scans. Age, tPSA, fPSA levels, and SUVmax were significantly different between benign and malignant cases. A good correlation was found between SUVmax1 and SUVmax2. There was significant difference between SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 in the malignant group (p = 0.001). SUVmax1 had superior diagnostic performance than SUVmax2, SUVmax difference and PSA levels, with a sensitivity of 85.4%, a specificity of 100% and an AUC of 0.956. A combination of SUVmax1 with nodal and/or distant metastases and MR PI-RADS V2 score had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Delayed pelvic PET/MR imaging in 33 patients were found to be redundant because these patients had nodal and/or distant metastases which can be easily detected by PET/CT. PET/MR provided incremental value in 8 patients at early-stage prostate cancer based on precise anatomical localization and changes in lesion signal provided by MR.

Conclusion: Combined ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA whole-body PET/CT and pelvic PET/MR can accurately differentiate benign prostate diseases from prostate cancer and accurately stage prostate cancer. Whole-body PET/CT is sufficient for advanced prostate cancer. Pelvic PET/MR contributes to diagnosis and accurate staging in early prostate cancer. Imaging at about 1 h after injection is sufficient in most patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03756077. Registered 27 November 2018—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03756077.

Delayed 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Image-Guided Biopsy for Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

ABSTRACT

Image-guided biopsy of prostate with multiparametric MRI is being adopted in the workup of prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-guided biopsy has also been shown to be equally sensitive in the evaluation of higher-grade tumors with increased PSMA expression. The sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, however, reduces with lesser PSMA expression in low-grade PAC. Herein, we demonstrate a case where delayed 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging helped in detecting low-grade PAC in BPH.

Utility of T2-weighted MRI texture analysis in assessment of peripheral zone prostate cancer aggressiveness: a single-arm, multicenter study

T₂-weighted (T₂W) MRI provides high spatial resolution and tissue-specific contrast, but it is predominantly used for qualitative evaluation of prostate anatomy and anomalies. This retrospective multicenter study evaluated the potential of T₂W image-derived textural features for quantitative assessment of peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness. A standardized preoperative multiparametric MRI was performed on 87 PCa patients across 6 institutions. T₂W intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram, and T₂W textural features were computed from tumor volumes annotated based on whole-mount histology. Spearman correlations were used to evaluate association between textural features and PCa grade groups (i.e. 1–5). Feature utility in differentiating and classifying low-(grade group 1) vs. intermediate/high-(grade group ≥ 2) aggressive cancers was evaluated using Mann–Whitney U-tests, and a support vector machine classifier employing “hold-one-institution-out” cross-validation scheme, respectively. Textural features indicating image homogeneity and disorder/complexity correlated significantly (p < 0.05) with PCa grade groups. In the intermediate/high-aggressive cancers, textural homogeneity and disorder/complexity were significantly lower and higher, respectively, compared to the low-aggressive cancers. The mean classification accuracy across the centers was highest for the combined ADC and T₂W intensity-textural features (84%) compared to ADC histogram (75%), T₂W histogram (72%), T₂W textural (72%) features alone or T₂W histogram and texture (77%), T₂W and ADC histogram (79%) combined. Texture analysis of T₂W images provides quantitative information or features that are associated with peripheral zone PCa aggressiveness and can augment their classification.

Clinicopathological correlation of pre-biopsy quantitative PSMA uptake in patients with persistently raised serum PSA: initial experience in 74 patients with simultaneous 68-Ga PSMA PET/MRI

Objective:

To analyze 68-Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake pattern of the prostate and its correlation with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), and Gleason’s score in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate (CaP).

Methods:

This was a retrospective study conducted between June 2015 and August 2017. Patients who had undergone whole body 68-Ga PSMA HBED-CC simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis or staging of CaP were eligible. Patients who presented with persistently raised serum PSA (>4 ng/mL) and normal urine routine and negative culture were included in the study.

Results:

A total of 74 patients were included in the study. Significant positive correlation was observed between PSMA delayed uptake with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ( p<0.001, ρ=0.750), PSA level ( p<0.001, ρ=0.414), DRE ( p<0.002, ρ=0.400), and Gleason’s score ( p<0.300, ρ=0.02). There was a significant difference between early and delayed phase of PSMA uptake in malignant prostatic lesions ( p<0.001). Delayed phase of PSMA uptake was able to characterize prostate lesions with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.91. Combined receiver operating characteristic analysis of PI-RADS score derived from multiparametric MRI and differential PSMA uptake to characterize prostatic lesions improved AUC to 0.94.

Conclusion:

Results demonstrated that the correlation with clinicopathological features (PSA, DRE, and Gleason’s score) could be used in prognostication of prostatic lesion along with PSMA PET/MRI.

Clinical PET/MR

Oncologic imaging has been a major focus of clinical research on PET/MR over the last 10 years. Studies so far have shown that PET/MR with ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) overall provides a similar accuracy for tumor staging as FDG PET/CT. The effective radiation dose of whole-body FDG PET/MR is more than 50% lower than for FDG PET/CT, making PET/MR particularly attractive for imaging of children. However, the longer acquisition times and higher costs have so far limited broader clinical use of PET/MR technology for whole-body staging. With the currently available technology, PET/MR appears more promising for locoregional staging of diseases for which MR is the anatomical imaging modality of choice. These include brain tumors, head and neck cancers, gynecologic malignancies, and prostate cancer. For instance, PET imaging with ligands of prostate-specific membrane antigen, combined with multi-parametric MR, appears promising for detection of prostate cancer and differentiation from benign prostate pathologies as well as for detection of local recurrences. The combination of functional parameters from MR, such as apparent diffusion coefficients, and molecular parameters from PET, such as receptor densities or metabolic rates, is feasible in clinical studies, but clinical applications for this multimodal and multi-parametric imaging approach still need to be defined.

PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

In recent years, the clinical availability of scanners for integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled the practical potential of multimodal, combined metabolic-receptor, anatomical, and functional imaging to be explored. The present systematic review and meta-analysis summarize the diagnostic information provided by PET/MRI in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

A literature search was conducted in three different databases. The terms used were “choline” or “prostate-specific membrane antigen - PSMA” AND “prostate cancer” or “prostate” AND “PET/MRI” or “PET MRI” or “PET-MRI” or “positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.” All relevant records identified were combined, and the full texts were retrieved. Reports were excluded if (1) they did not consider hybrid PET/MRI; or (2) the sample size was < 10 patients; or (3) the raw data were not enough to enable the completion of a 2 × 2 contingency table.

Results

Fifty articles were eligible for systematic review, and 23 for meta-analysis. The pooled data concerned 2104 patients. Initial disease staging was the main indication for PET/MRI in 24 studies. Radiolabeled PSMA was the tracer most frequently used. In primary tumors, the pooled sensitivity for the patient-based analysis was 94.9%. At restaging, the pooled detection rate was 80.9% and was higher for radiolabeled PSMA than for choline (81.8% and 77.3%, respectively).

Conclusions

PET/MRI proved highly sensitive in detecting primary PCa, with a high detection rate for recurrent disease, particularly when radiolabeled PSMA was used.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05025-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT combining ADC value of MRI in the diagnosis of naive prostate cancer: Perspective of radiologist

Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission computed tomography /computed tomography (PET/CT) is more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa). We evaluated the value of Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with MRI in treatment-naive PCa.This retrospective study was approved by the hospital ethics committee. The MRI and Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging data of 63 cases of highly suspected PCa were enrolled in this study. The SUVmax and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and their ratio, were assessed as diagnostic markers to distinguish PCa from benign disease.There were 107 prostate lesions detected in 63 cases. Forty cases with 64 malignant primary lesions were confirmed PCa, whereas 23 cases had 43 benign lesions. PSMA-avid lesions correlated with hypointense signal on ADC maps and hyperintense signal on diffusion-weighted imaging. The ADC of PCa was lower than that of benign lesions, and SUVmax and SUVmax/ADC of PCa was higher than that of benign lesions (P < .01). ADC had significant negative correlation with Gleason score (GS) and SUVmax, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC positively correlated with GS. From ROC analysis, we established cutoff values of ADC, SUVmax, and SUVmax/ADC at 1.02 × 10mm/s, 11.72, and 12.35, respectively, to differentiate PCa from benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 90.6%, 58.1%, and 0.816 for ADC, 67.2%, 97.7%, and 0.905 for SUVmax, and 81.2%, 88.4%, and 0.929 for SUVmax/ADC, respectively.Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT combined with MRI offers higher diagnostic efficacy in the detection of PCa than either modality alone.

68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for the diagnosis of primary and biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI) in patients with primary and biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

We searched for relevant articles in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science until September 12, 2019. Studies regarding the diagnostic performance of⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI in detecting primary PCa and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after definitive treatment were included. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET/MRI in identifying primary PCa and the pooled detection rate of PET/MRI for BCR were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies with 707 patients were included in the analysis, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET/MRI in detecting primary PCa were 0.83 (95 % CI, 0.73-0.90) and 0.81 (95 % CI, 0.61-0.93), respectively. In the pooled analysis of BCR, the pooled detection rate was 76 % (95 % CI, 72 %-79 %). For four levels of PSA (0-0.2 ng/mL, 0.2-1 ng/mL, 1-2 ng/mL and more than 2 ng/mL), the pooled detection rates were 38 %, 67 %, 74 %, and 95 %, respectively. There was no distinct publication bias, but there was significant study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI is likely an effective imaging method in the diagnosis of primary PCa. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI in patients with BCR was also high, positively correlating with PSA levels.

Kinetic modeling of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and validation of simplified methods for quantification in primary prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The positron emission tomography (PET) ligand ⁶⁸Ga-Glu-urea-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11) targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), upregulated in prostate cancer cells. Although ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET is widely used in research and clinical practice, full kinetic modeling has not yet been reported nor have simplified methods for quantification been validated. The aims of our study were to quantify ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in primary prostate cancer patients using compartmental modeling with arterial blood sampling and to validate the use of standardized uptake values (SUV) and image-derived blood for quantification.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with histologically proven primary prostate cancer underwent a 60-min dynamic ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET scan of the pelvis with axial T1 Dixon, T2, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired simultaneously. Time-activity curves were derived from volumes of interest in lesions, normal prostate, and muscle, and mean SUV calculated. In total, 18 positive lesions were identified on both PET and MR. Arterial blood activity was measured by automatic arterial blood sampling and manual blood samples were collected for plasma-to-blood ratio correction and for metabolite analysis. The analysis showed that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 was stable in vivo. Based on the Akaike information criterion, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 kinetics were best described by an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. The rate constants K₁ and k₃ and the net influx rate constants K_i were all significantly higher in lesions compared to normal tissue (p < 0.05). K_i derived using image-derived blood from an MR-guided method showed excellent agreement with K_i derived using arterial blood sampling (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). SUV correlated significantly with K_i with the strongest correlation of scan time-window 30-45 min (rho 0.95, p < 0.001). Both K_i and SUV correlated significantly with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and PSA density.

CONCLUSIONS

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 kinetics can be described by an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. An MR-guided method for image-derived blood provides a non-invasive alternative to blood sampling for kinetic modeling studies. SUV showed strong correlation with K_i and can be used in routine clinical settings to quantify ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 uptake.

Correlation of SUVmax and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Detected by Ga-68 PSMA PET/MRI in Primary Prostate Lesions and Their Significance in Lymph Node Metastasis: Preliminary Results of an On-going Study

Objectives:

Gallium-68 (Ga-68) prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to be more accurate than multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detection of primary prostate lesions. Using hybrid PET/MRI we aim to detect the correlation between SUV_max and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in primary prostate lesions and to assess their prognostic value in detection of lymph node (LN) metastasis.

Methods:

Twenty-six patients, who were diagnosed as having prostate cancer with biopsy and underwent Ga-68 PSMA PET/MRI together with biparametric prostate MRI (bpMRI) were included. SUV_max, SUV_mean and ADC were recorded for index lesions drawing a region of interest (ROI) of 1 cm² around the pixel with the highest SUV_max (ROI-1) and another ROI following borders of prostate tumor detected by bpMRI (ROI-2). Presence of LN metastasis was recorded according to PSMA PET/MRI.

Results:

SUV_max was inversely correlated with ADC (ROI-1: p=0.010; ROI-2: p=0.017 for b=800). SUV_max and SUV_means were both higher in patients with LN metastasis and ADC was lower in patients with LN metastasis for ROI-1. SUV_max cut-off value of 19.8 for ROI-1 and 20.9 for ROI-2 had sensitivity and specificity of 77.8% and 76.5%, respectively for detection of LN metastasis, whereas ADC (b=800) cut-off value of 0.92x10^-3 mm²/s had sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 76.5%, respectively. SUV_max/ADC (b=800) ratio increased the sensitivity and specificity to 100% and 82.4%, respectively.

Conclusion:

SUV and ADC values are inversely correlated in primary prostate lesions and the combined use of both values increases the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid PET/MRI in the detection of primary prostate lesions.

Comparison of PET/MRI with multiparametric MRI in diagnosis of primary prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI using various radiotracers with multiparametric (mp) MRI for detection of primary prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A systematic literature search up to January 2019 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of PET/MRI and mpMRI for detection of PCa in the same patient cohorts and had sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables for true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), false-negative (FN), and true-negative (TN) results. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool, and pooled sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curves (AUCs) were used to compare the performances of PET/MRI and mpMRI.

RESULTS

We identified 9 eligible studies that included a total of 353 patients. PET/MRI had a SEN of 0.783 (95% CI, 0.758-0.807) and a SPE of 0.899 (95% CI, 0.879-0.917), and mpMRI had a SEN of 0.603 (95% CI, 0.574-0.631) and a SPE of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.866-0.906). PET/MRI had a higher AUC than mpMRI (0.9311, 95% CI, 0.8990-0.9632 vs. 0.8403, 95% CI, 0.7864-0.8942; P =  0.0036). There was no notable publication bias, but there was medium heterogeneity in outcomes. The meta-regression analysis showed the major potential cause of heterogeneity was the use of region-based rather than lesion-based analysis.

CONCLUSION

PET/MRI has very good diagnostic performance and outperforms mpMRI for the diagnosis of primary PCa.