1
|
Patel H, Shepherd TA. Online health information-seeking behaviours for low back pain in the United Kingdom: analysis of data from Google trends and the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2004-2019. Int Health 2024:ihae020. [PMID: 38391366 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of global disability. Timely health-seeking is crucial for early diagnosis and management of pathologies. Despite increases in internet usage, there is sparse literature regarding online health information-seeking behaviours (OHISBs) for LBP and how they correlate with the LBP disease burden in the UK. METHODS To examine OHISB trends, we conducted Prais-Winsten analyses on monthly search volume data from Google Trends in the UK between 1 January 2004 and 1 December 2019. Cross-correlation analyses assessed the relationship between annual LBP search volume and LBP morbidity and mortality data from the Global Burden of Disease study (2004-2019). RESULTS From 2004 to 2019, the trend in LBP search volume was curvilinear (β=1.27, t=5.00, p<0.001), with a slope change around the end of 2006. There was a negative linear trend (β=-0.25, t35=-1.52, p<0.14) from 2004 to 2006 and a positive linear trend (β=0.67, t108=9.17, p<0.001) from 2007 to 2019. Cross-correlations revealed positive associations between search volume and disease burden indicators for LBP such as prevalence and incidence at lags 4 and 5. CONCLUSIONS A rising trend in OHISBs for LBP was noted between 2004 and 2019. This trend positively correlates with incidence, prevalence and burden measures. These findings emphasise the importance of high-quality online resources to increase awareness around LBP, facilitating early diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harpal Patel
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seliverstova EG, Sinkin MV, Kordonsky AY, Zabolotnikova DA, Grin AA. [Outcomes of lumbar decompression microsurgery]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEIROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2023; 87:47-55. [PMID: 37325826 DOI: 10.17116/neiro20238703147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microsurgical decompression of the spinal root in patients with herniated intervertebral discs is the most common spinal surgery. However, most national and foreign studies devoted to assessment of postoperative outcomes contain no consensus on the timing of radicular pain syndrome relief after decompression and predictors of unfavorable outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine the period of radicular pain syndrome relief after microsurgical decompression and to identify clinical and neuroimaging predictors of unfavorable postoperative outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 58 patients aged 26-73 years with clinical manifestations of L5 radiculopathy following compression by L4-L5 herniated disc. We assessed neurological status, functional state (Oswestry Disability Index) and fatty infiltration of paravertebral muscles. Results. Isolated radicular pain was observed in 31% of patients, combination of pain syndrome and sensory disorders - 17%, pain syndrome and motor disorders - 24%, pain syndrome, sensory and motor disorders - 28% of patients. Duration of disease until surgery was significantly longer in women (p=0.030). Complete relief of radicular pain immediately after surgery was observed in 24 (48%) patients. Sixteen (32%) patients had persistent pain syndrome for up to 1 month. Relief of radicular pain on the first postoperative day was significantly more common in patients without motor disorders (p<0.014). The outcomes of microsurgical decompression did not depend on duration of disease (p=0.551), sex (p=0.794), age (p=0.491) and degree of fatty infiltration of paravertebral muscles (p=0.686). CONCLUSION Radicular pain regresses within 4 weeks after microsurgical decompression. The predictor of unfavorable postoperative outcomes (long-standing pain syndrome and no functional improvement) is any preoperative motor impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E G Seliverstova
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Sinkin
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | - A Yu Kordonsky
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - A A Grin
- Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong CH, Chan TCW, Wong SSC, Russo M, Cheung CW. Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain and Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Neuromodulation 2022; 26:538-551. [PMID: 36058792 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Various approaches have been developed with a view to treating the back pain component in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). Emerging evidence shows that peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) may be an efficacious therapeutic modality against axial low back pain. Hence, the aim of the review was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of PNFS, when used alone or as an adjunct to spinal cord stimulation (SCS), for managing CLBP and PSPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search for clinical studies on PNFS and PNFS + SCS used for the management of CLBP and/or PSPS was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE via Proquest, and Web of Science. RESULTS A total of 15 studies were included, of which four were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nine were observational studies, and two were case series. For patients receiving PNFS, a significant decrease in back pain intensity and analgesic consumption, together with a significant improvement in physical functioning, was observed upon implant of the permanent system. Meanwhile, the addition of PNFS to SCS in refractory cases was associated with a significant reduction in back and leg pain, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that PNFS, when used alone or in combination with SCS, appears to be effective in managing back pain. However, high-quality evidence that supports the long-term analgesic efficacy and safety is still lacking. Hence, RCTs with a larger patient population and of a longer follow-up duration are warranted.
Collapse
|
4
|
Price MR, Cupler Z, Hawk C, Bednarz EM, Walters SA, Daniels CJ. Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:26. [PMID: 35562756 PMCID: PMC9101938 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00435-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and descriptively compare medication recommendations among low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG). METHODS We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Index to Chiropractic Literature, AMED, CINAHL, and PEDro to identify CPGs that described the management of mechanical LBP in the prior five years. Two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts and potentially relevant full text were considered for eligibility. Four investigators independently applied the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument for critical appraisal. Data were extracted for pharmaceutical intervention, the strength of recommendation, and appropriateness for the duration of LBP. RESULTS 316 citations were identified, 50 full-text articles were assessed, and nine guidelines with global representation met the eligibility criteria. These CPGs addressed pharmacological treatments with or without non-pharmacological treatments. All CPGS focused on the management of acute, chronic, or unspecified duration of LBP. The mean overall AGREE II score was 89.3% (SD 3.5%). The lowest domain mean score was for applicability, 80.4% (SD 5.2%), and the highest was Scope and Purpose, 94.0% (SD 2.4%). There were ten classifications of medications described in the included CPGs: acetaminophen, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, oral corticosteroids, skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs), and atypical opioids. CONCLUSIONS Nine CPGs, included ten medication classes for the management of LBP. NSAIDs were the most frequently recommended medication for the treatment of both acute and chronic LBP as a first line pharmacological therapy. Acetaminophen and SMRs were inconsistently recommended for acute LBP. Meanwhile, with less consensus among CPGs, acetaminophen and antidepressants were proposed as second-choice therapies for chronic LBP. There was significant heterogeneity of recommendations within many medication classes, although oral corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, and antibiotics were not recommended by any CPGs for acute or chronic LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cheryl Hawk
- Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salemi MDM, Gomes VMDSA, Bezerra LMR, Melo TMDS, Alencar GGD, Montenegro IHPDM, Calado APDM, Montenegro EJN, Siqueira GRD. Effect of Dry Cupping Therapy on Pain and Functional Disability in Persistent Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2021; 14:219-230. [DOI: 10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.6.219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
6
|
Inoue G, Kaito T, Matsuyama Y, Yamashita T, Kawakami M, Takahashi K, Yoshida M, Imagama S, Ohtori S, Taguchi T, Haro H, Taneichi H, Yamazaki M, Nishida K, Yamada H, Kabata D, Shintani A, Iwasaki M, Ito M, Miyakoshi N, Murakami H, Yonenobu K, Takura T, Mochida J. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Nationwide, Multicenter Study in Japan. Spine Surg Relat Res 2021; 5:252-263. [PMID: 34435149 PMCID: PMC8356229 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability, yet there is limited high-quality evidence to identify the most suitable pharmacological therapy. The purpose of this Japanese nationwide, multicenter, prospective study was to compare the effectiveness of four representative drug therapies-acetaminophen, celecoxib, loxoprofen, and a tramadol and acetaminophen (T+A) combination drug-to establish evidence for a drug of choice for CLBP. Methods Patients with CLBP (N=471) received one of the four treatments and were evaluated, prospectively and comprehensively, once every month for six months using a visual analog scale (VAS) for LBP, the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), the EuroQol five-dimensions three-levels (EQ-5D-3L), and the Short Form-8 item health survey (SF-8). We conducted multivariable linear regression analyses of the four drugs at 1 and 6 months after drug allocation. Differences with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Patients who received acetaminophen showed a significant improvement from baseline in the mental health subscale of the JOABPEQ at one month (P=0.02) and the JOA score at six months (P<0.01). None of the other outcome measures among the four drugs differed significantly. Across groups, all outcome measures, except the mental component summary (MCS) score of the SF-8, improved equivalently, although most measurements showed no obvious cumulative effect over six months. The MCS score of the SF-8 decreased gradually over six months in all groups. Conclusions Most of the outcome measures among the treated groups were not significantly different, indicating similar treatment effects of the four drugs for CLBP. Our study indicated the limit of each outcome measure for evaluating the patient status, suggesting that a single outcome measure is insufficient to reflect treatment effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gen Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Takashi Kaito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Yukihiro Matsuyama
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Mamoru Kawakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Wakayama Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Kazuhisa Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Munehito Yoshida
- Sumiya Orthopaedic Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Shiro Imagama
- Department of Orthopaedics/Rheumatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Seiji Ohtori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Toshihiko Taguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyoonoda, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hirotaka Haro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hiroshi Taneichi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibumachi, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Masashi Yamazaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Kotaro Nishida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Faculty of Medicine, Nishihara, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hiroshi Yamada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Daijiro Kabata
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Ayumi Shintani
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Manabu Ito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Naohisa Miyakoshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hideki Murakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Kazuo Yonenobu
- Osaka Yukioka College of Health Science, Osaka, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Tomoyuki Takura
- Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Joji Mochida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Medical Alliance, Ebina General Hospital, Ebina, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takahashi H, Aoki Y, Inoue M, Saito J, Nakajima A, Sonobe M, Akatsu Y, Koyama K, Shiga Y, Inage K, Eguchi Y, Orita S, Maki S, Furuya T, Akazawa T, Abe T, Funayama T, Noguchi H, Miura K, Mataki K, Shibao Y, Eto F, Kono M, Koda M, Yamazaki M, Ohtori S, Nakagawa K. Characteristics of relief and residual low back pain after discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation: analysis using a detailed visual analog scale. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:167. [PMID: 33573617 PMCID: PMC7879619 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04015-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several authors have reported favorable results in low back pain (LBP) for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treated with discectomy. However, detailed changes over time in the characteristics and location of LBP before and after discectomy for LDH remain unclear. To clarify these points, we conducted an observational study to determine the detailed characteristics and location of LBP before and after discectomy for LDH, using a detailed visual analog scale (VAS) bilaterally. Methods We included 65 patients with LDH treated by discectomy in this study. A detailed VAS for LBP was administered with the patient under 3 different conditions: in motion, standing, and sitting. Bilateral VAS was also administered (affected versus opposite side) for LBP, lower extremity pain (LEP), and lower extremity numbness (LEN). The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to quantify clinical status. Changes over time in these VAS and ODI were investigated. Pfirrmann grading and Modic change as seen by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reviewed before and 1 year after discectomy to determine disc and endplate condition. Results Before surgery, LBP on the affected side while the patients were in motion was significantly higher than LBP while they were sitting (p = 0.025). This increased LBP on the affected side in motion was improved significantly after discectomy (p < 0.001). By contrast, the residual LBP while sitting at 1 year after surgery was significantly higher than the LBP while they were in motion or standing (p = 0.015). At 1 year following discectomy, residual LBP while sitting was significantly greater in cases showing changes in Pfirrmann grade (p = 0.002) or Modic type (p = 0.025). Conclusions Improvement of LBP on the affected side while the patient is in motion suggests that radicular LBP is improved following discectomy by nerve root decompression. Furthermore, residual LBP may reflect increased load and pressure on the disc and endplate in the sitting position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan.
| | - Yasuchika Aoki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| | - Masahiro Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| | - Junya Saito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Arata Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Masato Sonobe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Yorikazu Akatsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Keita Koyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shiga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Inage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yawara Eguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sumihisa Orita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Maki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeo Furuya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Akazawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Abe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Toru Funayama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Noguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kousei Miura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kentaro Mataki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Yosuke Shibao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Eto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kono
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Masao Koda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamazaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Seiji Ohtori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patel N, Calodney A, Kapural L, Province‐Azalde R, Lad SP, Pilitsis J, Wu C, Cherry T, Subbaroyan J, Gliner B, Caraway D. High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain: Design of a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Pract 2021; 21:171-183. [PMID: 33463027 PMCID: PMC7891432 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to provide pain relief for chronic back and leg pain due to failed back surgery syndrome. But many patients with chronic back pain have not had major back surgery or are not good candidates for surgery, and conventional medical management (CMM) provides limited relief. We have termed this condition nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP). Level 1 evidence does not yet exist showing the therapeutic benefit of SCS for NSRBP. OBJECTIVE To compare 10-kHz SCS plus CMM (10-kHz SCS + CMM) to CMM alone for treatment of NSRBP in terms of clinical and cost effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT), with subjects randomized 1:1 to either 10-kHz SCS + CMM or CMM alone. Optional crossover occurs at 6 months if treatment does not achieve ≥50% pain relief. METHODS Patients with NSRBP as defined above may be enrolled if they are ineligible for surgery based on surgical consultation. Subjects randomized to 10-kHz SCS + CMM will receive a permanent implant if sufficient pain relief is achieved in a temporary trial. Both groups will receive CMM per standard of care and will undergo assessments at baseline and at follow-ups to 12 months. Self-report outcomes include pain, disability, sleep, mental health, satisfaction, healthcare utilization, and quality of life. RESULTS Enrollment was initiated on September 10, 2018. Prespecified independent interim analysis at 40% of the enrollment target indicated the sample size was sufficient to show superiority of treatment at the primary endpoint; therefore, enrollment was stopped at 211. CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter RCT will provide valuable evidence to guide clinical decisions in NSRBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leonardo Kapural
- Carolina’s Pain InstituteWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaU.S.A.
- School of MedicineWake Forest UniversityWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaU.S.A.
| | | | | | | | - Chengyuan Wu
- Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miyakoshi N, Kudo D, Matsuyama Y, Yamashita T, Kawakami M, Takahashi K, Yoshida M, Kaito T, Imagama S, Ohtori S, Taguchi T, Haro H, Taneichi H, Yamazaki M, Inoue G, Nishida K, Yamada H, Kabata D, Shintani A, Iwasaki M, Ito M, Murakami H, Yonenobu K, Takura T, Mochida J. Impact of Consultation Length on Satisfaction in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan. Spine Surg Relat Res 2020; 4:208-215. [PMID: 32864486 PMCID: PMC7447350 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major health burden worldwide and requires patient satisfaction with treatment. Consultation length can be an important factor in patient satisfaction, but few studies have investigated the impact of consultation length on satisfaction in patients with CLBP. This study tried to elucidate the impact of consultation length on clinical outcomes in patients with CLBP. Methods This study is part of an analysis using the database of the nationwide, multicenter cohort for CLBP performed by the Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. A total of 427 patients aged 20-85 years (median age, 73.0 years; female, 58.6%) with CLBP were prospectively followed-up monthly for 6 months. Multivariable nonlinear regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of consultation length on outcome measures including subjective satisfaction score, EuroQol 5-dimension, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS) and Medical Outcome Survey short-form 8-item health survey that evaluated at the next phase. Furthermore, we assessed whether the effect of consultation length on patient satisfaction was modified by the baseline Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients (BS-POP) score for patient and physician versions. Results VAS for CLBP was the only score that correlated significantly with consultation length (P = 0.018). Satisfaction score showed a significant positive correlation with consultation length in patients with the highest baseline BS-POP scores (P < 0.2). Moreover, consultation lengths more than 7.6 min and 15.1 min offered increase of satisfaction if patients show the highest BS-POP scores on patient and physician versions, respectively. Conclusions These findings suggest that a sufficiently long consultation is an important factor for subjective satisfaction in the patients with CLBP, particularly in patients with psychological problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohisa Miyakoshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Daisuke Kudo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Yukihiro Matsuyama
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Mamoru Kawakami
- Spine Care Center, Wakayama Medical University Kihoku Hospital, Katsuragi-cho, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Kazuhisa Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Munehito Yoshida
- Sumiya Orthopaedic Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Takashi Kaito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Shiro Imagama
- Department of Orthopaedics/Rheumatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Seiji Ohtori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyoonoda, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Toshihiko Taguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamaguchi Rosai Hospital, Sanyoonoda, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hirotaka Haro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hiroshi Taneichi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibumachi, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Masashi Yamazaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Gen Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Kotaro Nishida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Faculty of Medicine, Nishihara, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hiroshi Yamada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Daijiro Kabata
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Ayumi Shintani
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Manabu Ito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Hideki Murakami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Kazuo Yonenobu
- Osaka Yukioka College of Health Science, Osaka, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Tomoyuki Takura
- Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| | - Joji Mochida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Medical Alliance, Ebina General Hospital, Ebina, Japan.,The Project Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ogon I, Takashima H, Morita T, Oshigiri T, Terashima Y, Yoshimoto M, Takebayashi T, Yamashita T. Association between Spinopelvic Alignment and Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Quantified with Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2 Mapping in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine Surg Relat Res 2020; 4:135-141. [PMID: 32405559 PMCID: PMC7217674 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) and spinopelvic malalignment are likely key structural features of spinal degeneration and chronic low back pain (CLBP), the correlation analysis has not been fully conducted. This cross-sectional quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 mapping study aimed to elucidate the association between IVDD and spinopelvic alignment in CLBP patients. Methods The subjects included 45 CLBP patients (19 men and 26 women; mean age, 63.8 ± 2.0 years; range, 41-79 years). The T2 values of the anterior annulus fibrosus (AF), the nucleus pulposus (NP), and the posterior AF were evaluated using MRI T2 mapping. We compared the possible correlations of spinopelvic parameters with T2 values of anterior AF, NP, and posterior AF using Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis. T2 values in these regions were classified into upper (L1-L2 and L2-L3), middle (L3-L4), and lower (L4-L5 and L5-S1) disc levels, and we analyzed the correlations with spinopelvic parameters. Results There were significant correlations of the anterior AF T2 values with lumbar lordosis (r = 0.51, p < 0.01), sacral slope (r = 0.43, p < 0.01), sagittal vertical axis (r = −0.40, p < 0.01), and pelvic tilt (r = −0.33, p < 0.01). In all lumbar levels, T2 values of anterior AF had significantly positive correlation with LL and significantly negative correlation with SVA. In lower disc level, T2 values of anterior AF had significantly positive correlation with SS and significantly negative correlation with PT. T2 values of NP and posterior AF had no significant correlations with spinopelvic parameters in all lumbar disc levels. Conclusions In summary, this study indicated that the anterior AF degeneration is associated with hypolordosis of the lumbar spine, anterior translation of the body trunk, and posterior inclination of the pelvis in CLBP. Anterior AF degeneration in all lumbar disc levels was associated with hypolordosis of the lumbar spine and anterior translation of the body trunk. Anterior AF degeneration in lower disc level was associated with posterior inclination of the pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izaya Ogon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Morita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Oshigiri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Terashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Yoshimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tsuneo Takebayashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopaedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Inoue G, Uchida K, Miyagi M, Saito W, Nakazawa T, Imura T, Shirasawa E, Akazawa T, Orita S, Inage K, Takaso M, Ohtori S. Occupational Characteristics of Low Back Pain Among Standing Workers in a Japanese Manufacturing Company. Workplace Health Saf 2019; 68:13-23. [PMID: 31288629 DOI: 10.1177/2165079919853839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem that adversely affects the quality of life (QOL) of workers. The etiology of LBP is considered to be multi-factorial with individual, physical, and psychosocial factors contributing to its development and persistence. Although prevention of LBP in workers in the workplace is very important, only a small number of studies have assessed the risk factors and epidemiology of LBP among Japanese factory workers who stand as part of their job. This cross-sectional study investigated the prevalence of LBP in 691 factory employees who conducted their work while standing. Health-related QOL was evaluated using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) to quantify the severity of LBP with the aim of identifying risk factors for LBP among workers who stand as part of their work in an electronics manufacturing company. We observed that the prevalence of LBP lasting for at least 48 hours within a week was 20.0% among participants, with female employees and those with a prior history of LBP having a significantly increased risk of developing LBP. The distribution of the RDQ score showed a negative regression curve among the employees, which was different from the normal distribution pattern reported previously in Japanese patients with LBP. These findings suggest that prolonged standing among factory workers poses an increased risk for LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gen Inoue
- Kitasato University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ogon I, Takebayashi T, Takashima H, Morita T, Yoshimoto M, Terashima Y, Yamashita T. Quantitative Analysis Concerning Atrophy and Fat Infiltration of the Multifidus Muscle with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine Surg Relat Res 2019; 3:163-170. [PMID: 31435570 PMCID: PMC6690088 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) enables detailed analysis of the composition of muscular fat tissues such as intramyocellular lipids (IMCLs) and extramyocellular lipids (EMCLs). The aim of this study was to analyze the EMCL and IMCL of the multifidus muscle (Mm) using MRS in chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients and identify their possible correlations with age, body mass index (BMI), low-back pain (LBP) visual analog scale (VAS) score, cross-sectional area (CSA), and fat infiltration of the Mm. METHODS Eighty patients (32 men and 48 women; mean age, 64.7 ± 1.3 years; range, 22-83 years) with VAS scores >30 mm for CLBP were included. We analyzed the gender difference and the possible correlations of age, BMI, LBP VAS, CSA, and fat infiltration of the Mm with the IMCL and EMCL of the Mm. The subjects were divided into five groups as per their age range: < 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. We also analyzed the EMCL and IMCL of the Mm as per the fat infiltration classification. RESULTS CSA was larger in the male group, EMCL was higher in the female group, and there was no significant difference in IMCL between the female and male groups. There was a significant positive correlation of EMCL with age (r = 0.33, p < 0.01) and BMI (r = 0.42, p < 0.01) and a significant negative correlation of EMCL with CSA (r = -0.61, p < 0.01). There was a significant positive correlation between IMCL and VAS (r = 0.43, p < 0.01). The EMCL and CSA of the Mm decreased with age, whereas fat infiltration increased with age. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that EMCL could indicate Mm degeneration associated with aging, and IMCL could be an effective objective indicator of CLBP. The EMCL and IMCL of the Mm may be useful prognostic markers in rehabilitation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izaya Ogon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tsuneo Takebayashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopaedic Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Morita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Yoshimoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Terashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Yamashita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Takahashi H, Aoki Y, Saito J, Nakajima A, Sonobe M, Akatsu Y, Inoue M, Taniguchi S, Yamada M, Koyama K, Yamamoto K, Shiga Y, Inage K, Orita S, Maki S, Furuya T, Koda M, Yamazaki M, Ohtori S, Nakagawa K. Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression improves low back pain while standing equally on both sides in patients with lumbar canal stenosis: analysis using a detailed visual analogue scale. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:100. [PMID: 30832643 PMCID: PMC6399850 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2475-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a less invasive technique compared to conventional laminectomy. Recently, several authors have reported favorable results of low back pain (LBP) in patients of LSS treated with ULBD. However, the detailed changes and localization of LBP before and after ULBD for LSS remain unclear. Furthermore, unsymmetrical invasion to para-spinal muscle and facet joint may result in the residual unsymmetrical symptoms. To clarify these points, we conducted an observational study and used detailed visual analog scale (VAS) scores to evaluate the characteristics and bilateral changes of LBP and lower extremity symptoms. METHODS We included 50 patients with LSS treated with ULBD. A detailed visual analogue scale (VAS; 100 mm) score of LBP in three different postural positions: motion, standing, and sitting, and bilateral VAS score (approached side versus opposite side) of LBP, lower extremity pain (LEP), and lower extremity numbness (LEN) were measured. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to quantify the clinical improvement. RESULTS Detailed LBP VAS score before surgery was 51.5 ± 32.5 in motion, 63.0 ± 30.1 while standing, and 37.8 ± 31.8 while sitting; and showed LBP while standing was significantly greater than LBP while sitting (p < 0.01). After surgery, LBP while standing was significantly improved relative to that while sitting (p < 0.05), and levels of LBP in the three postures became almost the same with ODI improvement. Bilateral VAS scores showed significant improvement equally on both sides (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS ULBD improves LBP while standing equally on both sides in patients with LCS. The improvement of LBP by the ULBD surgery suggests radicular LBP improved because of decompression surgery. Furthermore, the symmetric improvement of LBP by the ULBD surgery suggests unsymmetrical invasion of the paraspinal muscles and facet joints is unrelated to residual LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Yasuchika Aoki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| | - Junya Saito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Arata Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Masato Sonobe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Yorikazu Akatsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Masahiro Inoue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinji Taniguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Manabu Yamada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Keita Koyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Keiichiro Yamamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shiga
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Inage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sumihisa Orita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Maki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeo Furuya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masao Koda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamazaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Seiji Ohtori
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura, Chiba 285-8741 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ikemoto T, Miki K, Matsubara T, Wakao N. Psychological Treatment Strategy for Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine Surg Relat Res 2018; 3:199-206. [PMID: 31440677 PMCID: PMC6698517 DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2018-0050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies have indicated that chronic low back pain (LBP) should be approached according to its morphological basis and in consideration of biopsychosocial interventions. This study presents an updated review on available psychological assessments and interventions for patients with chronic LBP. Psychosocial factors, including fear-avoidance behavior, low mood/withdrawal, expectation of passive treatment, and negative pain beliefs, are known as risk factors for the development of chronic LBP. The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire, STarT Back Screening Tool, and Brief Scale for Psychiatric Problems in Orthopaedic Patients have been used as screening tools to assess the development of chronicity or identify possible psychiatric problems. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Injustice Experience Questionnaire are also widely used to assess psychosocial factors in patients with chronic pain. With regard to interventions, the placebo effect can be enhanced by preferable patient-clinician relationship. Reassurance to patients with non-specific pain is advised by many guidelines. Cognitive behavioral therapy focuses on restructuring the negative cognition of the patient into realistic appraisal. Mindfulness may help improve pain acceptance. Self-management strategies with appropriate goal setting and pacing theory have proved to improve long-term pain-related outcomes in patients with chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsunori Ikemoto
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
- Pain Medicine & Research Information Center, nonprofit organization, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kenji Miki
- Center for Pain, Hayaishi Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- Pain Medicine & Research Information Center, nonprofit organization, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takako Matsubara
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan
- Pain Medicine & Research Information Center, nonprofit organization, Aichi, Japan
| | - Norimitsu Wakao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan
- Spine Center, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Japan
| |
Collapse
|