Peripheral nerve stimulation for the management of acute and subacute post-amputation pain: a randomized, controlled feasibility trial

Placement of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Device in Single Limb Controls Long-Term Pain in Pediatric Patient With 4-Limb Amputation: A Case Report

Septic shock caused by Group A Streptococcus (GAS) can cause multiorgan failure and limb ischemia, necessitating amputations. We present a 17-year-old girl who survived GAS-induced septic shock but required quadruple amputations. Postoperatively, she experienced significant stump and phantom pain primarily in her left leg, posing challenges for pain management. Two percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) leads were implanted, targeting the left femoral and posterior sciatic nerves. This resulted in excellent long-term pain control, allowing for rapid weaning off systemic opioids and other analgesics. This report highlights PNS as an effective, minimally invasive alternative for managing chronic pain in pediatric patients.

Perioperative Pain Management for Major Limb Amputation - A Systematic-Narrative Hybrid Review

INTRODUCTION

Post-amputation pain, including residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP), can affect the outcome of surgery and have an impact on quality of life. Effective management of acute post-amputation pain requires a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration among the surgical and anesthesia teams to optimize pain management. A systematic-narrative hybrid review was conducted to assess and report the effectiveness of various interventions in perioperative pain management for amputation surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for studies evaluating interventional and/or pharmacological approaches to managing perioperative pain in major extremity amputation surgery. The data collected included treatment options, average dosage and/or duration of treatments, and reported pain outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 27 studies evaluating interventions, 8 addressed neuraxial or perineural analgesia, 16 focused on peripheral nerve blocks (PNB), 2 examined peripheral nerve stimulators (PNS), and 1 investigated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Preoperative epidural analgesia was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative pain. PNS, PNB, and catheter-based infusions were found to be effective in managing postoperative pain. The role of ketamine in treating post-amputation pain yielded mixed results, while other pharmacological agents, such as valproic acid and gabapentin, demonstrated limited efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

While numerous pain interventions are available, no single approach has been shown to be superior. A multimodal strategy, incorporating PNBs, preoperative pain control, and potentially ketamine, appears to provide the most comprehensive pain management strategy. Further long-term prospective studies are required to refine and optimize pain management techniques for major extremity amputation surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Systematic reviews.

Role of peripheral nerve stimulation and percutaneous cryoneurolysis in preventing chronic postsurgical pain

BACKGROUND

Poorly controlled pain during the acute postoperative period is associated with the development of persistent or 'chronic' pain lasting months or years after surgery. Relatively small trials suggest that local anesthetic-based peripheral nerve blocks lasting hours or a few days may decrease persistent postsurgical pain for some surgical procedures, but definitive data is lacking. Two possible alternatives-percutaneous cryoneurolysis and peripheral nerve stimulation-are analgesic modalities with the potential to provide weeks or months of pain relief following surgery. This increase in analgesic duration raises the possibility of decreased transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarize the available evidence involving the use of percutaneous cryoneurolysis and peripheral nerve stimulation within the immediate perioperative period and its effects on decreasing chronic postoperative pain.

FINDINGS

Two randomized trials (n=66 and 16) comparing active percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation to sham stimulation and two randomized trials (n=60 and 7) comparing percutaneous cryoneurolysis to a sham procedure for postoperative pain are described in this review. In each trial, participants were followed for at least three months.

CONCLUSION

This review describes percutaneous cryoneurolysis and peripheral nerve stimulation for perioperative analgesia as well as the available evidence supporting their use to prevent persistent postsurgical pain.

Mechanism of Action of Temporary Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) refers to the technique of utilizing electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves to inhibit the transmission of pain signals. PNS is used to treat chronic intractable pain and post-surgical or post-traumatic pain alongside a variety of other pain conditions, including headaches, facial pain, pelvic and urogenital pain, chest wall pain, residual limb or phantom limb pain, and back pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

More recently, PNS has been used temporarily for periods of time less than 60 days to treat acute post-surgical pain. Peripheral nerve stimulation is believed to be effective due to its effects on both central and peripheral pathways. Centrally, it is proposed that the electrical pulses of PNS inhibit alpha-delta and C fibers, which decreases pain signaling in the higher centers of the central nervous system. Peripherally, gate theory is applied as it is theorized that PNS downregulates inflammatory mediators, endorphins, and neurotransmitters associated with pain signaling to decrease the transmission of efferent nociception and reduce pain sensations.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain Management: A Narrative Review

This narrative review examines the therapeutic efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) in the treatment of neuropathic pain (NP), a type of pain arising from lesions or diseases of the somatosensory system with a global prevalence ranging from 6.90% to 10.00%. Traditional pharmacological interventions often fall short for many persons, highlighting the need for alternative treatments such as PNS, which has demonstrated significant promise with minimal side effects. The review summarizes the effectiveness of PNS in various NP conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia, and underscores the need for further research to refine treatment approaches. The mechanism of PNS is discussed, involving the activation of non-nociceptive Aβ fibers and modulation of neurotransmitters, and offering pain relief through both peripheral and central pathways. Despite the proven efficacy of PNS, challenges remain, including the need for randomized controlled trials and the optimization of stimulation parameters. The review concludes that PNS is a promising treatment modality for NP, warranting additional high-quality trials to solidify its role in clinical practice.

A Computational Framework for Understanding the Impact of Prior Experiences on Pain Perception and Neuropathic Pain

Pain perception is influenced not only by sensory input from afferent neurons but also by cognitive factors such as prior expectations. It has been suggested that overly precise priors may be a key contributing factor to chronic pain states such as neuropathic pain. However, it remains an open question how overly precise priors in favor of pain might arise. Here, we first verify that a Bayesian approach can describe how statistical integration of prior expectations and sensory input results in pain phenomena such as placebo hypoalgesia, nocebo hyperalgesia, chronic pain, and spontaneous neuropathic pain. Our results indicate that the value of the prior, which is determined by the internal model parameters, may be a key contributor to these phenomena. Next, we apply a hierarchical Bayesian approach to update the parameters of the internal model based on the difference between the predicted and the perceived pain, to reflect that people integrate prior experiences in their future expectations. In contrast with simpler approaches, this hierarchical model structure is able to show for placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia how these phenomena can arise from prior experiences in the form of a classical conditioning procedure. We also demonstrate the phenomenon of offset analgesia, in which a disproportionally large pain decrease is obtained following a minor reduction in noxious stimulus intensity. Finally, we turn to simulations of neuropathic pain, where our hierarchical model corroborates that persistent non-neuropathic pain is a risk factor for developing neuropathic pain following denervation, and additionally offers an interesting prediction that complete absence of informative painful experiences could be a similar risk factor. Taken together, these results provide insight to how prior experiences may contribute to pain perception, in both experimental and neuropathic pain, which in turn might be informative for improving strategies of pain prevention and relief.

Integrating mechanistic-based and classification-based concepts into perioperative pain management: an educational guide for acute pain physicians

Chronic pain begins with acute pain. Physicians tend to classify pain by duration (acute vs chronic) and mechanism (nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic). Although this taxonomy may facilitate diagnosis and documentation, such categories are to some degree arbitrary constructs, with significant overlap in terms of mechanisms and treatments. In clinical practice, there are myriad different definitions for chronic pain and a substantial portion of chronic pain involves mixed phenotypes. Classification of pain based on acuity and mechanisms informs management at all levels and constitutes a critical part of guidelines and treatment for chronic pain care. Yet specialty care is often siloed, with advances in understanding lagging years behind in some areas in which these developments should be at the forefront of clinical practice. For example, in perioperative pain management, enhanced recovery protocols are not standardized and tend to drive treatment without consideration of mechanisms, which in many cases may be incongruent with personalized medicine and mechanism-based treatment. In this educational document, we discuss mechanisms and classification of pain as it pertains to commonly performed surgical procedures. Our goal is to provide a clinical reference for the acute pain physician to facilitate pain management decision-making (both diagnosis and therapy) in the perioperative period.

Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of 60-Day Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Treatment Indicates Relief of Persistent Postoperative Pain, and Improved Function After Knee Replacement

OBJECTIVES

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgery for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, but chronic postoperative pain and reduced function affect up to 20% of patients who undergo such surgery. There are limited treatment options, but percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising nonopioid treatment option for chronic, persistent postoperative pain. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of a 60-day percutaneous PNS treatment in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for treating persistent postoperative pain after TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with postoperative pain after knee replacement were screened for this postmarket, institutional review board-approved, prospectively registered (NCT04341948) trial. Subjects were randomized to receive either active PNS or placebo (sham) stimulation. Subjects and a designated evaluator were blinded to group assignments. Subjects in both groups underwent ultrasound-guided placement of percutaneous fine-wire coiled leads targeting the femoral and sciatic nerves on the leg with postoperative pain. Leads were indwelling for eight weeks, and the primary efficacy outcome compared the proportion of subjects in each group reporting ≥50% reduction in average pain relative to baseline during weeks five to eight. Functional outcomes (6-minute walk test; 6MWT and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) and quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Change) also were evaluated at end of treatment (EOT).

RESULTS

A greater proportion of subjects in the PNS groups (60%; 12/20) than in the placebo (sham) group (24%; 5/21) responded with ≥50% pain relief relative to baseline (p = 0.028) during the primary endpoint (weeks 5-8). Subjects in the PNS group also walked a significantly greater distance at EOT than did those in the placebo (sham) group (6MWT; +47% vs -9% change from baseline; p = 0.048, n = 18 vs n = 20 completed the test, respectively). Prospective follow-up to 12 months is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that percutaneous PNS decreases persistent pain, which leads to improved functional outcomes after TKA at EOT.

Literature Review: Mechanism, Indications, and Clinical Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Stimulators in Lower Extremity Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lower extremity pain is deemed by Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be a significant source of chronic pain in adults. If not appropriately managed, patients are subjected to risks of prolonged musculoskeletal dysfunction, disruption to quality of life, and elevated healthcare expenditures. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has shown great potential in recent years demonstrating efficacy in multiple diagnoses ranging from acute post-surgical pain to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). This study seeks to delineate efficacy of peripheral neuromodulation in the context of chronic lower extremity pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prevailing clinical studies demonstrate evidence levels ranging from II to V (Oxford Centre of Level of Evidence) in lower limb PNS, attaining positive outcomes in pain scores, opioid use, and quality of life measures. Nerves most frequently targeted are the sciatic and femoral nerves with post-amputation pain and CRPS most commonly investigated for efficacy. PNS is a promising therapeutic modality demonstrated to be effective for a variety of nociceptive and neuropathic pain conditions in the lower extremity. PNS offers chronic pain physicians a powerful tool in the multi-modal management of lower limb chronic pain.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Treating Acute Pain Following Traumatic Fracture: A Case Report of Rapid-Onset Analgesia Without Motor Blockade

Analgesia following acute traumatic fracture remains a clinical challenge. Pain relief via peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a promising treatment modality due to its opioid-sparing effects and rapid, reversible sensory blockade without motor blockade. We present the case of a patient who suffered a traumatic tibial plateau fracture. A popliteal sciatic PNS device was placed on postoperative day 1 following inadequate pain control. The patient reported marked pain relief, a significant reduction in morphine milligram equivalent (MME) utilization, and improved early functional recovery. The PNS lead was removed at the patient's 2-month follow-up visit without any adverse events.

The Emerging Role of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Postoperative Analgesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Though peripheral nerve stimulation has long been utilized in the field of chronic pain management, its use in acute pain management in the postoperative period is relatively novel and warrants further consideration.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the postsurgical period, peripheral nerve stimulation may offer an additional low-risk, opioid-sparing analgesic option, which is particularly pertinent in the setting of the ongoing opioid epidemic, as inadequate postsurgical analgesia has been shown to increase the risk of developing persistent or chronic postsurgical pain. In this review, we discuss the current literature that illustrate the emerging role of peripheral nerve stimulation as an effective treatment modality in the postoperative period for the management of acute pain, as various studies have recently been conducted evaluating the feasibility of utilizing percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation as an adjunct in postsurgical analgesia. Nonetheless, future studies are necessary to continue to elucidate the short- and long-term impacts of peripheral nerve stimulation use in acute postsurgical analgesia.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Despite numerous first-line treatment interventions, adequately managing a patient's postamputation pain can be difficult. Peripheral nerve stimulation has emerged as a safe neuromodulatory intervention that can be used for many etiologies of chronic pain. We performed a systemic review to appraise the evidence of peripheral nerve stimulation use for improvement in postamputation pain. This was performed in Ovid, Cochrane databases, OVID, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed. The primary outcome was improvement in postamputation pain after use of peripheral nerve stimulation. Secondary outcomes included improvements in functional status, opioid usage, and mood. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently in a blinded manner. Of the 989 studies identified, 13 studies were included consisting of three randomized control trials, seven observational studies, and three case series. While large heterogeneity limited definitive conclusions, the included studies generally demonstrated favorable outcomes regarding pain reduction. Each included study that used an objective pain scale demonstrated clinically significant pain improvements. Per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations criteria, there is very low-quality Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations evidence supporting that peripheral nerve stimulation is associated with improvements in pain intensity for postamputation pain. Future prospective, comparative, and well-powered studies assessing the use of peripheral nerve stimulation for postamputation pain are warranted.

Steering Toward Normative Wide-Dynamic-Range Neuron Activity in Nerve-Injured Rats With Closed-Loop Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

Chronic pain is primarily treated with pharmaceuticals, but the effects remain unsatisfactory. A promising alternative therapy is peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), but it has been associated with suboptimal efficacy because its modulation mechanisms are not clear and the current therapies are primarily open loop (ie, manually adjusting the stimulation parameters). In this study, we developed a proof-of-concept computational modeling as the first step toward implementing closed-loop PNS in future biological studies. When developing new pain therapies, a useful pain biomarker is the wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neuron activity in the dorsal horn. In healthy animals, the WDR neuron activity occurs in a stereotyped manner; however, this response profile can vary widely after nerve injury to create a chronic pain condition. We hypothesized that if injury-induced changes of neuronal response can be normalized to resemble those of a healthy condition, the pathological aspects of pain may be treated while maintaining protective physiological nociception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using an in vivo electrophysiology data set of WDR neuron recordings obtained in nerve-injured rats and naïve rats, we constructed sets of linear phenomenologic models of WDR firing rate during windup stimulation for both conditions. Then, we applied robust control systems techniques to identify a closed-loop PNS controller, which can drive the dynamics of WDR neuron response in neuropathic pain model into ranges associated with normal physiological pain.

RESULTS

The sets of identified linear models can accurately predict, in silico, nonlinear neural responses to electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerve. In addition, we showed that continuous closed-loop control of PNS can be used to normalize WDR neuron firing responses in three injured cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In this proof-of-concept study, we show how tractable, linear mathematical models of pain-related neurotransmission can be used to inform the development of closed-loop PNS. This new application of robust control to neurotechnology may also be expanded and applied across other neuromodulation applications.

Durable patient-reported outcomes following 60-day percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the medial branch nerves

Background

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is often associated with clinical evidence of central nervous system sensitization and finding a clear source of nociceptive input can be challenging. Conventional therapies targeting peripheral spinal pain structures can fail to address centrally-mediated, underlying causes of pain. Sixty-day percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) applied to the lumbar medial branch nerves is a non-surgical, non-opioid treatment that may restore the balance of peripheral inputs to the central nervous system and reverse maladaptive changes in central pain processing. As a minimally invasive, non-destructive treatment, percutaneous PNS was designed to be used earlier in the treatment continuum than radiofrequency ablation or permanently-implanted neurostimulation systems.

Objective

The objective of this clinical trial was to characterize the durability of responses to medial branch PNS in a prospective multicenter case series study of CLBP patients recalcitrant to multiple non-surgical treatments.

Design

Prospective, multicenter clinical trial.

Population

Adults with CLBP without radicular leg pain who had previously failed multiple types of conventional treatments.

Intervention

Sixty-day percutaneous PNS applied to the lumbar medial branch nerves.

Methods

Percutaneous PNS leads were implanted under image guidance (ultrasound and/or fluoroscopy) and treatment was applied for up to 60 days, after which the leads were removed. Participants were followed through 14 months (12 months after the 2-month PNS treatment). Prospectively-defined endpoints included assessments of pain intensity, disability, pain interference, health-related quality of life, depression, and patient global impression of change.

Results

Treatment of CLBP with 60-day percutaneous PNS treatment produced clinically meaningful improvements in average pain intensity, disability, and/or pain interference for a majority of participants through the entire 14 month follow up period without requiring permanent system implantation. The proportion of participants experiencing clinically meaningful improvement in at least one outcome (pain intensiy, disability, pain interference) with PNS was 91% after 2 months, 79% at 5 months, 73% at 8 months, 75% at 11 months, and 77% at 14 months. There were no serious or unanticipated study-related adverse events.

Conclusion

This prospective multicenter clinical trial demonstrates the clinical utility of percutaneous PNS when applied to the medial branch nerves for the treatment of chronic low back pain recalcitrant to non-surgical treatments. Given the minimally invasive nature of percutaneous PNS and the significant benefits experienced by participants, percutaneous PNS provides a safe and effective first-line neuromodulation treatment for patients with CLBP that may obviate the need for neuroablative procedures or permanent neurostimulation system implantation.