The cost-effectiveness, of pegcetacoplan compared with ravulizumab for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, in a UK setting

Examining Consistency Across NICE Single Technology Appraisals: A Review of Appraisals for Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria

In 2024, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended two new health technologies for paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria. This review systematically compares the clinical and cost-effectiveness evidence considered within the NICE single technology appraisals of iptacopan, danicopan and pegcetacoplan, examines the consistency of the clinical evidence and economic modelling, and considers whether single technology appraisals are a suitable apparatus for consistent decision making. The studies used different follow-up lengths and used different definitions for reporting breakthrough haemolysis (BTH), but otherwise reported similar outcomes and found a significant benefit for their interventions. A lack of direct evidence and unreliable indirect comparisons meant that naïve comparisons across trials were carried into the economic modelling despite differences in their control arms. Approaches to modelling BTH and associated dose escalation differed across appraisals, despite information for pegcetacoplan coming from the same source in each appraisal, which had a large impact on the economic results. This review raises the question of whether NICE should implement multiple technology appraisals more frequently to reduce these inconsistences. Additionally, we recommend the development of a framework for revisiting positive recommendations when the implementation of health technologies deviates from assumptions made in the economic modelling to ensure cost-effective healthcare is preserved.

Cost-effectiveness of iptacopan for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

ABSTRACT

Iptacopan, a novel oral factor B inhibitor, recently obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval for treating paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, a rare blood disorder characterized by persistent complement-mediated hemolytic anemia. The standard-of-care (SOC) has traditionally relied on complement C5 inhibitors eculizumab and ravulizumab, which are limited by persistent anemia from extravascular hemolysis and requirement for intravenous infusion. Recent publication of phase 3 studies in this arena reinforces iptacopan as an effective anticomplement monotherapy compared with SOC. Given ongoing price negotiations and limited literature showing its cost-ineffectiveness in the anti-C5-treated population, we conducted a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis of iptacopan monotherapy in anti-C5-treated patients from the societal perspective, as compared with C5 inhibition. The primary outcomes were the incremental net monetary benefit across a lifetime horizon and the cost-effective maximum monthly threshold price of iptacopan monotherapy compared with the SOC. The secondary outcome was time saved for patients and nurses with the use of oral iptacopan therapy. Iptacopan monotherapy and SOC accrued 12.6 and 10.8 quality-adjusted life-years at costs of $9.52 million and $13.5 million, respectively. Iptacopan monotherapy remained cost saving across extensive sensitivity and all scenario analyses, including alternative parameterization for anemia resolution and aggregated individual-level utilities and transition probability matrix. Across all probabilistic sensitivity analyses, iptacopan monotherapy was favored over SOC in 100% of 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations. Cost-saving thresholds for iptacopan vs anti-C5 are ∼1.1, 1.4, and 1.4 in Brazil, Japan, and the United States, respectively. Iptacopan monotherapy can improve quality-adjusted life expectancy for patients while saving health care costs across jurisdictions.

Development of a target concentration intervention to individualize paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria treatment with pegcetacoplan

Pegcetacoplan (Aspaveli®/Empaveli™) is a factor C3 inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. An individualized dosing strategy might be useful to improve patient-friendliness and cost-effectiveness of this very expensive drug. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an individualized treatment regimen for pegcetacoplan based on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data of the manufacturer. We conducted a clinical trial simulation with the approved dosing regimen of 1080 mg twice-weekly and a target concentration intervention-based dosing regimen in patients with and without prior eculizumab use. For eculizumab-naïve patients, the target concentration intervention-based dosing regimen resulted in a comparable fraction of patients with LDH normalization (LDH < 226 U/L) and hemoglobulin normalization (> 12 g/dL) compared to the approved regimen (LDH 50.2% and 50.0% respectively and hemoglobulin 45.6% and 44.4%). A modest dose reduction of ~ 5% was possible with target concentration intervention-based dosing. An intensified dosing interval was necessary in 2.3% of the patients however an interval prolongation was possible in 28.2% of the patients. Similar results were obtained for patients prior treated with eculizumab. In this study we show the potential of an individualized dosing regimen of pegcetacoplan with can improve patient friendliness in approximately 30% of the patients and improve therapy in approximately 2% of the patients at slightly reduced costs.

Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Pegcetacoplan to Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

Background

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is a rare, acquired disease characterized by hemolytic episodes and associated with significant clinical burden. The introduction of C5 inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (C5i) represented a major breakthrough in PNH treatment, effectively reducing intravascular hemolysis (IVH) but showing limited impact on extravascular hemolysis (EVH). In 2021, the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan was approved by EMA and recently reimbursed in Italy, which also has the advantages in the reduction of both IVH and EVH, increasing hemoglobin values and simultaneously improving the quality of life and fatigue of patients. A cost-utility analysis was developed to compare pegcetacoplan to C5i (eculizumab and ravulizumab) in the PNH population who remain anemic after treatment with C5i for at least 3 months.

Materials and Methods

The analysis employed a Markov model with a 5-year time horizon whereby patients can transition among 3 PNH health states, adopting the perspective of the Italian NHS. Efficacy data were sourced from the PEGASUS study, with drug prices reflecting ex-factory costs. Additionally, costs associated with resource utilization, adverse events, and complications were estimated based on outpatient and hospital care rates, excluding indirect expenses. Utility and disutility values related to transfusions were also considered, with pegcetacoplan allowing for dose escalation.

Results

The cumulative cost of treatment per individual patient at 5 years was estimated to be €1,483,454 for pegcetacoplan, €1,585,763 for eculizumab, and €1,574,826 for ravulizumab. Pegcetacoplan demonstrated a superior increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to both eculizumab (0.51 increase) and ravulizumab (0.27 increase). Furthermore, pegcetacoplan showed a reduction in complication management costs (€22,891 less compared to eculizumab and €22,611 less compared to ravulizumab) and lower transfusion-related expenses (€14,147 less than both C5i treatments).

Conclusion

Pegcetacoplan emerged as the dominant strategy in this analysis, being more effective, less expensive and improves quality of life in the analyzed population affected by PNH.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: Review of the patient experience and treatment landscape

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare disorder caused by complement-mediated hemolysis and thrombosis through the alternative pathway. The most common symptom of PNH is fatigue due to chronic anemia, which can negatively impact quality of life (QoL) and affect overall well-being. The currently approved therapies for PNH significantly limit intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and reduce the risk of thrombosis; however, they are associated with an infusion schedule that can become burdensome, and not all patients experience complete disease control. Several new complement inhibitors are in development that address the need for convenient routes of administration and aim to provide better disease control. With the variety of new treatment options on the horizon, hematologic markers as well as QoL concerns, patient opinion, and lifestyle factors should be considered to choose the optimal PNH treatment for each specific patient.

The cost-effectiveness of pegcetacoplan in complement treatment-naïve adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the USA

Aim: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare blood disorder characterized by hemolytic anemia, bone marrow failure and thrombosis, and is associated with high healthcare burden. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pegcetacoplan, a proximal complement-3 inhibitor (C3i), compared with the C5i, eculizumab and ravulizumab, in complement treatment-naive adults with PNH, from the US healthcare payer perspective. Materials & methods: A de novo cost-effectiveness model based on a Markov cohort structure evaluated lifetime (55-year) PNH costs and outcomes. The 6-month cycles of the model reflected the follow-up period of PRINCE (NCT04085601), an open-label trial of pegcetacoplan compared with eculizumab in C5i-naive patients. Data from PRINCE informed the clinical, safety and health-related quality of life outcomes in the model. Results: Pegcetacoplan was associated with lifetime cost savings of USD1,176,808 and USD213,062 relative to eculizumab and ravulizumab, respectively (largely attributed to reduced drug costs and blood transfusions), and additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.25 and 0.24. Conclusion: In patients with PNH who are treatment-naive, the base-case cost-effectiveness analysis, scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis showed both lifetime cost savings and increased QALYs associated with pegcetacoplan compared with eculizumab or ravulizumab in the USA.

Comparative Effectiveness of Pegcetacoplan Versus Ravulizumab and Eculizumab in Complement Inhibitor-Naïve Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

INTRODUCTION

In the absence of head-to-head trials, this study compared treatment outcomes with the C3 complement inhibitor pegcetacoplan versus the C5 complement inhibitor eculizumab or ravulizumab in complement inhibitor-naïve patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

METHODS

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using individual patient data from the pegcetacoplan arm of the PRINCE trial (NCT04085601; n = 34) and aggregate data from the ravulizumab (n = 125) and eculizumab (n = 121) arms of the ALXN1210-PNH-301 trial (NCT03056040). Clinical and quality of life endpoints were evaluated after matching patients in the two trials on baseline characteristics. The weighted Wald test with 95% confidence interval was used to compare categorical and continuous variables (i.e., weighted chi-squared and z tests, respectively). Bias factor analysis was performed to quantify the extent of residual bias from unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

After weighting, treatment with pegcetacoplan was associated with statistically significant improvements in most clinical endpoints compared with ravulizumab or eculizumab treatment. These included: greater absolute and percent reductions in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level and increase in hemoglobin level from baseline; shorter time to first occurrence of LDH normalization; larger proportions of patients achieving hemoglobin stabilization and avoiding transfusion, with fewer packed red blood cell units transfused; and a smaller proportion of patients experiencing breakthrough hemolysis (all p < 0.05). Patients receiving pegcetacoplan also had a greater increase in general health status score from baseline compared with those receiving C5 complement inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Pegcetacoplan provides clinical benefits as first-line treatment for complement inhibitor-naïve patients with PNH.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04085601.

Pegcetacoplan: A Review in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Haemoglobinuria

Subcutaneous pegcetacoplan (EMPAVELI® in the USA and ASPAVELI® in the EU) is the first complement component 3 (C3) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) in the USA, and in adults with PNH who are anaemic after ≥ 3 months of treatment with a C5 inhibitor in the EU. In the phase III PRINCE trial in adults with PNH who were anaemic and naïve to a complement inhibitor therapy, pegcetacoplan was superior to the control group (supportive care, excluding complement inhibitors) in achieving haemoglobin stabilization and reducing lactate dehydrogenase levels. Similarly, in the phase III PEGASUS trial in adults with PNH who had a haemoglobin level < 10.5 g/dL despite eculizumab therapy, pegcetacoplan was superior to eculizumab in improving haemoglobin levels. In both trials, pegcetacoplan also improved other clinical and haematological parameters of haemolysis, as well as quality of life (QOL) outcomes. Clinical benefits of pegcetacoplan were sustained for up to 48 weeks of treatment. Pegcetacoplan was generally well tolerated in patients with PNH, with its tolerability profile being similar in patients previously treated with eculizumab and in complement inhibitor-naïve patients. Long-term data would be beneficial to further support the safety profile of pegcetacoplan. Current evidence indicates that pegcetacoplan is a valuable treatment option for adults with PNH.