1
|
Ainiwaer A, Sun S, Bohetiyaer A, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Zhang W, Zhang J, Xu T, Chen H, Yao X, Jia C, Yan Y. Application of raman spectroscopy in the non-invasive diagnosis of urological diseases via urine. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2025; 52:104477. [PMID: 39814328 DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2024] [Revised: 01/05/2025] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the utilization of Raman spectroscopy in urinary system diseases, highlighting its potential in non-invasive diagnostic methodologies for early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of urinary ailments. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using 'raman,' 'bladder,' 'kidney,' 'prostate,' 'cancer,' 'infection,' 'stone or urinary calculi,' and 'urine or urinary,' along with 'AND' and 'OR' to refine our search. We excluded irrelevant articles and screened potential ones based on titles and abstracts before assessing the full texts for relevance and quality. FINDINGS The findings indicate that RS can furnish data on biomolecules in urine, which is significant for non-invasive diagnostic approaches. It has shown potential within non-invasive diagnostic methodologies and is expected to play a pivotal role in the early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of urinary system diseases, such as malignancies, urinary tract infections, kidney diseases, urolithiasis, and other urinary conditions. CONCLUSIONS Raman spectroscopy has demonstrated significant potential in providing precise and rapid diagnostic approaches for clinical use in the context of urinary system diseases. Its ability to analyze biomolecules non-invasively positions it as an increasingly important tool in the early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailiyaer Ainiwaer
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Department of Urology, Kashgar Prefecture Second People's Hospital, Kashgar, Xinjiang Uyghur, PR China
| | - ShuWen Sun
- Cancer Institute, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, PR China; Center of Clinical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, PR China
| | - Ayinuer Bohetiyaer
- Department of Nephrology, Kashgar Prefecture First People's Hospital, Kashgar, Xinjiang Uyghur, PR China
| | - Yuchao Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yufeng Jiang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Wentao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - JingCheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Tianyuan Xu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Hanyang Chen
- Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Xudong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.
| | - Chengyou Jia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, PR China; Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, PR China.
| | - Yang Yan
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; Urologic Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide a current comprehensive review of the available urinary biomarkers for the detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. RECENT FINDINGS The limitations of urine cytology and invasive nature of cystoscopic evaluation have led to a growing search for an ideal, cost-effective biomarker with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Current FDA approved biomarkers such as UroVysion fluorescent in situ hybridization, Immunocyt, and nuclear matrix protein 22 do not have the specificity, and thus positive predictive value to warrant their cost as a routine adjunct or replacement for cystoscopy. Several promising commercially available assays such as Cxbladder, Assure MDx, and Xpert BC may perform better than cytology in select populations. Novel genomic, epigenetic, inflammatory, and metabolomic-based assays are being analyzed as potential urinary biomarkers. SUMMARY Urinary biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity are an unmet need in bladder cancer. Several new assays may meet these criteria and future research may justify use in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
3
|
Current Status of Urinary Biomarkers for Detection and Surveillance of Bladder Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2016; 43:47-62. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
4
|
Todenhöfer T, Hennenlotter J, Guttenberg P, Mohrhardt S, Kuehs U, Esser M, Aufderklamm S, Bier S, Harland N, Rausch S, Gakis G, Stenzl A, Schwentner C. Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:155. [PMID: 25884545 PMCID: PMC4374530 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2014] [Accepted: 02/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic approach to directly compare the ability of a urine marker panel to predict the risk of recurrence and progression in bladder cancer (BC) patients with no evidence of relapse during surveillance for NMIBC. Methods One hundred fourteen patients who underwent urine marker testing during surveillance for NMIBC and who had no evidence of BC recurrence were included. For all patients cytology, Fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+) and Nuclear matrix protein 22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NMP22) were performed. All patients completed at least 24 months of endoscopic and clinical follow-up of after inclusion. Results Within 24 months of follow-up, 38 (33.0%) patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 (9.8%) progression. Recurrence rates in patients with positive vs. negative cytology, FISH, uCyt+ and NMP22 were 52.6% vs. 21.9% (HR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.75-9.2; p < 0.001), 47.6% vs. 25.0% (HR 2.7; 1.2-6.2; p = 0.01), 43.8% vs. 22.4% (HR 3.3; 1.5-7.6; p = 0.003) and 43.8% vs. 16.7% (HR 4.2; 1.7-10.8; p = 0.001). In patients with negative cytology, a positive NMP22 test was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.01), whereas FISH or uCyt+ were not predictive of recurrence in these patients. In the group of patients with negative cytology and negative NMP22, only 13.5% and 5.4% developed recurrence and progression after 24 months. Conclusions Patients with positive urine markers at time of negative cystoscopy are at increased risk of recurrence and progression. In patients with negative cytology, only NMP22 is predictive for recurrence. Patients with negative marker combinations including NMP22 harbour a low risk of recurrence. Therefore, the endoscopic follow-up regimen may be attenuated in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Todenhöfer
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany. .,Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, 2660 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V3Z6H, Canada.
| | - Jörg Hennenlotter
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Philipp Guttenberg
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Sarah Mohrhardt
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Ursula Kuehs
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Michael Esser
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Stefan Aufderklamm
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Simone Bier
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Niklas Harland
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Christian Schwentner
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hepburn S, Cairns DA, Jackson D, Craven RA, Riley B, Hutchinson M, Wood S, Smith MW, Thompson D, Banks RE. An analysis of the impact of pre-analytical factors on the urine proteome: Sample processing time, temperature, and proteolysis. Proteomics Clin Appl 2015; 9:507-21. [PMID: 25400092 PMCID: PMC4964914 DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2014] [Revised: 09/20/2014] [Accepted: 11/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We have examined the impact of sample processing time delay, temperature, and the addition of protease inhibitors (PIs) on the urinary proteome and peptidome, an important aspect of biomarker studies. Experimental design Ten urine samples from patients with varying pathologies were each divided and PIs added to one‐half, with aliquots of each then processed and frozen immediately, or after a delay of 6 h at 4°C or room temperature (20–22°C), effectively yielding 60 samples in total. Samples were then analyzed by 2D‐PAGE, SELDI‐TOF‐MS, and immunoassay. Results Interindividual variability in profiles was the dominant feature in all analyses. Minimal changes were observed by 2D‐PAGE as a result of delay in processing, temperature, or PIs and no changes were seen in IgG, albumin, β2‐microglobulin, or α1‐microglobulin measured by immunoassay. Analysis of peptides showed clustering of some samples by presence/absence of PIs but the extent was very patient‐dependent with most samples showing minimal effects. Conclusions and clinical relevance The extent of processing‐induced changes and the benefit of PI addition are patient‐ and sample‐dependent. A consistent processing methodology is essential within a study to avoid any confounding of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hepburn
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Department of Blood Sciences, The General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Rachel A Craven
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Beverley Riley
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Michelle Hutchinson
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Steven Wood
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Welberry Smith
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Department of Renal Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Douglas Thompson
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Department of Blood Sciences, The General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Rosamonde E Banks
- Clinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|