Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced mucosal melanoma

Comparative investigation of cell cycle and immunomodulatory genes in mucosal and cutaneous melanomas: Preliminary data suggest a potential promising clinical role for p16 and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis

Mucosal melanomas arise from the mucosal lining of various organs. Their etiology is currently unknown and there are no tissue-based methods to differentiate it from cutaneous melanomas. Furthermore, prognostic and predictive markers (e.g. for immune checkpoint inhibition) are lacking. In this study, we aimed to assess the protein expression levels of cell cycle-associated proteins and immune checkpoint markers in a cohort of mucosal melanomas in comparison to cutaneous melanomas and evaluated the effect of potential regulatory mechanisms. We performed immunohistochemistry, DNA methylation analysis and copy number profiling of 47 mucosal and 28 cutaneous melanoma samples. Protein expression of CD117, Ki67 and p16 was higher in mucosal melanomas, while BCL2, Cyclin D1, PD-1 and PD-L1 were overexpressed in cutaneous melanomas. CDKN2A deletions were the most prevalent numeric chromosomal alterations in both mucosal and cutaneous melanoma and were associated with decreased p16 expression. KIT was frequently amplified in mucosal melanomas, but not associated with CD117 expression. On the other hand, amplification of CCND1 lead to Cyclin D1 overexpression. In mucosal melanoma patients high PD-1 expression and high PD-L1 promoter methylation levels were associated with improved survival. PD-L1 expression correlated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the combined group of melanoma patients. Mucosal and cutaneous melanomas show different expression levels of cell cycle-associated and immunomodulatory proteins that are partially regulated by DNA methylation and copy number alterations. PD-1 expression and PD-L1 promoter methylation levels might be a prognostic marker for mucosal melanomas.

Anorectal Melanoma: An Uncommon Cause of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare, aggressive disease. Given that it presents with local symptoms that resemble other common benign anorectal conditions, ARM is often low on the differential diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis and nonconsensus of treatment options lead to poor prognosis. Here, we report the case of an 85-year-old woman with a history of Irritable bowel syndrome who presented with altered bowel habits and bleeding per rectum. CT revealed a rectal mass with metastatic lesions to the bone, liver, and lungs. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for Human Melanoma Black-45, melanoma antigen recognized by T cells, and SRY-related HMG-box 10. A final diagnosis of ARM was made.

Extracutaneous Melanoma

Extracutaneous melanomas (ECMs) represent a heterogeneous group of melanoma subtypes characterized by distinct clinical and biological features from cutaneous melanoma. These subtypes share an aggressive natural history with high mortalities compared with nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NACM). Although recent advances in NACM have made significant improvements in morbidity and mortality, ECMs continue to lag behind. As the pathogenesis and molecular features of these rare subtypes continue to emerge, therapeutic research has aimed to closing the gap.

Less is more: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of radical versus conservative primary resection in anorectal melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. There is no consensus as to the optimal primary surgical treatment for ARM, with advocates for both radical (abdominoperineal resection [APR]) and conservative strategies (wide local excision [WLE]). Here, we report a systematic review of studies comparing outcomes between these strategies.

METHODS

Studies comparing APR with WLE in patients with ARM were included, and a systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was performed. Outcomes deemed critical included overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence and quality of life.

RESULTS

Forty studies were identified, of which 27 were suitable for inclusion. Twenty-three studies compared overall survival between WLE and APR, with no difference in outcomes noted (risk ratio [RR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.07, p = 0.13). Seven studies compared disease-free survival, with no difference in outcomes noted (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.61-1.91, p = 0.79). A total of 19 studies compared local recurrence rates, with again no significant difference in outcomes noted (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.44-1.14, p = 0.16). None of the studies identified reported quality of life-related outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence to suggest that a radical primary surgical strategy improves outcomes in ARM. Therefore, given the well-documented morbidity associated with APR, WLE with regular surveillance for local recurrence should be the primary strategy in most patients.

Immunotherapy failure in adrenocortical cancer: where next?

Immunotherapy is widely used in the treatment of different cancer types, including metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and urothelial cancer. The results of the phase I JAVELIN study failed to demonstrate a substantial activity of the PDL-1 inhibitor Avelumab in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). This editorial focus on the possible mechanisms of ACC immunoevasion and suggests strategies to overcome the intrinsic immunotherapy resistance of this disease.