Development and Achievement of Cervical Laminoplasty and Related Studies on Cervical Myelopathy

Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty Using Instrumentation of Every Level Versus Alternate Levels: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In the setting of cervical open-door laminoplasty, the question of whether or not every opened laminar level should be instrumented has not been sufficiently investigated. We postulated that the surgical outcomes of open-door laminoplasty with instrumentation of every second opened level (skip-fixation) might not be inferior to those of laminoplasty with instrumentation of every opened level (all-fixation). The purpose of the present study was to test the noninferiority of laminoplasty with skip-fixation in improving myelopathy at 2 years postoperatively compared with all-fixation. Additionally, we compared radiographic and surgical outcomes between the 2 types of procedures.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, unblinded randomized controlled trial included patients ≥60 years of age who underwent C3 to C6 open-door cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients were allocated to the skip-fixation group (n = 80) or the all-fixation group (n = 75) using a permuted block method. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included surgical data, complications, 2-year change in the JOA score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain, and radiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients (including 66 in the skip-fixation group and 64 in the all-fixation group) completed the trial at 2 years (follow-up rate, 83.9%). The difference in the JOA score at 2 years was 0.0298 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.706 to 0.766), which was within the noninferiority margin (p < 0.0001; noninferiority test). In the secondary analyses, laminoplasty with skip-fixation demonstrated a significantly shorter surgical time (p = 0.010; Mann-Whitney U test) and greater improvement in the VAS score for neck pain, NDI, and EQ-5D-5L score (p = 0.006, p = 0.047, p = 0.037, respectively; mixed-effect model) compared with all-fixation. There were no significant between-group differences in radiographic outcomes, including the hinge union rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Skip-fixation may be sufficient to achieve noninferior 2-year postoperative improvement in myelopathy. Additionally, laminoplasty with skip-fixation potentially can lead to improvements in terms of neck pain, neck disability, and quality of life compared with all-fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

True Continuous Segment of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament is Protective Against Postoperative Early Kyphosis Progression After Laminoplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a potentially catastrophic disease. Laminoplasty (LP) is a common surgical intervention, but postoperative kyphosis progression is a major complication, for which various risk factors have been identified and used in surgical decision-making. Our focus is on the ability of OPLL with specific morphological traits, designated as the true continuous segment (TCS), to stabilize alignment and prevent postoperative kyphosis after LP.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent cervical LP for OPLL treatment with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Demographic, operative, and radiographic parameters were analyzed. TCS is defined as a continuous segment of OPLL that spans the disk space more than half of the adjacent vertebral body height without crack, or OPLL segment attached to both upper and lower adjacent vertebral bodies by bridging, or obvious interbody autofusion, and is identified from preoperative computed tomography. A subgroup analysis for preoperatively lordotic patients, divided into 2 groups based on cervical alignment at the final follow-up, was conducted to identify risk factors for kyphosis progression. Difference analysis, linear regression analysis for loss of lordosis (LoL), and logistic regression analysis for kyphosis progression were used.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were identified. Among them, 78 patients with preoperatively lordotic alignment were divided into 2 groups: those who maintained lordotic alignment (n = 60) and those who progressed to kyphosis (n = 18). Regression analyses revealed a significant protective effect of TCS count against LoL and postoperative kyphosis, with a TCS count of 3 or more conclusively preventing kyphosis (sensitivity 1.000, specificity 0.283, area under the curve 0.629).

CONCLUSION

For patients with OPLL, TCS was shown to protect against the LoL after LP. Therefore, TCS should be identified and considered when planning surgical treatment for OPLL.

Trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications: 10-year results from a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1095 patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the recent 10-year trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications.

METHODS

This retrospective multi-institutional cohort study enrolled patients who underwent laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause 30-day complications. Trends were investigated and compared in the early (2008-2012) and late (2013-2017) periods.

RESULTS

Among 1095 patients (mean age, 66 years; 762 [70%] male), 542 and 553 patients were treated in the early and late periods, respectively. In the late period, patients were older at surgery (65 years vs. 68 years), there were more males (66% vs. 73%), and open-door laminoplasty (50% vs. 69%) was the preferred procedure, while %CSM (77% vs. 78%) and the perioperative JOA scores were similar to the early period. During the study period, the rate of preservation of the posterior muscle-ligament complex attached to the C2/C7-spinous process (C2, 89% vs. 93%; C7, 62% vs. 85%) increased and the number of laminoplasty levels (3.7 vs. 3.1) decreased. While the 30-day complication rate remained stable (3.9% vs. 3.4%), C5 palsy tended to decrease (2.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.059); superficial SSI increased significantly (0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.015), while the decreased incidence of deep SSI did not reach statistical significance (0.6% vs. 0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2008 to 2017, there were trends toward increasing age at surgery and surgeons' preference for refined open-door laminoplasty. The 30-day complication rate remained stable, but the C5 palsy rate halved.

Effect of T1 Slope on Disappearance of Cervical Lordosis after Posterior Cervical Double-Door Laminoplasty Based on Medical Informatics

Cervical sagittal balance plays a pivotal role in spine surgeries as it has a significant impact on the clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. Image processing techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and precision of cervical surgical techniques. This study aims to investigate the effects of T1 slope (T1s) on the disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty using medical informatics and radiographic measures. To do so, we determined and measured the loss of T1s and cervical lordosis during the postoperative follow-up period in patients with double-door posterior cervical laminoplasty. Patients (n = 40) who underwent posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty participated in this study. For all patients, the difference between the preoperative T1s (angle between the upper edge of T1 and the horizontal line) and preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis (Cobb method) was estimated, and the linear relationship between the two was statistically analyzed to observe the influence of preoperative T1s on postoperative cervical lordosis disappearance. The average preoperative T1s was 23.54°, and the average preoperative cervical lordosis angle was 8.50°. After 1-20 months of follow-up (mean = 9.53 months), the average postoperative cervical lordosis was 8.50°, and the average loss of cervical lordosis was 0.22°. Twenty cases had different degrees of lordosis angle loss after the operation, with an average loss of 9.31°. All patients were divided into groups A and B, according to a mean value of T1s = 23.54°, of which T1S > 23.54° was group A and T1s < 23.54 was group B. Cervical lordosis was quantified by the C2-C7 Cobb angle. The Cobb angle difference of cervical lordosis was measured before and after the operation, and its correlation with preoperative T1s was assessed. The preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature changes in the two groups were statistically compared, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The group with a T1s > 23.54° had greater loss of preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature. In group A, the mean preoperative cervical disability index (NDI) was 32.4 ± 3.4, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 16.5 ± 2.1. The mean preoperative VAS scores of neck pain and neck pain were 5.41 ± 1.1 and 5.55 ± 0.3, respectively, and the improvement in neck pain was -0.2%. The mean preoperative NDI in group B was 30.1 ± 2.9, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 11.5 ± 3.1. The mean VAS score for preoperative neck pain was 5.11 ± 1.2, that for postoperative neck pain was 4.18 ± 0.7, and that for neck pain improved by 18%. There was a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty is an important cause of postoperative cervical spine pain. The T1s is meaningful for predicting the loss of postoperative curvature in patients undergoing posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty. This is especially true for patients with good preoperative cervical curvature without ankylosis and kyphosis but with a wide T1s.

Indication of C2-C7 Cervical Laminoplasty with Muscle and Ligament Preservation in Patients with Kyphosis

OBJECTIVE

Cervical laminoplasty is generally not indicated in patients with kyphosis because of poor outcomes. Therefore, data on the effectiveness of posterior structure-preserving techniques in patients with kyphosis are limited. This study investigated how laminoplasty with muscle and ligament preservation can benefit patients with kyphosis via risk factor analyses of postoperative complications.

METHODS

Clinicoradiological outcomes of 106 consecutive patients, including patients with kyphosis, who had undergone C2-C7 laminoplasty in a muscle- and ligament-preserving fashion, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical outcomes, including neurological recovery, were assessed, and sagittal parameters were measured on radiographs.

RESULTS

Surgical outcomes of patients with kyphosis were comparable to outcomes of other patients except for axial pain (AP), which was significantly more frequent in patients with kyphosis. Moreover, AP was significantly associated with alignment loss (AL) >0°. Substantial local kyphosis (local kyphosis angle >10°) and greater value of range of motion (ROM) during flexion minus ROM during extension were identified as risk factors for AP and AL >0°, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated ROM during flexion minus ROM during extension cutoff value of 0.7° for predicting AL >0° in patients with kyphosis (sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 84%). Substantial local kyphosis combined with ROM during flexion minus ROM during extension >0.7° had 56% sensitivity and 84% specificity for predicting AP in patients with kyphosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with kyphosis had a significantly higher incidence of AP, C2-C7 cervical laminoplasty with muscle and ligament preservation may not be contraindicated in selected patients with kyphosis by risk stratification for AP and AL using newly identified risk factors.

Segmental cervical instability does not drive the loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT

Kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty (CLP) often leads to unfavorable neurological recovery due to insufficient indirect decompression of the spinal cord. Existing literature has described that segmental cervical instability is a contraindication for CLP because it is a potential risk factor for kyphotic changes after surgery; however, this has never been confirmed in any clinical studies.

PURPOSE

To confirm whether segmental cervical instability was an independent risk factor for postoperative kyphotic change and to examine whether segmental cervical instability led to poor neurological outcomes after CLP for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent CLP for CSM between January 2013 and January 2021 with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were enrolled.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cervical radiographic measurements including C2-C7 lordosis (C2-7 angle), cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, flexion range of motion (fROM) and extension ROM (eROM) were assessed using neutral and flexion-extension views. Segmental cervical instability was classified into anterolisthesis (AL) of ≥2 mm displacement, retrolisthesis (RL) of ≥2 mm displacement, and translational instability (TI) of ≥3 mm translational motion. The amount of C2-7 angle loss at the follow-up period compared to the preoperative measurements was defined as cervical lordosis loss (CLL). Neurological outcomes were assessed using the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA-RR).

METHODS

CLL was compared among patients with and without segmental cervical instability. Further, multiple linear regression model for CLL was built for the evaluation with adjustment of the reported risks, including cervical sagittal vertical axis, C7 slope, fROM, eROM, and patient age together with AL, RL, and TI, as independent variables. The JOA-RR was also compared between patients with and without segmental cervical instability.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients (mean age, 68.7 years; 65.9% male) were included in the analysis. AL, RL, and TI were found in 12 (8.7%), 33 (23.9%), and 16 (11.6%) patients, respectively. Comparisons among the groups showed that AL led to greater CLL; however, RL and TI did not. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that greater CLL is significantly associated with greater fROM and smaller eROM (regression coefficient [β]=0.328, 95% confidence interval: 0.178 to 0.478, p<.001; β=-0.372, 95% confidence interval: -0.591 to -0.153, p=.001, respectively). However, there were no significant statistical associations in the AL, RL, and TI. Whereas, patients with AL tended to exhibit lower JOA-RR than those without AL (37.8% vs. 52.0%, p=.108).

CONCLUSIONS

Segmental cervical instability is not the definitive driver for loss of cervical lordosis after CLP in patients with CSM; thus, is not a contraindication in and of itself. However, it is necessary to consider the indications for CLP, according to individual cases of patients with AL on baseline radiograph, which is a sign of poor neurological recovery.

Biomechanical analysis of laminectomy, laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for the kyphotic cervical spine

PURPOSE

Anterior and posterior decompressions for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy may lead to clinical improvements. However, patients with kyphotic cervical alignment have sometimes shown poor clinical outcomes with posterior decompression. There is a lack on report of mechanical analysis of the decompression procedures for kyphotic cervical alignment.

METHODS

This study employed a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the cervical spine (C2-C7) with the pre-operative kyphotic alignment (Pre-OK) model and compared the biomechanical parameters (range of motion (ROM), annular stresses, nucleus stresses, and facet contact forces) for four decompression procedures at two levels (C3-C5); laminectomy (LN), laminoplasty (LP), posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), and anterior decompression with fusion (ADF). Pure moment with compressive follower load was applied to these models.

RESULTS

PDF and ADF models' global ROM were 40% at C2-C7 less than the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. The annular and nucleus stresses decreased more than 10% at the surgery levels for ADF, and PDF, compared to the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. However, the annular stresses at the adjacent cranial level (C2-C3) of ADF were 20% higher. The nucleus stresses of the caudal adjacent level (C5-C6) of PDF were 20% higher, compared to other models. The PDF and ADF models showed a less than 70% decrease in the facet forces at the surgery levels, compared to the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that posterior decompression, such as LN or LP, increases ROM, disc stress, and facet force and thus can lead to instability. Although there is the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), PDF and ADF can stabilize the cervical spine even for kyphotic alignments.

Investigation of Titanium Mesh and Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Bone Graft in Cervical Reconstruction of Spondylosis After Sub-Total Vertebral Body Resection

The nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) bionic bone column, as a high-performance tissue repair and replacement material, introduced as a high osteo-induction ability agent. Nanomaterial has significantly taken a place in orthopedic surgery, however, the efficacy of using n-HA/PA66 is yet to be established. In this regard, this study evaluated various sagittal parameters (such as imaging measurement) and clinical efficacy in postoperative patients, whom underwent cervical reconstruction surgery due to cervical spondylosis myelopathy (CSM). In this study, total 62 CSM cases were enrolled between October 2016 to March 2020, and were hospitalized for cervical reconstruction surgery. 31 cases were grafted with titanium mesh and 31 cases were grafted with n-HA/P66. The sagittal parameters such as cervical spine lateral radiographs (C_0-2Coob, C_2-7Coob, T1S, CSVA, and TIA) were taken before operation, after operation (within 1 week), 3, 6, and 9 months after operation. In order to evaluate the clinical efficacy, we used JOA scores before, after, 3 months, 6 months and 9 months after operation. Results showed that JOA scores after the re-examination in the two groups (titanium and n-HA/P66) were significantly higher than before the operation, suggesting a well postoperative functional recovery after surgery in both groups; however, there was no significant difference in JOA score and JOA improvement index between the two groups. In regard of angles measurement (C_0-2Cobb, C_2-7Cobb, T1S, CSVA, and TIA), we observed no significant difference between these two groups before and after the operation. In addition, we showed that C_0-2Cobb and C_2-7Cobb angle had a significant positive correlation; and C_0-2Cobb angle is positively correlated with T1S, and negatively correlated with CSVA. Both titanium mesh and n-HA/PA66 can be well improved and maintained within 9 months after surgery with clinical efficacy, however, using n-HA/PA66 might have more benefits.

Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy with athetoid cerebral palsy remains unestablished. Instrumented fusion is reported to have good clinical results; however, there are no data of decompression surgery for this pathology in recent years. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty with or without posterior instrumented fusion for cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy.

METHODS

A multi-centre surgical series of patients with cervical myelopathy and athetoid cerebral palsy were enrolled in this study. All patients showed symptoms and signs suggestive of cervical myelopathy and underwent laminoplasty with or without instrumented fusion. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Barthel index (BI), and changes in the C2-C7 sagittal Cobb angle in the lateral plain radiograph were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients (16 men and 9 women; mean age, 54.4 ± 10.8 years) with cervical myelopathy and athetoid cerebral palsy who underwent surgical treatment. The mean follow-up period was 41.9 ± 35.6 months. Overall, the BI significantly improved after surgery, whereas the JOA score and C2-C7 angle did not improve postoperatively. The recovery rate of the JOA score in the laminoplasty group was significantly higher than that of the fusion group (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical laminoplasty with or without instrumented fusion for treating cervical myelopathy due to athetoid cerebral palsy is effective in improving activities of daily living. Cervical laminoplasty may be an effective and less invasive surgical method for selective patients, especially for those with small involuntary movements and no remarkable cervical kyphosis nor instability.

Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Ligaments of Cervical Spine and Laminoplasty

Cervical laminoplasty is a valuable procedure for myelopathy but it is associated with complications such as increased kyphosis. The effect of ligament damage during cervical laminoplasty on biomechanics is not well understood. We developed the C2–C7 cervical spine finite element model and simulated C3–C6 double-door laminoplasty. Three models were created (a) intact, (b) laminoplasty-pre (model assuming that the ligamentum flavum (LF) between C3–C6 was preserved during surgery), and (c) laminoplasty-res (model assuming that the LF between C3–C6 was resected during surgery). The models were subjected to physiological loading, and the range of motion (ROM), intervertebral nucleus stress, and facet contact forces were analyzed under flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The maximum change in ROM was observed under flexion motion. Under flexion, ROM in the laminoplasty-pre model increased by 100.2%, 111.8%, and 98.6% compared to the intact model at C3–C4, C4–C5, and C5–C6, respectively. The ROM in laminoplasty-res further increased by 105.2%, 116.8%, and 101.8% compared to the intact model at C3–C4, C4–C5, and C5–C6, respectively. The maximum stress in the annulus/nucleus was observed under left bending at the C4–C5 segment where an increase of 139.5% and 229.6% compared to the intact model was observed for laminoplasty-pre and laminoplasty-res model, respectively. The highest facet contact forces were observed at C4–C5 under axial rotation, where an increase of 500.7% and 500.7% was observed compared to the intact model for laminoplasty-pre and laminoplasty-res, respectively. The posterior ligaments of the cervical spine play a vital role in restoring/stabilizing the cervical spine. When laminoplasty is performed, the surgeon needs to be careful not to injure the posterior soft tissue, including ligaments such as LF.

Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches

Background

The debate between anterior or posterior approach for pathologies such as cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) have drawn heated debate but are still inconclusive.

Main body of the abstract

A narrative review was performed specifically to study the differences pertaining to OPLL and other causes of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Current evidence suggests that anterior approach is preferred for K-line (−) OPLL, K-line (+) with canal occupying ratio > 60% and DCM with pre-existing cervical kyphosis. Posterior approach is preferred for K-line (+) OPLL with canal-occupying ratio < 50–60%, and multi-level CSM. No particular advantage for either approach was observed for DCM in a lordotic cervical spine. Anterior approach is generally associated with more complications and thus needs to be weighed carefully during decision-making. The evidence is not convincing for comparing single versus multi-level involvement, and the role of patients' co-morbidity status, pre-existing osteoporosis and co-existent spinal pathologies in influencing patient outcome and surgical options. This should be a platform for future research directives.

Conclusion

From this review, evidence is still inconclusive but there are some factors to consider, and DCM and OPLL should be considered separately for decision-making. Anterior approach is considered for pre-existing cervical kyphosis in DCM, for K-line (−) regardless of canal-occupying ratio, and K-line (+) and canal-occupying ratio > 60% for OPLL patients. Posterior approach is considered for patients with multi-level pathology for DCM, and K-line (+) and canal-occupying ratio < 50–60% for OPLL.