Phase I dose-escalation study of afatinib, an ErbB family blocker, plus docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer

The Right Partner in Crime: Unlocking the Potential of the Anti-EGFR Antibody Cetuximab via Combination With Natural Killer Cell Chartering Immunotherapeutic Strategies

Cetuximab has an established role in the treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer and head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). However, the long-term effectiveness of cetuximab has been limited by the development of acquired resistance, leading to tumor relapse. By contrast, immunotherapies can elicit long-term tumor regression, but the overall response rates are much more limited. In addition to epidermal growth factor (EGFR) inhibition, cetuximab can activate natural killer (NK) cells to induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). In view of the above, there is an unmet need for the majority of patients that are treated with both monotherapy cetuximab and immunotherapy. Accumulated evidence from (pre-)clinical studies suggests that targeted therapies can have synergistic antitumor effects through combination with immunotherapy. However, further optimizations, aimed towards illuminating the multifaceted interplay, are required to avoid toxicity and to achieve better therapeutic effectiveness. The current review summarizes existing (pre-)clinical evidence to provide a rationale supporting the use of combined cetuximab and immunotherapy approaches in patients with different types of cancer.

HER2 Expression Is Predictive of Survival in Cetuximab Treated Patients with RAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The overexpressed HER2 is an important target for treatment with monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab, only in patients with breast and gastric cancers, and is an emerging therapeutic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAbs cetuximab and panitumumab. In this study, we investigated the relative expression and predictive value of all human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family members in 144 cetuximab-treated patients with wild type RAS mCRC. The relative expression of EGFR and HER2 have also been examined in 21-paired primary tumours and their metastatic sites by immunohistochemistry. Of the 144 cases examined, 25%, 97%, 79%, 48%, and 10% were positive for EGFR, HER2, HER3, and HER4 and all four HER family members, respectively. The expression of EGFR was an indicator of poorer overall survival and the membranous expression of HER2 and HER3 3+ intensity was associated with a shorter progression free survival (PFS). In contrast, the cytoplasmic expression of HER2 was associated with better PFS. In 48% and 71% of the cases, there were discordance in the expression of EGFR or one or more HER family members in paired primary and related metastatic tumours, respectively. Our results implicate the importance of a large prospective investigation of the expression level and predictive value of not only the therapeutic target (i.e., EGFR protein) but also HER2 and other HER family members as therapeutic targets, or for response to therapy with anti-EGFR mAbs and other forms of HER inhibitors, in both the primary tumours and metastatic sites in mCRC.

Phase I dose-escalation trial of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in combination with gemcitabine or docetaxel in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors

Background Afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, has shown synergistic antitumor activity and manageable tolerability in combination with chemotherapy. This phase I study assessed oral afatinib plus intravenous gemcitabine or docetaxel in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Methods Patients received afatinib (30, 40, or 50 mg) plus gemcitabine (1000 or 1250 mg/m²) or docetaxel (60 or 75 mg/m²). Dose escalation proceeded via a 3 + 3 design until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached. Adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity were also assessed. Results Dose-limiting toxicities during Cycle 1 were reported in 6/39 patients receiving afatinib/gemcitabine (most commonly diarrhea, thrombocytopenia and vomiting) and 16/54 patients receiving afatinib/docetaxel (most commonly febrile neutropenia and stomatitis). The MTDs were established as afatinib 40 mg/gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² and afatinib 30 mg/docetaxel 60 mg/m². The most common drug-related AEs were diarrhea, asthenia and rash with afatinib/gemcitabine, and diarrhea, asthenia and stomatitis with afatinib/docetaxel. No relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed for either combination. Both combinations demonstrated clinical activity and durable disease control at the MTDs. Compared with the MTD, higher response rates were achieved with afatinib 30 mg/docetaxel 75 mg/m² (28% vs 6%); however, this regimen was associated with problematic febrile neutropenia, an expected AE with docetaxel, that is often managed with growth factor support. Conclusions Afatinib/gemcitabine and afatinib/docetaxel demonstrated manageable safety profiles, with evidence of clinical efficacy at the MTDs. For afatinib/docetaxel, a dose level of afatinib 30 mg/docetaxel 75 mg/m² produced higher response rates. Trial registration: NCT01251653 ( ClinicalTrials.gov ).

Phase I/II trial of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel and abiraterone

Background

Abiraterone and cabazitaxel improve survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We conducted an open-label phase I/II trial of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone to assess the antitumor activity and tolerability in patients with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel (phase I), and after docetaxel and abiraterone (phase II) (NCT01511536).

Patients and methods

The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cabazitaxel plus abiraterone (phase I), and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response defined as a ≥ 50% decrease confirmed ≥3 weeks later with this combination (phase II).

Results

Ten patients were enrolled in the phase I component; nine were evaluable. No DLTs were identified. The MTD was established as the approved doses for both drugs (cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and abiraterone 1000 mg once daily). Daily abiraterone treatment did not impact on cabazitaxel clearance. Twenty-seven patients received cabazitaxel plus abiraterone plus prednisone (5 mg twice daily) in phase II. The median number of cycles administered (cabazitaxel) was seven (range: 1-28). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events included asthenia (in 5 patients; 14%), neutropenia (in 5 patients; 14%) and diarrhea (in 3 patients; 8%). Nine patients (24%) required dose reductions of cabazitaxel. Of 26 evaluable patients, 12 achieved a PSA response [46%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.6-66.6%]. Median PSA-progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.1-10.3 months). Of 14 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 3 (21%) achieved a partial response per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

Conclusions

The combination of cabazitaxel and abiraterone has a manageable safety profile and shows antitumor activity in patients previously treated with docetaxel and abiraterone.

Preclinical and clinical studies on afatinib in monotherapy and in combination regimens: Potential impact in colorectal cancer

Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has been an interesting therapeutic strategy because aberrant activation of this receptor plays an important role in the tumorgenesis of many cancer types, including colorectal cancer (CRC). After the initial promising results of EGFR-targeted therapies, therapeutic resistance is a major clinical problem. In order to overcome resistance to these EGFR-targeted therapies, new treatment options are necessary. In contrast to first generation EGFR inhibitors, afatinib (BIBW2992) is a second-generation irreversible ErbB family blocker that inhibits EGFR as well as HER2 and HER4. Consequently, treatment with afatinib may result in a distinct and more pronounced therapeutic benefit. Preclinical studies have reported promising results for afatinib in monotherapy as well as in combination with other drugs in CRC model systems. Furthermore, clinical studies examining afatinib as single agent and in combination therapy demonstrated manageable safety profile. Nevertheless, only limited antitumor activity has been observed in CRC patients. Although several combination treatments with afatinib have already been investigated, no optimal combination has been identified for CRC patients yet. As molecular tumor characteristics have gained increased importance in the choice of treatment, additional studies with biomarker-driven patient recruitment are required to further explore afatinib efficacy in CRC.

Afatinib in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

INTRODUCTION

Recently new data on the efficacy of afatinib in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have been published.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the literature for published and ongoing studies with afatinib in HNSCC. Phase I data and results of phase II and III studies of afatinib in HNSCC are discussed. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib monotherapy with continuous administration was determined at 40 or 50 mg/day, rash and diarrhea being the principal dose-limiting toxicities. The MTD was lower when combined with chemotherapy. Studies with afatinib have been conducted or are ongoing both in the recurrent or metastatic (R/M) and in the locoregionally advanced (LA) HNSCC disease setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Comparable disease control and tumor shrinkage rates were observed with cetuximab and afatinib in HNSCC progressing after platinum-containing chemotherapy. In patients with R/M- Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had progressed on/after first-line platinum-based therapy, afatinib induced significantly higher disease control rate, longer progression-free survival and improved patient-reported outcome compared to methotrexate. Randomized phase III trials studying the role of adjuvant afatinib after definitive or postoperative chemoradiation in LA-HNSCC are ongoing.

A Phase I dose-escalation study of afatinib combined with nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumors

AIMS

To evaluate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib combined with nintedanib.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Patients received afatinib 10-20 mg daily plus nintedanib 150-200 mg twice daily (28-day cycle). Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design.

RESULTS

Patients received afatinib/nintedanib: 10/150 mg (n = 11); 10/200 mg (n = 13; MTD); 20/200 mg (n = 4). Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities (all grade 3): increased alanine aminotransferase (afatinib/nintedanib: 10/150 mg), diarrhea (10/200 mg), dehydration (20/200 mg), diarrhea with elevated liver enzymes (20/200 mg). Frequent treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, fatigue and vomiting. In total, 14 patients (46.2%) had objective responses at the MTD.

CONCLUSION

The MTD, afatinib 10 mg daily plus nintedanib 200 mg twice daily, had a manageable safety profile, but was considered subtherapeutic for Phase II evaluation.

Afatinib-based combination regimens for the treatment of solid tumors: rationale, emerging strategies and recent progress

In oncology, there is a clinical need for novel combination therapy regimens that maximize efficacy and delay resistance to individual treatment modalities. Given the role of aberrant ErbB receptor signaling in the pathogenesis of many human cancers, there is rationale for incorporating afatinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, into such combinations. This review focuses on: pharmacological properties of afatinib that facilitate its use in combination; preclinical rationale for the combination of afatinib with other agents; and recently completed, and ongoing, clinical trials of afatinib-based combinations across tumor types. Based on these data, we emphasize a number of areas of high unmet medical need that could benefit from afatinib-based combinations, including patients with relapsed/refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.

Phase I study of afatinib combined with nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This Phase I study evaluated continuous- and intermittent-dosing (every other week) of afatinib plus nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Methods:

In the dose-escalation phase (n=45), maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were determined for continuous/intermittent afatinib 10, 20, 30 or 40 mg once daily plus continuous nintedanib 150 or 200 mg twice daily. Secondary objectives included safety and efficacy. Clinical activity of continuous afatinib plus nintedanib at the MTD was further evaluated in an expansion phase (n=25).

Results:

The most frequent dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea (11%) and transaminase elevations (7%). Maximum tolerated doses were afatinib 30 mg continuously plus nintedanib 150 mg, and afatinib 40 mg intermittently plus nintedanib 150 mg. Treatment-related adverse events (mostly Grade ⩽3) included diarrhoea (98%), asthenia (64%), nausea (62%) and vomiting (60%). In the dose-escalation phase, two patients had partial responses (PRs) and 27 (60%) had stable disease (SD). In the expansion phase, one complete response and three PRs were observed (all non-small cell lung cancer), with SD in 13 (52%) patients. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed.

Conclusions:

MTDs of continuous or intermittent afatinib plus nintedanib demonstrated a manageable safety profile with proactive management of diarrhoea. Antitumour activity was observed in patients with solid tumours.

A phase I study of daily afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

This phase I study evaluated afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours likely to express human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) or HER2.

METHODS

Oral afatinib was combined with intravenous paclitaxel (80mg/m(2); days 1, 8 and 15 every four weeks) starting at 20mg once daily and escalated to 40 and 50mg in successive cohorts of ⩾3 patients. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib combined with paclitaxel. Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumour activity.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities with afatinib 50mg were fatigue and mucositis. The MTD was determined as afatinib 40mg with paclitaxel 80mg/m(2), which proved tolerable with repeated dosing. Frequent adverse events (AEs) included diarrhoea (94%), fatigue (81%), rash/acne (81%), decreased appetite (69%) and inflammation of mucosal membranes (69%); no grade 4 treatment-related AEs were observed. Five (31%) confirmed partial responses were observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (n=3), oesophageal cancer and cholangiocarcinoma; eight (50%) patients remained on study for ⩾6months. Pharmacokinetic parameters of afatinib and paclitaxel were similar for single administration or in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD and recommended phase II dose of once-daily afatinib combined with paclitaxel 80mg/m(2) (days 1, 8 and 15 every four weeks) was 40mg. AEs at or below this dose were generally manageable with repeated dosing. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. This combination demonstrated promising antitumour activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00809133.

Variability in bioavailability of small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (smTKIs) are in the centre of the very quickly expanding area of personalized chemotherapy and oral applicability thereof. The number of drugs in this class is rapidly growing, with twenty current approvals by both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The drugs are, however, generally characterized by a poor oral, and thus variable, bioavailability. This results in significant variation in plasma levels and exposure. The cause is a complex interplay of factors, including poor aqueous solubility, issued permeability, membrane transport and enzymatic metabolism. Additionally, food and drug-drug interactions can play a significant role. The issues related with an impaired bioavailability generally receive little attention. To the best of our knowledge, this article is the first to provide an overview of the factors that determine the bioavailability of the smTKIs.

Afatinib for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) through tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represents an effective strategy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Afatinib is an irreversible erythroblastosis oncogene B (ErbB) family blocker, able to inhibit the kinase domains of EGFR, HER2 and HER4, and the transphosphorylation of ErbB3 that has recently been approved in the United States for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC and in Europe and Japan for the treatment of EGFR-mutated TKI-naive patients.

AREAS COVERED

The authors analyzed the pharmacology and the clinical activity of afatinib in NSCLC through a review of the literature. Trials exploring different settings have been reported, including LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6, where the drug achieved better outcomes in terms of response rate, progression-free survival and quality of life compared with chemotherapy. The main toxicities of afatinib are gastrointestinal and skin-related adverse events.

EXPERT OPINION

Afatinib showed remarkable efficacy as a first-line treatment in the presence of common EGFR mutations. Afatinib showed some activity in NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs, although, currently, its efficacy after the failure of erlotinib or gefitinib has not been clearly stated. Direct clinical data comparing the activity and tolerability of different inhibitors are still needed.

Afatinib: first global approval

Afatinib, an irreversible inhibitor of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinases, is under development with Boehringer Ingelheim for the once-daily, oral treatment of cancer. Afatinib downregulates ErbB signalling by covalently binding to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 and HER4, irreversibly inhibiting tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation. It also inhibits transphosphorylation of HER3. Oral afatinib (Gilotrif™) has been approved in the US for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have tumours with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test. Afatinib has also been approved in Taiwan for the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. In addition, the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use has recommended the approval of afatinib (Giotrif®) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations who are EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor naïve. Afatinib is also under regulatory review in Canada, Japan and other Asian countries. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of afatinib, leading to this first approval in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

A multicenter phase 1 study of PX-866 in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This phase I, dose-finding study determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, and antitumour activity of PX-866, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, combined with docetaxel in patients with incurable solid tumours.

Methods:

PX-866 was administered at escalating doses (4–8 mg daily) with docetaxel 75 mg m⁻² intravenously every 21 days. Archived tumour tissue was assessed for potential predictive biomarkers.

Results:

Forty-three patients were enrolled. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2. The most frequent study drug-related AE was diarrhoea (76.7%), with gastrointestinal disorders occurring in 79.1% (docetaxel-related) and 83.7% (PX-866-related). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The RP2D was 8 mg, the same as the single-agent MTD. Co-administration of PX-866 and docetaxel did not affect either drug's PKs. Best responses in 35 evaluable patients were: 2 partial responses (6%), 22 stable disease (63%), and 11 disease progression (31%). Eleven patients remained on study for >180 days, including 8 who maintained disease control on single-agent PX-866. Overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 73.5 days (range: 1–569). A non-significant association between longer PFS for PIK3CA-MUT/KRAS-WT vs PIK3CA-WT/KRAS-WT was observed.

Conclusion:

Treatment with PX-866 and docetaxel was well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping/cumulative toxicity. Further investigation with this combination is justified.