Management and outcomes of primary anorectal melanoma in the United States

Primary anorectal amelanotic melanoma with liver, lungs and lymph nodal metastases

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is an exceedingly rare and very aggressive malignancy. It originates from the melanocytic cells in the anorectal mucosa, which produces melanin. Other mucosal melanomas commonly found in the mucosa of the oral cavity, vulvovaginal, pharynx and urinary tract. Patients usually present with bleeding per rectum, perianal pain and difficulty in defaecation. Distinction of primary anorectal melanoma from other tumours of this region is difficult because of the lack of common imaging features. MRI is the modality of choice for its better tissue characterisation and resolution. There is no standard treatment protocol available mainly due to scarcity of data. Surgery is the mainstay therapy. Herein we present a case of a male patient in his 30s who presented with rectal bleeding and perianal pain. Haematological analysis revealed normocytic normochromic anaemia. MRI detected a mass lesion in the anorectal region. Contrast enhanced CT revealed multiple metastases in the liver, lungs, periportal, mesorectal and inguinal lymph nodes. The diagnosis of the ulcerated anorectal melanoma was established on histopathological examination. The patient underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) followed by chemotherapy. Afterward the patient presented to the emergency room with respiratory distress for which he was on ventilator support. Sadly, the patient died after four days.

Management of primary anorectal mucosal melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic

Anorectal melanoma is a rare and difficult-to-diagnose highly malignant cancer with a poor prognosis. The treatment usually involves surgery and often includes adjuvants such as radiation therapy and immunotherapy. We present a case of a 77-year-old Peruvian who was eventually diagnosed with this cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, which complicated her treatment and allowed the cancer to spread. Her treatment included abdominoperineal resection, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, left internal iliac vein raffia and end colostomy, followed by 3D radiation therapy (50 Gy, 25 sessions) and systemic treatment with nivolumab, all of which were well tolerated. The patient was alive as of 20 August 2023, having survived for more than 3 years since the onset of symptoms.

Anorectal melanoma

Anorectal melanoma is an aggressive mucosal melanoma subtype with a poor prognosis. Although recent advancements have been seen for cutaneous melanoma, the optimal treatment paradigm for management of anorectal melanoma is evolving. In this review, we highlight differences in the pathogenesis of mucosal versus cutaneous melanoma, new concepts of staging for mucosal melanoma, updates to surgical management of anorectal melanoma, and current data for adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy in this unique patient population.

Treatment and outcome trends and predictors of overall survival of rectal melanoma: Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of rectal melanoma (RM).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study looked at patients with RM from National Cancer Database (2004-2019) analyzed characteristics and outcomes of the entire cohort and across three time periods (2004-2009; 2010-2014; 2015-2019). Main outcome measures were change in treatment and survival trends across time periods and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

641 patients (58.5% female; mean age: 68.2 ± 13.6 years) were included. OS rate was 26%; median survival duration was 17.9 (IQR: 15.93-20.67) months. There was a significant decrease in the use of chemotherapy (17.3%-6.6%; p = 0.001) and surgery (62.9%-41.8%; p = 0.00004) but increased use of immunotherapy (11.9%-52%; p < 0.001) across time periods. OS was longer in the last time period than in the first two (21.8 vs 16.8 vs 16.5 months; p = 0.09). Surgical excision was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR = 0.266, 95%CI: 0.089-0.789, p = 0.017) whereas older age (HR = 1.039, 95%CI: 1.007-1.072, p = 0.016), positive resection margins (HR = 5.06, 95%CI: 1.902-13.48, p = 0.001) and metastasis (HR = 34.62, 95%CI: 3.973-301.6, p = 0.001) were predictors of poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Over time, chemotherapy and surgery have been used less often in the treatment of RM while the use of immunotherapy increased by more than four-fold. Older age, surgical treatment, positive resection margins, and metastasis were predictive of survival of RM.

Primary malignant melanoma of rectum: A rare case report

INTRODUCTION

Malignant melanoma of the gastrointestinal tract is an extremely rare event of which 50 % occurs in anorectal region. The lesion can easily be misdiagnosed as rectal-carcinoma, which comprises >90 % of rectal tumors and has a different treatment. The behavior of the anorectal melanoma is very aggressive and has very poor prognosis with fatal outcome.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 48-year-old man presented complaining of rectal bleeding of two months' duration, without any other significant history. Colonoscopy showed a polypoidal mass in the rectum that was in favor of adenocarcinoma. The microscope examination of biopsy tissue showed sheets of poorly differentiated malignant neoplasm. Immuno-histochemical (IHC) staining showed negativity of pan Cytokeratin and CD31. IHC for HMB45 showed diffuse and strong positivity in neoplastic cells, confirming the diagnosis of malignant melanoma.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

According to a report by the National Cancer Database of the United States, primary rectal melanoma is very rare. Mucosal surface of the body is third most common site for primary melanoma after skin and eye. The first case of anorectal melanoma was reported in 1857. Histopathological examinations are gold standard for diagnosis, but histopathology examination without immunohistochemistry will misdiagnose some cases as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma which has completely different treatment. Surgical resection has been reported as the most useful treatment option.

CONCLUSION

Malignant melanoma of the rectum is extremely rare and difficult to diagnose in low resources settings. Histopathologic examination with IHC stains can differentiate poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma from melanoma and other rare tumors of anorectal region.

Outcomes After Sphincter-Sparing Local Therapy for Anorectal Melanoma: 1989 to 2020

PURPOSE

The treatment paradigm for patients with anorectal melanoma eligible for sphincter-sparing excision has evolved over time. This study examines outcomes across a 30-year era in this rare disease with poor prognosis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients with pelvis-confined anorectal melanoma undergoing sphincter-sparing local excision and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) at our institution between 1989 and 2020. Patterns of care and predictors of outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 108 patients included, 92 (85%) presented with clinically uninvolved nodes. For clinically node-negative patients, the sentinel lymph node biopsy rate increased from 18/43 (42%) before 2008 to 38/49 (78%) subsequently and the use of inguinal nodal RT decreased from 33/35 (94%) before 2003 to 1/57 (2%) subsequently. All clinically node-positive patients treated before 2003 received inguinal nodal RT, whereas no node-positive patient treated subsequently received this treatment. Patients treated before 2016 mostly received biochemotherapy, and those treated since 2017 mostly received immune checkpoint inhibitors. With median follow-up of 32 months, 77 patients (71%) recurred. Three-year actuarial outcomes were 84% local control, 64% nodal control, 38% distant metastasis-free survival, 30% disease-free survival, and 51% melanoma-specific survival. Ostomy-free survival at last follow-up was 95%. Factors contributing to outcome were identified. Outcomes for patients treated in the contemporary era (2017+) were not significantly better than those treated earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Sphincter-sparing surgery followed by adjuvant RT results in excellent local control and ostomy-free survival for locally resectable anorectal melanoma. Overall oncologic outcomes continue to be poor, reinforcing the need to identify more effective therapies.

Extensive resection improves overall and disease-specific survival in localized anorectal melanoma: A SEER-based study

Background

Anorectal melanoma is a rare tumor with a dismal prognosis. The only promising treatment for anorectal melanoma is surgery, either extensive resection (ER) or local excision (LE). However, the optimal extent of resection is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the survival outcomes of anorectal melanoma at different stages are influenced by the surgical approaches (LE or ER) using the National Institute of Health's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify patients treated for anorectal melanoma (2000–2018). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) outcomes were compared for the two surgical approaches (ER or LE) stratified by stage (localized, regional and distant).

Results

A total of 736 patients were included in the study. Details of previous surgical procedures were available for 548 of the study patients: 360 (65.7%) underwent LE, and 188 (34.3%) underwent ER. In localized cases, 199 underwent LE, and 48 underwent ER. The OS (median 45 vs. 29 months, 5-year rate 41.7% vs. 23.4%) and DSS (median 66 vs. 34 months, 5-year rate 51% vs. 30.7%) of patients undergoing ER were significantly better (p = 0.009 and 0.041, respectively) than those who received LE. Multivariate analysis showed that the type of surgery was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DSS. Among the regional cases, 89 cases had LE, and 96 cases had ER. Patients with regional disease who underwent ER had no significant differences in OS (23 vs. 21 months; p = 0.866) or DSS (24 vs. 24 months; p = 0. 907) compared to patients who underwent LE. In distant cases, 72 cases had LE, and 44 cases had ER. Patients with metastatic disease who had ER also had similar OS (median 11 vs. 8 months; p = 0.36) and DSS (median 11 vs. 8 months; p = 0.593) to those who underwent LE.

Conclusion

Extensive resection can improve the long-term prognosis of localized anorectal melanoma compared to local excision, but the prognosis of the two surgical techniques is comparable in both regional patients and distant patients.

Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without lymph node removal and preservation of the rectum) and extensive resection (procedures with rectum and pararectal lymph node removal). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival of patients who underwent extensive resection with that of patients who underwent local excision, stratifying patients according to tumour stage.

Methods

A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published until March 2021. Studies comparing survival outcomes in patients with anorectal melanoma who underwent local excision versus extensive resection were screened for eligibility. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival after the different surgical approaches, stratified by tumour stage.

Results

There were 347 studiesidentified of which 34 were included for meta-analysis with a total of 1858 patients. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgical approaches in patients per stage (stage I odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 2.72, P = 0.49); stage II odds ratio 1.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 4.18, P = 0.33); stage I–III odds ratio 1.19 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.70, P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the time intervals (<2000, 2001–2010 and 2011–2021) and for continent of study origin. Subgroup analysis for time interval and continent of origin also showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival.

Conclusion

No significant survival benefit exists for patients with anorectal melanoma treated with local excision or extensive resection, independent of tumour stage.

Anorectal polyp

A 71-year-old female with hypertension presented with painless rectal bleeding and found to have a soft mass on rectal exam. The colonoscopy revealed a large pedunculated polyp with patchy discoloration arising from the dentate line (Fig. 1). Biopsies of the polyp were obtained.

A case report of anorectal malignant melanoma in the transitional zone

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal malignant melanoma is an uncommon and highly malignant disease with a greater incidence in females. Many patients were misdiagnosed as hemorrhoids, benign polyps, and rectal cancer. They were often diagnosed in an advanced stage. Wide local excision and abdominoperineal resection are the main treatments of rectal melanoma.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A case report is a 77-year-old man who has blood in the stool for 4 months without clinical examination. He admitted to the emergency room with sudden syndromes that related to bowel perforation. Rectal examination detected a large anorectal polyp. Computer tomography showed free air and fluid in the peritoneal cavity. He was received laparoscopic surgery and found the fishbone penetrated the sigmoid colon without polyp resection. The polyp was treated by local excision a few days later. The histology examination was a primary malignant melanoma. Due to the pigmented lesion that remained from the resected polyp's root, the abdominoperineal resection was performed as a radical treatment.

DISCUSSION

Diagnosis of anorectal malignant melanoma is difficult because of atypical signs, that are confused with bleeding hemorrhoids especially an amelanotic melanoma. Treatment is controversial, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and target therapy. A present case is an option in radical surgery.

CONCLUSION

Anorectal melanoma is a rare disease with poor results and prognosis. A lack of large-data leads to a missing evidence-based guideline in this disease. Early-staging diagnosis and surgical treatment help patients improve their overall survival.