Pixantrone-rituximab versus gemcitabine-rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Current Opinion on Pixantrone in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin B-Cell Lymphoma

Not many treatment options exist for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in whom first- and second-line therapies were unsuccessful. This is especially true for patients with aggressive lymphomas. The innovative agent pixantrone has shown some promising results in terms of disease-free and overall survival, both in monotherapy as well as in combinations. However, recent trials (Phase III and real-world studies) reported unsatisfactory results, thereby raising the question about the role of pixantrone in the current treatment of R/R aggressive lymphomas. Nonetheless, there might still be a potential position for this drug in combinations, for use as first-line treatment of patients with cardiac dysfunction. This article summarizes the definition, structure, mechanism of action and reduced cardiotoxicity of pixantrone as well as efficacy and toxicity both in monotherapy and in combinations, as treatment for aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas.

Pixantrone plus rituximab versus gemcitabine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma not eligible for stem cell transplantation: a phase 3, randomized, multicentre trial (PIX306)

PIX306 was a phase 3, randomised, single-blind, multicentre trial conducted in adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3 who relapsed after ≥1 rituximab-containing regimen and were not eligible for a stem cell transplant. Patients were randomised 1:1 to pixantrone 50 mg/m² or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, combined with rituximab 375 mg/m² on day 1, for up to six cycles. Patients were followed for up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), complete response (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Overall, 312 patients were randomised (median age 73·0 years). The study did not meet its primary endpoint. Median PFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 7·3 months (5·2-8·4) with pixantrone + rituximab (PIX + R) and 6·3 months (4·4-8·1) with gemcitabine + rituximab [GEM + R; hazard ratio (HR): 0·85; 95% CI 0·64-1·14; P = 0·28]. Median OS was 13·3 (10·1-19·8) months with PIX + R and 19·6 (12·4-31·9) months with GEM + R (HR: 1·13; 95% CI 0·83-1·53). ORR was 61·9% and 43·9% respectively and CR rate 35·5% and 21·7%. The incidence of adverse events, including cardiac events, was not statistically significant different between PIX + R and GEM + R.

Pixantrone beyond monotherapy: a review

Outcomes for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) that proves refractory to treatment remain poor. Treatment of such patients is individualized and can include enrolment in a clinical trial of novel agents or use of one of a wide array of drug regimens. Initial treatment with anthracyclines such as doxorubicin limits options at later stages of treatment because of anthracycline-related cumulative cardiotoxicity. The aza-anthracenedione pixantrone was developed to reduce the likelihood of cardiotoxicity without compromising efficacy and is currently conditionally approved for use as monotherapy in patients with multiply-relapsed or refractory aggressive B cell NHL. The use of pixantrone in combination therapy, often to replace doxorubicin or mitoxantrone, has or is currently being investigated in numerous studies in patients with aggressive or indolent NHL and is the focus of this review. These include the R-CPOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, pixantrone, vincristine, prednisone) for aggressive NHL in the first-line setting, including a study in elderly patients with limited cardiac function, and for patients with relapsed NHL with prior anthracycline exposure; the PSHAP regimen (pixantrone, cytarabine, prednisone, cisplatin), also in the latter setting; the PREBen/PEBen regimen (pixantrone, bendamustine and etoposide with or without rituximab) as salvage therapy; and pixantrone in combination with fludarabine, dexamethasone, and rituximab (FPD-R) for relapsed indolent NHL.

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody that targets the interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Pembrolizumab has shown significant clinical efficacy in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), but results in non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) are mixed. Some NHL subtypes, which share certain genetic features with HL, such as alterations in chromosome 9p24.1 and expression of PD-L1, have shown promising responses in early phase trials. Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of pembrolizumab as a compound, and present the available clinical efficacy and safety data in the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphomas. Expert opinion: Current early phase data suggest that single agent pembrolizumab in NHL demonstrates both efficacy and a favorable safety profile. However, it is anticipated that future treatment strategies will be biomarker-driven and incorporate pembrolizumab into combination therapies with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy agents.

Pixantrone, etoposide, bendamustine, rituximab (P[R]EBEN) as an effective salvage regimen for relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma-Polish Lymphoma Research Group real-life analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite a significant improvement in treatment outcomes, 30-40% of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) patients are refractory or relapse after the first line therapy. Half of them are not eligible to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) due to failure of platinum-based salvage regimens. Pixantrone is conditionally approved in Europe in patients with R/R aggressive NHL failing at least 2 previous lines of therapy. Polish Lymphoma Research Group (PLRG) evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of P[R]EBEN combining pixantrone, etoposide, bendamustine with or without rituximab), a new regimen developed recently by Francesco d'Amore, in real-life experience.

METHODS

In this retrospective audit, we analyzed the data of consecutive 25 R/R NHL cases, treated with P[R]EBEN regimen in 9 PLRG centers. Safety and efficacy data, including adverse reactions (AE), response rates, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) were collected.

RESULTS

Overall response rate (ORR) to P[R]EBEN regimen was 68% (40% CR and 28% PR). Most patients responded, relatively early, by second cycle of therapy. P[R]EBEN was effective in 8 out of 15 patients (53%) refractory to previous platinum-based salvage regimens. In 4 patients (16%) stabilization of disease (SD) during therapy was observed and further 4 patients (16%) progressed during the treatment (PD). Response rates were higher in patients, chemosensitive to their prior regimen (ORR - 87.5%, including 50% CR). At the median follow-up of 7.5 months (range 1-16) the median PFS and OS were not reached. Projected PFS and OS at 12 months are 68% and 78% respectively. The P[R]EBEN regimen was well tolerated and most of patients received it as out-patients. AEs grade ≥3 occurred in 17 patients (68%). Most common grade 3-4 AEs were due to hematological toxicity with febrile neutropenia observed in 5 patients (20%). There were no episodes of septic deaths. Six patients (24%) died during treatment and follow-up period, all of them due to lymphoma progression.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest good efficiency and tolerability of P[R]EBEN regimen as a rescue therapy in patients with R/R aggressive NHL.

The rationale for combination therapy in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: ten questions

Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone immunochemotherapy remains standard of care for first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation is offered to most relapsing/refractory patients who respond to salvage therapy. This Q&A review evaluates recommended management strategies for second and subsequent lines of therapy in patients with DLBCL, outlining the relative efficacies of currently available options including novel agents such as ibrutinib and CAR-T cells. The combination of pixantrone and rituximab is currently under investigation as a second-line treatment for patients ineligible for stem cell transplantation, while pixantrone monotherapy is the only therapeutic option approved for multiply relapsed and refractory DLBCL beyond the second line at this time.

An evaluation of pixantrone for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

The overall prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas is poor. Only a minority of patients are able to receive autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients not transplant-eligible or patients relapsing after transplantation have an urgent need for effective treatment options. Pixantrone is the only compound approved in Europe for this situation. Areas covered: This review describes the clinical development of pixantrone, starting with phase I trials up to phase III trials in order to define the role of pixantrone in treatment algorithms. The effectiveness of pixantrone is considered in relation to alternative therapeutic options. Furthermore, the similarities and differences between pixantrone and anthracyclines is highlighted, with a special focus on the mode of action and on cardiotoxicity. Expert opinion: Pixantrone is a valuable treatment option in relapsed and refractory aggressive lymphomas, with documented disease responses, manageable toxicities and clear distinctions to anthracyclines. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the role of pixantrone in combination with other compounds, especially with upcoming targeted therapies, and to confirm the effectiveness of pixantrone in other lymphoma subtypes, e.g. follicular lymphomas.

Recent developments in topoisomerase-targeted cancer chemotherapy

The DNA topoisomerase enzymes are essential to cell function and are found ubiquitously in all domains of life. The various topoisomerase enzymes perform a wide range of functions related to the maintenance of DNA topology during DNA replication, and transcription are the targets of a wide range of antimicrobial and cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Natural product-derived agents, such as the camptothecin, anthracycline, and podophyllotoxin drugs, have seen broad use in the treatment of many types of cancer. Selective targeting of the topoisomerase enzymes for cancer treatment continues to be a highly active area of basic and clinical research. The focus of this review will be to summarize the current state of the art with respect to clinically used topoisomerase inhibitors for targeted cancer treatment and to discuss the pharmacology and chemistry of promising new topoisomerase inhibitors in clinical and pre-clinical development.

The Servier oncology pipeline in 2017

Cancer is a complex, multifactorial disease that for years has been the focus of intensive research efforts to explore both the molecular and biological mechanisms involved and the development of novel agents to target these pathways. Servier is an independent French pharmaceutical company with a focus on oncology. Currently, Servier's commercial portfolio includes agents used to treat non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and metastatic colorectal cancer; Servier's oncology pipeline involves agents for the treatment of both solid and hematological tumors. The main areas of future research focus on the development of therapeutics targeting apoptosis or the active immune components involved in tumour development/maintenance. Servier intends to continue its focus on cutting-edge oncology innovation by collaborating with both industry and academia, and maintaining its strong patient-centered approach.

Single-Agent Pixantrone as a Bridge to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in a Patient with Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with poor long-term survival after relapse or resistance to chemotherapy. We report a case of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma refractory to first-line R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and second-line R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin) chemotherapy treatments. The patient achieved remission with single-agent pixantrone, and received a consolidation with high-dose BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. He received consolidation radiotherapy on the site of bulky disease. At 20 months from transplant, the disease is in continuous complete remission. The successful use of pixantrone as a bridge to transplant is highlighted, together with the absence of serious side effects.

Pixantrone: A Review in Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Pixantrone (Pixuvri^®) is an aza-anthracenedione with a novel mode of action that is conditionally approved in the EU for use as monotherapy in adult patients with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). In the randomized, open-label, multinational, phase 3 PIX301 trial in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, the complete response (CR) plus unconfirmed CR (uCR) rate at the end of treatment (primary endpoint) was significantly higher with intravenous pixantrone monotherapy than with a single-agent comparator (vinorelbine, oxaliplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide, mitoxantrone or gemcitabine). Post hoc analysis also demonstrated a significantly higher CR/uCR rate in the subgroup of patients with centrally confirmed aggressive B-cell NHL who were receiving pixantrone versus a comparator agent as third- or fourth-line therapy. Pixantrone was generally well tolerated in PIX301, with a manageable adverse event profile. In conclusion, pixantrone is a useful option in patients with multiply relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell NHL. Further results examining the use of pixantrone in combination with rituximab in patients previously treated with rituximab-containing regimens are awaited with interest.