Diagnosis and management of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis: time for change

Predictors of multiple sclerosis progression: A systematic review of conventional magnetic resonance imaging studies

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that affects the central nervous system (CNS) and results in progressive clinical disability and cognitive decline. Currently, there are no specific imaging parameters available for the prediction of longitudinal disability in MS patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has linked imaging anomalies to clinical and cognitive deficits in MS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MRI in predicting disability, clinical progression, and cognitive decline in MS.

METHODS

In this study, according to PRISMA guidelines, we comprehensively searched the Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases to identify pertinent articles that employed conventional MRI in the context of Relapsing-Remitting and progressive forms of MS. Following a rigorous screening process, studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction and evaluated for potential sources of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 3028 records were retrieved from database searching. After a rigorous screening, 53 records met the criteria and were included in this study. Lesions and alterations in CNS structures like white matter, gray matter, corpus callosum, thalamus, and spinal cord, may be used to anticipate disability progression. Several prognostic factors associated with the progression of MS, including presence of cortical lesions, changes in gray matter volume, whole brain atrophy, the corpus callosum index, alterations in thalamic volume, and lesions or alterations in cross-sectional area of the spinal cord. For cognitive impairment in MS patients, reliable predictors include cortical gray matter volume, brain atrophy, lesion characteristics (T2-lesion load, temporal, frontal, and cerebellar lesions), white matter lesion volume, thalamic volume, and corpus callosum density.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that MRI can be used to predict the cognitive decline, disability progression, and disease progression in MS patients over time.

Peripheral oedema as an adverse effect of treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with siponimod: A case series

Siponimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulator used to treat secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We report 3 SPMS patients treated with siponimod who developed new or worsening peripheral oedema soon after commencing treatment. In one case, peripheral oedema resulted in immobility. Siponimod-related peripheral oedema deserves wider recognition due to the potential for morbidity and over-investigation. Clinicians should assess for pre-existing oedema and coexisting conditions that may predispose to developing peripheral oedema prior to commencing siponimod.

Clinical characterization of long-term multiple sclerosis (COLuMbus) patients in Argentina: A cross-sectional non-interventional study

BACKGROUND

Most Multiple Sclerosis (MS) clinical trials fail to assess the long-term effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) or disability.

METHODS

COLuMbus was a single-visit, cross-sectional study in Argentina in adult patients with ≥10 years of MS since first diagnosis. The primary endpoint was to determine patient disability using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the distribution of diagnoses between relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS), patient demographics, disease history, and the risk of disability progression. The relationship between baseline characteristics and the current disability state and the risk of disability progression was assessed.

RESULTS

Out of the 210 patients included, 76.7 % had a diagnosis of RRMS and 23.3 % had been diagnosed with SPMS, with a mean disease duration of 17.9 years and 20.5 years, respectively. The mean delay in the initial MS diagnosis was 2.6 years for the RRMS subgroup and 2.8 years for the SPMS subgroups. At the time of cut-off (28May2020), 90.1 % (RRMS) and 75.5 % (SPMS) of patients were receiving a DMT, with a mean of 1.5 and 2.0 prior DMTs, respectively. The median EDSS scores were 2.5 (RRMS) and 6.5 (SPMS). In the RRMS and SPMS subgroups, 23 % and 95.9 % of patients were at high risk of disability, respectively; the time since first diagnosis showed a significant correlation with the degree of disability.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first local real-world study in patients with long-term MS that highlights the importance of recognizing early disease progression to treat the disease on time and delay disability.

Ocrelizumab in highly disabled progressive multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Ocrelizumab is a commonly used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with efficacy in the treatment of both relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) multiple sclerosis. Real world use of ocrelizumab in MS patients with higher levels of motor disability requiring a walker or a wheelchair is not well characterized as these populations were excluded from initial studies. Higher levels of disability may be a barrier to treatment access. This study aimed to describe the access to, and tolerability and therapeutic outcomes of ocrelizumab in highly disabled MS patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

As part of an ongoing study of ocrelizumab treatment access, barriers, and outcomes in MS patients at the Brigham MS Center, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 6.5 or greater at the time of ocrelizumab initiation. All patients were started on ocrelizumab by their treating providers prior to this study initiation. Patients were excluded for recent rituximab exposure, co-treatment with more than one immunosuppressant, or alternative diagnoses contributing to high EDSS. Data was collected on incidence and severity of side effects while on ocrelizumab, persistence of treatment beyond one year, and MS stabilization versus progression while on this treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 1219 patients on ocrelizumab between 2017 and 2021, 113 (9.3 %) had EDSS of 6.5 or greater at the time of ocrelizumab initiation. Of the 113, 51 (45.1 %) were excluded: 6 (5.3 %) because they were duplicates or didn't receive ocrelizumab at our center, 25 (22.1 %) due to rituximab treatment in the previous year, 16 (14.2 %) due to lack of at least 1 year of follow up, and 4 (3.5 %) due to relevant comorbidities/treatment with other immunosuppressants. 62 patients were included in the final analysis. At ocrelizumab start, mean age was 62.1 +/- 8.7 years and median EDSS was 7.0 (range 6.5 to 9.5). Ocrelizumab was started in 26 of the included 62 patients (41.9 %) because of objective clinical disease worsening, in 17 (27.4 %) because of subjective worsening, in 8 (12.9 %) to prevent future progression. 32 patients (51.6 %) continued ocrelizumab throughout the study period, with average length of ocrelizumab use of 36.5 +/- 17.0 months. 29 patients (46.8 %) experienced no side effects during the study period. 29 (46.7 %) patients discontinued treatment, and of those, 9 (31.0 %) cited more than one reason for discontinuation: 17 (58.6 %) cited side effects, 12 (41.4 %) cited progression/lack of benefit, 6 (20.7 %) cited the Covid19 pandemic, and 1 (3.4 %) cited financial issues as a reason for discontinuation. Over the course of the study, 16 (25.8 %) patients had disability worsening by EDSS, 5 (8.1 %) had disability improvement, and 41 (66.1 %) remained stable, with a median end EDSS of 7.0 (range 6.5 to 9.5). Importantly, 18 patients (29.0 %) reported subjective disease stability while on ocrelizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocrelizumab may lead to disease stabilization in a subset of highly disabled MS patients, but possible benefits need to be carefully balanced against the incidence of adverse events in this high-risk patient population.

Impact of a specific consultation for patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis on the response to their unmet care needs: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

As their disease evolves, most patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) develop particular healthcare needs that are not always addressed with usual follow-up. To adapt neurological care to these patients, we created a specific consultation for patients with progressive MS in our centre in 2019.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the main unmet care needs of patients with progressive MS in our setting, and to establish the usefulness of the specific consultation to address them.

METHODS

Literature review and interviews with patients and healthcare professionals were conducted to identify the main unmet needs in routine follow-up. Two questionnaires were developed, assessing the importance of the unmet needs identified and the usefulness of the consultation to meet them, for patients under follow-up in the specific consultation and their informal caregivers.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients and nineteen informal caregivers participated. The most important unmet needs were the information about the disease, access to social services and coordination between specialists. A positive correlation was found between the importance of these unmet needs and the responsiveness to each of them in the specific consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation of a specific consultation may improve attention to the healthcare needs of patients with progressive MS.

Consensus for the Early Identification of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis in Portugal: a Delphi Panel

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis is a disease with a heterogeneous evolution. The early identification of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is a clinical challenge, which would benefit from the definition of biomarkers and diagnostic tools applicable in the transition phase from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We aimed to reach a Portuguese national consensus on the monitoring of patients with multiple sclerosis and on the more relevant clinical variables for the early identification of its progression.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A Delphi panel which included eleven Portuguese Neurologists participated in two rounds of questions between July and August of 2021. In the first round, 39 questions which belonged to the functional, cognitive, imaging, biomarkers and additional evaluations were included. Questions for which no consensus was obtained in the first round (less than 80% of agreement), were appraised by the panel during the second round.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100% in both rounds and consensus was reached for a total of 33 questions (84.6%). Consensus was reached for monitoring time, evaluation scales and clinical variables such as the degree of brain atrophy and mobility reduction, changes suggestive of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Additionally, digital devices were considered tools with potential to identify disease progression. Most questions for which no consensus was obtained referred to the cognitive assessment and the remaining referred to both functional and imaging domains.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was obtained for the determination of the monitorization interval and for most of the clinical variables. Most questions that did not reach consensus were related with the confirmation of progression taking into account only one test/domain, reinforcing the multifactorial nature of multiple sclerosis.

Decreased frequency of regulatory T cells and level of helios gene expression in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients: Evidence about the development of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an aggressive disease characterized by central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory and demyelinating lesions. Tolerance failure is implicated in the development of several autoimmune disorders, including MS. Due to their involvement in maintaining environmental tolerance, regulatory T cells (Tregs) are regarded as efficient immune cells. We examined the frequency of Tregs in this study using CD4/CD25/forkhead box protein P3 (FOXP3)/Helios markers.

METHODS

Fifty participants, including 25 patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and 25 healthy controls (HCs), were enrolled in this study, and their demographic characteristics were recorded. Peripheral blood samples ranging from 5 to 6 mL were obtained, and the Ficoll technique was used to extract peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Then, the percentage of CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺Helios⁺ regulatory T lymphocytes was examined by flow cytometry in the study groups. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was also used to assess the Helios gene expression level.

RESULTS

This study showed that the percentage of Tregs with CD4 and CD25 markers did not reveal a significant difference compared with HCs despite the decrease in SPMS patients (P = 0.6). However, lymphocytes with CD4/CD25/FOXP3/Helios markers were significantly reduced in the patients (P = 0.01). Additionally, SPMS patients had statistically significantly lower Helios gene expression levels (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In SPMS patients, a decrease in the frequency of the CD4⁺CD25⁺FOXP3⁺Helios⁺ Treg population can result in an imbalanced immune system. In other words, one of the immunological mechanisms involved in this disease may be a deficiency in Tregs. Helios gene expression was also decreased in these patients, which may exacerbate functional defects in Tregs.

Recent Progress in the Identification of Early Transition Biomarkers from Relapsing-Remitting to Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Despite extensive research into the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) and recent developments in potent disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), two-thirds of relapsing-remitting MS patients transition to progressive MS (PMS). The main pathogenic mechanism in PMS is represented not by inflammation but by neurodegeneration, which leads to irreversible neurological disability. For this reason, this transition represents a critical factor for the long-term prognosis. Currently, the diagnosis of PMS can only be established retrospectively based on the progressive worsening of the disability over a period of at least 6 months. In some cases, the diagnosis of PMS is delayed for up to 3 years. With the approval of highly effective DMTs, some with proven effects on neurodegeneration, there is an urgent need for reliable biomarkers to identify this transition phase early and to select patients at a high risk of conversion to PMS. The purpose of this review is to discuss the progress made in the last decade in an attempt to find such a biomarker in the molecular field (serum and cerebrospinal fluid) between the magnetic resonance imaging parameters and optical coherence tomography measures.

Prognostic uncertainty in multiple sclerosis: A concept analysis

AIM

To report an analysis of the concept of prognostic uncertainty in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

BACKGROUND

The complexity and ambiguity involved in a diagnosis of MS lead to the occurrence of prognostic uncertainty among patients. A concept analysis is presented that analyses what prognostic uncertainty means to those experiencing the transition between relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

DESIGN

Concept analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched for literature published within the last 10 years using combinations of the terms prognostic and diagnostic uncertainty, and multiple sclerosis along with archival referencing.

METHODS

The Walker and Avant method was used to analyse the concept of prognostic uncertainty in patients with MS.

RESULTS

The defining attributes identified that provide additional context to prognostic uncertainty are illness uncertainty, intolerance of uncertainty and progressive dwindling. Related, contrary, model and borderline cases are presented to further discuss the application of the key attributes to the concept.

CONCLUSION

There are limited data on prognostic uncertainty and multiple sclerosis; however, patients and physicians express uncertainty in understanding one's disease trajectory and determining when a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis has entered the secondary progressive multiple sclerosis disease course leading to ineffective communication and frustration.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Genetics and genomics have the potential to provide a prognostic factor for addressing the concept of uncertainty as it relates to persons with multiple sclerosis. Moving beyond the concept analysis, a case is made for nurse involvement in genetic and genomic research to conduct trials, translate, and apply these findings to clinical practice and nursing curricula, addressing the uncertainty experienced by those afflicted with chronic illnesses, such as multiple sclerosis.

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A national consensus paper on diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, the diagnosis of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is often delayed, retrospective and non-reproducible, as there are no consensus criteria that define the advent of SPMS. Early identification of SPMS is essential to improve patient care.

METHODS

Eight regional board meetings in France involving 56 multiple sclerosis (MS) experts (neurologists) were convened to discuss diagnostic criteria for SPMS. Subsequently, a national board meeting of 13 neurologists (with an expert representing each geographical region) was held to review points of convergence or divergence between regions and to develop a national consensus document.

RESULTS

Based on the discussions from the regional boards, the MS experts at the national board retained the worsening of the EDSS score, with compatible clinical features, as the only consensus criterion for the diagnosis of SPMS in clinical practice. The patient should have experienced during at least the previous 6 months and in the absence of any relapse, a worsening in the EDSS score of +1.0 point (if the previous EDSS was≤5.0) or of +0.5 point (if the previous EDSS was≥5.5), with a pyramidal or cerebellar functional system score≥2 and without setting a minimum EDSS score; or, in case of a stable EDSS score≥4.0, a worsening of a functional score. This worsening should be confirmed within 3 to 6 months. According to the MS experts, the patient's age, duration of illness and a minimal threshold EDSS score are only risk factors for transition to SPMS. Patient reports during consultation and cognitive impairment are important warning signs, which should trigger an objective assessment with specific tests or closer monitoring. Clinical relapse and/or MRI activities are non-discriminatory for making the diagnosis of SPMS.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts defined precise diagnostic criteria adapted to clinical practice for earlier identification of SPMS, paving the way for better management of this stage of the disease.

Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an update on progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly referred to as primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS. It discusses the importance of diagnosing and detecting progression early, the similarities between progressive forms, challenges in detecting progression, factors that could augment progression, and the importance of disease-modifying therapies in patients with evidence of active progressive MS. It also discusses the overall care of progressive MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pathogenesis of primary progressive MS and secondary progressive MS is overlapping, and in both presentations, patients with relapses or focal MRI activity are classified as having active, progressive MS. All currently approved disease-modifying therapies are indicated for active secondary progressive MS. The therapeutic opportunity of anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of progressive MS is enhanced in those who are younger and have a shorter disease duration. Vascular comorbidities may contribute to progression in MS.

SUMMARY

Several challenges remain in the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of progressive MS. Early identification of active progressive MS is needed to maximize treatment benefit. The advantages of optimal comorbidity management (eg, hypertension, hyperlipidemia) in delaying progression are uncertain. Clinical care guidelines for advanced, severe MS are lacking.

Difficulty in identification of patients with active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by clinical classification tools

BACKGROUND

The transition from relapsing-remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive (SPMS) multiple sclerosis is not well defined. Different definitions and tools to identify SPMS have been proposed. Meanwhile, early diagnosis of "active" SPMS is getting progressively more important as pharmaceutical treatment options are being developed. In this study, we compared different classification methods regarding their accuracy to reliably identify "active SPMS".

METHODS

Independent from previous diagnostic classification, we descriptively analyzed the disease course (regarding relapses, progression and MR-activity) in 208 consecutive multiple sclerosis patients treated in our MS outpatient clinic in 2018. Patients were reclassified according to different SPMS criteria and tools. Diagnostic accuracy to identify patients with "active SPMS" was determined.

RESULTS

Comparing the tools to each other, significant variability in the number of patients identified as having SPMS as well as in the proportion of these patients having "active SPMS" was noted. Applying both diagnostic criteria "SPMS" and "active disease" reduced the sensitivity to identify patients with active progressive disease in all approaches.

CONCLUSION

We propose to lessen the emphasis on the label "SPMS" in favor of the more open term "active progressive disease" to simplify the process of identification of patients who may benefit from immune therapy.

Clinical and Paraclinical Biomarkers and the Hitches to Assess Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

Conversion to secondary progressive (SP) course is the decisive factor for long-term prognosis in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), generally considered the clinical equivalent of progressive MS-associated neuroaxonal degeneration. Evidence is accumulating that both inflammation and neurodegeneration are present along a continuum of pathologic processes in all phases of MS. While inflammation is the prominent feature in early stages, its quality changes and relative importance to disease course decreases while neurodegenerative processes prevail with ongoing disease. Consequently, anti-inflammatory disease-modifying therapies successfully used in relapsing MS are ineffective in SPMS, whereas specific treatment for the latter is increasingly a focus of MS research. Therefore, the prevention, but also the (anticipatory) diagnosis of SPMS, is of crucial importance. The problem is that currently SPMS diagnosis is exclusively based on retrospectively assessing the increase of overt physical disability usually over the past 6–12 months. This inevitably results in a delay of diagnosis of up to 3 years resulting in periods of uncertainty and, thus, making early therapy adaptation to prevent SPMS conversion impossible. Hence, there is an urgent need for reliable and objective biomarkers to prospectively predict and define SPMS conversion. Here, we review current evidence on clinical parameters, magnetic resonance imaging and optical coherence tomography measures, and serum and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the context of MS-associated neurodegeneration and SPMS conversion. Ultimately, we discuss the necessity of multimodal approaches in order to approach objective definition and prediction of conversion to SPMS.

The Current Challenges for Drug Discovery in CNS Remyelination

The myelin sheath wraps around axons, allowing saltatory currents to be transmitted along neurons. Several genetic, viral, or environmental factors can damage the central nervous system (CNS) myelin sheath during life. Unless the myelin sheath is repaired, these insults will lead to neurodegeneration. Remyelination occurs spontaneously upon myelin injury in healthy individuals but can fail in several demyelination pathologies or as a consequence of aging. Thus, pharmacological intervention that promotes CNS remyelination could have a major impact on patient’s lives by delaying or even preventing neurodegeneration. Drugs promoting CNS remyelination in animal models have been identified recently, mostly as a result of repurposing phenotypical screening campaigns that used novel oligodendrocyte cellular models. Although none of these have as yet arrived in the clinic, promising candidates are on the way. Many questions remain. Among the most relevant is the question if there is a time window when remyelination drugs should be administrated and why adult remyelination fails in many neurodegenerative pathologies. Moreover, a significant challenge in the field is how to reconstitute the oligodendrocyte/axon interaction environment representative of healthy as well as disease microenvironments in drug screening campaigns, so that drugs can be screened in the most appropriate disease-relevant conditions. Here we will provide an overview of how the field of in vitro models developed over recent years and recent biological findings about how oligodendrocytes mature after reactivation of their staminal niche. These data have posed novel questions and opened new views about how the adult brain is repaired after myelin injury and we will discuss how these new findings might change future drug screening campaigns for CNS regenerative drugs.

Re-examining the effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Background/objective: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is previously given to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients. This study aimed to re-examine the effects of IVMP in SPMS. Materials & methods: Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were included. IVMP may be inferior to mitoxantrone (MTX) in terms of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) improvement. There was no significant difference in terms of EDSS reduction and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plaque reduction when IVMP + MTX were compared with MTX. There is no significant difference between IVMP and cyclophosphamide based on EDSS progression and relapse reduction. Conclusion: IVMP should not be routinely used as treatment for SPMS and is not recommended as an alternative treatment for SPMS.

Approaches and challenges in the diagnosis and management of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A Central Eastern European perspective from healthcare professionals

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is a debilitating condition characterized by gradual worsening after an initial relapsing disease course. Despite the recent advances in our understanding of the disease, the diagnosis and treatment of SPMS continue to be challenging in routine clinical practice. The aim of this review article is to present the views of leading MS experts on the challenges in the diagnosis and management of SPMS and clinicians' perspectives in Central and Eastern Europe. This article also provides recommendations of MS experts to improve the situation with diagnosis and management of SPMS. Many countries within Central and Eastern Europe have high prevalence of MS (>100 per 100,000 population). Consistent with the global trend, in the absence of reliable tests or biomarkers, SPMS at early stage remains undiagnosed. Due to diagnostic uncertainty and lack of a universally accepted disease definition, clinicians rely more on retrospective analysis of the clinical symptoms to confirm the diagnosis. With the lack of awareness and poor understanding of the timing of the onset of SPMS, clinicians may tend to direct attention to relapses than the symptoms of progression, which leads to underestimation of SPMS. Although several predictors of progression to SPMS have been identified, their predictive value is highly variable. Therefore, defining the transitioning period as a separate stage of MS is essential. According to experts' opinion, frequent follow-up of patients and periodic assessment of progression are recommended for the timely identification of patients transitioning from RRMS to SPMS. MSProDiscuss Tool is an example of a quick assessment tool for identifying patients progressing from RRMS to SPMS. MS progression is usually assessed by changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. As EDSS scores tend to fluctuate when measured in the short term (3-6 months), a longer period (≥12 months) may be needed to confirm the progression. Assessment of cognitive function is also important for evaluating secondary progression. Compartmentalization of inflammation within the central nervous system is an important reason behind the limited success of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for treating SPMS. Most of the DMTs fail to cross the blood-brain barrier; only 38% of the tested DMTs achieved their primary endpoint in SPMS. In Europe, siponimod is the first oral treatment for adults with active SPMS. Particularly, in Central and Eastern Europe, patients with SPMS are still being prescribed less efficacious DMTs and interferons. The absence of alternative treatments in SPMS supports the use of new products (siponimod and others); however the decision to initiate siponimod therapy in more severe patients (EDSS score of 7 or higher) should be individualized in consultation with the payers. The focus should be on early treatment initiation to delay disease progression.

Siponimod: A Review in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Oral siponimod (Mayzent®), a next-generation, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) 1 and 5 modulator, is approved in several countries for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), with specific indications varying between individual countries. In the pivotal EXPAND trial (median duration double-blind treatment 18 months) in a broad spectrum of patients with SPMS, once-daily oral siponimod 2 mg (initial dose titration over 6 days) was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing clinical and MRI-defined outcomes of disease activity and disability progression, including 3-month confirmed disability progression on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and was generally well tolerated in the core phase of the study. These beneficial effects of siponimod appeared to be sustained during up to 5 years of treatment in the ongoing open-label extension phase of EXPAND. The safety profile of siponimod is similar to that of other agents in its class, including adverse events of special interest (i.e. those known to be associated with S1PR modulators). No new safety signals were identified during up to 5 years' treatment in the open-label extension phase. Albeit further long-term efficacy and safety data from the real-world setting are required to fully define its role, given the paucity of current treatment options and its convenient dosage regimen, siponimod represents an important emerging option for the treatment of adult patients with SPMS with active disease evidenced by relapses or imaging-features of inflammatory activity.