1
|
Loban K, Milland T, Hales L, Lam NN, Dipchand C, Sandal S. Understanding the Healthcare Needs of Living Kidney Donors Using the Picker Principles of Patient-centered Care: A Scoping Review. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00770. [PMID: 38773835 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Living kidney donors (LKDs) undertake a complex and multifaceted journey when pursuing donation and have several unmet healthcare needs. A comprehensive understanding of these needs across their entire donation trajectory can help develop a patient-centered care model. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize empirical evidence, published since 2000, on LKDs' experiences with healthcare from when they decided to pursue donation to postdonation care, and what they reported as their care needs. We categorized them according to the 8 Picker principles of patient-centered care. Of the 4514 articles screened, 47 were included. Ample literature highlighted the need for (1) holistic, adaptable, and linguistically appropriate approaches to education and information; (2) systematic, consistent, and proactive coordination and integration of care; and (3) self-management and preparation to optimize perioperative physical comfort. Some literature highlighted the need for (4) better continuity and transition of care postdonation. Two key unmet needs were the lack of (5) a holistic psychosocial evaluation predonation and predischarge to provide emotional support and alleviation of fear and anxiety; and (6) access to specialty and psychosocial services postdonation especially when adverse events occurred. Limited literature explored the principles of (7) respect for patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs; and (8) involvement of family and friends as caregivers. We summarize several unmet healthcare needs of LKDs throughout their donation journey and highlight knowledge gaps. Addressing them can improve their well-being and experiences, and potentially address inequities in living kidney donation and increase living donor kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katya Loban
- MEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Thea Milland
- MEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lindsay Hales
- Library Services, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christine Dipchand
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Shaifali Sandal
- MEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weightman AC, Coghlan S, Clayton PA. Respecting living kidney donor autonomy: an argument for liberalising living kidney donor acceptance criteria. Monash Bioeth Rev 2023; 41:156-173. [PMID: 36484936 PMCID: PMC10654180 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-022-00166-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Doctors routinely refuse donation offers from prospective living kidney donors with certain comorbidities such as diabetes or obesity out of concern for donor wellbeing. This refusal occurs despite the ongoing shortage of kidney transplants and the superior performance of living donor kidney transplants compared to those from deceased donors. In this paper, we argue that this paternalistic refusal by doctors is unjustified and that, within limits, there should be greater acceptance of such donations. We begin by describing possible weak and strong paternalistic justifications of current conservative donor acceptance guidelines and practices. We then justify our position by outlining the frequently under-recognised benefits and the routinely overestimated harms of such donation, before discussing the need to respect the autonomy of willing donors with certain comorbidities. Finally, we respond to a number of possible objections to our proposal for more liberal kidney donor acceptance criteria. We use the situation in Australia as our case study, but our argument is applicable to comparable situations around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison C Weightman
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
- Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
| | - Simon Coghlan
- Centre for AI and Digital Ethics, School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip A Clayton
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fox D, Hall M, Thibodeau C, Coldwell K, Lauder L, Dewell S, Davidson S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadian transplant journeys: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068347. [PMID: 38040429 PMCID: PMC10693860 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Navigating the organ donation and transplantation system in Canada can be challenging for individuals on transplant journeys. Although it is likely that the COVID-19 pandemic has further contributed to these challenges, the experiences of individuals during the pandemic in Canada have not been well elicited. OBJECTIVE To illuminate how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted individuals on transplant journeys in Canada. DESIGN Convergent parallel mixed-methods study. SETTING Canada. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients, caregivers, and donors on transplant journeys across Canada. DATA COLLECTION Eight focus groups and an online survey between May and November 2021. Focus group transcripts were analysed using an inductive conventional content analysis approach. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The study was guided by individuals with lived experience of organ donation and transplantation. RESULTS A total of 830 participants completed three COVID-19 related survey questions, with 21 participating in the focus groups. Survey results: over 50% of patients and caregivers reported that the pandemic impacted their access to their healthcare team, their mental health (60% and 65%, respectively) and their comfort going out in public (80% and 75%, respectively). Although many donors reported several factors that impacted their transplant journey, the impact appeared to be greater for patients and caregivers. Qualitative results: three themes emerged from the qualitative data that contextualise participant's experiences: compounding isolation, disruption amid uncertainty and unforeseen benefits. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated many of the challenges that individuals on transplant journeys experience. It will be critical for transplant programmes to consider these factors in future care provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Fox
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marc Hall
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Kristi Coldwell
- Transplant Research Foundation of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lydia Lauder
- Kidney Foundation of Canada, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sarah Dewell
- School of Nursing, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sandra Davidson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karydis N, Maroulis I. Changing landscape in living kidney donation in Greece. World J Transplant 2023; 13:28-35. [PMID: 36908308 PMCID: PMC9993187 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i2.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with end-stage renal disease in Greece are facing long waiting times to receive a kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Living kidney donation offers a valuable alternative that provides optimal outcomes and significantly expands the donor pool but still remains relatively underutilised. Developments around the world in the field of kidney transplantation mandate a change in current practice to include additional options for living donation through paired exchange, antibody-incompatible transplantation and other strategies, following careful consideration of the cultural and ethical factors involved in these complex clinical decisions. An increase in living donation rates may be achieved in several ways, including targeted campaigning to overcome potential barriers. Educating clinicians on transplantation will prove as equally important as informing patients and prospective donors but requires training and resources. Adoption of established practices and implementation of new strategies must be tailored to the needs of the Greek donor and recipient population. Local beliefs about donation, perception of associated risk and other social characteristics must be considered in the design of future strategies. Facilitating living donation in a safe environment with appropriate donor and recipient education will form the solid foundation of a new era of kidney transplantation in Greece.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Karydis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| | - Ioannis Maroulis
- Department of General Surgery, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laneuville L, Ballesteros F, Affdal A, Malo MF, Brassard L, Gagnon Chainey B, Millot P, Mavrikakis C, Harel S, Fortin MC. Perspectives of Kidney Transplant Recipients, Transplant Candidates, and Living Kidney Donors on the Role of Patients’ Self-Narratives and Experiences of Creative Writing Workshops: A Qualitative Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221132742. [PMID: 36353517 PMCID: PMC9638699 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221132742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for kidney failure but is
associated with medical, psychological, and existential challenges for
patients. Patients’ experiential knowledge can help other patients facing
these challenges. Patients’ self-narratives and creative writings are ways
to operationalize this experiential knowledge. Creative writing has been
described as a therapeutic tool for patients with chronic disease. Over the
past year, we conducted creative writing workshops with kidney transplant
recipients (KTRs), living kidney donors (LKDs), kidney transplant candidates
(KTCs), and professional writers. During these workshops, patients were
invited to explore different aspects of their experiences of their
transplant or donation journey through narrative-writing, poetry, comic art,
and screenwriting. Objective: The objectives of this study were to gather the perspectives of KTRs, KTCs,
and LKDs on the role of patients’ self-narratives and creative writing, and
to collect patients’ experiences of the creative writing workshops. Design: Focus groups and individual interviews. Setting: The Center hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) kidney transplant
program. Participants: KTRs, LKDs, and KTCs attending the CHUM kidney transplant clinic between
February 2020 and January 2021. Methods: We conducted 2 focus groups and 8 semi-structured individual interviews with
7 KTRs, 8 LKDs, and 5 KTCs from the CHUM between June and November 2020,
before the creative writing workshops. We also conducted 10 semi-structured
interviews with 5 KTRs, 1 KTC, and 4 LKDs in March 2021, after their
participation in the creative writing workshops. The interviews were
recorded and transcribed. Thematic and content analyses were conducted. Results: KTRs, LKDs, and KTCs had multiple significant moments to share from their
transplant/donation journey. These moments were highly emotional and marked
by uncertainty. The creative writing workshops were described as therapeutic
by participants, because they offered a safe space for group-facilitated
reflection, including a discovery and learning process, and normalization,
relativization, and appreciation of the transplant/donation experience. The
creative writing workshops also provided an opportunity to give back to
others (helping other patients, promoting kidney donation and continuing
this process in the future through the web platform). Limitations: Our participants came from a single French-speaking urban transplant center
in Quebec and were highly educated. Conclusion: The study set out to capture the perspectives of KTRs, LKDs, and KTCs through
the sharing of self-narratives and their participation in creative writing
workshops related to their transplant or donation journey. A website was set
up to publish patients’ creative writings (https://recitsdudonetdelavie.lorganon.ca/les-recits/).
Further study is needed to assess the website’s impact on other
patients. Trial registration: Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Laneuville
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Aliya Affdal
- Bioethics Program, École de santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Françoise Malo
- Bioethics Program, École de santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Léonore Brassard
- Chaire McConnell-Université de Montréal en recherche-création sur les récits de don et de la vie en contexte de soins, QC, Canada
| | - Benjamin Gagnon Chainey
- Chaire McConnell-Université de Montréal en recherche-création sur les récits de don et de la vie en contexte de soins, QC, Canada
| | - Pascale Millot
- Chaire McConnell-Université de Montréal en recherche-création sur les récits de don et de la vie en contexte de soins, QC, Canada
- Département des littératures de langues française, Faculté des arts et des sciences, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Mavrikakis
- Chaire McConnell-Université de Montréal en recherche-création sur les récits de don et de la vie en contexte de soins, QC, Canada
- Département des littératures de langues française, Faculté des arts et des sciences, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Simon Harel
- Chaire McConnell-Université de Montréal en recherche-création sur les récits de don et de la vie en contexte de soins, QC, Canada
- Département de littératures et de langues du monde, Faculté des arts et des sciences, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Chantal Fortin
- Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Bioethics Program, École de santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
- Chaire McConnell-Université de Montréal en recherche-création sur les récits de don et de la vie en contexte de soins, QC, Canada
- Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rota-Musoll L, Brigidi S, Molina-Robles E, Oriol-Vila E, Homs-Del Valle M, Subirana-Casacuberta M. Sexo y género en la donación de riñón: visiones desde la consulta. ENFERMERÍA NEFROLÓGICA 2021. [DOI: 10.37551/s2254-28842021032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introducción: En el trasplante renal de donante vivo son las mujeres las que donan con más frecuencia. Las profesionales de nefrología tienen un papel muy importante en la información sobre los tratamientos de sustitución renal y la ayuda en la toma de decisiones. Objetivo: Explorar cómo influye la perspectiva de género en el trasplante renal de donante vivo desde la visión de las profesionales de nefrología.Metodología: Estudio cualitativo fenomenológico. Participaron 13 profesionales de las Unidades de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal de Catalunya. Se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas y se analizaron a través de un análisis temático. Resultados: Las opiniones y percepciones de las profesionales de nefrología se clasificaron a través de los siguientes temas: 1) manera de informar sobre los tratamientos; 2) donación habitual; 3) predisposición para donar y 4) actitud de la persona donante. Las mujeres se muestran más predispuestas a donar debido a los mandatos de género, además de las desigualdades en el mercado laboral. Cabe destacar que, la forma en la toma de decisión es igual para hombres y mujeres. Así mismo, las mujeres se muestran más preparadas psicológicamente y se recuperan más rápido del postoperatorio. Conclusiones: La feminización en la donación de riñón es la suma de factores médicos, socioculturales y económicos. Los roles de género influyen en las mujeres en sus actitudes y comportamientos a lo largo de todo el proceso de trasplante renal de vivo. Las profesionales de nefrología entrevistadas describen las diferencias entre hombres y mujeres en la donación de riñón.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Departamento de Antropología. Filosofía y Trabajo social de la Universidad Rovira i Virgili (URV). Tarragona. España
| | | | - Ester Oriol-Vila
- Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Universitario de Vic. Vic. España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Locke JE, Reed RD, Shewchuk RM, Stegner KL, Qu H. Cognitive mapping as an approach to facilitate organ donation among African Americans. Sci Prog 2021; 104:368504211029442. [PMID: 34261381 PMCID: PMC10450727 DOI: 10.1177/00368504211029442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Making up 13.4% of the United States population, African Americans (AAs) account for 28.7% of candidates who are currently waiting for an organ donation. AAs are disproportionately affected by end-organ disease, particularly kidney disease, therefore, the need for transplantation among this population is high, and the high need is also observed for other solid organ transplantation. To this end, we worked with the AA community to derive an empirical framework of organ donation strategies that may facilitate AA decision-making. We used a cognitive mapping approach involving two distinct phases of primary data collection and a sequence of data analytic procedures to elicit and systematically organize strategies for facilitating organ donation. AA adults (n = 89) sorted 27 strategies identified from nominal group technique meetings in phase 1 based on their perceived similarities. Sorting data were aggregated and analyzed using Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses. Among 89 AA participants, 68.2% were female, 65.5% obtained > high school education, 69.5% reported annual household income ≤ $50,000. The average age was 47.4 years (SD = 14.5). Derived empirical framework consisted of five distinct clusters: fundamental knowledge, psychosocial support, community awareness, community engagement, and system accountability; and two dimensions: Approach, Donor-related Information. The derived empirical framework reflects an organization scheme that may facilitate AA decision-making about organ donation and suggests that targeted dissemination of donor-related information at both the individual-donor and community levels may be critical for increasing donation rates among AAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayme E Locke
- Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Rhiannon D Reed
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Richard M Shewchuk
- School of Health Professions, Department of Health Services Administration, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Katherine L Stegner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Haiyan Qu
- School of Health Professions, Department of Health Services Administration, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of qualitative research approaches in the study of health, disease, and health service delivery and summarizes important considerations when designing research studies to address questions that ask the "how," "why," or "what" of a particular issue. As qualitative research encompasses distinct methodologies, brief descriptions of the main approaches and examples from the literature are provided. Guidance on how to evaluate quality in the design and reporting of qualitative studies is also discussed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rota-Musoll L, Brigidi S, Molina-Robles E, Oriol-Vila E, Perez-Oller L, Subirana-Casacuberta M. An intersectional gender analysis in kidney transplantation: women who donate a kidney. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:59. [PMID: 33593306 PMCID: PMC7885450 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02262-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living-donor transplantation is the best treatment option in patients with chronic kidney failure. Global data show that women are less likely to be kidney recipients than men but are more likely to become living kidney donors. We explored the experience of women who donate a kidney to relatives with biological and socio-cultural ties and to understand the similarities and differences in their experience. METHODS A qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological study with an intersectional analysis of gender. Ten women donors accepted in the transplant evaluation period participated, all of whom donated a kidney to a pre-dialysis relative. Two categories were included: women with biological kinship ties (mothers, sisters) and women who have a socio-cultural relationship (wives) with kidney recipient. The data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Women donate their kidneys in a convinced manner, without worrying about their health, with an optimistic and positive attitude, and without believing that they are acting heroically. Women with biological kinship ties see it as a 'naturalization thing'. In contrast, wives donate conditioned by gender roles, but also as a form of empowerment and as a personal benefit: they donate in order to avoid taking on carer role for their husband and as a way of protecting their children. CONCLUSION The study's findings expand the conception of kidney donation as solely altruistic and may help professionals to pay attention to the complexity and intersectionality of features present in women who are living kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rota-Musoll
- Department of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work in the University of Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Catalunya, Spain.
| | - Esmeralda Molina-Robles
- Department of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Ester Oriol-Vila
- Department of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | | | - Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
- Department of Nursing Management, Parc Taulí Health Corporation Consortium, Sabadell, Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reed RD, Killian AC, Mustian MN, Hendricks DH, Baldwin KN, Kumar V, Dionne-Odom JN, Saag K, Hites L, Ivankova NV, Locke JE. The Living Donor Navigator Program Provides Support Tools for Caregivers. Prog Transplant 2020; 31:55-61. [PMID: 33353498 DOI: 10.1177/1526924820978598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Living Donor Navigator (LDN) program is one of several initiatives designed to help transplant candidates identify living donors with the help of a friend or family member advocate to speak on their behalf. More than half of advocates in the LDN program were the spouse or parent of the candidate and served in a caregiving role. Caregivers for patients awaiting transplantation have reported poorer quality of life than the general population, suggesting more support is needed for this vulnerable group. The purpose of this study was to understand whether the LDN program met the needs of advocates who were also caregivers for the transplant candidate. METHODS We performed a supplementary secondary qualitative analysis of a parent study conducted December 2017-January 2018 with 9 advocates who participated in the LDN program. Transcripts were reanalyzed from focus group discussions, concentrating on comments about caregiving or made by caregivers. Using manual coding and reflexive thematic analysis, we identified broad codes and major themes. FINDINGS Our re-analysis revealed one theme overlapping with our previous analysis (Support) and 2 new themes specific to caregiver advocates: Quality of Life and Fear. Caregivers agreed that the LDN program equipped them with tools to address these areas and best serve their simultaneous caregiver/advocate roles. DISCUSSION These analyses demonstrated that those who served as advocate and caregiver derived a benefit from the LDN program but had distinct needs from other advocates. These findings can inform continued refinement of the program and expansion to support needs of caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon D Reed
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - A Cozette Killian
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Margaux N Mustian
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Daagye H Hendricks
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kimberly N Baldwin
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Vineeta Kumar
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Kenneth Saag
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Lisle Hites
- 37364University of Alabama College of Community Health Sciences, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| | - Natalia V Ivankova
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA.,9968University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Health Professions, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jayme E Locke
- 9968University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Transplant Institute, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schick-Makaroff K, Hays RE, Hunt J, Taylor LA, Rudow DL. Education Priorities and What Matters to Those Considering Living Kidney Donation. Prog Transplant 2020; 31:32-39. [PMID: 33297879 DOI: 10.1177/1526924820978599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although informed consent content elements are prescribed in detailed regulatory guidance, many live kidney donors describe feeling underprepared and under informed. The goal of this pilot study was to explore the educational components needed to support an informed decision-making process for living kidney donors. METHODS/APPROACH A qualitative description design was conducted with thematic analysis of 5 focus groups with 2 cohorts: living kidney donor candidates (n = 11) and living kidney donors (n = 8). FINDINGS The educational components needed to engage in an informed decision-making process were: 1) contingent upon, and motivated by, personal circumstances; 2) supported through explanation of risks and benefits; 3) enhanced by understanding the overall donation experience; and 4) personalized by talking to another donor. DISCUSSION Tailoring education to meet the needs for fully informed decision-making is essential. Current education requirements, as defined by regulatory bodies, remain challenging to transplant teams attempting to ensure fully informed consent of living kidney donor candidates. Information on the emotional, financial, and overall life impact is needed, along with acknowledgement of relational ties driving donor motivations and the hoped-for recipient outcomes. Discussion of care practices, and access to peer mentoring may further strengthen the informed decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca E Hays
- 5229University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Julia Hunt
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, 5944Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura A Taylor
- 1865Uniformed Services University of the Health Science/Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dianne LaPointe Rudow
- Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, 5944Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oveyssi J, Manera KE, Baumgart A, Cho Y, Forfang D, Saxena A, Craig JC, Fung SK, Harris D, Johnson DW, Kerr PG, Lee A, Ruiz L, Tong M, Wang AYM, Yip T, Tong A, Shen JI. Patient and caregiver perspectives on burnout in peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2020; 41:484-493. [PMID: 33174471 DOI: 10.1177/0896860820970064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal dialysis (PD) can offer patients more autonomy and flexibility compared with in-center hemodialysis (HD). However, burnout - defined as mental, emotional, or physical exhaustion that leads to thoughts of discontinuing PD - is associated with an increased risk of transfer to HD. We aimed to describe the perspectives of burnout among patients on PD and their caregivers. METHODS In this focus group study, 81 patients and 45 caregivers participated in 14 focus groups from 9 dialysis units in Australia, Hong Kong, and the United States. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS We identified two themes. Suffering an unrelenting responsibility contributed to burnout, as patients and caregivers felt overwhelmed by the daily regimen, perceived their life to be coming to a halt, tolerated the PD regimen for survival, and had to bear the burden and uncertainty of what to expect from PD alone. Adapting and building resilience against burnout encompassed establishing a new normal, drawing inspiration and support from family, relying on faith and hope for motivation, and finding meaning in other activities. CONCLUSIONS For patients on PD and their caregivers, burnout was intensified by perceiving PD as an unrelenting, isolating responsibility that they had no choice but to endure, even if it held them back from doing other activities in life. More emphasis on developing strategies to adapt and build resilience could prevent or minimize burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, 4334The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Baumgart
- Sydney School of Public Health, 4334The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Anjali Saxena
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, 4334The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Samuel Ks Fung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Jockey Club Nephrology and Urology Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - David Harris
- Sydney Medical School, 4334The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Peter G Kerr
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Achilles Lee
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, 36658Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lorena Ruiz
- Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Tong
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, 260246Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China
| | - Angela Yee-Moon Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Terence Yip
- Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, 4334The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rota-Musoll L, Subirana-Casacuberta M, Oriol-Vila E, Homs-Del Valle M, Molina-Robles E, Brigidi S. The experience of donating and receiving a kidney: A systematic review of qualitative studies. J Ren Care 2020; 46:169-184. [PMID: 31868304 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The experiences described by people who have undergone kidney transplant are complex. Understanding how donors and recipients experience kidney transplantation can help us to design strategies that provide a more person-centred health care. OBJECTIVES To review articles that report the experiences of donors and recipients in the living-donor kidney transplantation process. METHOD A systematic review of qualitative studies was carried out. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were used to search for articles published in English, French and Spanish between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles were included in this review. For recipients, receiving a kidney is a positive experience (positive feelings and significant experience) that also involves certain difficulties and stressors (making a difficult decision, fears and worries). The experience of the donors is positive as they are motivated to improve the life of the recipient. They are committed to donating and use coping strategies as well as experiencing personal growth. On the contrary, being a donor involves certain difficulties and stressors (personal investment, mental, physical and economic impact and overcoming opposition) and a perception of deficiency in the health system (lack of information and attentiveness). CONCLUSION Donating and receiving a kidney is a positive experience that involves certain difficulties and a variety of stressors for both the donors and recipients. Moreover, the donors note deficiencies in the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rota-Musoll
- Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Nephrology, Vic, Barcelona, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Mireia Subirana-Casacuberta
- Department of Nursing Management, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Ester Oriol-Vila
- Department of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | - Esmeralda Molina-Robles
- Department of Nephrology, Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya, Vic, Catalunya, Spain
- Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lam NN, Dipchand C, Fortin MC, Foster BJ, Ghanekar A, Houde I, Kiberd B, Klarenbach S, Knoll GA, Landsberg D, Luke PP, Mainra R, Singh SK, Storsley L, Gill J. Canadian Society of Transplantation and Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the 2017 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120918457. [PMID: 32577294 PMCID: PMC7288834 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120918457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review an international guideline on the evaluation and care of living
kidney donors and provide a commentary on the applicability of the
recommendations to the Canadian donor population. Sources of information: We reviewed the 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney
Donors and compared this guideline to the Canadian 2014 Kidney Paired
Donation (KPD) Protocol for Participating Donors. Methods: A working group was formed consisting of members from the Canadian Society of
Transplantation and the Canadian Society of Nephrology. Members were
selected to have representation from across Canada and in various
subspecialties related to living kidney donation, including nephrology,
surgery, transplantation, pediatrics, and ethics. Key findings: Many of the KDIGO Guideline recommendations align with the KPD Protocol
recommendations. Canadian researchers have contributed to much of the
evidence on donor evaluation and outcomes used to support the KDIGO
Guideline recommendations. Limitations: Certain outcomes and risk assessment tools have yet to be validated in the
Canadian donor population. Implications: Living kidney donors should be counseled on the risks of postdonation
outcomes given recent evidence, understanding the limitations of the
literature with respect to its generalizability to the Canadian donor
population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ngan N Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Bethany J Foster
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Isabelle Houde
- Division of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Québec, Québec City, Canada
| | - Bryce Kiberd
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Greg A Knoll
- Division of Nephrology, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - David Landsberg
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Patrick P Luke
- Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rahul Mainra
- Division of Nephrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Sunita K Singh
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leroy Storsley
- Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Jagbir Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mathur AK, Hong BA, Goodrich NP, Xing J, Warren PH, Gifford KA, Merion RM, Ojo AO. Satisfaction with life and depressive symptoms in living organ donors and non‐donors: New insights from the National Living Donor Assistance Center. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e13838. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amit K. Mathur
- Transplant Surgery Mayo Clinic Phoenix AZ USA
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Mayo Clinic Phoenix Phoenix AZ USA
| | - Barry A. Hong
- Psychiatric Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA
| | | | - Jiawei Xing
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health Ann Arbor MI USA
| | | | | | | | - Akinlolu O. Ojo
- Medical School Administration, University of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas KS USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cash E, Graver A, Kuo S, Kirkland G, Hughes P, Robertson A, Jose MD. Why do not all living kidney donor candidates proceed to donation? Intern Med J 2019; 49:384-387. [PMID: 30897662 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
There are national and international guidelines for donor workup and acceptance criteria of potential living kidney donor candidates (LKDC), but there is significant variation in clinical practice. We examined our local practice in assessing potential LKDC against current guidelines; nearly all of our accepted donors met these guidelines. LKDC who did not proceed to donation had an identified health issue (60%), the presence of risk factors for long-term end-stage kidney disease (17%), social (13%) or immunological reasons (7%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie Cash
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Alison Graver
- Renal Unit, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Stephanie Kuo
- Renal Unit, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | | | - Peter Hughes
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda Robertson
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew D Jose
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,Renal Unit, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ralph AF, Chadban SJ, Butow P, Craig JC, Kanellis J, Wong G, Logeman C, Tong A. The experiences and impact of being deemed ineligible for living kidney donation: Semi-structured interview study. Nephrology (Carlton) 2019; 25:339-350. [PMID: 31257667 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM We aimed to describe the impact and experience of being deemed ineligible as a living kidney donor. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 ineligible donor candidates. Transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS Seven themes were identified: deriving health and relationship benefits in the process (strengthening emotional connection, identifying problematic health conditions); devastating loss and disappointment (harbouring guilt over personal failings, shattering confidence and hope, undermining relationships with extended family and friends, disrupting home dynamics); constrained within a rigid system (denied autonomy, resorting to other avenues); acknowledging as matter of fact (accepting the clinical decision, reassured by preventing a poor outcome); reluctant to relinquish the donor identity (unable to fulfil family duty, having the donor role stolen, holding onto other opportunities to donate); uncertainty in unpredictability, inconsistency and ambiguities (frustrated by inefficiencies, questioning clinician motivation, suspended donor status, unfairness in changeable eligibility criteria, unresolved concerns and questions of own health); and abandoned in despair (lacking practical support to meet eligibility criteria, ill prepared for rejection, dismissed and discarded by the system). CONCLUSION Being deemed unsuitable for donation took an emotional toll on ineligible donor candidates who felt immense guilt for 'failing' the potential recipient. Ineligible donor candidates were frustrated and angry with the perceived lack of support from clinicians and rigidity of the evaluation process. Informing potential donors of available services, including psychological support, communicating the decision sensitively and with sufficient time, and full disclosure of their health status, may contribute to improved adjustment following the ineligibility decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique F Ralph
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steve J Chadban
- Kidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - John Kanellis
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health and Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charlotte Logeman
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ralph AF, Butow P, Craig JC, Chapman JR, Gill JS, Kanellis J, Tong A. Clinicians' attitudes and approaches to evaluating the potential living kidney donor-recipient relationship: An interview study. Nephrology (Carlton) 2019; 24:252-262. [PMID: 29437270 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Careful assessment of the potential donor-recipient relationship is recommended by guidelines to prevent undue coercion, and to ensure realistic expectations and genuine motivations. However, relationships are complex, nuanced and value-laden, and can be challenging to evaluate in living kidney donation. We aimed to describe the attitudes and approaches of transplant clinicians towards assessing the relationship between potential living kidney donors and their recipients. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 54 transplant clinicians (nephrologists, surgeons, coordinators, social workers, psychiatrists and psychologists) from 32 transplant centres across nine countries including Australia, United States, Canada and New Zealand. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Four themes were identified: protecting against vulnerability and premature decisions (ensuring genuine motivation, uncovering precarious dynamics and pre-empting conflict, shared accountability, relying on specialty psychosocial expertise, trusting intimate bonds, tempering emotional impulsivity); safeguarding against coercion (discerning power imbalance, justified inquiry, awareness of impression management); minimizing potential threat to relationships (preserving the bond, giving equitable attention to donors and recipients, ensuring realistic expectations); and ambiguities in making judgments (adjudicating appropriateness and authenticity of relationships, questioning professional intervening, uncertainties in subjective and emotional assessments). CONCLUSIONS Clinicians felt ethically compelled to minimize the risk of undue coercion and to protect donors and recipients when evaluating the donor-recipient relationship. However, disentangling voluntariness and altruism from potential undisclosed pressures to enact societal and family duty, making decisions within this complex, multi-stakeholder context, and avoiding the imposition of undue paternalism and donor autonomy, were challenging. Multidisciplinary expertise and practical strategies for managing uncertainties are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique F Ralph
- Sydney School of Public Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Melbourne, Australia.,Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-based Decision-making, The University of Sydney, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeremy R Chapman
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The University of Sydney, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John S Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - John Kanellis
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health and Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Ralph AF, Butow P, Craig JC, Wong G, Chadban SJ, Luxton G, Gutman T, Hanson CS, Ju A, Tong A. Living kidney donor and recipient perspectives on their relationship: longitudinal semi-structured interviews. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026629. [PMID: 30948607 PMCID: PMC6500358 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Many donors and recipients report an improved bond posttransplantation; however, unexpected conflicts and tension may also occur. Insights into the lived experiences of the donor-recipient relationship can inform strategies for interventions and support. We aimed to describe donor and recipient expectations and experiences of their relationship before and after living kidney donor transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 16 donor-recipient pairs before the transplant and 11-14 months post-transplant. Transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS We identified seven themes (with respective subthemes): donation as enacting familial responsibility for care; analytical decision making to mitigate regret (avoiding anticipated regret and maintaining control, removing emotional impulsivity); strengthened interpersonal ties (gaining a deeper appreciation among family members, stronger empathy for each other, improving social participation); instability of relational impacts (anger and aggression threatening dynamics, unanticipated stress and emotional lability, triggering familial tension); renegotiating social roles (unexpected continuation of caregiving responsibilities, inability to relinquish the caregiving role, disappointment with unfulfilled renewal of intimacy, dissatisfaction over discrepant energy levels); guilt over unmet expectations and inevitability of the gift relationship (vague and transient indebtedness, expectation of reciprocity, transferring kidney ownership). CONCLUSIONS Donor-recipient relationships may be improved through increased empathy, appreciation, and ability to participate in life together; however, unfulfilled expectations and behavioural and emotional changes in recipients (a side effect related to immunosuppression) remain unresolved consequences of living kidney donor transplantation. Education and counselling to help donors and recipients adjust to potential changes in relationship dynamics may help protect and foster relational stability postdonation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelique F Ralph
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steve J Chadban
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Transplantation Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Grant Luxton
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Talia Gutman
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Camilla S Hanson
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Ju
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oztek-Celebi FZ, Herle M, Ritschl V, Kaltenegger L, Stamm T, Aufricht C, Boehm M. High Rate of Living Kidney Donation to Immigrant Children Despite Disparities-An Epidemiological Paradox? Front Pediatr 2019; 7:25. [PMID: 30809513 PMCID: PMC6379308 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment modality for children with end-stage renal disease. In the adult population, migration-related modifiable factors were associated with low living donation rates; no such data are available on the pediatric population. This pilot study therefore compares donation modality, communication, knowledge, and attitudes/beliefs between families of immigrant and non-immigrant descent. Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics of a cohort of children from 77 families of immigrant (32; 42%) and non-immigrant (45; 58%) descent who had undergone renal transplantation were assessed and related to donation modality at the Medical University of Vienna. In a representative subset, modifiable migration-related factors were assessed in a questionnaire-based study. Results: In immigrant families, information delay, limited communication, low knowledge levels, and self-reported conflicting beliefs were significantly more prevalent than in non-immigrants. The living kidney donation rate to children was high in both populations (immigrants: 63%, non-immigrants: 44%; p = 0.12). Living donation to children on dialysis was even significantly higher in immigrant families (immigrants: 13 out of 20; 57%, non-immigrants: 9 out of 33; 27%; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Contrary to expectations, migration-related disparities did not translate into decreased living donation rates in immigrant families, in particular to children on dialysis. Certain factors might therefore be less important for the living donation process in pediatric care structures and/or might be overcome by yet undefined protective factors. Larger pediatric studies including qualitative and quantitative methods are required to validate and refine current conceptual frameworks integrating the perspective of affected families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Zehra Oztek-Celebi
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Dr. Sami Ulus Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Marion Herle
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Valentin Ritschl
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Kaltenegger
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Aufricht
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Boehm
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Reese PP, Allen MB, Carney C, Leidy D, Levsky S, Pendse R, Mussell AS, Bermudez F, Keddem S, Thiessen C, Rodrigue JR, Emanuel EJ. Outcomes for individuals turned down for living kidney donation. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13408. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter P. Reese
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
- Renal Division; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew B. Allen
- Department of Medicine; Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Caroline Carney
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the Leonard Davis Institute; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel Leidy
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Simona Levsky
- School of Arts and Sciences; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Ruchita Pendse
- School of Arts and Sciences; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Adam S. Mussell
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | | | - Shimrit Keddem
- Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Evaluation of the Patient Aligned Care Team; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Carrie Thiessen
- Department of Surgery; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven Connecticut
| | - James R. Rodrigue
- Department of Surgery; Beth Israel Deaconess, Harvard Medical School; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Ezekiel J. Emanuel
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy; University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|