Healthcare resource utilization and costs for extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis

Prospective trial of natalizumab personalised extended interval dosing by therapeutic drug monitoring in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NEXT-MS)

BACKGROUND

Extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab is a promising strategy to optimise treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS). Personalised EID by therapeutic drug monitoring can enable further extension of treatment intervals.

METHODS

The NEXT-MS trial is an investigator-initiated prospective phase IV non-randomised study. Adults with a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting MS who received ≥6 natalizumab infusions were included in three groups: personalised EID with a target drug trough concentration of 10 µg/mL (EID10), an exploratory group of personalised EID with a target of 5 µg/mL (EID5) and standard interval dosing (SID) of 4 weeks. The primary outcome is radiological disease activity (new/newly enlarged T2 lesions) comparing the EID10 group to a historical cohort of SID (HSID).

RESULTS

Results of the first phase of the NEXT-MS trial are reported here (n=376) as the study will continue with an amended protocol. In the EID10 group (n=251), incidence rate of radiological activity was 10.0 per 1000 person-years, which was non-inferior to the HSID cohort (24.7 per 1000 person-years (n=87), incidence rate difference 14.7, 90% CI -4.5 to 34.0). Incidence rate of radiological activity was 10.0 per 1000 person-years in the EID5 group (n=65), and 47.0 per 1000 person-years in the SID group (n=60). Serum neurofilament light levels did not increase over time within the EID groups. There were no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

MS disease activity is adequately controlled with personalised natalizumab EID. Interval extension to a drug trough concentration of 5 µg/mL is likely a safe target to extend natalizumab treatment intervals >6 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04225312.

Safety and efficacy of extended versus standard interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, immune-mediated disease affecting the central nervous system. Natalizumab, an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody for MS, has been explored for its off-label extended interval dosing (EID), suggesting a potential reduction in the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) compared to standard interval dosing (SID). Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of EID in comparison to SID for natalizumab treatment in patients with MS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, WOS, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Clinical trials.gov, and Cochrane Library. Our assessed outcomes were clinical relapses, MRI activity, change in expanded disability status scale [EDSS], and the risk of PML. The EID group was defined as 5 to 8 weeks [EID (Q5-8W)]. The analysis was conducted using RevMan ver. 5.4. The effect estimates were presented as a risk ratio [RR] or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals [CI] using SID group as the reference for comparisons.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria: 2 RCTs, 1 switched single-arm trial, and 12 observational studies. No significant differences were found in all efficacy outcomes of interest. Risk of clinical relapses [RR = 0.90, (95%CI 0.80, 1.02)], risk of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense MRI lesions [RR = 0.78, (95%CI 0.59, 1.04)], risk gadolinium enhancing lesions [RR = 1.30, (95%CI 0.98, 1.72)], change in EDSS [MD = 0.09 (95%CI - 0.57, 0.76)], risk of PML [RR = 1.09, 95%CI (0.24, 4.94)].

CONCLUSION

In summary, our meta-analysis indicates that natalizumab maintains its effectiveness under extended interval dosing [up to 8 weeks], presenting comparable risks for clinical relapses, MRI lesions, EDSS, and PML. Caution is advised given study limitations and heterogeneity. Robust conclusions necessitate well-designed high-quality prospective studies.

Natalizumab extended-interval dosing in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab is a high-efficacy therapy for recurrent multiple sclerosis (RMS) with a four-week administration interval. Controlled trials have shown that extending this interval to six weeks led to better safety without increasing the risk of relapse. We aimed to analyze the safety of extending the natalizumab interdose interval from 4 to 6 weeks in a real-life setting.

METHODS

This monocentric retrospective self-controlled study included adult patients with RMS treated with natalizumab with a four-week interval between infusions for a minimum of six months, before switching to a six-week interval. The main outcomes were the incidence of MS relapse, new MRI lesions, and MRI activity signs during the two periods, with patients being their own controls.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The mean (95%CI) annualized relapse rate (AAR) before natalizumab introduction was 1.03 (0.52; 1.55). During the four-week interval dosing period, no patient presented with an MS relapse, and seven (13.5%) patients had new MRI lesions. During the six-week interval dosing period, no relapse was observed and two (3.6%) patients had new MRI lesions.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe more relapses or signs of MRI activity when extending the interval between natalizumab infusions from four to six weeks.

Fingerprick blood samples to measure serum natalizumab concentrations

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab via subcutaneous administration was recently approved for patients with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE

In light of personalized extended dosing, in which treatment intervals are prolonged to a concentration cut-off, it would be preferable to measure natalizumab drug concentrations in capillary blood.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study in patients treated with intravenous (IV) natalizumab, capillary blood samples by fingerprick and venous blood samples were collected in 30 participants prior to IV administration of natalizumab.

RESULTS

Natalizumab concentrations were similar with a mean bias of -0.36 μg/mL (95% CI: 1.3 to -2 μg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that physicians can monitor natalizumab drug concentrations by a fingerprick, which could be used for personalized extended dosing.

sNFL applicability as additional monitoring tool in natalizumab extended interval dosing regimen for RRMS patients

INTRODUCTION

Extended interval dosing (EID) of Natalizumab (NAT) has been proposed to reduce progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk associated with standard interval dosing (SID) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous studies have suggested that NAT effectiveness is maintained in the great majority of patients who switch from SID to EID; monitoring of disease activity is currently based exclusively on clinical and MRI parameters. Frequent MRI are expensive and not always applicable, underlining the need for biological markers able to detect central nervous system lesions. Serum Neurofilament-light chain (sNFL) currently represents the most promising biomarker of disease activity, prognosis and treatment response in MS, and their clinical suitability is increasingly evident. The objective of the present study is to assess the applicability of sNFL as additional/alternative measure of treatment efficacy during EID regimen.

METHODS

We measured sNFL by Simoa technology in longitudinal samples from 63 Relapsing Remitting (RR) MS patients switched from SID to EID.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

diagnosis of RRMS, age 18-60 years; NAT SID for at least 12 months; NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity) for at least 12 months; availability of at least 2 serum samples collected 6 months apart. Patients' follow-up time during EID was at least 12 months and 2 blood samples were collected after at least 6 and 12 months. Clinical examination was performed before each infusion, while MRI 6 and 12 months after NAT initiation and according to PML risk during the whole study.

RESULTS

No patients showed clinical or MRI activity during the whole follow-up. sNFL levels measured during SID and EID were comparable, without significant difference between groups. The effect of EID on NFL levels did not show significant effects (LMM, p> 0.05) and sNFL levels did not vary with time during SID or EID protocols (LMM, p> 0.05). Intra-individual sNFL levels demonstrated overall stability during SID and EID (median CV=11% between SID and EID samples). According to our previously published reference values, sNFL levels were in the normal range in all samples, both during SID and EID.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that sNFL quantification can be used as an alternative/additional approach to MRI in managing individual patients. The present work provides a new clinical application of sNFL to monitor NAT efficacy.