Risk factors for survival after lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical Resection of a Single Colorectal Lung Metastasis is Associated With Best Survival

INTRODUCTION

The management of solitary colorectal cancer metastases to the lungs after resection of the primary colon cancer is controversial. Surgical resection of a metastatic tumor in the lungs may be associated with improved survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with colon cancer (2010-2020). Patients with solitary colon cancer metastasis to the lungs after resection of the primary site were included in the study. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis among the different treatment modalities. We also performed a multivariable Cox regression analysis to determine the factors associated with all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2976 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and presented with solitary colorectal cancer metastasizing to the lungs after resection of the primary tumor. Among them, 305 patients (10%) underwent surgical resection of the metastasis, 157 (5%) received radiation therapy, and 2514 (85%) received no local treatment to the metastasis (conservative therapy). Patients who underwent surgical resection had a significant survival advantage, with a 5-y survival rate of 42.7% compared to 29.7% for radiation therapy and 23.9% for conservative management (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, surgical resection was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.58, 0.80; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of a single metastatic colon cancer in the lung after resection of the primary tumor is associated with improved survival. Patients with solitary colorectal lung metastases without any signs of tumors outside the chest should undergo appropriate cardiopulmonary testing and multidisciplinary evaluation for surgical resection.

Treatment of Colorectal Lung Metastases: Two Centers Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Clear guidelines for colorectal lung metastasis (LM) treatment are not available. This study aimed to provide insight into the treatment strategies and efficacy of local and systemic therapy in patients with LM eligible for (potentially) curative treatment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with ≤5 LM discussed in two tertiary referral centers. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared between treatment groups. Treatment strategies were compared between centers and survival data between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, and treating centers.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (median 2 LMs) were included. Seventy-one (77%) patients underwent local treatment (17 surgery, 13 ablation, 38 radiotherapy, 3 combination of local treatments) and 21 (23%) with systemic therapy alone. The latter group more frequently had extrapulmonary metastases (81.0% vs. 26.8%, p < 0.001) and synchronous presentation of LM (23.8% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.045). Choice of local versus systemic therapy and time to start treatment after diagnosis (median 109 days, IQR 44-240 vs. 88 days, IQR 53-168) were comparable between centers. Three-year survival rates did not differ between treatment groups, local treatment modalities, or treating centers.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies and oncological outcomes were rather similar between centers. Survival outcomes were not different between locally and systemically treated patients.

Do resected colorectal cancer patients need early chest imaging? Impact of clinicopathologic characteristics on time to development of pulmonary metastases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the lung is the most common extra-abdominal site of distant metastasis. However, practices for chest imaging after colorectal resection vary widely. We aimed to identify characteristics that may indicate a need for early follow-up imaging.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent CRC resection, collecting clinicopathologic details and oncologic outcomes. Patients were grouped by timing of pulmonary metastases (PM) development. Analyses were performed to investigate odds ratio (OR) of PM diagnosis within 3 months of CRC resection.

RESULTS

Of 1600 patients with resected CRC, 233 (14.6%) developed PM, at a median of 15.4 months following CRC resection. Univariable analyses revealed age, receipt of systemic therapy, lymph node ratio (LNR), lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and KRAS mutation as risk factors for PM. Furthermore, multivariable regression showed neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 2.99, p < 0.001), adjuvant therapy (OR: 6.28, p < 0.001), LNR (OR: 28.91, p < 0.001), and KRAS alteration (OR: 5.19, p < 0.001) to predict PM within 3 months post-resection.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified clinicopathologic characteristics that predict development of PM within 3 months after primary CRC resection. Early surveillance in such patients should be emphasized to ensure timely identification and treatment of PM.

Clinical score for colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastases undergoing surgical resection: Meta-Lung Score

BACKGROUND

Radical resection of isolated lung metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. Like Fong's criteria in liver metastases, our study was meant to assign a clinical prognostic score in patients with LM from CRC, aiming for better surgery selection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 260 CRC patients who underwent curative LM resection from December 2002 to January 2022, verifying the impact of different clinicopathological features on the overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

At the univariate analysis: higher baseline CEA levels (p = 0.0001), disease-free survival less than or equal to 12 months (m) (p = 0.0043), LM size larger than 2 cm (p = 0.0187), multiple resectable nodules (p = 0.0083), and positive nodal status of the primary tumor (p = 0.0011) were associated with worse prognosis. In a Cox regression model, these characteristics retained their independent role for OS (p < 0.0001) and were chosen as criteria to be assigned one point each for clinical risk score. The 5-year survival rate in patients with 0 points was 88%, while no patients with a 5-point score survived at 2 years. Based on the 0-1 vs. 2-5 score range, we obtained a significant difference in median OS: not reached vs. 40.8 months (95 %CI 36 to 87.5), respectively (p < 0.0001) stratifying patients into good and poor prognosis. The prognostic role of the score was also confirmed in terms of median RFS: not reached in 0-1 scored patients vs. 30.5 months (95 %CI 19.4 to 42) in patients with 2-5 scores (p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

When LM from CRC is resectable, the Meta-Lung Score provides valuable prognostic information. Indeed, while upfront surgery should be considered in patients with scores of 0 to 1, it should be cautiously suggested in patients with scores of 2 to 5, for whom a prognosis comparison between preventive surgery and other treatments should be investigated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Long-term outcome following microwave ablation of lung metastases from colorectal cancer

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in colorectal cancer (CRC) lung metastases, and to analyze prognostic factors.

Materials and methods

Data were collected from 31 patients with CRC lung metastases from May 2013 to September 2017. They had removed the CRC, no extrapulmonary metastases, no more than three metastases in the lung, the maximum diameter of the lesions was ≤3 cm, and all the lung metastases could be completely ablated. The ablation procedures were performed using a KY-2000 microwave multifunctional therapeutic apparatus. Efficacy is assessed two to four weeks after ablation, and follow-up are performed every three months for two years. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), and complications. Cox regression analysis was used for the evaluation of the statistical significance of factors affecting the end result of MWA therapy. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for estimation of survival rates.

Results

A total of 45 metastatic lung lesions from CRC in 31 patients were treated with CT-guided MWA procedures. The median OS was 76 months. The one, two, three, and five-year survival rates were 93.5%, 80.6%, 61.3%, and 51.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the primary tumor from the rectum (P = 0.009) and liver metastases at the diagnosis of lung metastases (P = 0.043) were risk factors affecting OS, while PFS was a protective factor. The median PFS was 13 months. The maximum diameter of lung metastases lesions (P = 0.004) was a risk factor. The interval between pulmonary metastases and MWA (P=0.031) was the protective factor. Pneumothorax was observed in 13 out of 36 procedures. Four patients developed pneumothorax requiring drainage tube insertion. No patient deaths occurred within 30 days of ablation. Three out of 31 patients (9.67%) were found to have local recurrence of the original lung metastatic ablation foci.

Conclusion

MWA therapy may be safely and effectively used as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of selected CRC pulmonary metastases, and the prognosis is better in patients without liver metastases at the diagnosis of lung metastases.

Completeness of reporting oligometastatic disease characteristics in literature and influence on oligometastatic disease classification using the ESTRO/EORTC nomenclature

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence for the integration of locally ablative therapy into multimodality treatment of oligometastatic disease (OMD). To support standardised data collection, analysis, and comparison, a consensus OMD classification based on fundamental disease and treatment characteristics has previously been established. This study investigated the completeness of reporting the proposed OMD characteristics in literature and evaluated whether the proposed OMD classification system can be applied to the historical data.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, searching for prospective and retrospective studies, where SBRT was a treatment component of OMD. Reporting of the OMD characteristics as described in the EORTC/ESTRO classification was analyzed, feasibility to retrospectively classify the proposed OMD states was investigated and the impact of the categorisation on overall survival (OS) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Our study shows incomplete reporting of the proposed OMD characteristics. The most fully reported characteristic was 'type of involved organs' (88/95 studies); 'history of cancer progression' was the least reported (not mentioned in 50/95 studies). Retrospective OMD classification of existing literature was only possible for 7/95 studies. With respect to categorization as de novo, repeat or induced OMD, homogeneous patient cohorts were observed in 21/95 studies, most frequently de novo OMD, in 20 studies. Differences in OS at 2, 3, or 5 years were not statistically significant between the different states. OS was significantly influenced by primary tumor histology, with superior OS observed for prostate cancer and worst OS observed for non-small cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSION

The largely incomplete reporting of the proposed OMD characteristics hampers a retrospective classification of existing literature. To facilitate future comparison of individual studies, as well as validation of the OMD classification, comprehensive reporting of OMD characteristics using standardised terminology is recommended, as proposed by the EORTC/ESTRO classification system and following ESTRO-ASTRO consensus.

Management of single pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: State of the art

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of death from cancer. Lung seeding occurs in approximately 10% of patients surgically treated for primary CRC with radical intent: the lung is the most common site of metastases after the liver. While surgical treatment of liver metastases is widely accepted to affect long-term outcomes, more controversial and not standardized is the therapy for CRC patients developing lung metastases. Experience suggests the potential curative role of pulmonary metastasectomy, especially in oligometastatic disease. However, the optimal strategy of care and the definition of prognostic factors after treatment still need to be defined. This review focused on the uncommon scenario of single pulmonary metastases from CRC. We explored pertinent literature and provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and imaging of single pulmonary metastases from CRC. Additionally, we identified the best available evidence for overall management. In particular, we analyzed the role and results of locoregional approaches (surgery, radiotherapy or ablative procedures) and their integration with systemic therapy.

Pulmonary metastasectomy with lymphadenectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Routine lymphadenectomy during metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer has been recommended by several recent expert consensus meetings. However, evidence supporting lymphadenectomy is limited. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the impact of simultaneous lymph node metastases on patient survival during metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases (CRPM).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines of studies on lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. Articles published between 2000 and 2020 were identified from Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library without language restriction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability of included studies. Survival rates were assessed and compared for the presence and level of nodal involvement.

RESULTS

Following review of 8054 studies by paper and abstract, 27 studies comprising 3619 patients were included in the analysis. All patients included in these studies underwent lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM. A total of 690 patients (19.1%) had simultaneous lymph node metastases. Five-year overall survival for patients with and without lymph node metastases was 18.2% and 51.3%, respectively (p < .001). Median survival for patients with lymph node metastases was 27.9 months compared to 58.9 months in patients without lymph node metastases (p < .001). Five-year overall survival for patients with N1 and N2 lymph node metastases was 40.7% and 10.9%, respectively (p = .064).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous lymph node metastases of CRPM have a detrimental impact on survival and this is most apparent for mediastinal lymph node metastases. Therefore, lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRPM can be advised to obtain important prognostic value.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer

The most effective treatment for pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) is complete resection. However, as the recurrence rate after resection of the pulmonary metastases from CRC is high, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is often performed in clinical practice. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC. The medical records of 16 patients who underwent the first complete resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC were retrospectively reviewed. A total of eight patients were treated with single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis, and oral fluoropyrimidines were selected in all regimens. As a result, the relapse-free survival rate after resection of pulmonary metastasis in the group that received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly improved in comparison with the group treated with surgery alone. In the subgroup analysis, patients who benefited from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in some high-risk groups were selected, including patients with a high tumor stage or poor immunological status. In conclusion, single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC was effective for reducing the risk of recurrence and was safe to administer. In addition, certain risk factors may identify patients who would receive more benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC.

Surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases in the Netherlands: data from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection is widely employed as a potential curative treatment option for patients with limited lung metastases originating from a wide range of primary tumours. However, there are no clear national or international practice guidelines and, thereby, the risk for potential practice variation exists. This study aims to define the current practice for the surgical treatment of pulmonary metastases in the Netherlands by using data from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery (DLCA-S).

METHODS

Data from the DLCA-S were used to analyse patients undergoing a parenchymal lung resection for the treatment of pulmonary metastases between 2012 and 2017. Volume of metastasectomies per hospital was calculated as a proportion of the volume of primary lung cancer resection. Studied outcomes were overall complications and postoperative mortality and complicated course. For the latter, both the national average and between-hospital variation were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2090 patients, distributed over 45 Dutch hospitals, were included for analysis. The most common primary cancer was colorectal carcinoma (N = 1087, 52.0%) followed by the urogenital carcinoma (N = 296, 14.2%). The most common type of parenchymal resection was a wedge resection (N = 1477, 70.7%) followed by a lobectomy (N = 424, 20.3%). Resection was performed minimally invasively in 1548 patients (74.1%) with a conversion rate of 3.8%. Resection of a solitary metastasis was performed in 1663 patients (79.6%). In 40 patients (1.9%), 4 or more metastases were resected. A postoperative complicated course was noted in 3.6%, and the 30-day mortality rate was 0.7%. The variety between hospitals in the volume of metastasectomies in proportion to the volume of primary lung cancer resections was 3.4-41.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of the DLCA-S registry provides a unique insight into current practice on pulmonary metastasectomies in the Netherlands over a 6-year period. The rate of postoperative adverse outcome was limited, and the morbidity and mortality were lower compared to primary lung cancer resections in the DLCA-S database.

Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is estimated that 50% of all patients with CRC develop metastases, most commonly in the liver and the lung. Lung metastases are seen in approximately 10–15% of all patients with CRC. A large number of these patients with metastatic CRC can only receive palliative treatment due to invasion of other organs and disseminated disease. However, a subset of these patients present with potentially resectable metastases. Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered to be a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with resectable metastatic CRC. Current data suggest that patients that undergo pulmonary metastasectomy have 5-year survival rates of approximately 40%. However, the majority of data published regarding lung metastasectomy is based on small, retrospective case series. Due to this lack of prospective data, it is still unclear which subset of patients will benefit most from curative-intent surgery. Furthermore, there is also controversy regarding which prognostic and genetic factors are related to survival outcomes and whether there is a difference between open and thoracoscopic approaches in terms of overall and disease-free survival. In this review, we aim to summarize the latest data on prognostic factors and survival outcomes after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with metastatic CRC.

An observational retrospective analysis of the main metastatic site and corresponding locoregional treatment as a prognostic factor in metastatic gastric cancer

Despite novel drugs, the prognosis for patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains poor. In rare instances, locoregional therapies are used in addition to standard chemotherapy in patients with oligometastatic involvement. This type of approach has not been supported by solid published evidence. The aim of the present retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of factors such as metastatic site, tumour histology and locoregional treatment in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. A total of 184 patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who received at least one line of palliative therapy with doublet or triplet chemotherapy were enrolled in the current analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.32 months (95% CI, 7.02-9.41) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.16 months (95% CI, 3.24-5.08). Lung metastases vs. other sites of metastatic involvement [hazard ratio (HR), 0.27; P=0.0133] and intestinal histology (HR, 0.48; P=0.08) were significantly associated with an improved OS. Improved PFS was also observed (HR, 0.49; P=0.10 and HR, 0.72; P=0.08 for lung metastases and intestinal histology, respectively). Second line chemotherapy and locoregional treatment of metastases (surgery or radiotherapy) were associated with improved OS (HR, 0.52; P<0.0001 and HR, 0.35; P<0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent prognostic role for OS only for locoregional treatment, second line treatment and intestinal histology. The present results suggested that the presence of lung metastases alone was not a relevant prognostic factor and was influenced by the availability of further lines of treatment or by locoregional treatments. Locoregional treatments in patients with oligometastatic disease should be offered as they allow prolonged survival in patients with otherwise relatively short life expectancy.

Histological growth patterns and molecular analysis of resected colorectal lung metastases

Lung is the site of metastasis in about 15-25 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Lung metastasectomy of CRC represents a standard therapy in patients with resectable metastases. In this study we investigated both histological patterns of metastases and mutations in MAPkinase pathway genes and their relationship to prognosis. The study included 74 patients that underwent metastasectomy of colorectal lung metastasis (CLM). In patients that underwent surgical resection of more than one metastasis in the same operation the largest was chosen. In patients that had undergone multiple lung metastasectomy only the sample from the first metastasectomy was included. Histologically metastases were scored according to amount and distribution of necrosis and fibrosis and three patterns were identified: "pattern A", metastasis with extensive, confluent central necrosis surrounded by a rim of neoplastic glands; "pattern B", metastasis characterized by a proliferation of neoplastic glands in a dense stroma with focal necrosis mainly intraglandular; "pattern C", metastasis with a mixed A and B morphology. In all samples direct sequencing of exon 2 of KRAS and NRAS genes and exon 15 of BRAF genes was carried out.Histological patterns weren't related to metastasis size or other clinical features however pattern C metastases showed a significant worst disease free survival (DFS). KRAS mutations were observed in 39 % of patients. Mutations in KRAS codon 13 resulted significantly associated with synchronous metastasis and poor prognosis. No mutations were identified in exon 2 NRAS gene whilst 1.4 % harboured a mutation in BRAF. To our knowledge this is the first study that investigates in a large series of CLM histological growth patterns, molecular alterations and their relationship to prognosis. Our data suggest a prognostic role in CLM of KRAS specific mutations and histopathological patterns.

Meta-analysis of survival outcomes following surgical and non surgical treatments for colorectal cancer metastasis to the lung

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of colorectal lung metastases (CRLM). This meta-analysis compared surgical (Surg) versus interventional (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) and observational non-surgical (NSurg) management of CRLM.

METHODS

A systematic review of the major databases including Medline, Embase, SCOPUS and the Cochrane library was performed.

RESULTS

One randomized and nine observational studies including 2232 patients: 1551 (69%) comprised the Surg cohort, 521 (23%) the interventional NSurg group and 160 (7%) the observational NSurg group. A significantly higher overall survival (OS) was observed when Surg was compared to interventional NSurg at 1 year (Surg 88%, 310/352; interventional NSurg 64%, 245/383; odds ratio (OR) 2.77 (confidence interval (CI) 1.94-3.97), P = 0.001), at 3 years (Surg 59%, 857/1444; interventional NSurg 26%, 138/521; OR 2.61 (CI 1.65-4.15), P = 0.002), at 5 years (Surg 47%, 533/1144; interventional NSurg 23%, 45/196; OR 3.24 (CI 1.42-7.39), P = 0.009) and at 10 years (Surg 27%, 306/1122; interventional NSurg 1%, 2/168; OR 15.64 (CI 1.87-130.76), P = 0.031). Surg was associated with a greater OS than observational NSurg at only 1 year (Surg 92%, 98/107; observational NSurg 83%, 133/160; OR 6.69 (CI 1.33-33.58), P = 0.037) and was similar to observational NSurg at all other OS time points. Comparable survival was observed among Surg and overall NSurg cohorts at 3- and 5-year survival in articles published within the last 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent evidence suggests comparable survival with Surg and NSurg modalities for CRLM, contrasting to early evidence where Surg had an improved survival. Significant selection bias contributes to this finding, prompting the need for high powered randomized controlled trials and registry data.

Chemotherapy at the End of Life

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of chemotherapy at the end of life in advanced cancer patients has increased and end of life care has become increasingly aggressive. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 3 months of life and the aggressiveness of end-of-life support of these patients.

METHODS

All adult patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy in their last 3 months of life and died in our hospital between January 2015 to June 2019 were included. Detailed information on chemotherapy and toxicity was collected in patient records.

RESULTS

A total of 182 patients included. Median age was 58,9 years. The median survival from the docementation of metastatic disease was 9,98 months (0,95-64,3). Of these 182 patients, 95 (52%) were treated with chemotherapy in the last month of life and 52 (29%) in the last 2 weeks of life. The median number of days between the last administration of chemotherapy and patient death was 29 (0-90). A new chemotherapy regimen was started in the last 3 months of life in 102 patients (56%), in the last month of life in 43 patients (23,6%) and in the last 2 weeks in 23 patients (12.6%).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

There are many patients who received chemotherapy in the last 3 months of their life and the rates of chemotherapy initiation during this period are well above ideal rates. Whether such care has positive effects on survival or quality of life is questionable and deserves additional investigation.

Population-based SEER analysis of survival in colorectal cancer patients with or without resection of lung and liver metastases

Background

Approximately one third of all patients with CRC present with, or subsequently develop, colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The objective of this population-based analysis was to assess the impact of resection of liver only, lung only and liver and lung metastases on survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and resected primary tumor.

Methods

Ten thousand three hundred twenty-five patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2010 and 2015 with resected primary were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Overall, (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by Cox regression with multivariable, inverse propensity weight, near far matching and propensity score adjustment.

Results

The majority (79.4%) of patients had only liver metastases, 7.8% only lung metastases and 12.8% metastases of lung and liver. 3-year OS was 44.5 and 27.5% for patients with and without metastasectomy (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.58–0.65, P < 0.001). Metastasectomy uniformly improved CSS in patients with liver metastases (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77, P < 0.001) but not in patients with lung metastases (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.62–1.12, P = 0.232) and combined liver and lung metastases (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.75–1.06, P = 0.196) in multivariable analysis. Adjustment by inverse propensity weight, near far matching and propensity score and analysis of OS yielded similar results.

Conclusions

This is the first SEER analysis assessing the impact of metastasectomy in mCRC patients with removed primary tumor on survival. The analysis provides compelling evidence of a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in OS and CSS for liver resection but not for metastasectomy of lung or both sites.

The Use of Circulating Tumor DNA to Monitor and Predict Response to Treatment in Colorectal Cancer

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and has a high mortality rate following disease recurrence. Treatment efficacy is maximized by providing tailored cancer treatment, ideally involving surgical resection and personalized neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and increasingly, targeted therapy. Early detection of recurrence or disease progression results in more treatable disease and is essential to improving survival outcomes. Recent advances in the understanding of tumor genetics have resulted in the discovery of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). A growing body of evidence supports the use of these sensitive biomarkers in detecting residual disease and diagnosing recurrence as well as enabling targeted and tumor-specific adjuvant therapies. Methods: A literature search in Pubmed was performed to identify all original articles preceding April 2019 that utilize ctDNA for the purpose of monitoring response to colorectal cancer treatment. Results: Ninety-two clinical studies were included. These studies demonstrate that ctDNA is a reliable measure of tumor burden. Studies show the utility of ctDNA in assessing the adequacy of surgical tumor clearance and changes in ctDNA levels reflect response to systemic treatments. ctDNA can be used in the selection of targeted treatments. The reappearance or increase in ctDNA, as well as the emergence of new mutations, correlates with disease recurrence, progression, and resistance to therapy, with ctDNA measurement allowing more sensitive monitoring than currently used clinical tools. Conclusions: ctDNA shows enormous promise as a sensitive biomarker for monitoring response to many treatment modalities and for targeting therapy. Thus, it is emerging as a new way for guiding treatment decisions-initiating, altering, and ceasing treatments, or prompting investigation into the potential for residual disease. However, many potentially useful ctDNA markers are available and more work is needed to determine which are best suited for specific purposes and for improving specific outcomes.

A Curative-Intent Trimodality Approach for Isolated Abdominal Nodal Metastases in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Update of a Single-Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to define survival rates in patients with isolated advanced abdominal nodal metastases secondary to colorectal cancer (CRC), treated with curative-intent trimodality therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients received trimodality therapy, defined as chemotherapy delivered with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by lymphadenectomy and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). Infusional 5-fluorouracil was the most common radiosensitizer used (63%, 41 patients). The median dose of EBRT was 50 Gy, and the median dose of IORT was 12.5 Gy. We evaluated time to distant metastasis, toxicities, local failure within the EBRT field, recurrence within the IORT field, and survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-two percent of patients were male; patients' median age was 50.5 years. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≤1. Twenty-nine patients had right-sided colon cancer, 22 had left-sided colon cancer, and 14 had rectal primaries. The median time from initial CRC diagnosis to development of abdominal nodal metastatic disease was 20.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2-40.8 months). Seventy-eight percent (51 patients) had para-aortic nodal metastases, 15% (10 patients) had mesenteric nodal metastases, and 6% (4 patients) had both. With a median follow-up of 77.6 months, the median overall survival and 5-year estimated survival rate were 55.4 months (95% CI, 47.2-80.9 months) and 45%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 19.3 months (95% CI, 16.5-32.8 months). Twenty-six (40%) patients never developed distant disease. The outcome was not affected by disease sidedness or rectal primary. Treatment was well tolerated without grade 3 or 4 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Trimodality therapy produces sustainable long-term survival in selected patients with metastatic CRC presenting with isolated retroperitoneal or mesenteric nodal relapse.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This article reports a unique trimodality approach incorporating external beam radiotherapy with radiosensitizing chemotherapy, surgical resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy provides durable survival benefit with significant curative potential for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who present with isolated abdominal nodal (mesenteric and/or retroperitoneal) recurrence.

Perioperative bevacizumab improves survival following lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer in patients harbouring v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue exon 2 codon 12 mutations†

OBJECTIVES

The role of perioperative chemotherapy (POC) and targeted therapies in lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is still subject to debate. We aimed to evaluate whether POC and targeted therapies were associated with different outcomes according to the mutational status.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 223 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC from 1998 to 2015 and for whom the V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) and V-raf Murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF) mutational statuses were known.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients (74%) underwent POC: 62 (37%) received neoadjuvant therapy, 59 (35%) were in the adjuvant setting and 46 (28%) were in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. POC did not significantly influence either the loco-regional recurrence free survival (LRRFS) (P = 0.21) or the overall survival (OS) (P = 0.29). Furthermore, in cases of adjuvant chemotherapy, outcomes were not significantly different in cases of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or both neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (P = 0.26 for OS, P = 0.14 for LRRFS). For patients with KRAS mutation, perioperative bevacizumab was associated with a significant improvement in both LRRFS [70 months (41.58–98.42) vs 24 months (1.15–46.86), P = 0.001] and OS [101 vs 55 months (49.77–60.23), P = 0.004]. However, this benefit was only significant in cases of KRAS exon 2 codon 12 mutations [median OS: 101 months (83.97–118.02) vs 60 months (53–66.99), P < 0.001; median LRRFS: 76 months (64.62–87.38) vs 44 months (35.27–52.73), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Perioperative bevacizumab appears to be beneficial in patients with exon 2 codon 12 KRAS mutations who have undergone lung metastasectomy for CRC.

Prognostic factors for overall survival after lung metastasectomy in renal cell cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary metastasis of Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) is usually considered as a systemic disease. However, some studies revealed potential survival benefits of pulmonary metastasectomies for such patients. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic factors for pulmonary metastasectomy of RCC patients.

METHODS

An electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) were conducted to identify eligible studies. We combined the hazard ratios (HRs) of the identified prognostic factors for overall survival of RCC patients after pulmonary metastasectomy from the eligible studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with a total of 1447 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled 1, 3, 5, 10-year overall survival rates for RCC patient after pulmonary metastasectomy were 84%, 59%, 43% and 20%, respectively. The poor prognostic factors were lymph node involvement (LNI) of primary RCC (HR 3.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-6.67, P = 0.001), incomplete resection of metastases (HR 3.74, 95% CI 2.49-5.61, P = 0.000), multiple metastases (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.18-2.03, P = 0.002), larger metastases (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.26-1.66, P = 0.000), LNI of metastases (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.52-6.19, P = 0.002), synchronous metastasis (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.46-4.24, P = 0.001) and short disease free interval (DFI).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery may be a promising treatment for pulmonary metastases of RCC patients. A short DFI, LNI of primary RCC, incomplete resection of metastases, multiple metastases, larger metastases, LNI of metastases and synchronous metastasis are predictors of poor survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for RCC patients.

KRAS exon 2 codon 13 mutation is associated with a better prognosis than codon 12 mutation following lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer

Introduction

The utilization of molecular markers as routinely used biomarkers is steadily increasing. We aimed to evaluate the potential different prognostic values of KRAS exon 2 codons 12 and 13 after lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer (CRC).

Results

KRAS codon 12 mutations were observed in 116 patients (77%), whereas codon 13 mutations were observed in 34 patients (23%). KRAS codon 13 mutations were associated with both longer time to pulmonary recurrence (TTPR) (median TTPR: 78 months (95% CI: 50.61–82.56) vs 56 months (95% CI: 68.71–127.51), P = 0.008) and improved overall survival (OS) (median OS: 82 months vs 54 months (95% CI: 48.93–59.07), P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis confirmed that codon 13 mutations were associated with better outcomes (TTPR: HR: 0.40 (95% CI: 0.17–0.93), P = 0.033); OS: HR: 0.39 (95% CI: 0.14–1.07), P = 0.07). Otherwise, no significant difference in OS (P = 0.78) or TTPR (P = 0.72) based on the type of amino-acid substitutions was observed among KRAS codon 12 mutations.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from 525 patients who underwent a lung metastasectomy for CRC in two departments of thoracic surgery from 1998 to 2015 and focused on 150 patients that had KRAS exon 2 codon 12/13 mutations.

Conclusions

KRAS mutation in lung metastases from colorectal cancer: prognostic implications

KRAS mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) patients develop lung and brain metastases more frequently than KRAS wild-type (WT) counterpart. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic role of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA (exon 20) mutations and loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in surgically resected lung metastases. Lung specimens from 75 metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients treated with one or more metastasectomies with curative intent were analyzed. Sixty-four percent of patients had KRAS WT lung metastases. PTEN loss-of-function was found in 75%. BRAF and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations were not found. Seven patients subsequently developed brain metastases and 43% of them had KRAS mutation. In univariate analysis, median overall survival (OS) for KRAS WT patients was longer, compared to KRAS mutant patients (median 60.9 vs. 36.6 months, P = 0.035). In addition, both progression-free survival (PFS) and lung disease-free survival (LDFS) between lung surgery and relapse were not associated with KRAS and PTEN status. In multivariate analysis, the risk of death was significantly increased by KRAS mutational status (OS Hazard ratio (HR) 2.17, 95% IC 1.19-3.96, P = 0.012) and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (OS HR 0.10, 95% IC 0.01-0.74, P = 0.024). The proportion of KRAS mutations in lung metastases was similar to the expected proportion in primary tumors. Patients harboring KRAS mutation had a poorer survival rate compared to WT group both in univariate and multivariate analysis. Moreover, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy after lung metastasectomy (LM) significantly improved both PFS and OS. KRAS mutation is a negative prognostic factor in mCRC patients undergoing LM. Further larger and prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.