A foundational description of Antilocapra americana pronghorn core osteohistology

Cranial bony projections ("headgear") have diverse forms and functions, such as defense, species recognition, mate selection, and thermoregulation. Most commonly, they are associated with the artiodactyl infraorder, Pecora. All pecoran headgear-antlers, horns, ossicones, and pronghorns-are osseous protrusions of the frontal or parietal bone with an integumentary covering, although there is taxonomic, developmental, and compositional variation. However, compared with other pecorans, there is a dearth of literature addressing extant antilocaprids-Antilocapra americana. This study provides a foundational osteohistological description of A. americana pronghorn cores in order to start building a framework to better understand the complex interplay among microanatomy, development, behavior, environment, and phylogenetic history of pronghorn headgear. Osteohistological analysis of adult A. americana pronghorn cores reveal the inner medullary region is composed of trabecular bone. Based on similar studies in bovids, we propose that these trabeculae may function to reduce the effects of repeated loading incurred by intraspecific combat. The deep aspect of the outer region was found to be composed of compacted coarse cancellous bone and primary bone remodeled to dense Haversian bone, in both male and female specimens, respectively, and superficially composed of highly vascularized fibrolamellar bone. The presence of fibrolamellar bone may indicate that the bone is fast-growing, and its presence at the periosteal surface suggests protracted growth of the pronghorn core beyond sexual maturity.

Formation, structure, and function of extra-skeletal bones in mammals

This review describes the formation, structure, and function of bony compartments in antlers, horns, ossicones, osteoderm and the os penis/os clitoris (collectively referred to herein as AHOOO structures) in extant mammals. AHOOOs are extra-skeletal bones that originate from subcutaneous (dermal) tissues in a wide variety of mammals, and this review elaborates on the co-development of the bone and skin in these structures. During foetal stages, primordial cells for the bony compartments arise in subcutaneous tissues. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition is assumed to play a key role in the differentiation of bone, cartilage, skin and other tissues in AHOOO structures. AHOOO ossification takes place after skeletal bone formation, and may depend on sexual maturity. Skin keratinization occurs in tandem with ossification and may be under the control of androgens. Both endochondral and intramembranous ossification participate in bony compartment formation. There is variation in gradients of density in different AHOOO structures. These gradients, which vary according to function and species, primarily reduce mechanical stress. Anchorage of AHOOOs to their surrounding tissues fortifies these structures and is accomplished by bone-bone fusion and Sharpey fibres. The presence of the integument is essential for the protection and function of the bony compartments. Three major functions can be attributed to AHOOOs: mechanical, visual, and thermoregulatory. This review provides the first extensive comparative description of the skeletal and integumentary systems of AHOOOs in a variety of mammals.

The systematics of the Cervidae: a total evidence approach

Systematic relationships of cervids have been controversial for decades. Despite new input from molecular systematics, consensus could only be partially reached. The initial, gross (sub) classification based on morphology and comparative anatomy was mostly supported by molecular data. The rich fossil record of cervids has never been extensively tested in phylogenetic frameworks concerning potential systematic relationships of fossil cervids to extant cervids. The aim of this work was to investigate the systematic relationships of extant and fossil cervids using molecular and morphological characters and make implications about their evolutionary history based on the phylogenetic reconstructions. To achieve these objectives, molecular data were compiled consisting of five nuclear markers and the complete mitochondrial genome of 50 extant and one fossil cervids. Several analyses using different data partitions, taxon sampling, partitioning schemes, and optimality criteria were undertaken. In addition, the most extensive morphological character matrix for such a broad cervid taxon sampling was compiled including 168 cranial and dental characters of 41 extant and 29 fossil cervids. The morphological and molecular data were analysed in a combined approach and other comprehensive phylogenetic reconstructions. The results showed that most Miocene cervids were more closely related to each other than to any other cervids. They were often positioned between the outgroup and all other cervids or as the sister taxon to Muntiacini. Two Miocene cervids were frequently placed within Muntiacini. Plio- and Pleistocene cervids could often be affiliated to Cervini, Odocoileini or Capreolini. The phylogenetic analyses provide new insights into the evolutionary history of cervids. Several fossil cervids could be successfully related to living representatives, confirming previously assumed affiliations based on comparative morphology and introducing new hypotheses. New systematic relationships were observed, some uncertainties persisted and resolving systematics within certain taxa remained challenging.

Antlers - Evolution, development, structure, composition, and biomechanics of an outstanding type of bone

Antlers are bony appendages of deer that undergo periodic regeneration from the top of permanent outgrowths (the pedicles) of the frontal bones. Of the "less familiar" bone types whose study was advocated by John Currey to gain a better understanding of structure-function relationships of mineralized tissues and organs, antlers were of special interest to him. The present review summarizes our current knowledge about the evolution, development, structure, mineralization, and biomechanics of antlers and how their formation is affected by environmental factors like nutrition. Furthermore, the potential role of antlers as a model in bone biology and several fields of biomedicine as well as their use as a monitoring tool in environmental studies are discussed.

Los apéndices tipo asta del ciervo primitivo Dicrocerus elegans: morfología, ciclo de crecimiento, ontogenia y dimorfismo sexual

Tanto los machos como muchas de las hembras del ciervo primitivo Dicrocerus elegans de Sansan (Mioceno Medio, Francia) poseían apéndices craneales de tipo asta que consisten en una protoasta bifurcada y ornamentada con surcos y crestas que es sustentada por un pedículo moderadamente largo. La capacidad de la protoasta de ser expulsada y regenerada es evidente a partir de los ejemplares de desmogue y también por las diferencias histológicas existentes entre la protoasta y el pedículo. El primer apéndice consiste en una vara larga, comprimida lateralmente, y con el ápice bifurcado, sin que se observe ningun límite apreciable entre la protoasta y el pedículo. En las hembras, el ángulo que forman los margenes anterior y posterior del apéndice es más agudo que en los machos (los márgenes son más paralelos en vista lateral). Tras el primer desmogue, la base de la protoasta es más amplia que la sección distal del pedículo, y se desarrolla una estructura similar a la roseta en la parte medial. Con los sucesivos desmogues, el pedículo se acorta y su sección se hace más circular, mientras que la protoasta es cada vez más grande y las ramas son más largas y parten más separadas desde la base sin interposición de un tramo basal. En las hembras, las ramas son más cortas, especialmente la anterior, y su trazado es rectilíneo en vez de curvo como en los machos. En los ejemplares seniles, las ramas son más cortas y de longitud más similar entre ellas. Es frecuente la presencia de ramas accesorias, así como irregularidades de este patrón básico. Los análisis discriminantes y de componentes principales realizados muestran una clara separación entre los morfotipos atribuidos a machos y a hembras. Existen importantes diferencias histológicas con las verdaderas astas que sugieren que el desmogue podría no haber sido anual. Se confirma que no se desarrolla hueso esponjoso y que la mineralización del protoasta progresa centrífugamente desde el centro hasta la periferia. El desmogue tiene lugar una vez que los tejidos están completamente mineralizados (muertos). A diferencia de otras protoastas, el ciclo en Dicrocerus era completo dado que están documentadas tanto la fase de muda del terciopelo, como la de exposición del hueso desnudo antes del desmogue. Dadas las similitudes en el ciclo de crecimiento, y dado que la base de la protoasta presenta parcialmente una estructura similar a la roseta, las protoastas de Dicrocerus y las astas parecen ser apéndices homólogos. Las diferencias histológicas podrían estar relacionadas con diferencias en el ciclo hormonal que regulaba su crecimiento. Diferencias que podrían guardar relación con el hecho que i) Dicrocerus vivió en ambientes tropicales, ii) las hembras también poseían protoastas. Cabe resaltar que las verdaderas astas aparecieron varios millones de años más tarde de que surgieran las protoastas y otros apéndices craneales en Ruminantia, y en coincidencia con la transición climática del Mioceno Medio.

Evolution of ruminant headgear: a review

The horns, ossicones and antlers of ruminants are familiar and diverse examples of cranial appendages. We collectively term ruminant cranial appendages 'headgear'; this includes four extant forms: antlers (in cervids), horns (in bovids), pronghorns (in pronghorn antelope) and ossicones (in giraffids). Headgear evolution remains an open and intriguing question because phylogenies (molecular and morphological), adult headgear structure and headgear development (where data are available) all suggest different pictures of ruminant evolution. We discuss what is known about the evolution of headgear, including the evidence motivating previous hypotheses of single versus multiple origins, and the implications of recent phylogenetic revisions for these hypotheses. Inclusion of developmental data is critical for progress on the question of headgear evolution, and we synthesize the scattered literature on this front. The areas most in need of attention are early development in general; pronghorn and ossicone development in particular; and histological study of fossil forms of headgear. An integrative study of headgear development and evolution may have ramifications beyond the fields of systematics and evolution. Researchers in organismal biology, as well as those in biomedical fields investigating skin, bone and regenerative medicine, may all benefit from insights produced by this line of research.