1
|
Hast M, Glatt V, Archdeacon M, Ledet E, Lewis G, Ahn J, Haller J. Biomechanics of fracture healing: how best to optimize your construct in the OR. OTA Int 2024; 7:e304. [PMID: 38487404 PMCID: PMC10936157 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Orthopaedic surgeons routinely assess the biomechanical environment of a fracture to create a fixation construct that provides the appropriate amount of stability in efforts to optimize fracture healing. Emerging concepts and technologies including reverse dynamization, "smart plates" that measure construct strain, and FractSim software that models fracture strain represent recent developments in optimizing construct biomechanics to accelerate bone healing and minimize construct failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hast
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Vaida Glatt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Michael Archdeacon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Eric Ledet
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Gregory Lewis
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Jaimo Ahn
- Department Orthopedics Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Justin Haller
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Glatt V, O'Toole R, Mehta S, Kandemir U, Ricci W, Nauth A, Schemitsch E, Hast MW. Great debates in trauma biomechanics. OTA Int 2023; 6:e249. [PMID: 37168029 PMCID: PMC10166369 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
At the 2021 annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, the Basic Science Focus Forum hosted its first ever debate-style symposium focused on biomechanics and fracture repair. The 3 subjects of debate were "Mechanics versus Biology-Which is 'More Important' to Consider?" "Locked Plate versus Forward Dynamization versus Reverse Dynamization-Which Way Should I Go?" and "Sawbones versus Cadaver Models-What Should I Believe Most?" These debates were held because fracture healing is a highly organized synergistic response between biological factors and the local mechanical environment. Multiple studies have demonstrated that both factors play roles in governing bone healing responses, and the causal relationships between the 2 remain unclear. The lack of clarity in this space has led to a spectrum of research with the common goal of helping surgeons make good decisions. Before reading further, the reader should understand that the questions posed in the debate titles are unanswerable and might represent a false choice. Instead, the reader should appreciate that the debates were held to gain a more thorough understanding of these topics based on the current state of the art of experimental and clinical studies, by using an engaging and thought-provoking format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaida Glatt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Robert O'Toole
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD
| | - Samir Mehta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Utku Kandemir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - William Ricci
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Aaron Nauth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; and
| | - Emil Schemitsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Michael W. Hast
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Woloszyk A, Aguilar L, Perez L, Salinas EL, Glatt V. Biomimetic hematoma delivers an ultra-low dose of rhBMP-2 to successfully regenerate large femoral bone defects in rats. BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES 2023; 148:213366. [PMID: 36905826 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Successful repair of large bone defects remains a clinical challenge. Following fractures, a bridging hematoma immediately forms as a crucial step that initiates bone healing. In larger bone defects the micro-architecture and biological properties of this hematoma are compromised, and spontaneous union cannot occur. To address this need, we developed an ex vivo Biomimetic Hematoma that resembles naturally healing fracture hematoma, using whole blood and the natural coagulants calcium and thrombin, as an autologous delivery vehicle for a very reduced dose of rhBMP-2. When implanted into a rat femoral large defect model, complete and consistent bone regeneration with superior bone quality was achieved with 10-20× less rhBMP-2 compared to that required with the collagen sponges currently used. Moreover, calcium and rhBMP-2 demonstrated a synergistic effect enhancing osteogenic differentiation, and fully restored mechanical strength 8 weeks after surgery. Collectively, these findings suggest the Biomimetic Hematoma provides a natural reservoir for rhBMP-2, and that retention of the protein within the scaffold rather than its sustained release might be responsible for more robust and rapid bone healing. Clinically, this new implant, using FDA-approved components, would not only reduce the risk of adverse events associated with BMPs, but also decrease treatment costs and nonunion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Woloszyk
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, TX, USA
| | - Leonardo Aguilar
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, TX, USA
| | - Louis Perez
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, TX, USA
| | - Emily L Salinas
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, TX, USA
| | - Vaida Glatt
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, TX, USA; Sam and Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78229, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Surgical Classification for Preclinical Rat Femoral Bone Defect Model: Standardization Based on Systematic Review, Anatomical Analysis and Virtual Surgery. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9090476. [PMID: 36135022 PMCID: PMC9495991 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9090476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Though surgical techniques profoundly influence in vivo experiments, significant heterogeneity exists in current surgeries for inducing rat femoral bone defects. Such variations reduce the reproducibility and comparability of preclinical studies, and are detrimental to clinical translation. The purposes of this study were: (1) to conduct a systematic review of rat femoral defect models, summarizing and analyzing the surgical techniques; (2) to analyze surgical design and potential pitfalls via 3D anatomy and virtual surgeries for fostering future precision research; and (3) to establish a surgical classification system, for improving the reproducibility and comparability among studies, avoiding unnecessary repetitive experiments. The online database PubMed was searched to identify studies from January 2000 to June 2022 using keywords, including rat, femur, bone defect. Eligible publications were included for a review of surgical methods. Anatomical analysis and virtual surgeries were conducted based on micro-CT reconstruction of the rat femur for further investigation and establishment of a classification system. A total of 545 publications were included, revealing marked heterogeneity in surgical methods. Four major surgical designs were reported for inducing defects from the proximal to distal femur: bone tunnel, cortical window, segmental defect, and wedge-shaped defect. Anatomical analysis revealed potential pitfalls hindering efficient clinical translation. A classification system was established according to the anatomical region, surgical design, and fixation devices. This systematic review in combination with 3D analysis and virtual surgery provides a general overview of current surgical approaches to inducing femoral defects in rats, and establishes a surgical classification facilitating preclinical research of quality and translational value.
Collapse
|
5
|
Margolis DS, Figueroa G, Barron Villalobos E, Smith JL, Doane CJ, Gonzales DA, Szivek JA. A Large Segmental Mid-Diaphyseal Femoral Defect Sheep Model: Surgical Technique. J INVEST SURG 2022; 35:1287-1295. [DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2045393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Margolis
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Gerardo Figueroa
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Jordan L. Smith
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - David A. Gonzales
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - John A. Szivek
- Orthopedic Research Laboratory, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun Y, Helmholz H, Will O, Damm T, Wiese B, Luczak M, Peschke E, Luthringer-Feyerabend B, Ebel T, Hövener JB, Glüer C, Willumeit-Römer R. Dynamic in vivo monitoring of fracture healing process in response to magnesium implant with multimodal imaging: Pilot longitudinal study in a rat external fixation model. Biomater Sci 2022; 10:1532-1543. [DOI: 10.1039/d2bm00051b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Rodent models are commonly used in pre-clinical research of magnesium (Mg) -based and other types of biomaterials for fracture treatment. Most studies selected unstable fixation methods, and there is a...
Collapse
|
7
|
Qi W, Feng X, Zhang T, Wu H, Fang C, Leung F. Development and validation of a modularized external fixator for generating standardized fracture healing micromotions in rats. Bone Joint Res 2021; 10:714-722. [PMID: 34747191 PMCID: PMC8636178 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1011.bjr-2021-0028.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To fully verify the reliability and reproducibility of an experimental method in generating standardized micromotion for the rat femur fracture model. Methods A modularized experimental device has been developed that allows rat models to be used instead of large animal models, with the aim of reducing systematic errors and time and money constraints on grouping. The bench test was used to determine the difference between the measured and set values of the micromotion produced by this device under different simulated loading weights. The displacement of the fixator under different loading conditions was measured by compression tests, which was used to simulate the unexpected micromotion caused by the rat’s ambulation. In vivo preliminary experiments with a small sample size were used to test the feasibility and effectiveness of the whole experimental scheme and surgical scheme. Results The bench test showed that a weight loading < 500 g did not affect the operation of experimental device. The compression test demonstrated that the stiffness of the device was sufficient to keep the uncontrollable motion between fracture ends, resulting from the rat’s daily activities, within 1% strain. In vivo results on 15 rats prove that the device works reliably, without overburdening the experimental animals, and provides standardized micromotion reproductively at the fracture site according to the set parameters. Conclusion Our device was able to investigate the effect of micromotion parameters on fracture healing by generating standardized micromotion to small animal models. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(11):714–722.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weichen Qi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xiaoreng Feng
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Yangjiang People's Hospital, Yangjiang, China
| | - Teng Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hao Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Christian Fang
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Frankie Leung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Autologous cancellous bone (ACB) grafting is the "gold standard" treatment for delayed bone union. However, small animal models for such grafts are lacking. Here, we developed an ACB graft rat model. Anatomical information regarding the iliac structure was recorded from five rat cadavers (10 ilia). Additionally, 5 and 25 rats were used as controls and ACB graft models, respectively. A defect was created in rat femurs and filled with ACB. Post-graft neo-osteogenic potential was assessed by radiographic evaluation and histological analysis. Iliac bone harvesting yielded the maximum amount of cancellous bone with minimal invasiveness, considering the position of parailiac nerves and vessels. The mean volume of cancellous bone per rat separated from the cortical bone was 73.8 ± 5.5 mm3. Bone union was evident in all ACB graft groups at 8 weeks, and new bone volume significantly increased every 2 weeks (P < 0.001). Histological analysis demonstrated the ability of ACB grafts to act as a scaffold and promote bone union in the defect. In conclusion, we established a stable rat model of ACB grafts by harvesting the iliac bone. This model can aid in investigating ACB grafts and development of novel therapies for bone injury.
Collapse
|
9
|
Glatt V, Samchukov M, Cherkashin A, Iobst C. Reverse Dynamization Accelerates Bone-Healing in a Large-Animal Osteotomy Model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:257-263. [PMID: 33315696 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse dynamization is a mechanical manipulation regimen designed to accelerate bone-healing and remodeling. It is based on the hypothesis that a fracture that is initially stabilized less rigidly allows micromotion to encourage initial cartilaginous callus formation. Once substantial callus has formed, the stabilization should then be converted to a rigid configuration to prevent the disruption of neovascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether bone-healing can be accelerated using a regimen of reverse dynamization in a large-animal osteotomy model. METHODS Transverse 2-mm tibial osteotomies were created in 18 goats, stabilized using circular external fixation, and divided into groups of 6 goats each: static fixation (rigid fixation), dynamic fixation (continuous micromotion using dynamizers), and reverse dynamization (initial micromotion using dynamizers followed by rigid fixation at 3 weeks postoperatively). Healing was assessed with the use of radiographs, micro-computed tomography, and mechanical testing. RESULTS Radiographic evaluation showed earlier and more robust callus formation in the dynamic fixation and reverse dynamization groups compared with the static fixation group. After 8 weeks of treatment, the reverse dynamization group had reduced callus size, less bone volume, higher bone mineral density, and no evidence of radiolucent lines compared with the static fixation and dynamic fixation groups. This appearance is characteristic of advanced remodeling, returning closest to the values of intact bone. Moreover, the tibiae in the reverse dynamization group were significantly stronger in torsion compared with those in the static fixation and dynamic fixation groups. CONCLUSIONS These findings confirmed that tibial osteotomies under reverse dynamization healed faster, healed objectively better, and were considerably stronger, all suggesting an accelerated healing and remodeling process. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study demonstrates that the concept of reverse dynamization challenges the current understanding regarding the optimal fixation stability necessary to maximize the regenerative capacity of bone-healing. When reverse dynamization is employed in the clinical setting, it may be able to improve the treatment of fractures by reducing the time to union and potentially lowering the risk of delayed union and nonunion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaida Glatt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Mikhail Samchukov
- The Center for Excellence in Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alexander Cherkashin
- The Center for Excellence in Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Christopher Iobst
- Center for Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Osagie-Clouard L, Kaufmann J, Blunn G, Coathup M, Pendegrass C, Meeson R, Briggs T, Moazen M. Biomechanics of two external fixator devices used in rat femoral fractures. J Orthop Res 2019; 37:293-298. [PMID: 29727021 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The use of external fixators allows for the direct investigation of newly formed interfragmentary bone, and the radiographic evaluation of the fracture. We validated the results of a finite element (FE) model with the in vitro stiffness' of two widely used external fixator devices used for in vivo analysis of fracture healing in rat femoral fractures with differing construction (Ti alloy ExFix1 and PEEK ExFix2). Rat femoral fracture fixation was modeled using two external fixators. For both constructs an osteotomy of 2.75 mm was used, and offset maintained at 5 mm. Tufnol, served as standardized substitutes for rat femora. Constructs were loaded under axial compression and torsion. Overall axial and torsional stiffness were compared between the in vitro models and FE results. FE models were also used to compare the fracture movement and overall pattern of von Mises stress across the external fixators. In vitro axial stiffness of ExFix1 was 29.26 N/mm ± 3.83 compared to ExFix2 6.31 N/mm ± 0.67 (p* < 0.05). Torsional stiffness of ExFix1 was 47.5 Nmm/° ± 2.71 compared to ExFix2 at 19.1 Nmm/° ±1.18 (p* < 0.05). FE results predicted similar comparative ratios between the ExFix1 and 2 as the in vitro studies. FE results predicted considerably larger interfragmentary motion in the ExFix2 comparing to ExFix1. We demonstrated significant differences in the stiffness' of the two external fixators as one would expect from such variable designs; yet, importantly we validated the utility of an FE model for the analysis and prediction of changes in fracture mechanics dependent on fixator choice. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:293-298, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua Kaufmann
- Division of Surgery, University College London, Stanmore, UK
| | - Gordon Blunn
- Division of Surgery, University College London, Stanmore, UK.,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | | | - Richard Meeson
- Division of Surgery, University College London, Stanmore, UK
| | | | - Mehran Moazen
- Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Petersen A, Princ A, Korus G, Ellinghaus A, Leemhuis H, Herrera A, Klaumünzer A, Schreivogel S, Woloszyk A, Schmidt-Bleek K, Geissler S, Heschel I, Duda GN. A biomaterial with a channel-like pore architecture induces endochondral healing of bone defects. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4430. [PMID: 30361486 PMCID: PMC6202397 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06504-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomaterials developed to treat bone defects have classically focused on bone healing via direct, intramembranous ossification. In contrast, most bones in our body develop from a cartilage template via a second pathway called endochondral ossification. The unsolved clinical challenge to regenerate large bone defects has brought endochondral ossification into discussion as an alternative approach for bone healing. However, a biomaterial strategy for the regeneration of large bone defects via endochondral ossification is missing. Here we report on a biomaterial with a channel-like pore architecture to control cell recruitment and tissue patterning in the early phase of healing. In consequence of extracellular matrix alignment, CD146+ progenitor cell accumulation and restrained vascularization, a highly organized endochondral ossification process is induced in rats. Our findings demonstrate that a pure biomaterial approach has the potential to recapitulate a developmental bone growth process for bone healing. This might motivate future strategies for biomaterial-based tissue regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Petersen
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - A Princ
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - G Korus
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Ellinghaus
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - H Leemhuis
- Matricel GmbH, Kaiserstrasse 100, 52134, Herzogenrath, Germany
| | - A Herrera
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Klaumünzer
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Schreivogel
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Woloszyk
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, 78229, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - K Schmidt-Bleek
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Geissler
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - I Heschel
- Matricel GmbH, Kaiserstrasse 100, 52134, Herzogenrath, Germany
| | - G N Duda
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate an unbiased, accurate, convenient, and inexpensive means of determining when an osseous defect has healed and recovered sufficient strength to allow weight bearing. METHODS A novel image processing software algorithm was created to analyze the radiographic images and produce a metric designed to reflect the bone strength. We used a rat femoral segmental defect model that provides a range of healing responses from complete union to nonunion. Femora were examined by x-ray, micro-computed tomography and mechanical testing. Accurate simulated radiographic images at different incident x-ray beam angles were produced from the micro-computed tomography data files. RESULTS The software-generated metric (SC) showed high levels of correlation with both the mechanical strength (τMech) and the polar moment of inertia (pMOI), with the mechanical testing data having the highest association. The optimization analysis yielded optimal oblique angles θB of 125 degrees for τMech and 50 degrees for pMOI. The Pearson R values for the optimized model were 0.71 and 0.64 for τMech and pMOI, respectively. Further validation using true radiographs also demonstrated that the metric was accurate and that the simulations were realistic. CONCLUSIONS The preliminary findings suggest a very promising methodology to assess bone fracture healing using conventional radiography. With radiographs acquired at appropriate incident angles, it proved possible to accurately calculate the degree of healing and the mechanical strength of the bone. Further research is necessary to refine this approach and determine whether it translates to the human clinical setting.
Collapse
|
13
|
Schwarz C, Ott CE, Wulsten D, Brauer E, Schreivogel S, Petersen A, Hassanein K, Roewer L, Schmidt T, Willie BM, Duda GN. The Interaction of BMP2-Induced Defect Healing in Rat and Fixator Stiffness Modulates Matrix Alignment and Contraction. JBMR Plus 2018; 2:174-186. [PMID: 30283901 PMCID: PMC6124159 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Successful fracture healing requires a tight interplay between mechanical and biological cues. In vitro studies illustrated that mechanical loading modulates bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling. However, in the early phases of large bone defect regeneration in vivo, the underlying mechanisms leading to this mechanosensation remained unknown. We investigated the interaction of BMP2 stimulation and mechanical boundary conditions in a rat critical‐sized femoral defect model (5 mm) stabilized with three distinctly different external fixator stiffness. Defects were treated with 5 μg rhBMP2 loaded on an absorbable collagen sponge. Early matrix alignment was monitored by second‐harmonic generation imaging. Bony bridging of defects and successive healing was monitored by histology at day 7 and day 14 as well as in vivo microCT at days 10, 21, and 42 post‐operation. Femora harvested at day 42 were characterized mechanically assessing torsional load to failure ex vivo. At tissue level, differences between groups were visible at day 14 with manifest bone formation in the microCT. Histologically, we observed prolonged chondrogenesis upon flexible fixation, whereas osteogenesis started earlier after rigid and semirigid fixation. At later time points, there was a boost of bone tissue formation upon flexible fixation, whereas other groups already displayed signs of tissue maturation. Based on gene expression profiling, we analyzed the mechanobiological interplay. Already at day 3, these analyses revealed differences in expression pattern, specifically of genes involved in extracellular matrix formation. Gene regulation correlating with fixator stiffness was pronounced at day 7 comprising genes related to immunological processes and cellular contraction. The influence of loading on matrix contraction was further investigated and confirmed in a 3D bioreactor. Taken together, we demonstrate an early onset of mechanical conditions influencing BMP2‐induced defect healing and shed light on gene regulatory networks associated with extracellular matrix organization and contraction that seemed to directly impact healing outcomes. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Schwarz
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Claus-Eric Ott
- Institute for Medical Genetics and Human Genetics Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany.,Research Group Development and Disease Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics Berlin Germany
| | - Dag Wulsten
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Erik Brauer
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Sophie Schreivogel
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Ansgar Petersen
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Kerstin Hassanein
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Linda Roewer
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Tanja Schmidt
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| | - Bettina M Willie
- Research Center Shriners Hospitals for Children-Canada Department of Pediatric Surgery McGill University Montreal Canada
| | - Georg N Duda
- Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Meyers N, Sukopp M, Jäger R, Steiner M, Matthys R, Lapatki B, Ignatius A, Claes L. Characterization of interfragmentary motion associated with common osteosynthesis devices for rat fracture healing studies. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176735. [PMID: 28453556 PMCID: PMC5409164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Rat models are widely used in preclinical studies investigating fracture healing. The interfragmentary movement at a fracture site is critical to the course of healing and therefore demands definition in order to aptly interpret the experimental results. Estimation of this movement requires knowledge of the fixation stiffness and loading. The characteristic loading for the rat femur has been estimated, but the stiffness of fixation used in rat studies has yet to be fully described. This study aimed to determine the 6 degree of freedom stiffness of four commonly used implants, two external fixators (RatExFix and UlmExFix), a locking plate, and a locking intramedullary nail, in all degrees of freedom and estimate the interfragmentary movement under specific physiological loads. The external fixator systems allow the greatest movement. Mounted 45° anterolateral on the femur, the RatExFix allows an average of 0.88 mm of motion in each anatomic direction while the stiffer UlmExFix allows about 0.6 mm of motion. The nail is far stiffer than the other implants investigated while the plate allows movement of an intermediate magnitude. Both the nail and plate demonstrate higher axial than shear stiffness. The relatively large standard deviations in external fixator shear motion imply strong dependence on bone axis alignment across the gap and the precise orientation of the specimen relative to the loading. The smaller standard deviation associated with the nail and plate results from improved alignment and minimization of the influence of rotational positioning of the specimen due to the reduced implant eccentricity relative to the specimen axis. These results show that the interfragmentary movement is complex and varies significantly between fixation devices but establishes a baseline for the evaluation of the results of different studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholaus Meyers
- Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Center of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Matthias Sukopp
- Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Center of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Jäger
- Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Malte Steiner
- Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Center of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Lapatki
- Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Anita Ignatius
- Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Center of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Lutz Claes
- Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Center of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Glatt V, Evans CH, Tetsworth K. A Concert between Biology and Biomechanics: The Influence of the Mechanical Environment on Bone Healing. Front Physiol 2017; 7:678. [PMID: 28174539 PMCID: PMC5258734 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In order to achieve consistent and predictable fracture healing, a broad spectrum of growth factors are required to interact with one another in a highly organized response. Critically important, the mechanical environment around the fracture site will significantly influence the way bone heals, or if it heals at all. The role of the various biological factors, the timing, and spatial relationship of their introduction, and how the mechanical environment orchestrates this activity, are all crucial aspects to consider. This review will synthesize decades of work and the acquired knowledge that has been used to develop new treatments and technologies for the regeneration and healing of bone. Moreover, it will discuss the current state of the art in experimental and clinical studies concerning the application of these mechano-biological principles to enhance bone healing, by controlling the mechanical environment under which bone regeneration takes place. This includes everything from the basic principles of fracture healing, to the influence of mechanical forces on bone regeneration, and how this knowledge has influenced current clinical practice. Finally, it will examine the efforts now being made for the integration of this research together with the findings of complementary studies in biology, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine. By bringing together these diverse disciplines in a cohesive manner, the potential exists to enhance fracture healing and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaida Glatt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center San AntonioSan Antonio, TX, USA; Orthopaedic Research Centre of AustraliaBrisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Orthopaedic Research Centre of AustraliaBrisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalHerston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu F, Wells JW, Porter RM, Glatt V, Shen Z, Schinhan M, Ivkovic A, Vrahas MS, Evans CH, Ferreira E. Interaction between living bone particles and rhBMP-2 in large segmental defect healing in the rat femur. J Orthop Res 2016; 34:2137-2145. [PMID: 27037517 PMCID: PMC5367769 DOI: 10.1002/jor.23255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Orthopedic surgeons sometimes combine recombinant, human BMP-2 with autograft bone when dealing with problematic osseous fractures. Although some case reports indicate success with this off-label strategy, there have been no randomized controlled trials. Moreover, a literature search revealed only one pre-clinical study and this was in a cranial defect model. The present project examined the consequences of combining BMP-2 with particles of living bone in a rat femoral defect model. Human bone particles were recovered with a reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA). To allow acceptance of the xenograft as surrogate autograft, rats were administered an immunosuppressive cocktail that does not interfere with bone healing. Implantation of 200 µg living bone particles generated a small amount of new bone and defects did not heal. Graded amounts of BMP-2 that alone provoked no healing (1.1 µg), borderline healing (5.5 µg), or full healing (11 µg) were added to this amount of bone particles. Addition of BMP-2 (1.1 µg) increased osteogenesis, and produced bridging in 2 of 7 defects. The combination of BMP-2 (5.5 µg) and bone particles made healing more reliable and advanced the maturation of the regenerate. Bone formation with BMP-2 (11 µg) and bone particles showed improved maturation. Thus, the combination of autograft and BMP-2 may be helpful clinically under conditions where the healing response is suboptimal. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:2137-2145, 2016. Clinical significance These data support the clinical use of recombinant, human BMP-2 with autograft bone when treating large segmental osseous defects. The combination leads to greater bone formation and accelerates the maturation of the regenerate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangjun Liu
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
| | - James W. Wells
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Ryan M. Porter
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Vaida Glatt
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Zhenxin Shen
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Martina Schinhan
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alan Ivkovic
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Mark S. Vrahas
- Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher H. Evans
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland,To whom correspondence should be addressed:
| | - Elisabeth Ferreira
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue RN-115, Boston, MA 02215, USA,Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Glatt V, Bartnikowski N, Quirk N, Schuetz M, Evans C. Reverse Dynamization: Influence of Fixator Stiffness on the Mode and Efficiency of Large-Bone-Defect Healing at Different Doses of rhBMP-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98:677-87. [PMID: 27098327 PMCID: PMC4832588 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.15.01027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse dynamization is a technology for enhancing the healing of osseous defects. With use of an external fixator, the axial stiffness across the defect is initially set low and subsequently increased. The purpose of the study described in this paper was to explore the efficacy of reverse dynamization under different conditions. METHODS Rat femoral defects were stabilized with external fixators that allowed the stiffness to be modulated on living animals. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) was implanted into the defects on a collagen sponge. Following a dose-response experiment, 5.5 μg of rhBMP-2 was placed into the defect under conditions of very low (25.4-N/mm), low (114-N/mm), medium (185-N/mm), or high (254-N/mm) stiffness. Reverse dynamization was evaluated with 2 different starting stiffnesses: low (114 N/mm) and very low (25.4 N/mm). In both cases, high stiffness (254 N/mm) was imposed after 2 weeks. Healing was assessed with radiographs, micro-computed tomography (μCT), histological analysis, and mechanical testing. RESULTS In the absence of dynamization, the medium-stiffness fixators provided the best healing. Reverse dynamization starting with very low stiffness was detrimental to healing. However, with low initial stiffness, reverse dynamization considerably improved healing with minimal residual cartilage, enhanced cortication, increased mechanical strength, and smaller callus. Histological analysis suggested that, in all cases, healing provoked by rhBMP-2 occurred by endochondral ossification. CONCLUSIONS These data confirm the potential utility of reverse dynamization as a way of improving bone healing but indicate that the stiffness parameters need to be selected carefully. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Reverse dynamization may reduce the amount of rhBMP-2 needed to induce healing of recalcitrant osseous lesions, reduce the time to union, and decrease the need for prolonged external fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaida Glatt
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,E-mail address for V. Glatt:
| | - Nicole Bartnikowski
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicholas Quirk
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael Schuetz
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation (IHBI), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Christopher Evans
- Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Bone defects do not heal in 5-10% of the fractures. In order to enhance bone regeneration, drug delivery systems are needed. They comprise a scaffold with or without inducing factors and/or cells. To test these drug delivery systems before application in patients, they finally need to be tested in animal models. The choice of animal model depends on the main research question; is a functional or mechanistic evaluation needed? Furthermore, which type of bone defects are investigated: load-bearing (i.e. orthopedic) or non-load-bearing (i.e. craniomaxillofacial)? This determines the type of model and in which type of animal. The experiments need to be set-up using the 3R principle and must be reported following the ARRIVE guidelines.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mataliotakis GI, Tsouknidas A, Panteliou S, Vekris MD, Mitsionis GI, Agathopoulos S, Beris AE. A new, low cost, locking plate for the long-term fixation of a critical size bone defect in the ratfemur: in vivo performance, biomechanical and finite element analysis. Biomed Mater Eng 2015; 25:335-46. [PMID: 26407196 DOI: 10.3233/bme-151540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum fixation device for the critical size bone defect is not established yet. OBJECTIVE A reliable, feasible and low-cost fixation device for the long-term maintenance of a critical bone defect. METHODS A custom-made plate made of poly-methyl-methacrylate was used for the fixation of a critical defect of rats' femurs. The screws were securely fixing both on the plate and the bone. A three point bending test, aimed to resemble the in vivo loading pattern, a Finite Element Analysis and a 24-week in vivo monitoring of the integrity of the plate fixation were utilized. RESULTS The plate has linear and reproducible behavior. It presents no discontinuities in the stress field of the fixation. Its properties are attributed to the material and the locking principle. It fails beyond the level of magnitude of the normal ambulatory loads. In vivo, 100% of the plates maintained the bone defect intact up to 12 weeks and 85% of them at 24 weeks. CONCLUSION This novel locking plate shows optimal biomechanical performance and reliability with high long-term in vivo survival rate. It is fully implantable, inexpensive and easily manufactured. It can be qualified for long term critical defect fixation in bone regeneration studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander Tsouknidas
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sofia Panteliou
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Marios D Vekris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Simeon Agathopoulos
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Alexander E Beris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Glatt V, Matthys R. Adjustable stiffness, external fixator for the rat femur osteotomy and segmental bone defect models. J Vis Exp 2014:e51558. [PMID: 25350129 DOI: 10.3791/51558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The mechanical environment around the healing of broken bone is very important as it determines the way the fracture will heal. Over the past decade there has been great clinical interest in improving bone healing by altering the mechanical environment through the fixation stability around the lesion. One constraint of preclinical animal research in this area is the lack of experimental control over the local mechanical environment within a large segmental defect as well as osteotomies as they heal. In this paper we report on the design and use of an external fixator to study the healing of large segmental bone defects or osteotomies. This device not only allows for controlled axial stiffness on the bone lesion as it heals, but it also enables the change of stiffness during the healing process in vivo. The conducted experiments have shown that the fixators were able to maintain a 5 mm femoral defect gap in rats in vivo during unrestricted cage activity for at least 8 weeks. Likewise, we observed no distortion or infections, including pin infections during the entire healing period. These results demonstrate that our newly developed external fixator was able to achieve reproducible and standardized stabilization, and the alteration of the mechanical environment of in vivo rat large bone defects and various size osteotomies. This confirms that the external fixation device is well suited for preclinical research investigations using a rat model in the field of bone regeneration and repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaida Glatt
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology;
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Glatt V, Miller M, Ivkovic A, Liu F, Parry N, Griffin D, Vrahas M, Evans C. Improved healing of large segmental defects in the rat femur by reverse dynamization in the presence of bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94:2063-73. [PMID: 23172324 PMCID: PMC3497904 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.k.01604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large segmental defects in bone do not heal well and present clinical challenges. This study investigated modulation of the mechanical environment as a means of improving bone healing in the presence of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2. Although the influence of mechanical forces on the healing of fractures is well established, no previous studies, to our knowledge, have described their influence on the healing of large segmental defects. We hypothesized that bone-healing would be improved by initial, low-stiffness fixation of the defect, followed by high-stiffness fixation during the healing process. We call this reverse dynamization. METHODS A rat model of a critical-sized femoral defect was used. External fixators were constructed to provide different degrees of stiffness and, importantly, the ability to change stiffness during the healing process in vivo. Healing of the critical-sized defects was initiated by the implantation of 11 μg of recombinant human BMP (rhBMP)-2 on a collagen sponge. Groups of rats receiving BMP-2 were allowed to heal with low, medium, and high-stiffness fixators, as well as under conditions of reverse dynamization, in which the stiffness was changed from low to high at two weeks. Healing was assessed at eight weeks with use of radiographs, histological analysis, microcomputed tomography, dual x-ray absorptiometry, and mechanical testing. RESULTS Under constant stiffness, the low-stiffness fixator produced the best healing after eight weeks. However, reverse dynamization provided considerable improvement, resulting in a marked acceleration of the healing process by all of the criteria of this study. The histological data suggest that this was the result of intramembranous, rather than endochondral, ossification. CONCLUSIONS Reverse dynamization accelerated healing in the presence of BMP-2 in the rat femur and is worthy of further investigation as a means of improving the healing of large segmental bone defects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These data provide the basis of a novel, simple, and inexpensive way to improve the healing of critical-sized defects in long bones. Reverse dynamization may also be applicable to other circumstances in which bone-healing is problematic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaida Glatt
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue, RN-115, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail address for V. Glatt:
| | - Micah Miller
- Harvard Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Alan Ivkovic
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue, RN-115, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail address for V. Glatt:
| | - Fangjun Liu
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue, RN-115, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail address for V. Glatt:
| | - Nicola Parry
- Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Building 16, Room 825, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139
| | - Damian Griffin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warwick University Medical School, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Vrahas
- Harvard Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Christopher Evans
- Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330, Brookline Avenue, RN-115, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail address for V. Glatt:
| |
Collapse
|