1
|
Li W, Wang W. KRAS-G12 inhibitors in lung cancer therapy: unveiling the toxicity profile through a pharmacovigilance study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:812. [PMID: 39570438 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09024-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the advent of drugs designed to selectively target the KRAS-G12C mutant protein, sotorasib and adagrasib have exhibited remarkable efficacy in patients with KRAS G12C mutant lung cancers. Nevertheless, the safety profiles of these agents in a real-world context remain undisclosed. METHODS Data was systematically extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) website from January 2021 to December 2023, focusing on adverse events associated with KRAS G12C inhibitors, sotorasib and adagrasib. RESULTS The predominant adverse events attributed to KRAS G12C inhibitors predominantly encompassed general disorders and administration site conditions, investigations, and gastrointestinal disorders. Among these, the significant adagrasib-related adverse events comprised nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, asthenia, dizziness, and weight loss. Notably, incidences of renal failure were also documented in patients receiving adagrasib. Conversely, the primary adverse events associated with sotorasib included diarrhea, nausea, abnormal hepatic function, elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase, and hepatotoxicity. It is noteworthy that a considerable number of adverse events manifested within the inaugural month following the initiation of therapy with KRAS G12C inhibitors. CONCLUSION Although most adverse effects are reversible, vigilance is warranted particularly for nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity during the administration of KRAS G12C inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barsouk A, Friedes C, Iocolano M, Doucette A, Cohen RB, Robinson KW, D'Avella CA, Marmarelis ME, Kosteva JA, Singh AP, Ciunci CA, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Bradley JD, Feigenberg SJ, Sun L, Aggarwal C, Langer CJ, Yegya-Raman N. Plunging Into the PACIFIC: Outcomes of Patients With Unresectable KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Definitive Chemoradiation and Durvalumab Consolidation. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:e161-e171. [PMID: 38195320 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) substantially improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the PACIFIC trial becoming the standard of care in locally-advanced, unresectable NSCLC. KRAS mutation may influence response to ICI. METHODS In this single-institution, retrospective analysis, we compared treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable KRAS mutated (KRAS-mt) and wild-type (KRAS-wt) NSCLC treated with CRT between October 2017 and December 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted comparing median progression free survival and median overall survival from completion of radiotherapy in all KRAS-mt patients and KRAS-G12C-mutated patients. Outcomes were also compared with and without ICI consolidation. RESULTS Of 156 patients, 42 (26.9%) were KRAS-mt and 114 (73.1%) were KRAS-wt. Baseline characteristics differed only in histology; KRAS-mt NSCLC more likely to be adenocarcinoma. KRAS-mt patients had worse PFS (median 6.3 vs. 10.7 months, P = .041) but similar OS (median 23.1 vs. 27.3 months, P = .237). KRAS-mt patients were more likely to not receive ICI due to rapid disease progression post-CRT (23.8% vs. 4.4%, P = .007). Among patients who received ICI (n = 114), KRAS-mt was not associated with inferior PFS (8.1 vs. 11.9 months, P = .355) or OS (30.5 vs. 31.7 months, P = .692). KRAS-G12C patients (n = 22) had similar PFS and OS to other KRAS-mt. CONCLUSION In one of the largest post-CRT KRAS-mt cohort published, KRAS-mt was associated with inferior PFS, largely due to rapid progression prior to ICI consolidation, but did not affect OS. Among those who received ICI consolidation, outcomes were comparable regardless of KRAS-mt status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Barsouk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kyle W Robinson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher A D'Avella
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melina E Marmarelis
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John A Kosteva
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aditi P Singh
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christine A Ciunci
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kano Y, Suenaga M, Uetake H. Strategic Insight into the Combination Therapies for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:6546-6558. [PMID: 37504340 PMCID: PMC10378516 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The 5-year survival rate after curative resection is almost 80%, however, it is still less than satisfactory for metastatic CRC (mCRC). The combination approach including surgery, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy is a promising strategy due to its synergistic anticancer effect. Moreover, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has been reported to stratify the post-operative risk of recurrence, thus providing clinically valuable information for deciding to conduct adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, multiple new drugs that potentially target undruggable genes, including KRAS, have been developed. In this review, we discuss the current management of patients with mCRC and future perspectives in the light of a combination therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihito Kano
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
| | - Mitsukuni Suenaga
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo 113-8510, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uetake
- Department of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo 190-0014, Japan
| |
Collapse
|