Survival and complications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

Global trends and emerging research in nanotechnology for esophageal cancer: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing body of research on nanotechnology for esophageal cancer (EC), a comprehensive bibliometric analysis in this field has yet to be conducted. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing global research trends, key contributors, and emerging themes in nanotechnology for EC.

METHODS

A bibliometric analysis was performed on publications from 1980 to 2024, using data from the Web of Science Core Collection. The analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the R package 'bibliometrix' to visualize research trends, collaboration networks, and thematic areas.

RESULTS

The analysis included 419 documents authored by 2952 researchers from 44 countries. A significant increase in publications was observed, particularly after 2011, with China, the United States, and Japan leading the contributions. Prominent institutions, including Zhengzhou University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, were identified as key players. The research predominantly focused on drug delivery systems, nanomedicine, and cancer treatment mechanisms, with emerging trends in the development of advanced nanomaterials for personalized therapies.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive bibliometric analysis of nanotechnology applications in EC highlights global research trends, key contributors, and emerging research areas. The findings underscore the crucial role of nanotechnology in advancing treatment strategies for EC and identify areas for future research and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Major pathologic response as a prognostic surrogate in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy: A multi-center cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic and survival surrogate value of major pathologic response (MPR) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy(nCT/nICT) and surgery.

METHOD

A retrospective multi-center study cohort study enrolled 305 ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy followed by esophagectomy. Endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival(L-RFS), distant metastasis-free survival(D-MFS), and recurrence patterns. The Cox regression analysis and Harrell's C-index were used to analyze survival differences and surrogate endpoints. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the subgroup analysis in two subgroups(the patients receiving nICT and patients receiving nCT) and the prognostic value analysis of adjuvant therapy in non-MPR and MPR patients.

RESULT

Of the 305 patients, 105 achieved MPR, demonstrating a significantly improved RFS (P value < 0.001), L-RFS (P value < 0.001), and D-MFS (P value = 0.003). MPR was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS(HR:0.415, 95%CI:[0.227, 0.759], P value = 0.004) and demonstrated equal predictive capacity to be a surrogate of survival endpoints with T stage and N stage(Harrell's C-index: 0.613). In subgroup analysis, patients with MPR showed better survival outcomes in subgroups that received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (P value = 0.012) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy(P value < 0.001). Additionally, adjuvant therapy did not confer additional survival benefits to both MPR and non-MPR patients. Compared with patients who achieved MPR, non-MPR patients exhibited a higher recurrence rate, although the recurrence sites were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

MPR can serve as an independent prognostic factor and a surrogate of survival endpoints in ESCC patients undergoing nCT/nICT. Besides, as a potential indicator for postoperative management, MPR can provide reference basis and evidence support in clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy application in radical esophagectomy surgery: Safety and feasibility: A descriptive study in Vietnam

Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks as the 7th most prevalent form of cancer and the 6th leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Neoadjuvant therapy, encompassing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, has shown promise in reducing the staging of EC and mitigating the risk of early systemic spread. This study seeks to assess the safety and viability of implementing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in conjunction with radical esophagectomy surgery for Vietnamese patients diagnosed with locally advanced EC. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, while feasibility was assessed through indicators such as pathological complete response, major pathological response, and R0 resection rates. The study analyzed data from 30 patients, following specific inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics analysis revealed a participant cohort entirely composed of males, wherein 83.3% were identified as smokers, with tumors predominantly located in the middle (46.7%) and lower (53.3%) regions of the thoracic esophagus. The predominance of clinical stages II and III was observed. The nCRT protocol resulted in a substantial reduction in dysphagia score, with a statistically significant P < .001. The median duration from the conclusion of radiation treatment to surgery was 62 days, with a median operative time of 302 minutes and a median estimated blood loss of 189 mL. Surgical complications primarily included anastomotic leakage and pneumonia, occurring in 23.3% and 16.7% of cases, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 29 (96.7%) patients, with 43.4% attaining pathological complete response and 56.7% demonstrating tumor complete response. The study's outcomes emphasize the safety and feasibility of employing esophagectomy subsequent to nCRT in Vietnamese patients, as evidenced by the absence of mortality, low complication rates, and favorable surgical results. It also suggests the potential advantages of utilizing a lower daily Gy dose for enhanced safety and considering squamous cell carcinoma as a specific criterion for nCRT.

Induction Radiochemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes from a Single-Center Study

Background/Objectives: The management of esophageal cancer (EC) remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in optimizing therapeutic strategies for different stages and subgroups. This study assessed the impact of preoperative radiochemotherapy (CRT) on clinical staging and identified subgroups for whom definitive CRT (dCRT) may provide a favorable alternative to surgery. Methods: Sixty-one patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. Pre-treatment staging included computed tomography, gastroscopy with biopsy, and comprehensive laboratory evaluations. Patients received preoperative CRT following the CROSS or dCRT protocols based on tumor stage. Surgical approaches included staged esophagectomy or single-stage Ivor Lewis procedures. Four patients declined surgery and were treated with dCRT. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated using pTNM classification. Follow-up included imaging and endoscopic surveillance. Statistical analyses assessed changes in staging and factors influencing treatment outcomes. Results: CRT significantly reduced T stage across the entire cohort (p = 0.0002), with complete pathological response (pT0N0M0) observed in 54.5% of patients following induction CRT (p = 0.0001). Male patients demonstrated a significant reduction in T stage (p = 0.0008), while a similar trend in females was not significant (p = 0.068). Among patients declining surgery, dCRT demonstrated acceptable oncologic control over a mean follow-up of 4 ± 0.79 years. Conclusions: Preoperative CRT effectively downstages EC and achieves high rates of response, especially in male patients. Therefore, dCRT may be a viable alternative in selected patients, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment strategies to optimize outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of refining multimodal approaches in EC care.

Phase III randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus platinum with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction squamous cancer, 5-fluorouracil plus platinum, is toxic and logistically challenging; alternative regimens are needed.

METHODS

This was a phase III randomized open-label noninferiority trial at Tata Memorial Center, India, in resectable locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction squamous cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 3 cycles of 3-weekly platinum (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin area under the curve 6) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (day 1) or 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 continuous infusion (days 1-4), followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Between August 2014 and June 2022, we enrolled 420 patients; 210 to each arm. Statistically significantly more patients on paclitaxel plus platinum (n =194, 92.3%) received all 3 chemotherapy cycles than on 5-fluorouracil with platinum (n = 170, 85.9%; P = .009). 5-fluorouracil plus platinum caused more grade 3 or higher toxicities (n = 124, 69.7%) than paclitaxel plus platinum (n = 97, 51.9%; P = .001). Surgery was performed in 131 (62.4%) patients on 5-fluorouracil plus platinum vs 139 (66.2%) on paclitaxel plus platinum (P = .415). Paclitaxel plus platinum resulted in higher pathologic primary tumor clearance (n = 33, 25.8%, vs n = 17, 15%; P = .04) and pathologic complete responses in 21.9% compared with 12.4% from 5-fluorouracil plus platinum (P = .053). Median overall survival was 27.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 18.6 to 43.5 months) from paclitaxel plus platinum, which was noninferior to 27.1 months (95% CI = 18.8 to 40.7 months) from 5-fluorouracil plus platinum (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.72 to 1.09; P = .346).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus platinum chemotherapy is safer and results in similar R0 resections, higher pathologic tumor clearance and noninferior survival compared with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum. Paclitaxel plus platinum should replace 5-fluorouracil plus platinum as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophagealor gastroesophageal junction squamous cancer.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY INDIA NUMBER

CTRI/2014/04/004516.

Prediction of Anastomotic Leakage in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Multimodal Machine Learning Model Integrating Imaging and Clinical Data

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Surgery in combination with chemo/radiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Even after the introduction of minimally invasive techniques, esophagectomy carries significant morbidity and mortality. One of the most common and feared complications of esophagectomy is anastomotic leakage (AL). Our work aimed to develop a multimodal machine-learning model combining CT-derived and clinical data for predicting AL following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 471 patients were prospectively included (Jan 2010-Dec 2022). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate celia trunk stenosis and vessel calcification. Clinical variables, including demographics, disease stage, operation details, postoperative CRP, and stage, were combined with CT data to build a model for AL prediction. Data was split into 80%:20% for training and testing, and an XGBoost model was developed with 10-fold cross-validation and early stopping. ROC curves and respective areas under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1-scores were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients (24.8%) exhibited post-operative AL. The XGboost model achieved an AUC of 79.2% (95%CI 69%-89.4%) with a specificity of 77.46%, a sensitivity of 65.22%, PPV of 48.39%, NPV of 87.3%, and F1-score of 56%. Shapley Additive exPlanation analysis showed the effect of individual variables on the result of the model. Decision curve analysis showed that the model was particularly beneficial for threshold probabilities between 15% and 48%.

CONCLUSION

A clinically relevant multimodal model can predict AL, which is especially valuable in cases with low clinical probability of AL.

Debating the Optimal Preoperative Approach: NACRT vs NACT in Locally Advanced Oesophageal Cancer

Oesophageal cancer (EC), ranking 11th in incidence and 7th in mortality globally, presents a significant health challenge, with a notable prevalence in India, especially in the northeastern region. This article examines the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in treating locally advanced EC, analyzing data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 2000 and 2024. NACRT, involving preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, has shown improved survival rates, notably in the CROSS trial, which reported a 10-year overall survival benefit of 13%. Conversely, NACT is supported by key trials like the OE02 and MAGIC trials, demonstrating comparable survival outcomes. Key points of debate include compliance, complications, response and resection status, survival rates, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Compliance rates are similar for both modalities, though disease progression is more common after NACT. Postoperative complications and mortality rates are comparable, with NACTRT showing higher pathologic complete response (pCR) and R0 resection rates, potentially avoiding additional adjuvant radiation. While NACRT shows marginally better 3-year survival rates, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, 5-year survival rates and HRQOL outcomes are similar for both treatments. NACTRT is associated with more respiratory symptoms, whereas NACT patients experience more gastrointestinal issues. Both NACT and NACTRT are viable options, with the choice depending on patient-specific factors and a thorough assessment of potential benefits and risks. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols for EC.

TME-responsive nanoplatform for multimodal imaging-guided synergistic precision therapy of esophageal cancer via inhibiting HIF-1α signal pathway

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and its treatment poses significant challenges. In recent years, photodynamic, photothermal, and chemodynamic therapies have emerged as alternative strategies for tumor intervention. However, limitations such as poor tumor targeting, insufficient microenvironment responsiveness, and unclear mechanisms hinder their application. In this study, we found that hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) was highly expressed in clinical EC samples, which contributed to tumor malignancy and metastasis. We developed a carbon dots (CDs)-based tumor microenvironment (TME)-responsive nanoplatform, CDs-MnO2-Au-Cet (CMAC), designed for multimodal imaging-guided precision therapy in EC. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that CMAC effectively targeted and imaged EC cells and tissues. CMAC significantly inhibited tumor growth by inducing apoptosis and reducing lung metastasis. Mechanistically, CMAC administration led to a substantial downregulation of HIF-1α and its downstream targets, GLUT1 and MMP9. In summary, we presented a novel nanoplatform for imaging-guided synergistic therapy in EC, which demonstrated excellent anti-tumor growth and metastasis capabilities, along with favorable biocompatibility. This study laid the groundwork for developing innovative theranostic strategies for EC.

Perioperative outcomes in patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy versus up-front surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment for oesophageal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant therapy has evolved over time as evidence for its survival benefit comes to hand. Clinician reluctance to offer patients neoadjuvant therapy may be based on the perception that patients receiving treatment before surgery may be exposed to a greater risk of perioperative complications. The aim of this study was to examine short-term outcomes in patients who undergo neoadjuvant therapy versus up-front surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collated data from 2001 to 2020 of patients undergoing resection for oesophageal cancer. Patients who had neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy and up-front surgery were compared for perioperative morbidity (via the Clavien-Dindo classification), length of stay, unplanned readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Logistic regression was performed to predict perioperative morbidity following surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 284 patients underwent an oesophagectomy. Most patients received neoadjuvant treatment (41% received chemoradiotherapy (117/284), 33% received chemotherapy (93/284)), and 26% of patients received up-front surgery (74/284). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or up-front surgery were more likely to have a complication (57%, 67/117 and 57%, 43/74) than patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only (38%, 35/93, P = 0.009). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 1.4% (n = 4) and 2.8% (n = 8), respectively, with no difference between the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this series, we found that patients who received neoadjuvant treatment could undergo oesophagectomy with curative intent with acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To date, few studies have compared effectiveness and survival rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NACI) and conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study was conducted to compare therapeutic response and survival between NACI and NCRT.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with either NACI or NCRT followed by surgery between June 2018 and March 2021. The 2 groups were compared for treatment response, 3-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method, differences were compared using the log-rank test, and potential imbalances were corrected for using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method.

RESULTS

Among 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 81 received NACI and 121 received conventional NCRT. After IPTW adjustment, the R0 resection rate (85.2% vs 92.3%; P = .227) and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (27.5% vs 36.4%; P = .239) were comparable between the 2 groups. Nevertheless, patients who received NACI exhibited both a better 3-year OS rate (91.7% vs 79.8%; P = .032) and a better 3-year DFS rate (87.4% vs 72.8%; P = .039) compared with NCRT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

NACI has R0 resection and pCR rates comparable to those of NCRT and seems to be correlated with better prognosis than NCRT. NACI followed by surgery may be an effective treatment strategy for locally advanced ESCC.

Multi-disciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma: Current practices and future directions

Esophageal cancer in one of the most malignant and hard-to-treat cancers. Esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) is most common in Asian countries, whereas adenocarcinoma at the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ AC) is more prevalent in the Western countries. Due to differences in both genetic background and response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, both histologic subtypes need different paradigms of management. Since the landmark CROSS study has demonstrated the superior survival benefit of tri-modality including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to esophagectomy, the tri-modality becomes the standard of care; however, it is suitable for a highly-selected patient. Tri-modality should be offered for every ESCC patient, if a patient is fit for surgery with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve, regardless of ages. Definitive chemoradiotherapy remains the best option for a patient who is not a surgical candidate or declines surgery. On the contrary, owing to doubtful benefits of radiotherapy with potentially more toxicities related to radiotherapy in EGJ AC, either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or peri-operative chemotherapy would be more preferable in an EGJ AC patient. In case of very locally advanced disease (cT4b), the proper management is more challenging. Even though, palliative care is the safe option, multi-modality therapy with curative intent like neoadjuvant chemotherapy with conversion surgery may be worthwhile; however, it should be suggested on case-by-case basis.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is an essential modality for reducing the clinical stage of esophageal cancer; however, the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear. Therefore, a discussion of these two modalities is necessary.

AIM

To investigate the benefits and complications of neoadjuvant modalities.

METHODS

To address this concern, predefined criteria were established using the PICO protocol. Two independent authors performed comprehensive searches using predetermined keywords. Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant differences between groups. Potential publication bias was visualized using funnel plots. The quality of the data was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Tool 2 (RoB2) and the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Ten articles, including 1928 patients, were included for the analysis. Significant difference was detected in pathological complete response (pCR) [P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 0.27; 95%CI: 0.16-0.46], 30-d mortality (P = 0.015; OR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.22-0.71) favoring the nCRT, and renal failure (P = 0.039; OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 0.66-1.64) favoring the nCT. No significant differences were observed in terms of survival, local or distal recurrence, or other clinical or surgical complications. The result of RoB2 was moderate, and that of the GRADE approach was low or very low in almost all cases.

CONCLUSION

Although nCRT may have a higher pCR rate, it does not translate to greater long-term survival. Moreover, nCRT is associated with higher 30-d mortality, although the specific cause for postoperative complications could not be identified. In the case of nCT, toxic side effects are suspected, which can reduce the quality of life. Given the quality of available studies, further randomized trials are required.

Generation and characterization of mAb 61H9 against junctional adhesion molecule-a with potent antitumor activity

Junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) is an adhesion molecule that exists on the surface of certain types of cells, including white blood cells, endothelial cells, and dendritic cells. In this study, the cDNA sequences of JAM-A-Fc were chemically synthesized with optimization for mammalian expression. Afterward, we analyzed JAM-A protein expression through transient transfection in HEK293 cell lines. Mice were immunized with JAM-A-Fc protein, and hybridoma was prepared by fusing myeloma cells and mouse spleen cells. Antibodies were purified from the hybridoma supernatant and four monoclonal strains were obtained and numbered 61H9, 70E5, 71A8, and 74H3 via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay screening. Immunofluorescence staining assay showed 61H9 was the most suitable cell line for mAb production due to its fluorescence signal being the strongest. Flow cytometric analysis proved that 61H9 possessed high affinity. Moreover, antagonism of JAM-A mAb could attenuate the proliferative, migrative, and invasive abilities of ESCC cells and significantly inhibit tumor growth in mice. By examining hematoxylin-eosin staining mice tumor tissues, we found inflammatory cells infiltrated lightly in the anti-JAM-A group. The expression of BCL-2 and IκBα in the anti-JAM-A group were decreased in mice tumor tissues compared to the control group. Ultimately, a method for preparing high-yield JAM-A-Fc protein was created and a high affinity mAb against JAM-A with an antitumor effect was prepared.

Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals the IFI6 Gene as a Prognostic Indicator and Therapeutic Target in Esophageal Cancer

The role of the IFI6 gene has been described in several cancers, but its involvement in esophageal cancer (ESCA) remains unclear. This study aimed to identify novel prognostic indicators for ESCA-targeted therapy by investigating IFI6's expression, epigenetic mechanisms, and signaling activities. We utilized public data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to analyze IFI6's expression, clinical characteristics, gene function, pathways, and correlation with different immune cells in ESCA. The TIMER2.0 database was employed to assess the pan-cancer expression of IFI6, while UALCAN was used to examine its expression across tumor stages and histology subtypes. Additionally, the KEGG database helped identify related pathways. Our findings revealed 95 genes positively correlated and 15 genes negatively correlated with IFI6 in ESCA. IFI6 was over-expressed in ESCA and other cancers, impacting patient survival and showing higher expression in tumor tissues than normal tissues. IFI6 was also correlated with CD4+ T cells and B cell receptors (BCRs), both essential in immune response. GO Biological Process (GO BP) enrichment analysis indicated that IFI6 was primarily associated with the Type I interferon signaling pathway and the defense response to viruses. Intriguingly, KEGG pathway analysis demonstrated that IFI6 and its positively correlated genes in ESCA were mostly linked to the Cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, which plays a crucial role in innate immunity and viral defense, and the RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) signaling pathway, which detects viral infections and activates immune responses. Pathways related to various viral infections were also identified. It is important to note that our study relied on online databases. Given that ESCA consists of two distinct subgroups (ESCC and EAC), most databases combine them into a single category. Future research should focus on evaluating IFI6 expression and its impact on each subgroup to gain more specific insights. In conclusion, inhibiting IFI6 using targeted therapy could be an effective strategy for treating ESCA considering its potential as a biomarker and correlation with immune cell factors.

An update of clinical value of circulating tumor DNA in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a deadly disease with limited therapeutic options. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a promising tool in this regard, the availiable evidence is limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the clinical applicability of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) technology on the ctDNA detection of the EC and listed the current challenges.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library from January, 2000 to April, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were set as primary outcome endpoints. Pathologic response was evaluated by tumor regression grade (TRG), according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Major pathologic regression (MPR) was defined as TRG 1 and 2. The MPR was set as secondary endpoint. Hazard rate (HR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators the association between ctDNA and prognosis of EC. MPR rates were also calculated. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies, containing 1144 patients with EC, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that OS (HR = 3.87; 95% CI, 2.86-5.23) and PFS (HR = 4.28; 95% CI, 3.34-5.48) were shorter in ctDNA-positive patients. In the neoadjuvant therapy, the sensitivity analysis showed the clarified HR of ctDNA-positive was 1.13(95% CI, 1.01-1.28). We also found that TP53, NOTCH1, CCND1 and CNKN2A are the most frequent mutation genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive ctDNA is associated with poor prognosis, which demonstrated clinical value of ctDNA. Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring showed potential prognostic value in the neoadjuvant therapy. In an era of precision medicine, ctDNA could be a promising tool to individualize treatment planning and to improve outcomes in EC.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023412465.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Society for Radiation Oncology Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer have improved over the last decade with the implementation of multimodality therapy. There are currently no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that have incorporated the input of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. To address the need for multidisciplinary input in the management of esophageal cancer and to meet current best practices for clinical practice guidelines, the current guidelines were created as a collaboration between The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Physician representatives chose 8 key clinical questions pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (excluding cervical location). A comprehensive literature review was performed identifying 227 articles that met the inclusion criteria covering the use of induction chemotherapy, chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy before surgery, optimal radiation dose, the value of esophagectomy, timing of esophagectomy, the approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection. The relevant data were reviewed and voted on by the panel with 80% of the authors, with 75% agreement on class and level of evidence. These data were then complied into the guidelines document.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for the Risk of Cardiac Death in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

The primary cause of mortality in esophageal cancer survivors is cardiac death. Early identification of cardiac mortality risk during chemotherapy for esophageal cancer is crucial for improving the prognosis. We developed and validated a nomogram model to identify patients with high cardiac mortality risk after chemotherapy for esophageal cancer for early screening and clinical decision-making. We randomly allocated 37,994 patients with chemotherapy-treated esophageal cancer into two groups using a 7:3 split ratio: model training (n = 26,598) and validation (n = 11,396). 5- and 10-year survival rates were used as endpoints for model training and validation. Decision curve analysis and the consistency index (C-index) were used to evaluate the model's net clinical advantage. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and computing the area under the curve (AUC). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on the prognostic index was performed. Patient risk was stratified according to the death probability. Age, surgery, sex, and year were most closely related to cardiac death and used to plot the nomograms. The C-index for the training and validation datasets were 0.669 and 0.698, respectively, indicating the nomogram's net clinical advantage in predicting cardiac death risk at 5 and 10 years. The 5- and 10-year AUCs were 0.753 and 0.772 for the training dataset and 0.778 and 0.789 for the validation dataset, respectively. The accuracy of the model in predicting cardiac death risk was moderate. This nomogram can identify patients at risk of cardiac death after chemotherapy for esophageal cancer at an early stage.

Current neoadjuvant therapy for operable locally advanced esophageal cancer

Locally advanced esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis, while an increasing number of patients are diagnosed with that. Neoadjuvant therapy has become a hot topic in treating locally advanced esophageal cancer to improve its survival benefit. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery has been confirmed by many studies, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are included in the guidelines. In recent years, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged, and more studies are evaluating the efficacy of combining them with neoadjuvant therapy for operable esophageal cancer patients. Even though the preliminary data is disappointing, many trials are still under investigation without improving survival benefits. New indexes used as surrogate endpoints (e.g., major pathologic response and pathological complete response) are emerging to accelerate the development and approval of neoadjuvant drugs. This review summarized the research progress in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and discussed which primary endpoint should be used in neoadjuvant therapy trials.

Mechanisms of esophageal cancer metastasis and treatment progress

Esophageal cancer is a prevalent tumor of the digestive tract worldwide. The detection rate of early-stage esophageal cancer is very low, and most patients are diagnosed with metastasis. Metastasis of esophageal cancer mainly includes direct diffusion metastasis, hematogenous metastasis, and lymphatic metastasis. This article reviews the metabolic process of esophageal cancer metastasis and the mechanisms by which M2 macrophages, CAF, regulatory T cells, and their released cytokines, including chemokines, interleukins, and growth factors, form an immune barrier to the anti-tumor immune response mediated by CD8+ T cells, impeding their ability to kill tumor cells during tumor immune escape. The effect of Ferroptosis on the metastasis of esophageal cancer is briefly mentioned. Moreover, the paper also summarizes common drugs and research directions in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy for advanced metastatic esophageal cancer. This review aims to serve as a foundation for further investigations into the mechanism and management of esophageal cancer metastasis.

Preoperative BChE serves as a prognostic marker in patients with resectable AEG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Diminished systemic serum butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), a biomarker for chronic inflammation, cachexia, and advanced tumor stage, has shown to play a prognostic role in various malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of pretherapeutic BChE levels in patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG), treated with or without neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Data of a consecutive series of patients with resectable AEG at the Department for General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, were analyzed. Preoperative serum BChE levels were correlated to clinic-pathological parameters as well as treatment response. The prognostic impact of serum BChE levels on disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves used for illustration.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients were included in this study, with an overall mean (standard deviation, SD) pretreatment serum BChE level of 6.22 (± 1.91) IU/L. In univariate models, diminished preoperative serum BChE levels were significantly associated with shorter overall (OS, p < 0.003) and disease-free survival (DFS, p < 0.001) in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment and/or primary resection. In multivariated analysis, decreased BChE was significantly associated with shorter DFS (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.00, p 0.049) and OS (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-1.00, p < 0.49) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Backward regression identified the interaction between preoperative BChE and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a predictive factor for DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Diminished serum BChE serves as a strong, independent, and cost-effective prognostic biomarker for worse outcome in patients with resectable AEG who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Current trends in perioperative treatment of resectable gastric cancer

In the last few decades, the treatment strategy for locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (GC) has shifted to a multimodal approach, which potentially decreases recurrence risk and improves survival rates. Perioperative therapy leads to downstaging, increased curative resection rates, and prolonged disease-free and overall survival, by preventing micrometastases in patients with resectable GC. Application of neoadjuvant therapy provides information about tumor biology and in vivo sensitivity. A consensus regarding the therapeutic approach for non-metastatic GC does not exist, and many clinical trials aim to clarify this aspect. Advances in precision medicine and the role of immunotherapy have been the focus of research in GC treatment. Herein, the current status and possible future developments of perioperative therapy for locally advanced resectable GC are reviewed, based on the most recent randomized clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is not superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery has been recommended as standard treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). But the risk of tumor recurrence still remained, and many patients refused or abandoned radiotherapy because of the intolerable adverse effects in China. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) followed by surgery has become an emerging treatment in patients with esophageal cancer. There was still no consensus on whether nICT was superior to nCT alone in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received surgery after nICT (n=26, 40%) or nCT alone (n=39, 60%) were included. The patients were classified as nICT or nCT arm. The primary endpoints were pathological tumor response (PTR) and event-free survival (EFS). The different clinic-pathological features were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square (χ2) test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate EFS from the date of treatment to recurrence or death. All tests were 2-sided with a significative P-value defined <.05.

RESULTS

Three (11.5%) of the 26 patients achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) in the nICT group, and four (10.3%) of the 39 patients achieved pCR in the nCT group, respectively (P=1.000). Six (23.1%) of the 26 patients achieved major pathological response (MPR) in the nICT group, and 11 (28.2%) of the 39 patients achieved MPR in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.645). Downstaging was achieved in 13 (44.8%) patients in the nICT group and 16 (55.2%) patients in the nCT group, respectively (P=0.732). To verify the tumor regression grade (TRG) results, we compared them with MPR and pCR, which showed a significant dependency (P< 0.001). Patients who achieved downgrading showed better MPR and pCR rates (P<0.001 and P =0.010). There was no significant difference in EFS between the nICT and nCT groups (HR=1.011, 95% CI: 0.421-2.425, P = 0.981).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy was not superior to chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. However, more studies with long-term follow-up were needed to confirm this result.

Presurgical radiation and chemotherapy in preparation for thoracic tumor resection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims at describing the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy as well the novel immunotherapy and targeted therapy in thoracic oncology with focus on anesthetic considerations of such treatments for the surgical patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, immune check point inhibitors have changed the landscape of thoracic oncology treatment. In this review, we summarize the key studies that have been fundamental in this change.

SUMMARY

Rather than a comprehensive review, the purpose of this work is to provide the reader with an overview of the most common neoadjuvant regimens used in current practice, with the corresponding most prevalent adverse effects as it pertains for patients with esophageal and lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and mediastinal tumors. Considerations relevant to the anesthesiologist, including specific toxicities related to each treatment type, and the impact of each treatment type on perioperative outcomes and complications will be discussed.

Perioperative outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus camrelizumab compared with chemotherapy alone and chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer

Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) is becoming a new therapeutic frontier for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, crucial details and technical know-how regarding surgical techniques and the perioperative challenges following nCIT remain poorly understood. The study investigated and compared the advantages and disadvantages of esophagectomy following nCIT with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients initially diagnosed with resectable ESCC at clinical stage T2-4N+ and received neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy at the Hunan Cancer Hospital between October 2014 and February 2021. Patients were divided into three groups according to neoadjuvant treatment: (i) nCIT; (ii) nCT; and (iii) nCRT.

Results

There were 34 patients in the nCIT group, 97 in the nCT group, and 31 in the nCRT group. Compared with nCT, nCIT followed by esophagectomy achieved higher pathological complete response (pCR; 29.0% versus 4.1%, p<0.001) and major pathological response (MPR; 52.9% versus 16.5%, p<0.001) rates, more resected lymph nodes during surgery (25.06 ± 7.62 versus 20.64 ± 9.68, p=0.009), less intraoperative blood loss (200.00 ± 73.86 versus 266.49 ± 176.29 mL, p=0.035), and comparable results in other perioperative parameters. Compared with nCRT, nCIT achieved similar pCR (29.0% versus 25.8%) and MPR (52.9% versus 51.6%, p=0.862) rates, with significantly more lymph nodes resected during surgery (25.06 ± 7.62 versus 16.94 ± 7.24, p<0.001), shorter operation time (267.79 ± 50.67 versus 306.32 ± 79.92 min, p=0.022), less intraoperative blood loss (200.00 ± 73.86 versus 264.53 ± 139.76 mL, p=0.022), and fewer ICU admissions after surgery (29.4% versus 80.6%, p<0.001). Regarding perioperative adverse events and complications, no significant statistical differences were detected between the nCIT and the nCT or nCRT groups. The 3-year overall survival rate after nCIT was 73.3%, slightly higher than 46.1% after nCT and 39.7% after nCRT, with no statistically significant differences (p=0.883).

Conclusions

This clinical analysis showed that nCIT is safe and feasible, with satisfactory pCR and MPR rates. Esophagectomy following nCIT has several perioperative advantages over nCT and nCRT, with comparable perioperative morbidity and mortality. The long-term survival benefits after nCIT still requires further investigation.

Evaluation of Clinical and Safety Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

A considerable number of clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal cancer are emerging. However, systematic evaluations of these studies are lacking.

Objective

To provide state-of-the-art evidence and normative theoretical support for neoadjuvant immunotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant original articles and conference proceedings that were published in English through April 1, 2022.

Study Selection

Published phase 2 or 3 clinical trials that included patients with resectable stage I to IV esophageal cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before surgery as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for meta-analysis were followed to extract data. A random-effects model was adopted if the heterogeneity was significant (I2 statistic >50%); otherwise, the common-effects model was used. Data analyses were conducted from April 2 to 8, 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Pathological complete response (pCR) rate and major pathological response (MPR) rate were considered to be the primary outcomes calculated for the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was set as the major measure for the safety outcome. The rate of R0 surgical resection was summarized. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to histologic subtype and ICI types.

Results

A total of 27 clinical trials with 815 patients were included. Pooled rates were 31.4% (95% CI, 27.6%-35.3%) for pCR and 48.9% (95% CI, 42.0-55.9%) for MCR in patients with esophageal cancer. In terms of safety, the pooled incidence of treatment-related severe adverse events was 26.9% (95% CI, 16.7%-38.3%). Most patients achieved R0 surgical resection (98.6%; 95% CI, 97.1%-99.6%). Regarding histologic subtypes, the pooled pCR rates were 32.4% (95% CI, 28.2%-36.8%) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 25.2% (95% CI, 16.3%-35.1%) in esophageal adenocarcinoma. The pooled MPR rate was 49.4% (95% CI, 42.1%-56.7%) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy had promising clinical and safety outcomes for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are warranted to validate the findings and benefits of ICIs.

Interventions targeting postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and narrative discussion

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent the most common complications after esophageal cancer surgery. The lack of a uniform reporting nomenclature and a severity classification has hampered consistency of research in this area, including the study of interventions targeting prevention and treatment of PPCs. This systematic review focused on RCTs of clinical interventions used to minimize the impact of PPCs. Searches were conducted up to 08/02/2021 on MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and the COCHRANE library for RCTs and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 339 citations, with a pooled dataset of 1,369 patients and 14 RCTs, were included. Heterogeneity of study design and outcomes prevented meta-analysis. PPCs are multi-faceted and not fully understood with respect to etiology. The review highlights the paucity of high-quality evidence for best practice in the management of PPCs. Further research in the area of intraoperative interventions and early postoperative ERAS standards is required. A consistent uniform for definition of pneumonia after esophagectomy and the development of a severity scale appears warranted to inform further RCTs and guidelines.

Safety and Feasibility of Esophagectomy Following Combined Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objectives

The combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy (nICT) is a novel treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. There is concern that nICT may increase operation difficulty, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. This study aimed to compare short-term outcomes among esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and nICT and for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients (from January 2017 through July 2021) who underwent surgery for ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.05 was conducted to balance potential bias.

Results

A 1:1 PSM was conducted based on clinical stage, age, body mass index (BMI), and tumor location, and then 32 comparable pairs were matched. After PSM, age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, smoking history, clinical stage, tumor location, lymphadenectomy field, pathological stage, anastomotic position, route of gastric conduit, procedure type, and operative approach were comparable between groups. Compared with the nICT group (median, 300 min), the operation time was significantly longer in the nCRT group (median, 376 min). However, both groups were comparable in intraoperative blood loss, thoracic drainage volume, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital cost. Further, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, ICU readmission, and major complications were similar in both groups. The nCRT group had an advantage in pathological response. The pathological complete response (pCR) was 18.8% (6/32) in the nICT group and 43.8% (14/32) in the nCRT group (p = 0.03). The major pathological response (MPR) was 71.9% (23/32) in the nCRT group and 34.4% (11/32) in the nICT group (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Based on our preliminary experience, esophagectomy appears to be safe and feasible following combined neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (nICT) is a novel treatment for locally esophageal cancer squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to evaluate the potential effect of nICT on surgery safety by comparing short-term outcomes between the surgery alone group and the nICT followed by surgery group.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed to identify patients (from January 2017 to July 2021) who underwent surgery for ESCC with or without nICT. A propensity score matching (PSM) comparison (1:1) was conducted to reduce selection biases and balance the demographic and oncologic characteristics between groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, the nICT group (n = 38) was comparable to the surgery alone group (n = 38) in the following characteristics: age, sex, BMI, ASA status, smoking, tumor location, lymph node resection, clinical stage, anastomotic location, surgical approach, and surgical approach. The operation time and incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the nICT group were higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). However, other complications and major complications were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss, ICU stay time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization cost. The 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and ICU readmission rates were also similar in the nICT and control groups. In the nICT group, the pathological complete response rate in primary tumor was 18.4%, and the major pathological response rate in tumor was 42.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our preliminary experience, nICT followed by surgery is safe and effective with acceptable increased operation risk, manageable postoperative complications, and promising pathological response. Further multicenter prospective trials are needed to validate our results.