Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with solid tumors and pre-existing autoimmune or inflammatory disease: real-world data

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients with autoimmune disease: Safety and efficacy

The utilization of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy frequently leads to the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), making it generally not recommended for patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis on safety and efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases to provide further insights. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until December 20, 2024. The main summary measures used were pooled rate and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidential interval (CI), which were analyzed using R statistic software. A total of 52 articles were included in the study. When cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases received ICIs treatment, the overall incidence was 0.610 (95% CI: 0.531-0.686) for any grade irAEs, 0.295 (95% CI: 0.248-0.343) for flares, 0.325 (95% CI: 0.258-0.396) for de novo irAEs, 0.238 (95% CI: 0.174-0.309) for grade ≥3 irAEs, and 0.143 (95% CI: 0.109-0.180) for discontinuation due to immunotoxicity. Compared with those without autoimmune diseases, cancer patients with autoimmune diseases experienced a higher risk of any-grade irAEs (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.12-1.35) and discontinuation due to immunotoxicity (1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.78). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. During ICIs treatment, irAEs are common among cancer patients with autoimmune diseases, but severe irAEs is relatively low. ICIs are effective in this population, but should be strictly monitored when used to avoid immunotoxicity.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.

METHODS

We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Psoriasis: Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of Cases

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective antitumor agents but are associated with immune-related adverse events. ICI-induced psoriasis commonly presents in patients with a history of psoriasis but may occur de novo, and it has a significant physical and psychosocial impact. ICI-induced and non-ICI-induced psoriasis are likely mediated by similar cytokines, and similar treatments are employed. Topical treatment often suffices, and when needed, several systemic treatments appear to be effective without impacting antitumor response. Development of psoriasis may indicate a superior response to ICIs. Thus, recognition and management of ICI-induced psoriasis is essential to avoid ICI interruption and maximize therapeutic potential.

Perspectives on Psoriasiform Adverse Events from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Lessons Learned from Our Practice

Background: New oncologic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have revolutionized the survival and prognosis of cancer patients. However, these therapies are often complicated by immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that may impact quality of life and potentially limit their use. Among these adverse events are psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis that may develop de novo or flare under treatment with ICIs. Given the exceptional immune status of patients receiving ICIs, managing these conditions without interfering with the effect of the oncologic treatment may prove very challenging. Aim: To review the literature data on ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation or development, to present our own experience, and to discuss the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this association and the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients. Case Reports: We report three cases of ICI-induced de novo psoriasis and two cases of ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation that required systemic treatment. Oral acitretin treatment successfully controlled psoriasis lesions in three cases and allowed for the continuation of immunotherapy. Literature Review: We performed a medical literature search across several databases (PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar) using the search terms "immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis/psoriasiform dermatitis/psoriasis arthritis". We identified and revised 80 relevant publications that reported 1102 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriasis arthritis induced or exacerbated by ICIs. We assessed the type of cancer, the therapeutic agent involved, the clinical form of psoriasis, the presence or absence of psoriatic arthritis, the personal and family history of psoriasis, the age, the gender, the time until onset or exacerbation of skin lesions, the specific treatment recommended, the need for ICI discontinuation, and the patient's outcome. Conclusions: As ICIs represent a fairly novel therapy, the association with several adverse effects is only now unraveling. Psoriasis exacerbation or onset following the initiation of immunotherapy is one such example, as more and more reports and case series are being published. Awareness of the relationship between psoriasis and treatment with ICIs, prompt recognition, and initiation of adequate skin-directed therapies are essential for the avoidance of skin lesions worsening, the need for systemic treatments that may interfere with ICIs' effects, or the discontinuation of the latter. In the absence of generally accepted guidelines, it is advisable to treat patients with severe, widespread psoriasis with drugs that do not impair the effects of immunotherapy and thus do not alter the patient's prognosis.

Predictive Factors in Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: From Clinical Practice to Future Perspective

The introduction of immunotherapy revolutionized the treatment landscape in metastatic melanoma. Despite the impressive results associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only a portion of patients obtain a response to this treatment. In this scenario, the research of predictive factors is fundamental to identify patients who may have a response and to exclude patients with a low possibility to respond. These factors can be host-associated, immune system activation-related, and tumor-related. Patient-related factors can vary from data obtained by medical history (performance status, age, sex, body mass index, concomitant medications, and comorbidities) to analysis of the gut microbiome from fecal samples. Tumor-related factors can reflect tumor burden (metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and circulating tumor DNA) or can derive from the analysis of tumor samples (driver mutations, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and myeloid cells). Biomarkers evaluating the immune system activation, such as IFN-gamma gene expression profile and analysis of circulating immune cell subsets, have emerged in recent years as significantly correlated with response to ICIs. In this manuscript, we critically reviewed the most updated literature data on the landscape of predictive factors in metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs. We focus on the principal limits and potentiality of different methods, shedding light on the more promising biomarkers.

Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients With Autoimmune Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases (PADs) have largely been excluded from clinical trials evaluating this drug class. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of ICI therapy in individuals with PAD in a real-world setting. A retrospective study of patients exposed to ICI therapy between 2012 and 2019 was conducted. Patients with PAD were identified and matched to an ICI-exposed group without PAD based on age, sex, and cancer type. Primary outcomes included toxicity, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and objective response rate. The association between PAD status and outcomes was determined using Cox and logistic regression modeling. A total of 813 patients exposed to ICI therapy were identified, of which 8.2% (N=67) had a PAD. When compared with a matched cohort without PAD (N=132), there was no significant difference in the rates of new immune-related adverse events (irAEs, 42.4% in the non-PAD group vs. 47.8% in the PAD group, P=0.474). After controlling for the type of ICI, there was no significant association between PAD status and irAE (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI: 0.9-3.21 P=0.1). There was no significant association between overall survival and PAD status (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% CI: 0.76-1.66. P=0.56) or between time to treatment failure and PAD status (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI: 0.6-1.12, P=0.22). There was an association between PAD status and objective response rate (odds ratio 3.28, 95% CI: 1.28-8.38, P=0.013). In summary, PAD status was not associated with enhanced toxicity when compared with patients without PAD, with similar oncologic effectiveness between these 2 groups.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Pre-existing Neurologic Autoimmune Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for oncologic indications is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases are at increased risk of irAEs and have largely been excluded from clinical trials of ICIs. Therefore, there is limited data on the safety of safety of ICIs in patients with pre-existing neurologic autoimmune diseases (nAIDs) such as myasthenia gravis and multiple sclerosis. This review aims to synthesize the literature on the post-marketing experience with ICI in patients with pre-existing nAID and to discuss possible strategies for mitigating the risk of post-ICI nAID relapses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with pre-existing myasthenia gravis (MG), myositis, and paraneoplastic encephalitis appear highly susceptible to neurologic relapses of their underlying neurologic disorder following ICI initiation; these relapses can cause considerable morbidity and mortality. In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the risk and severity of MS relapses following ICI appears to be relatively lower compared to MG. Preliminary evidence suggests that older MS patients with no recent focal neuroinflammatory activity may be safely treated with ICI. Among the several case reports of ICI in patients with a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), neurologic worsening was only recorded in one patient who was in the acute phase of GBS at the time of ICI start. Initiating an ICI in a patient with pre-existing nAID involves a complex risk-benefit discussion between the patient, their oncologist, and neurologist. Relevant issues to consider before ICI include the choice of disease-modifying therapy for nAID (if any) and strategies for promptly identifying and managing nAID relapses should they occur. Currently, the literature consists mainly of case reports and case series, subject to publication bias. Prospective studies of ICI in patients with nAID are needed to improve the level of evidence.

Conundrum for Psoriasis and Thyroid Involvement

Strategies concerning thyroid anomalies in patients confirmed with psoriasis, either on clinical level or molecular levels, and their genetic findings remain an open issue. Identification of the exact subgroup of individuals that are candidates to endocrine assessments is also controversial. Our purpose in this work was to overview clinical and pathogenic data concerning psoriasis and thyroid comorbidities from a dual perspective (dermatologic and endocrine). This was a narrative review of English literature between January 2016 and January 2023. We included clinically relevant, original articles with different levels of statistical evidence published on PubMed. We followed four clusters of conditions: thyroid dysfunction, autoimmunity, thyroid cancer, and subacute thyroiditis. A new piece of information in this field was the fact that psoriasis and autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATD) have been shown to be related to the immune-based side effects of modern anticancer drugs-namely, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP). Overall, we identified 16 confirmatory studies, but with heterogeneous data. Psoriatic arthritis had a higher risk of positive antithyroperoxidase antibodies (TPOAb) (25%) compared to cutaneous psoriasis or control. There was an increased risk of thyroid dysfunction versus control, and hypothyroidism was the most frequent type of dysfunction (subclinical rather than clinical), among thyroid anomalies correlated with >2-year disease duration, peripheral > axial and polyarticular involvement. With a few exceptions, there was a female predominance. Hormonal imbalance included, most frequently, low thyroxine (T4) and/or triiodothyronine (T3) with normal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), followed by high TSH (only one study had higher total T3). The highest ratio of thyroid involvement concerning dermatologic subtypes was 59% for erythrodermic psoriasis. Most studies found no correlation between thyroid anomalies and psoriasis severity. Statistically significant odds ratios were as follows: hypothyroidism: 1.34-1.38; hyperthyroidism: 1.17-1.32 (fewer studies than hypo); ATD: 1.42-2.05; Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT): 1.47-2.09; Graves' disease: 1.26-1.38 (fewer studies than HT). A total of 8 studies had inconsistent or no correlations, while the lowest rate of thyroid involvement was 8% (uncontrolled studies). Other data included 3 studies on patients with ATD looking for psoriasis, as well as 1 study on psoriasis and thyroid cancer. ICP was shown to potentially exacerbate prior ATD and psoriasis or to induce them both de novo (5 studies). At the case report level, data showed subacute thyroiditis due to biological medication (ustekinumab, adalimumab, infliximab). Thyroid involvement in patients with psoriasis thus remained puzzling. We observed significant data that confirmed a higher risk of identifying positive antibodies and/or thyroid dysfunction, especially hypothyroidism, in these subjects. Awareness will be necessary to improve overall outcomes. The exact profile of individuals diagnosed with psoriasis who should be screened by the endocrinology team is still a matter of debate, in terms of dermatological subtype, disease duration, activity, and other synchronous (especially autoimmune) conditions.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Background

Immunotherapies represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. A large part of the population has both cancer and psoriasis but is usually excluded from ICI clinical trials because of the dysregulated activation of the immune system. This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer and preexisting psoriasis.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception through February 2022. Observational studies on patients with cancer and confirmed psoriasis before ICI initiation were included. Outcomes included the incidence of psoriasis flares, de novo immune-related adverse events (irAEs), discontinuation rate due to flare/de novo irAEs, and efficacy of ICI therapy. Clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes for adverse events (AEs) were systematically reviewed. All pooled analyses were based on a random-effects model using Stata software. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Twelve studies involving 191 patients were included. The pooled incidence of psoriasis flares was 45.0% (95% CI: 31.1%-58.9%, I² = 71.7%) and 44.9% (95% CI: 29.0%–60.7%, I² = 71.8%) for de novo irAEs. The tumor type, psoriasis subtype, ICI class, and country were the main sources of heterogeneity. Grade 3–4 flares occurred in 10.8% (95% CI: 5.3%–16.3%) of patients, and about 16.6% (95% CI: 10.7%–22.5%) of patients experienced grade 3–4 de novo irAEs. The estimated incidence of ICI discontinuation due to AE was 18.5% (95% CI: 6.1%–30.8%, I² = 68.7%). The median times to develop flare and de novo irAEs were 44 and 63 days, respectively. Endocrinopathies and colitis were the most common de novo irAEs. Conventional therapy is effective for most AEs. The estimated objective response rate (ORR) of ICIs was 38.1% (95% CI: 11.8%–64.3%, I² = 81.7%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 64.5% (95% CI: 55.3%–73.8%, I² = 0).

Conclusions

The flare of patients with cancer and preexisting psoriasis treated with ICI therapy is frequent, but the incidence of de novo irAEs and the efficacy of ICI therapy are comparable to those of the general population. Most AEs are mild and manageable with conventional therapy, which required discontinuation of ICI therapy in 18.5%.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022320646

Immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical trials to real-world data and future advances

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. HCC is an inflammation-associated immunogenic cancer that frequently arises in chronically inflamed livers. Advanced HCC is managed with systemic therapies; the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib has been used in 1st-line setting since 2007. Immunotherapies have emerged as promising treatments across solid tumors including HCC for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are licensed in 1st- and 2nd-line treatment setting. The treatment field of advanced HCC is continuously evolving. Several clinical trials are investigating novel ICI candidates as well as new ICI regimens in combination with other therapeutic modalities including systemic agents, such as other ICIs, TKIs, and anti-angiogenics. Novel immunotherapies including adoptive cell transfer, vaccine-based approaches, and virotherapy are also being brought to the fore. Yet, despite advances, several challenges persist. Lack of real-world data on the use of immunotherapy for advanced HCC in patients outside of clinical trials constitutes a main limitation hindering the breadth of application and generalizability of data to this larger and more diverse patient cohort. Consequently, issues encountered in real-world practice include patient ineligibly for immunotherapy because of contraindications, comorbidities, or poor performance status; lack of response, efficacy, and safety data; and cost-effectiveness. Further real-world data from high-quality large prospective cohort studies of immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC is mandated to aid evidence-based clinical decision-making. This review provides a critical and comprehensive overview of clinical trials and real-world data of immunotherapy for HCC, with a focus on ICIs, as well as novel immunotherapy strategies underway.

Atezolizumab-Induced Hypothyroidism in a Patient With Pre-existing Triiodothyronine (T3) Thyrotoxicosis Due to Graves' Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved the management and prognosis of many solid tumors. Because of their mechanism of action, and as checks on the immune systems are reduced, immune-related adverse events are common, including the exacerbation of the pre-existing autoimmune disease. The literature is scanty regarding reports of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing Graves' disease. We report a case of a woman with pre-existing triiodothyronine (T3) thyrotoxicosis (hyperthyroidism) secondary to Graves' disease, who developed thyroiditis followed by severe hypothyroidism after receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor (atezolizumab) for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. She had been on an anti-thyroid drug for Graves' disease for two and a half years and was on the waiting list for a total thyroidectomy. However, the discovery of the severe hypothyroidism following atezolizumab-induced thyroiditis resulted in the need for long-term thyroid replacement therapy, and the planned surgery was no longer required. This case is one of the very few published reports of the use of atezolizumab in a patient with pre-existing Graves' disease, resulting in the conversion from pre-existing T3-thyrotoxicosis to overt hypothyroidism. A multidisciplinary team approach is required when using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing Graves' disease or any other autoimmune disease.