Unconventional treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy: Current Therapeutic Approaches and Future Outlooks

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a treatable autoimmune disorder, for which different treatment options are available. Current first-line evidence-based therapies for CIDP include intravenous and subcutaneous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids and plasma exchanges. Despite lack of evidence, cyclophosphamide, rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used in circumstances of refractoriness and, more debatably, of perceived overdependence on first-line therapies. Rituximab is currently the object of a randomized controlled trial for CIDP. Based on case series, and although rarely considered, haematopoietic autologous stem cell transplants may be effective in refractory disease, with low mortality and high remission rates. A new therapeutic option has appeared with efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor blocker, recently shown to significantly lower relapse rate versus placebo, after withdrawal from previous immunotherapy. Other neonatal Fc receptor blockers, nipocalimab and batoclimab, are under study. The C1 complement-inhibitor SAR445088, acting in the proximal portion of the classical complement system, is currently the subject of a new study in treatment-responsive, refractory and treatment-naïve subjects. Finally, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, which exert anti-B cell effects, may represent another future research avenue. The widening of the therapeutic armamentarium enhances the need for improved evaluation of treatment effects and reliable biomarkers in CIDP.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy as the Initial Presentation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Successfully Treated With Cyclophosphamide

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder that can manifest with a wide range of clinical features, including peripheral nervous system involvement. Among the neurological complications associated with SLE, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare but significant entity. This case report explores the complex relationship between CIDP and SLE, emphasizing the challenges in diagnosis and the complexities of treatment strategies. We present the case of a patient diagnosed with CIDP as the initial manifestation of SLE, who exhibited a remarkable response to a unique treatment approach. This case underscores the potential overlap of these two conditions, the need for individualized diagnostic, and the importance of considering lupus activity when making therapeutic decisions. While conventional treatment approaches for CIDP are established, the management of CIDP in the context of SLE requires a thorough approach. This report presents a case where early intervention with steroids and cyclophosphamide yielded favorable outcomes, providing insights into alternative treatment options. As this subset of patients remains underrepresented in clinical trials, further research is needed to establish clear guidelines for the management of CIDP in SLE, optimizing patient care while minimizing risks associated with immunomodulatory therapies.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare disease, but it is one of the most common inflammatory neuropathies in the population. It is particularly common among patients with diabetes mellitus. This raises many problems, both with the differential diagnosis of diabetic and inflammatory neuropathy, as well as the choice of treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is one of the therapeutic options. There is evidence for the effectiveness of IVIG in treating about two-thirds of patients. However, no review has been published to date systematising studies evaluating the response to IVIG treatment in patients with CIDP and coexisting diabetes.

METHODS

The present study is based on the PRISMA statement and is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022356180). The study included searches of the databases of MEDLINE, ERIC, CINAHL Complete, Academic Search Ultimate and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, finally including seven original papers evaluating a total of 534 patients in the review. The main inclusion criteria were the presence of a group of patients with CIDP and comorbid diabetes in the study.

RESULTS

The systematic review showed a lower efficacy of IVIG treatment among patients with coexisting diabetes compared with idiopathic CIDP (61 % vs 71 %). In addition, the presence of conduction blocks on neurography and shorter disease duration proved to be significant factors improving response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Current scientific data do not allow for strong recommendations on the choice of treatment for CIDP. A randomised, multicentre study evaluating the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to this disease entity needs to be planned.

Tacrolimus treatment for relapsing-remitting chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

This study describes the efficacy of a tacrolimus treatment regimen used to treat two patients with relapsing-remitting chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

CASE SUMMARY

Two patients (17-year-old female and 27-year-old male) were enrolled in the current study and were followed up for 12 mo. The first patient was administered tacrolimus (2 mg/d) for 12 mo and prednisolone (40 mg/d) for six months. The second patient was administered tacrolimus (3 mg/d) for six months. Both patients were followed up for 12 mo and the degree of recurrent weakness or normalized motor function was monitored. In addition, nerve conduction studies and tacrolimus levels were recorded. Following tacrolimus treatment, both patients showed marked improvement in clinical outcomes. In the first patient, prednisolone treatment was successfully withdrawn after six months. Sensory as well as motor nerve conduction velocities showed evident recovery following treatment. However, conduction velocities did not completely return to normal, suggesting that electrophysiological recovery can be slower than clinical recovery.

CONCLUSION

Neither patient exhibited any adverse effects due to the tacrolimus therapy. Therefore, tacrolimus can be effective for the treatment of patients with steroid-resistant CIDP.

Contemporary challenges in the diagnosis and management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

INTRODUCTION

Despite extensive research, multiple inter-related diagnostic and management challenges remain for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed on diagnosis and treatment in CIDP. The clinical features and disease course were evaluated. Investigative techniques, including electrophysiology, cerebrospinal fluid examination, neuropathology, imaging and neuroimmunology, were considered in relation to technical aspects, sensitivity, specificity, availability and cost. Available evidenced-based treatments and those with possible efficacy despite lack of evidence, were considered, as well as current methods for evaluation of treatment effects.

EXPERT OPINION

CIDP remains a clinical diagnosis, supported first and foremost by electrophysiology. Other investigative techniques have limited impact. Most patients with CIDP respond to available first-line treatments and immunosuppression may be efficacious in those who do not. Consideration of the natural history and of the high reported remission rate, of under-recognised associated disabling features, of treatment administration modalities and assessment methods, require enhanced attention.

Tacrolimus Combined with Corticosteroids Improved the Outcome of CIDP Patients with Autoantibodies Against Paranodal Proteins

PURPOSE

To investigate the response of tacrolimus to chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) with autoantibodies against paranodal proteins, including neurofascin-155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr1).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all CIDP patients who carried anti-NF155, CNTN1 and Caspr1 antibodies and were treated with tacrolimus at Tongji hospital from Jan 2018 to Apr 2021.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients with CIDP and only 9 patients had autoantibodies against paranodal proteins (17.2%). Five of the 9 patients received tacrolimus treatment with an initial dose of 2-3 mg once daily. One patient with anti-CNTN1 antibody started tacrolimus and corticosteroid treatment, at the first episode and eventually achieved full clinical remission without relapse. Four patients with anti-NF155 or -Caspr1 antibodies experienced relapse during corticosteroids tapering. Then, they were given oral tacrolimus and presented with clinical improvement. During follow-up, only one patient developed worsening weakness due to unreasonable tacrolimus discontinuation. Moreover, 3 patients were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids and 2 patients took corticosteroids at low maintenance dose (10mg/d) after tacrolimus treatment. No severe adverse events were observed in all the patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with autoantibodies against paranodal proteins had a better long-term outcome after adding tacrolimus. Combination therapy with corticosteroids and tacrolimus may be an effective therapeutic regimen.

Retrospective analysis of response to rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy refractory to first-line therapy

Few case reports/series describe the efficacy of rituximab in refractory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), which is preferred in the presence of anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies. We aimed at evaluating the clinical response to rituximab in a subset of patients with refractory CIDP for whom the anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies status was unknown, as not available in Iran. We retrospectively analyzed the response to rituximab in 14 Iranian patients with refractory CIDP (3 children, 11 adults), in whom the anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies status was unknown. The subjects were evaluated with the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score (MRCSS), Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability scores, and electrophysiology, before and after treatment. Mean age was 34.4 ± 20.7 years, disease duration pre-rituximab treatment was 27.8 ± 18.8 (range: 6-60) months, and mean follow-up duration was 18.5 ± 11.0 (range: 4-36) months. Considering the INCAT sum score, one worsened during post-rituximab treatment, and three patients did not change. Considering MRCSS, notably, four patients achieved normalization of their MRCSS. Regarding the corticosteroid dose, two patients could discontinue prednisolone. As rated by a pre-defined scoring system, nerve conduction parameters improved significantly post-rituximab in the treated cohort (P = .006). All patients tolerated rituximab infusions without adverse effects. Rituximab may be effective in refractory CIDP, even though worsening may occur in some patients. Anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies assay, when available, and other criteria may help drive therapeutic decision-making on rituximab as second-line treatment.

[Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a dysimmune neuropathy with sensory and/or motor symptoms due to destruction of the myelin sheat secondary to an auto-immune attack. A quarter to a third of patients do not respond to immunomodulatory first line recommended therapies. No second line treatment has shown its effectiveness with a sufficient level of evidence. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a promising therapy for autoimmune disease, especially for CIDP in recent works. We present in this article an update on the diagnosis of CIDP, its conventional treatments as well as the results of AHSCT in this indication, which was the subject of French recommendations under the aegis of the SFGMTC and neuromuscular disease french faculty (FILNEMUS) as a third line therapy after failure of two first-line and one second-line treatments.

Management challenges for chronic dysimmune neuropathies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the need to re-think the delivery of services to patients with chronic dysimmune neuropathies. Telephone/video consultations have become widespread but have compounded concerns about objective evaluation. Therapeutic decisions need, more than ever before, to be considered in the best interests of both patients, and society, while not denying function-preserving/restoring treatment. Immunoglobulin therapy and plasma exchange, for those treated outside of the home, expose patients to the hazards of hospital or outpatient infusion centers. Steroid therapy initiation and continuation pose increased infectious risk. Immunosuppressant therapy similarly becomes highly problematic, with the risks of treatment continuation enhanced by uncertainties regarding duration of the pandemic. The required processes necessitate considerable time and effort especially as resources and staff are re-deployed to face the pandemic, but are essential for protecting this group of patients and as an integral part of wider public health actions.

Inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies: Clinical and immunological aspects, current therapies, and future perspectives

Inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies are heterogeneous disorders characterized by immune-mediated leukocyte infiltration of peripheral nerves and nerve roots leading to demyelination or axonal degeneration or both. Inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies can be divided into acute and chronic: Guillain–Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and their variants. Despite major advances in immunology and molecular biology have been made in the last years, the pathogenesis of these disorders is not completely understood. This review summarizes the current literature of the clinical features and pathogenic mechanisms of inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies and focuses on current therapies and new potential treatment for the future.

[Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Diagnosis and therapeutic update]

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies are acquired demyelinating neuropathies belonging to the group of autoimmune neuropathies. Since specific biological markers are present in less than 10% of cases, the diagnosis is based on the clinical and electrophysiological analysis of each patient. Furthermore, a decision-making algorithm ranking all other available paraclinical tools will guide the physician to the diagnosis of atypical forms. In nearly 80% of cases, these dysimmune neuropathies are responsive to first-line treatments, namely intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids and plasma exchanges. A second line treatment may be proposed in case of no response, intolerance or inaccessibility to the three reference treatments. While some immunosuppressants or monoclonal antibodies can sometimes be very effective, there is currently no predictive marker or recommendation available to determine which treatment will be most appropriate for which patient.

Conventional and unconventional therapies in typical and atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy with different clinical course of progression

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), corticosteroids and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are evidence-based conventional treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In many centres, unconventional treatments are frequently used as alternatives. We evaluated the outcome of conventional and unconventional therapies in 31 CIDP patients. Overall response rate with conventional first-line immunotherapies was 77% (20/26), comparable between IVIG and corticosteroids (80% vs 70%). Use of TPE was limited. Treatment response among typical and atypical CIDP were comparable (76 vs 80%). Non-responders were patients with progressive form of typical CIDP and DADS. Majority (21/26, 81%) of patients with persistent neurological deficits received maintenance therapy. Two subgroups of patients frequently treated with maintenance immunosuppressants were those with improving or stable disease following first-line treatment (12, 57%) and those with progressive form of CIDP (2, 10%). Primary indications for immunosuppressant use were corticosteroids-sparing and additional immunosuppression effects. Nine (64%) patients with improving or stable disease given azathioprine were taken off corticosteroids after a median duration of 14 months (range 12-108). Two (14%) eventually achieved cure or clinical remission without treatment. Maintenance IVIg was given to 6 (29%) relapsing CIDP patients; none of achieved cure or remission after similar median duration of treatment. Less potent immunosuppressant drugs (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate) were frequently used, with moderate adverse effect profiles. In resource limited setting, unconventional treatments were commonly used among CIDP patients with different clinical course of progression. In most cases, careful risk-benefit re-assessment is required to justify its further use.