Renal function and oral anticoagulant treatment of incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study

Application of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and end-stage kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Nowadays, the number of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated by end-stage renal disease (ESKD) is increasing. There are significant challenges in anticoagulation with prescription drugs because of the high risk of bleeding and embolism among these patients. However, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of warfarin in combination with any non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOACs) have been performed in patients with baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) <25 ml/min, which makes it difficult to justify the use of anticoagulants in such patients. Then, we aimed to collect and summarize all evidence to enable the anticoagulation of rivaroxaban, which is less cleared by the kidneys, in patients with severe renal insufficiency and to complement and improve the evidence on the use of rivaroxaban for anticoagulation.

Methods

The present systematic review and meta-analysis searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, and Google Scholar for relevant studies from inception to 1 June 2022, with the restriction of English and Chinese. Eligible cohort studies and RCTs that reported efficacy outcomes [composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SSE), ischemic stroke (ICS), and systemic embolization] or safety outcomes [major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB)] of rivaroxaban in NVAF patients with ESKD were enrolled. Two authors completed the data extraction and quality assessment work, respectively. The Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias was used for RCTs, and the NEW-Castle Ottawa scale was used for study quality assessment for cohort studies. Dichotomous variables were calculated as risk factors with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and meta-analysis was performed to probe the effect of research design, rivaroxaban dose, and controlled drug factors on outcomes.

Results

In total, three studies were included for meta-analysis, involving 6,071 NVAF patients with ESKD, and two studies were included for qualitative analysis. All included studies were at low risk of bias. A meta-analysis demonstrated that mix-dose rivaroxaban caused no statistical discrepancy in the occurrence of thrombotic and bleeding events when compared to the control group (embolism, LogOR: -0.64, 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.23, P:0.25; bleeding, LogOR: -0.33, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.03, P:0.15), and low-dose rivaroxaban produced similar results (embolism, LogOR: -1.04, 95% CI: -2.15 to 0.07, P:0.61; bleeding, LogOR: -0.81, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.44, P:0.93).

Conclusion

In this study, low-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg, once a day) may benefit more than warfarin in patients with NVAF and ESKD.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42022330973.

Renal function and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation

AIM

The aim of this study is to examine the association of the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values with mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

This posthoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial consisted of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation who were followed up for a median of 2.7 years after discharge. Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate Cox-regression and spline curves were utilized to assess the association of CKD, CKD stages 2-5 according to the KDOQI guidelines, and the continuum of eGFR values with the primary outcome of all-cause death, and the secondary outcome of cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 1064 hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation, 465 (43.7%) had comorbid CKD. The presence of CKD was associated with an increased risk for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality following hospitalization [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.60; 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs): 1.25-2.05 and aHR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.30-2.33, respectively]. The aHRs for all-cause mortality in CKD stages 2-5, as compared with CKD stage 1 were 2.18, 2.62, 4.20 and 3.38, respectively (all P < 0.05). In spline curve analyses, eGFR values lower than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 were independent predictors of higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSION

In recently hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation, the presence of CKD was independently associated with decreased survival, which was significant across CKD stages 2-5, as compared with CKD stage 1. Values of eGFR lower than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 were incrementally associated with worse prognosis.

Anticoagulation Prescription and Outcomes in Relation to Renal Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Results from GLORIA-AF

Objective  Anticoagulation management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and impaired renal function is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate anticoagulation prescription patterns in relation to renal function and to describe 2-year clinical outcomes among dabigatran users. Methods  Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF) is an international, prospective, and observational study program involving patients with newly diagnosed AF at risk for stroke. Prescription patterns were assessed by creatinine clearance (CrCl) at enrollment. Dabigatran users were followed for 2 years. Clinical outcomes were standardized for stroke and bleeding risk, based on CHA ₂ DS ₂ -VASc and HAS-BLED scores, with missing values imputed. Results  Baseline CrCl values were available for 12,056 of 15,308 eligible patients (79%). With declining renal function, prescriptions increased for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and decreased for dabigatran (30-47% and 34-12%, respectively). The prescription of other non-vitamin K antagonists remained similar across CrCl groups (14-19%). In 4,873 dabigatran users, standardized stroke rates were low across all CrCl groups; 0.58/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.90) in CrCl ≥80 mL/min, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.48-1.21) in CrCl 50 to 79 mL/min, and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.06-1.11) in CrCl 30 to 49 mL/min. Similarly, major bleeding rates were low and numerically increased with declining renal function (0.68/100 patient-years, 95% CI: 0.39-1.03; 0.92, 95% CI: 0.58-1.32; and 1.26, 95% CI: 0.66-1.97, respectively). Conclusion  In patients with AF, VKA prescriptions increased and dabigatran prescriptions decreased with declining renal function. Rates of stroke and major bleeding in dabigatran patients remained low across the categories of renal impairment.

The Magnitude of the Warfarin-Amiodarone Drug-Drug Interaction Varies With Renal Function: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Amiodarone inhibits warfarin metabolism and is associated with major bleeding during warfarin therapy. Managing this drug-drug interaction (DDI) is challenging because of substantial interpatient variability in DDI magnitude. Because renal dysfunction induces changes in drug metabolism and protein binding that could alter cytochrome P450 inhibition mechanisms, we hypothesized that renal dysfunction alters the impact of the warfarin-amiodarone DDI. We tested this question in a propensity-matched cohort study of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients were queried from an electronic health record database. Renal function was estimated with creatinine clearance (CrCl). Warfarin response was measured with the warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), a dose-normalized international normalized ratio (INR) measure, and was modeled with multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Time to supratherapeutic INR (> 4) was modeled using Cox regression. Propensity score matching resulted in 4,518 patients administered amiodarone and 4,518 controls. Amiodarone's effect on warfarin response varied threefold across the renal function range, increasing WSI by 36% in patients with normal renal function (CrCl 115 mL/minute), but by only 11.8% in patients with severe renal dysfunction (CrCl 15 mL/minute). Similarly, amiodarone had a strong effect in patients with normal renal function (hazard ratio (HR) 1.80; 1.23, 2.64), but a negligible effect on supratherapeutic INR hazard in patients with severe renal dysfunction (HR 1.01; 0.75, 1.37). These results suggest that renal function is a novel factor that explains substantial variability in the warfarin-amiodarone DDI. This information could inform warfarin dosage adjustment and monitoring and may have implications for the selection of oral anticoagulation agents in patients treated with amiodarone.

[Prevalence of Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalized in Cardiology Departments]

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) 3b - 5 stages and the newly diagnosed sustained reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) &lt;30 ml / min / 1.73 m2 in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in real clinical practice, as well as the features of their anticoagulant therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Retrospectively, data of all discharge epicrisis from cardiological departments of five Moscow hospitals from June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were analyzed. Patients over 18 years old with AF were enrolled. At the next stage, patients with CKD 3 b - 5 st and newly diagnosed sustained reduction in GFR &lt;30 ml / min / 1.73 m2 (at least 2 measurements during hospitalization) were selected.

RESULTS

Data of 9725 patients were analyzed, AF was diagnosed in 2983 (31 %) cases, of which a decreased GFR &lt;45 ml / min / 1.73 m2 was detected in 27 % (n = 794) cases. Among them, 349 (44 %) were diagnosed with CKD 3b st, 123 (15 %) with CKD 4 st, 44 (6 %) with CKD 5 st, 278 (35 %) had a newly diagnosed sustained reduction in GFR. In 63 % of patients with AF and GFR &lt;45 ml / min / 1.73 m2, anemia was diagnosed, 39 % of them had moderate and severe one. 711 (89 %) patients were prescribed anticoagulants, 53 % were assigned direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Patients with CKD 3 b st. more often rivaroxaban 15 mg (29 %) was prescribed, with CKD 4 and CKD 5 - warfarin (48 % and 25 %, respectively), in patients with newly diagnosed sustained reduction in GFR &lt;30 ml / min / 1.73 m2 - apixaban 10 mg / day (16.2 %).

CONCLUSION

A quarter of patients with AF revealed a decreased GFR &lt;45 ml / min / 1.73 m2, half of them were recommended DOACs. 42 % of patients with GFR &lt;30 ml / min / 1.72 m2 were prescribed DOACs, 27 % - warfarin. Patients with CKD 5 st DOACs were not assigned; in half of cases, none of the anticoagulants was recommended. Most often, the dose of the prescribed anticoagulant was not counted according to GFR in patients with newly diagnosed sustained reduction in GFR &lt;30 ml / min / 1.73 m2.

Rivaroxaban versus apixaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with end-stage renal disease or receiving dialysis

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs apixaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and/or receiving dialysis in routine practice.

METHODS

Using US MarketScan claims data from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017, we identified new-users of rivaroxaban or apixaban during 2015 with at least 12 months of insurance coverage prior to oral anticoagulant (OAC) initiation. Differences in baseline covariates between cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weighting based on propensity scores. Patients were followed for stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) or major bleeding hospitalizations. Cox proportion hazards regression was used to compare rivaroxaban and apixaban. Analyses stratified by age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, prior stroke, prior bleed, diabetes, and reduced OAC dose were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 787 rivaroxaban and 1836 apixaban users. Median (25, 75% range) age = 70 (61, 79), CHA2DS2-VASc score = 3 (2, 4), and follow-up = 0.87 (0.38, 1.56) years. No differences in the risks of SSE (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.53-2.63), ischemic stroke (HR = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.45-2.76), or major bleeding (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.63-1.58) were observed. No significant interactions were observed upon subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

In NVAF patients with ESRD and/or receiving dialysis, rivaroxaban and apixaban were associated with similar risks of SSE and major bleeding.