1
|
Husby T, Johannessen K, Berntsen EM, Johansen H, Giskeødegård GF, Karlberg A, Fagerli UM, Eikenes L. 18F-FACBC and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the evaluation of 3 patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: a pilot study. EJNMMI REPORTS 2024; 8:2. [PMID: 38748286 PMCID: PMC10962628 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-024-00189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This PET/MRI study compared contrast-enhanced MRI, 18F-FACBC-, and 18F-FDG-PET in the detection of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) in patients before and after high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy. Three immunocompetent PCNSL patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma received dynamic 18F-FACBC- and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI at baseline and response assessment. Lesion detection was defined by clinical evaluation of contrast enhanced T1 MRI (ce-MRI) and visual PET tracer uptake. SUVs and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (for 18F-FACBC and 18F-FDG) and time-activity curves (for 18F-FACBC) were assessed. RESULTS At baseline, seven ce-MRI detected lesions were also detected with 18F-FACBC with high SUVs and TBRs (SUVmax:mean, 4.73, TBRmax: mean, 9.32, SUVpeak: mean, 3.21, TBRpeak:mean: 6.30). High TBR values of 18F-FACBC detected lesions were attributed to low SUVbackground. Baseline 18F-FDG detected six lesions with high SUVs (SUVmax: mean, 13.88). In response scans, two lesions were detected with ce-MRI, while only one was detected with 18F-FACBC. The lesion not detected with 18F-FACBC was a small atypical MRI detected lesion, which may indicate no residual disease, as this patient was still in complete remission 12 months after initial diagnosis. No lesions were detected with 18F-FDG in the response scans. CONCLUSIONS 18F-FACBC provided high tumor contrast, outperforming 18F-FDG in lesion detection at both baseline and in response assessment. 18F-FACBC may be a useful supplement to ce-MRI in PCNSL detection and response assessment, but further studies are required to validate these findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered 15th of June 2017 (Identifier: NCT03188354, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03188354 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trine Husby
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Knut Johannessen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erik Magnus Berntsen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Håkon Johansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Guro Fanneløb Giskeødegård
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anna Karlberg
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Unn-Merete Fagerli
- Department of Oncology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kambe A, Kitao S, Ochiai R, Hosoya T, Fujii S, Kurosaki M. The utility of arterial spin labeling imaging for predicting prognosis after a recurrence of high-grade glioma in patients under bevacizumab treatment. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:175-183. [PMID: 38165552 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04550-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Currently, the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (BVZ) is used as a treatment option for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. However, BVZ restores disruptions of the blood-brain barrier, which leads to the disappearance of contrast enhancement during radiological examinations and therefore complicates evaluations of treatment efficacy. This study aimed to investigate the radio-morphological features of recurrent lesions that newly appeared under BVZ therapy, as well as the utility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging for evaluating treatment response and prognosis in HGG patients receiving BVZ. METHODS Thirty-two patients (20 males, 12 females; age range, 35-84 years) with HGG who experienced a recurrence under BVZ therapy were enrolled. We measured the relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) values of each recurrent lesion using ASL, and retrospectively investigated the correlation between rCBF values and prognosis. RESULTS The optimal rCBF cut-off value for predicting prognosis was defined as 1.67 using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The patients in the rCBF < 1.67 group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) than those in the rCBF ≥ 1.67 group (OS: 34.0 months vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.03 and PPS: 13.0 months vs. 6.0 months, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION The ASL-derived rCBF values of recurrent lesions may serve as an effective imaging biomarker for prognosis in HGG patients undergoing BVZ therapy. Low rCBF values may indicate that BVZ efficacy is sustainable, which will influence BVZ treatment strategies in HGG patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Kambe
- Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
| | - Shinichiro Kitao
- Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Division of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Ryoya Ochiai
- Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Division of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Hosoya
- Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Shinya Fujii
- Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Division of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masamichi Kurosaki
- Department of Brain and Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Veikutis V, Brazdziunas M, Keleras E, Basevicius A, Grib A, Skaudickas D, Lukosevicius S. Diagnostic Approaches to Adult-Type Diffuse Glial Tumors: Comparative Literature and Clinical Practice Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7818-7835. [PMID: 37754483 PMCID: PMC10528153 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most frequent intrinsic central nervous system tumors. The new 2021 WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors brought significant changes into the classification of gliomas, that underline the role of molecular diagnostics, with the adult-type diffuse glial tumors now identified primarily by their biomarkers rather than histology. The status of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 describes tumors at their molecular level and together with the presence or absence of 1p/19q codeletion are the most important biomarkers used for the classification of adult-type diffuse glial tumors. In recent years terminology has also changed. IDH-mutant, as previously known, is diagnostically used as astrocytoma and IDH-wildtype is used as glioblastoma. A comprehensive understanding of these tumors not only gives patients a more proper treatment and better prognosis but also highlights new difficulties. MR imaging is of the utmost importance for diagnosing and supervising the response to treatment. By monitoring the tumor on followup exams better results can be achieved. Correlations are seen between tumor diagnostic and clinical manifestation and surgical administration, followup care, oncologic treatment, and outcomes. Minimal resection site use of functional imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) have become indispensable tools in invasive treatment. Perfusion imaging provides insightful information about the vascularity of the tumor, spectroscopy shows metabolic activity, and nuclear medicine imaging displays tumor metabolism. To accommodate better treatment the differentiation of pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, or radiation necrosis is needed. In this report, we present a literature review of diagnostics of gliomas, the differences in their imaging features, and our radiology's departments accumulated experience concerning gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincentas Veikutis
- Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (M.B.); (E.K.); (A.B.); (D.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Mindaugas Brazdziunas
- Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (M.B.); (E.K.); (A.B.); (D.S.); (S.L.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Kaunas University of Applied Sciences, LT44162 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Evaldas Keleras
- Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (M.B.); (E.K.); (A.B.); (D.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Algidas Basevicius
- Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (M.B.); (E.K.); (A.B.); (D.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Andrei Grib
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, MD2004 Chisinau, Moldova;
| | - Darijus Skaudickas
- Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (M.B.); (E.K.); (A.B.); (D.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Saulius Lukosevicius
- Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; (M.B.); (E.K.); (A.B.); (D.S.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:693-700. [PMID: 37055222 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, several amino acid PET tracers have been used to optimize diagnostics in patients with brain tumors. In clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for amino acid PET in brain tumor patients are differentiation of neoplasm from nonneoplastic etiologies, delineation of tumor extent for further diagnostic and treatment planning (i.e., diagnostic biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy), differentiation of treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis after radiation or chemoradiation from tumor progression at follow-up, and assessment of response to anticancer therapy, including prediction of patient outcome. This continuing education article addresses the diagnostic value of amino acid PET for patients with either glioblastoma or metastatic brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hormuth DA, Farhat M, Christenson C, Curl B, Chad Quarles C, Chung C, Yankeelov TE. Opportunities for improving brain cancer treatment outcomes through imaging-based mathematical modeling of the delivery of radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 187:114367. [PMID: 35654212 PMCID: PMC11165420 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has become a fourth pillar in the treatment of brain tumors and, when combined with radiation therapy, may improve patient outcomes and reduce the neurotoxicity. As with other combination therapies, the identification of a treatment schedule that maximizes the synergistic effect of radiation- and immune-therapy is a fundamental challenge. Mechanism-based mathematical modeling is one promising approach to systematically investigate therapeutic combinations to maximize positive outcomes within a rigorous framework. However, successful clinical translation of model-generated combinations of treatment requires patient-specific data to allow the models to be meaningfully initialized and parameterized. Quantitative imaging techniques have emerged as a promising source of high quality, spatially and temporally resolved data for the development and validation of mathematical models. In this review, we will present approaches to personalize mechanism-based modeling frameworks with patient data, and then discuss how these techniques could be leveraged to improve brain cancer outcomes through patient-specific modeling and optimization of treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Maguy Farhat
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Chase Christenson
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Brandon Curl
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Departments of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Giorgio E, Cuocolo A, Mansi L, Sicignano M, Squame F, Gaudieri V, Giordano P, Giugliano FM, Mazzaferro MP, Negro A, Villa A, Spadafora M. Assessment of therapy response to Regorafenib by 18F-DOPA-PET/CT in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas: a case series. Clin Transl Imaging 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00416-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Bapuraj JR, Perni K, Gomez-Hassan D, Srinivasan A. Imaging Surveillance of Gliomas: Role of Basic and Advanced Imaging Techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 2021; 59:395-407. [PMID: 33926685 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
It is essential to be aware of widely accepted criteria for grading of treatment response in both high-grade and low-grade gliomas. These criteria primarily take into account responses of measurable and nonmeasurable lesions on T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and postcontrast images to determine a final category of response for the patient. The additional role that other advanced imaging techniques, such as diffusion and perfusion imaging, can play in the surveillance of these tumors is discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayapalli Rajiv Bapuraj
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UMHS, B2-A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Krishna Perni
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UMHS, B2-A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Diana Gomez-Hassan
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 4260 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UMHS, B2-A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johannessen K, Berntsen EM, Johansen H, Solheim TS, Karlberg A, Eikenes L. 18F-FACBC PET/MRI in the evaluation of human brain metastases: a case report. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2021; 5:7. [PMID: 34181107 PMCID: PMC8218039 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-021-00101-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with metastatic cancer to the brain have a poor prognosis. In clinical practice, MRI is used to delineate, diagnose and plan treatment of brain metastases. However, MRI alone is limited in detecting micro-metastases, delineating lesions and discriminating progression from pseudo-progression. Combined PET/MRI utilises superior soft tissue images from MRI and metabolic data from PET to evaluate tumour structure and function. The amino acid PET tracer 18F-FACBC has shown promising results in discriminating high- and low-grade gliomas, but there are currently no reports on its use on brain metastases. This is the first study to evaluate the use of 18F-FACBC on brain metastases. Case presentation A middle-aged female patient with brain metastases was evaluated using hybrid PET/MRI with 18F-FACBC before and after stereotactic radiotherapy, and at suspicion of recurrence. Static/dynamic PET and contrast-enhanced T1 MRI data were acquired and analysed. This case report includes the analysis of four 18F-FACBC PET/MRI examinations, investigating their utility in evaluating functional and structural metastasis properties. Conclusion Analysis showed high tumour-to-background ratios in brain metastases compared to other amino acid PET tracers, including high uptake in a very small cerebellar metastasis, suggesting that 18F-FACBC PET can provide early detection of otherwise overlooked metastases. Further studies to determine a threshold for 18F-FACBC brain tumour boundaries and explore its utility in clinical practice should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Johannessen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erik Magnus Berntsen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Håkon Johansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tora S Solheim
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anna Karlberg
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Postboks 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Strauss SB, Meng A, Ebani EJ, Chiang GC. Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021; 31:103-120. [PMID: 33220823 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Strauss
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alicia Meng
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Edward J Ebani
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Gloria C Chiang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wirsching HG, Roelcke U, Weller J, Hundsberger T, Hottinger AF, von Moos R, Caparrotti F, Conen K, Remonda L, Roth P, Ochsenbein A, Tabatabai G, Weller M. MRI and 18FET-PET Predict Survival Benefit from Bevacizumab Plus Radiotherapy in Patients with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-type Glioblastoma: Results from the Randomized ARTE Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:179-188. [PMID: 32967939 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore a prognostic or predictive role of MRI and O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18FET) PET parameters for outcome in the randomized multicenter trial ARTE that compared bevacizumab plus radiotherapy with radiotherpay alone in elderly patients with glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma ages 65 years or older were included in this post hoc analysis. Tumor volumetric and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analyses of serial MRI scans from 67 patients and serial 18FET-PET tumor-to-brain intensity ratios (TBRs) from 31 patients were analyzed blinded for treatment arm and outcome. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was done to account for established prognostic factors and treatment arm. RESULTS Overall survival benefit from bevacizumab plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone was observed for larger pretreatment MRI contrast-enhancing tumor [HR per cm3 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-0.99] and for higher ADC (HR 0.18; CI, 0.05-0.66). Higher 18FET-TBR on pretreatment PET scans was associated with inferior overall survival in both arms. Response assessed by standard MRI-based Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria was associated with overall survival in the bevacizumab plus radiotherapy arm by trend only (P = 0.09). High 18FET-TBR of noncontrast-enhancing tumor portions during bevacizumab therapy was associated with inferior overall survival on multivariate analysis (HR 5.97; CI, 1.16-30.8). CONCLUSIONS Large pretreatment contrast-enhancing tumor mass and higher ADCs identify patients who may experience a survival benefit from bevacizumab plus radiotherapy. Persistent 18FET-PET signal of no longer contrast-enhancing tumor after concomitant bevacizumab plus radiotherapy suggests pseudoresponse and predicts poor outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Georg Wirsching
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Ulrich Roelcke
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hundsberger
- Department of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Andreas F Hottinger
- Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Roger von Moos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubuenden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Caparrotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Katrin Conen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Luca Remonda
- Department of Neuroradiology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Ochsenbein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bashir A, Mathilde Jacobsen S, Mølby Henriksen O, Broholm H, Urup T, Grunnet K, Andrée Larsen V, Møller S, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Law I. Recurrent glioblastoma versus late posttreatment changes: diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography (18F-FET PET). Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:1595-1606. [PMID: 31618420 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic accuracy in previous studies of O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET in patients with suspected recurrent glioma may be influenced by prolonged dynamic PET acquisitions, heterogeneous populations, different non-standard-of-care therapies, and PET scans performed at different time points post radiotherapy. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a 20-minute 18F-FET PET scan in MRI-suspected recurrent glioblastoma 6 months after standard radiotherapy and its ability to prognosticate overall survival (OS). METHODS In total, 146 glioblastoma patients with 168 18F-FET PET scans were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with MRI responses to bevacizumab or undergoing re-irradiation or immunotherapy after 18F-FET PET were excluded. Maximum and mean tumor-to-background ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) and biological tumor volume (BTV) were recorded and verified by histopathology or clinical/radiological follow-up. Thresholds of 18F-FET parameters were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Prognostic factors were investigated in Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Surgery was performed after 104 18F-FET PET scans, while clinical/radiological surveillance was used following 64, identifying 152 glioblastoma recurrences and 16 posttreatment changes. ROC analysis yielded thresholds of 2.0 for TBRmax, 1.8 for TBRmean, and 0.55 cm3 for BTV in differentiating recurrent glioblastoma from posttreatment changes with the best performance of TBRmax (sensitivity 99%, specificity 94%; P < 0.0001) followed by BTV (sensitivity 98%, specificity 94%; P < 0.0001). Using these thresholds, 166 18F-FET PET scans were correctly classified. Increasing BTV was associated with shorter OS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION A 20-minute 18F-FET PET scan is a powerful tool to distinguish posttreatment changes from recurrent glioblastoma 6-month postradiotherapy, and predicts OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Bashir
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Otto Mølby Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Urup
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Grunnet
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Møller
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Werner JM, Lohmann P, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. Current Landscape and Emerging Fields of PET Imaging in Patients with Brain Tumors. Molecules 2020; 25:E1471. [PMID: 32213992 PMCID: PMC7146177 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of positron-emission tomography (PET) tracers used to evaluate patients with brain tumors has increased substantially over the last years. For the management of patients with brain tumors, the most important indications are the delineation of tumor extent (e.g., for planning of resection or radiotherapy), the assessment of treatment response to systemic treatment options such as alkylating chemotherapy, and the differentiation of treatment-related changes (e.g., pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis) from tumor progression. Furthermore, newer PET imaging approaches aim to address the need for noninvasive assessment of tumoral immune cell infiltration and response to immunotherapies (e.g., T-cell imaging). This review summarizes the clinical value of the landscape of tracers that have been used in recent years for the above-mentioned indications and also provides an overview of promising newer tracers for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.-M.W.); (G.R.F.)
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
| | - Gereon R. Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.-M.W.); (G.R.F.)
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (J.-M.W.); (G.R.F.)
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St., 52425 Juelich, Germany; (P.L.); (K.-J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Strauss SB, Meng A, Ebani EJ, Chiang GC. Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis. Radiol Clin North Am 2019; 57:1199-1216. [PMID: 31582045 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Strauss
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alicia Meng
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Edward J Ebani
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Gloria C Chiang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Albert NL, Tonn JC, Langen KJ. Current status of PET imaging in neuro-oncology. Neurooncol Adv 2019; 1:vdz010. [PMID: 32642650 PMCID: PMC7324052 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdz010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decades, a variety of PET tracers have been used for the evaluation of patients with brain tumors. For clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for PET imaging in patients with brain tumors are the identification of neoplastic tissue including the delineation of tumor extent for the further diagnostic and therapeutic management (ie, biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy planning), the assessment of response to a certain anticancer therapy including its (predictive) effect on the patients’ outcome and the differentiation of treatment-related changes (eg, pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis) from tumor progression at follow-up. To serve medical professionals of all disciplines involved in the diagnosis and care of patients with brain tumors, this review summarizes the value of PET imaging for the latter-mentioned 3 clinically relevant indications in patients with glioma, meningioma, and brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nowosielski M, Gorlia T, Bromberg JEC, Sahm F, Harting I, Kickingereder P, Brandes AA, Taphoorn MJB, Taal W, Domont J, Idbaih A, Campone M, Clement PM, Weller M, Fabbro M, Le Rhun E, Platten M, Golfinopoulos V, van den Bent MJ, Bendszus M, Wick W. Imaging necrosis during treatment is associated with worse survival in EORTC 26101 study. Neurology 2019; 92:e2754-e2763. [PMID: 31076534 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Imaging necrosis on MRI scans was assessed and compared to outcome measures of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26101 phase III trial that compared single-agent lomustine with lomustine plus bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma. METHODS MRI in this post hoc analysis was available for 359 patients (lomustine = 127, lomustine + bevacizumab = 232). First, imaging necrosis at baseline being formally measurable (>10 × 10 mm, given 2 slices) was assessed. At weeks 6 and 12 of treatment, it was analyzed whether this necrosis remained stable or increased >25% calculated by 2 perpendicular diameters or whether necrosis developed de novo. Univariate and multivariate associations of baseline necrosis with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were tested by log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated by Cox model. RESULTS Imaging necrosis at baseline was detected in 191 patients (53.2%) and was associated with worse OS and PFS in univariate, but not in multivariate analysis. Baseline necrosis was predictive for OS in the lomustine-only group (HR 1.46, p = 0.018). At weeks 6 and 12 of treatment, increase of baseline necrosis and de novo necrosis were strongly associated with worse OS and PFS in univariate and multivariate analysis (PFS both p < 0.001, OS univariate p < 0.001, multivariate p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION Increase of and new development of imaging necrosis during treatment is a negative prognostic factor for patients with progressive glioblastoma. These data call for consideration of integrating the assessment of imaging necrosis as a separate item into the MRI response assessment criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Nowosielski
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Thierry Gorlia
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jacoline E C Bromberg
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Felix Sahm
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Inga Harting
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philipp Kickingereder
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alba A Brandes
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Walter Taal
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Julien Domont
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mario Campone
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Paul M Clement
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Weller
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michel Fabbro
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Platten
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vassilis Golfinopoulos
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin Bendszus
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- From the University Medical Center & German Cancer Research Center (M.N., F.S., I.H., P.K., M.P., M.B., W.W.), Heidelberg, Germany; EORTC Headquarters (T.G., V.G.), Brussels, Belgium; Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (J.E.C.B., W.T., M.J.v.d.B.), Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Medical Oncology Department (A.A.B.), AUSL-Bologna-IRCCS Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy; Haaglanden Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Hague; Leiden University Medical Center (M.J.B.T.), the Netherlands; Institut Gustave Roussy (J.D.), Villejuif; Sorbonne Université (A.I.), Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest (ICO)-Centre Rene Gauducheau (M.C.), Saint-Herblain, France; Leuven Cancer Institute-KU Leuven (P.M.C.), Belgium; Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center (M.W.), University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland; Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier (M.F.); University of Lille (E.L.R.), U-1192, Inserm; CHU Lille (E.L.R.), General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service; Oscar Lambret Center (E.L.R.), Neurology, Lille, France; Department of Neurology (M.P.), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Germany; and Department of Neurology (M.N.), Medical University Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to give an update on the emerging role of PET using radiolabelled amino acids in the diagnostic workup and management of patients with cerebral gliomas and brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Numerous studies have demonstrated the potential of PET using radiolabelled amino acids for differential diagnosis of brain tumours, delineation of tumour extent for treatment planning and biopsy guidance, differentiation between tumour progression and recurrence versus treatment-related changes, and for monitoring of therapy. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group - an international effort to develop new standardized response criteria for clinical trials in brain tumours - has recently recommended the use of amino acid PET imaging for brain tumour management in addition to MRI at every stage of disease. With the introduction of F-18 labelled amino acids, a broader clinical application has become possible, but is still hampered by the lack of regulatory approval and of reimbursement in many countries. SUMMARY PET using radiolabelled amino acids is a rapidly evolving method that can significantly enhance the diagnostic value of MRI in brain tumours. Current developments suggest that this imaging technique will become an indispensable tool in neuro-oncological centres in the near future.
Collapse
|
17
|
Tamrazi B, Mankad K, Nelson M, D'Arco F. Current concepts and challenges in the radiologic assessment of brain tumors in children: part 2. Pediatr Radiol 2018; 48:1844-1860. [PMID: 30215111 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-018-4232-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Assessing tumor response is a large part of everyday clinical work in neuroradiology. However in the setting of tumor treatment, distinguishing tumor progression from treatment-related changes is difficult on conventional MRI sequences. This is made even more challenging in children where mainstay advanced imaging techniques that are often used to decipher progression versus treatment-related changes have technical limitations. In this review, we highlight the challenges in pediatric neuro-oncologic tumor assessment with discussion of pseudophenomenon including pseudoresponse and pseudoprogression. Additionally, we discuss the advanced imaging techniques often employed in neuroradiology to distinguish between pseudophenomenon and true progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benita Tamrazi
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd., MS #81, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.
| | - Kshitij Mankad
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marvin Nelson
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd., MS #81, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA
| | - Felice D'Arco
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The Emerging Role of Amino Acid PET in Neuro-Oncology. Bioengineering (Basel) 2018; 5:bioengineering5040104. [PMID: 30487391 PMCID: PMC6315339 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering5040104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a critical role in the management of the highly complex and widely diverse central nervous system (CNS) malignancies in providing an accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, response assessment, prognosis, and surveillance. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary modality for CNS disease management due to its high contrast resolution, reasonable spatial resolution, and relatively low cost and risk. However, defining tumor response to radiation treatment and chemotherapy by contrast-enhanced MRI is often difficult due to various factors that can influence contrast agent distribution and perfusion, such as edema, necrosis, vascular alterations, and inflammation, leading to pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse assessments. Amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) is emerging as the method of resolving such equivocal lesion interpretations. Amino acid radiotracers can more specifically differentiate true tumor boundaries from equivocal lesions based on their specific and active uptake by the highly metabolic cellular component of CNS tumors. These therapy-induced metabolic changes detected by amino acid PET facilitate early treatment response assessments. Integrating amino acid PET in the management of CNS malignancies to complement MRI will significantly improve early therapy response assessment, treatment planning, and clinical trial design.
Collapse
|
19
|
Galldiks N, Dunkl V, Ceccon G, Tscherpel C, Stoffels G, Law I, Henriksen OM, Muhic A, Poulsen HS, Steger J, Bauer EK, Lohmann P, Schmidt M, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Early treatment response evaluation using FET PET compared to MRI in glioblastoma patients at first progression treated with bevacizumab plus lomustine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:2377-2386. [PMID: 29982845 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4082-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this prospective study was to compare the value of both conventional MRI and O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET for response evaluation in glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab plus lomustine (BEV/LOM) at first progression. METHODS After chemoradiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, 21 IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients at first progression (age range, 33-75 years; MGMT promoter unmethylated, 81%) were treated with BEV/LOM. Contrast-enhanced MRI and FET-PET scans were performed at baseline and after 8-10 weeks. We obtained FET metabolic tumor volumes (MTV) and tumor/brain ratios. Threshold values of FET-PET parameters for treatment response were established by ROC analyses using the post-progression overall survival (OS) ≤/>9 months as the reference. MRI response assessment was based on RANO criteria. The predictive ability of FET-PET thresholds and MRI changes on early response assessment was evaluated subsequently concerning OS using uni- and multivariate survival estimates. RESULTS Early treatment response as assessed by RANO criteria was not predictive for an OS>9 months (P = 0.203), whereas relative reductions of all FET-PET parameters significantly predicted an OS>9 months (P < 0.05). The absolute MTV at follow-up enabled the most significant OS prediction (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 88%; P = 0.001). Patients with an absolute MTV below 5 ml at follow-up survived significantly longer (12 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001), whereas early responders defined by RANO criteria lived only insignificantly longer (9 vs. 6 months; P = 0.072). The absolute MTV at follow-up remained significant in the multivariate survival analysis (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS FET-PET appears to be useful for identifying responders to BEV/LOM early after treatment initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany. .,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany. .,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Veronika Dunkl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Caroline Tscherpel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Otto M Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aida Muhic
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans S Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Steger
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena K Bauer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Matthias Schmidt
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadim J Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann St. 9, 50937, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Leo-Brandt-St. 5, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nandu H, Wen PY, Huang RY. Imaging in neuro-oncology. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2018; 11:1756286418759865. [PMID: 29511385 PMCID: PMC5833173 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418759865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays several key roles in managing brain tumors, including diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment. Ongoing challenges remain as new therapies emerge and there are urgent needs to find accurate and clinically feasible methods to noninvasively evaluate brain tumors before and after treatment. This review aims to provide an overview of several advanced imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (PET), including advances in new PET agents, and summarize several key areas of their applications, including improving the accuracy of diagnosis and addressing the challenging clinical problems such as evaluation of pseudoprogression and anti-angiogenic therapy, and rising challenges of imaging with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hari Nandu
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02445, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ponisio MR, Iranpour P, Khanna G, McConathy J. PET/MRI for Clinical Pediatric Oncologic Imaging. PET/MRI IN ONCOLOGY 2018:401-432. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68517-5_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
22
|
Field KM, Phal PM, Fitt G, Goh C, Nowak AK, Rosenthal MA, Simes J, Barnes EH, Sawkins K, Cher LM, Hovey EJ, Wheeler H. The role of early magnetic resonance imaging in predicting survival on bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: Results from a prospective clinical trial (CABARET). Cancer 2017; 123:3576-3582. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M. Field
- Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- University of Melbourne; Parkville Victoria Australia
| | | | - Greg Fitt
- Austin Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Christine Goh
- Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Anna K. Nowak
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology; University of Western Australia; Crawley Western Australia Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands; Perth Western Australia
| | - Mark A. Rosenthal
- Royal Melbourne Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
- University of Melbourne; Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - John Simes
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre; University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Elizabeth H. Barnes
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre; University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Kate Sawkins
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre; University of Sydney; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | | | | | - Helen Wheeler
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Despite the fact that MRI has evolved to become the standard method for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with brain tumours, conventional MRI sequences have two key limitations: the inability to show the full extent of the tumour and the inability to differentiate neoplastic tissue from nonspecific, treatment-related changes after surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy. In the past decade, PET involving the use of radiolabelled amino acids has developed into an important diagnostic tool to overcome some of the shortcomings of conventional MRI. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group - an international effort to develop new standardized response criteria for clinical trials in brain tumours - has recommended the additional use of amino acid PET imaging for brain tumour management. Concurrently, a number of advanced MRI techniques such as magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging and perfusion weighted imaging are under clinical evaluation to target the same diagnostic problems. This Review summarizes the clinical role of amino acid PET in relation to advanced MRI techniques for differential diagnosis of brain tumours; delineation of tumour extent for treatment planning and biopsy guidance; post-treatment differentiation between tumour progression or recurrence versus treatment-related changes; and monitoring response to therapy. An outlook for future developments in PET and MRI techniques is also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology, Josef-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology and Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Nadim Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4) Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Strasse, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.,Monash Institute of Medical Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Wellington Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bevacizumab for malignant gliomas: current indications, mechanisms of action and resistance, and markers of response. Brain Tumor Pathol 2017; 34:62-77. [PMID: 28386777 DOI: 10.1007/s10014-017-0284-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an attractive target of antiangiogenic therapy in glioblastomas. Bevacizumab (Bev), a humanized anti-VEGF antibody, is associated with the improvement of progression-free survival and performance status in patients with glioblastoma. However, randomized trials uniformly suggest that these favorable clinical effects of Bev do not translate into an overall survival benefit. The mechanisms of action of Bev appear to include the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, as well as indirect effects such as the depletion of niches for glioma stem cells and stimulation of antitumor immunity. Although several molecules/pathways have been reported to mediate adaptation and resistance to Bev, including the activation of alternative pro-angiogenic pathways, the resistance mechanisms have not been fully elucidated; for example, the mechanism that reinduces tumor hypoxia remains unclarified. The identification of imaging characteristics or biomarkers predicting the response to Bev, as well as the better understanding of the mechanisms of action and resistance, is crucial to improve the overall clinical outcome and optimize individual therapy. In this article, the authors review the results of important clinical trials/studies, the current understanding of the mechanisms of action and resistance, and the knowledge of imaging characteristics and biomarkers predicting the response to Bev.
Collapse
|
25
|
Galldiks N, Law I, Pope WB, Arbizu J, Langen KJ. The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 13:386-394. [PMID: 28116231 PMCID: PMC5226808 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Routine diagnostics and treatment monitoring of brain tumors is usually based on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, the capacity of conventional MRI to differentiate tumor tissue from posttherapeutic effects following neurosurgical resection, chemoradiation, alkylating chemotherapy, radiosurgery, and/or immunotherapy may be limited. Metabolic imaging using PET can provide relevant additional information on tumor metabolism, which allows for more accurate diagnostics especially in clinically equivocal situations. This review article focuses predominantly on the amino acid PET tracers 11C-methyl-l-methionine (MET), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine (FDOPA) and summarizes investigations regarding monitoring of brain tumor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Dept. of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Dept.of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Whitney B. Pope
- Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
A previous review published in 2012 demonstrated the role of clinical PET for diagnosis and management of brain tumors using mainly FDG, amino acid tracers, and 18F-fluorothymidine. This review provides an update on clinical PET studies, most of which are motivated by prediction of prognosis and planning and monitoring of therapy in gliomas. For FDG, there has been additional evidence supporting late scanning, and combination with 13N ammonia has yielded some promising results. Large neutral amino acid tracers have found widespread applications mostly based on 18F-labeled compounds fluoroethyltyrosine and fluorodopa for targeting biopsies, therapy planning and monitoring, and as outcome markers in clinical trials. 11C-alpha-methyltryptophan (AMT) has been proposed as an alternative to 11C-methionine, and there may also be a role for cyclic amino acid tracers. 18F-fluorothymidine has shown strengths for tumor grading and as an outcome marker. Studies using 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) and 68Ga-labeled compounds are promising but have not yet clearly defined their role. Studies on radiotherapy planning have explored the use of large neutral amino acid tracers to improve the delineation of tumor volume for irradiation and the use of hypoxia markers, in particular 18F-fluoromisonidazole. Many studies employed the combination of PET with advanced multimodal MR imaging methods, mostly demonstrating complementarity and some potential benefits of hybrid PET/MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Herholz
- The University of Manchester, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, England, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Holzgreve A, Brendel M, Gu S, Carlsen J, Mille E, Böning G, Mastrella G, Unterrainer M, Gildehaus FJ, Rominger A, Bartenstein P, Kälin RE, Glass R, Albert NL. Monitoring of Tumor Growth with [(18)F]-FET PET in a Mouse Model of Glioblastoma: SUV Measurements and Volumetric Approaches. Front Neurosci 2016; 10:260. [PMID: 27378835 PMCID: PMC4906232 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Noninvasive tumor growth monitoring is of particular interest for the evaluation of experimental glioma therapies. This study investigates the potential of positron emission tomography (PET) using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]-FET) to determine tumor growth in a murine glioblastoma (GBM) model—including estimation of the biological tumor volume (BTV), which has hitherto not been investigated in the pre-clinical context. Fifteen GBM-bearing mice (GL261) and six control mice (shams) were investigated during 5 weeks by PET followed by autoradiographic and histological assessments. [18F]-FET PET was quantitated by calculation of maximum and mean standardized uptake values within a universal volume-of-interest (VOI) corrected for healthy background (SUVmax/BG, SUVmean/BG). A partial volume effect correction (PVEC) was applied in comparison to ex vivo autoradiography. BTVs obtained by predefined thresholds for VOI definition (SUV/BG: ≥1.4; ≥1.6; ≥1.8; ≥2.0) were compared to the histologically assessed tumor volume (n = 8). Finally, individual “optimal” thresholds for BTV definition best reflecting the histology were determined. In GBM mice SUVmax/BG and SUVmean/BG clearly increased with time, however at high inter-animal variability. No relevant [18F]-FET uptake was observed in shams. PVEC recovered signal loss of SUVmean/BG assessment in relation to autoradiography. BTV as estimated by predefined thresholds strongly differed from the histology volume. Strikingly, the individual “optimal” thresholds for BTV assessment correlated highly with SUVmax/BG (ρ = 0.97, p < 0.001), allowing SUVmax/BG-based calculation of individual thresholds. The method was verified by a subsequent validation study (n = 15, ρ = 0.88, p < 0.01) leading to extensively higher agreement of BTV estimations when compared to histology in contrast to predefined thresholds. [18F]-FET PET with standard SUV measurements is feasible for glioma imaging in the GBM mouse model. PVEC is beneficial to improve accuracy of [18F]-FET PET SUV quantification. Although SUVmax/BG and SUVmean/BG increase during the disease course, these parameters do not correlate with the respective tumor size. For the first time, we propose a histology-verified method allowing appropriate individual BTV estimation for volumetric in vivo monitoring of tumor growth with [18F]-FET PET and show that standardized thresholds from routine clinical practice seem to be inappropriate for BTV estimation in the GBM mouse model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of MunichMunich, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of MunichMunich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Song Gu
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Janette Carlsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Erik Mille
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Guido Böning
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Giorgia Mastrella
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Franz J Gildehaus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Roland E Kälin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Glass
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Miyake K, Ogawa D, Okada M, Hatakeyama T, Tamiya T. Usefulness of positron emission tomographic studies for gliomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2016; 56:396-408. [PMID: 27250577 PMCID: PMC4945598 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive positron emission tomography (PET) enables the measurement of metabolic and molecular processes with high sensitivity. PET plays a significant role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of brain tumors and predominantly detects brain tumors by detecting their metabolic alterations, including energy metabolism, amino acids, nucleic acids, and hypoxia. Glucose metabolic tracers are related to tumor cell energy and exhibit good sensitivity but poor specificity for malignant tumors. Amino acid metabolic tracers provide a better delineation of tumors and cellular proliferation. Nucleic acid metabolic tracers have a high sensitivity for malignant tumors and cellular proliferation. Hypoxic metabolism tracers are useful for detecting resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, PET imaging techniques are useful for detecting biopsy-targeting points, deciding on tumor resection, radiotherapy planning, monitoring therapy, and distinguishing brain tumor recurrence or progression from post-radiotherapy effects. However, it is not possible to use only one PET tracer to make all clinical decisions because each tracer has both advantages and disadvantages. This study focuses on the different kinds of PET tracers and summarizes their recent applications in patients with gliomas. Combinational uses of PET tracers are expected to contribute to differential diagnosis, prognosis, treatment targeting, and monitoring therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Miyake
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Stegmayr C, Schöneck M, Oliveira D, Willuweit A, Filss C, Galldiks N, Shah NJ, Coenen HH, Langen KJ. Reproducibility of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine uptake kinetics in brain tumors and influence of corticoid therapy: an experimental study in rat gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 43:1115-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3274-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
30
|
Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Pope WB. From the clinician's point of view - What is the status quo of positron emission tomography in patients with brain tumors? Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:1434-44. [PMID: 26130743 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/31/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The most common type of primary brain tumor is malignant glioma. Despite intensive therapeutic efforts, the majority of these neoplasms remain incurable. Imaging techniques are important for initial tumor detection and comprise indispensable tools for monitoring treatment. Structural imaging using contrast-enhanced MRI is the method of choice for brain tumor surveillance, but its capacity to differentiate tumor from nonspecific tissue changes can be limited, particularly with posttreatment gliomas. Metabolic imaging using positron-emission-tomography (PET) can provide relevant additional information, which may allow for better assessment of tumor burden in ambiguous cases. Specific PET tracers have addressed numerous molecular targets in the last decades, but only a few have achieved relevance in routine clinical practice. At present, PET studies using radiolabeled amino acids appear to improve clinical decision-making as these tracers can offer better delineation of tumor extent as well as improved targeting of biopsies, surgical interventions, and radiation therapy. Amino acid PET imaging also appears useful for distinguishing glioma recurrence or progression from postradiation treatment effects, particularly radiation necrosis and pseudoprogression, and provides information on histological grading and patient prognosis. In the last decade, the tracers O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[(18)F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) have been increasingly used for these indications. This review article focuses on these tracers and summarizes their recent applications for patients with brain tumors. Current uses of tracers other than FET and FDOPA are also discussed, and the most frequent practical questions regarding PET brain tumor imaging are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich, Germany (N.G., K.-J.L.); Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Germany (K.-J.L.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA., Los Angeles (W.B.P.)
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich, Germany (N.G., K.-J.L.); Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Germany (K.-J.L.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA., Los Angeles (W.B.P.)
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Jülich, Germany (N.G., K.-J.L.); Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (N.G.); Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Germany (K.-J.L.); Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA., Los Angeles (W.B.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Juhász C, Dwivedi S, Kamson DO, Michelhaugh SK, Mittal S. Comparison of amino acid positron emission tomographic radiotracers for molecular imaging of primary and metastatic brain tumors. Mol Imaging 2015; 13. [PMID: 24825818 DOI: 10.2310/7290.2014.00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is an imaging technology that can detect and characterize tumors based on their molecular and biochemical properties, such as altered glucose, nucleoside, or amino acid metabolism. PET plays a significant role in the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of various cancers, including brain tumors. In this article, we compare uptake mechanisms and the clinical performance of the amino acid PET radiotracers (l-[methyl-11C]methionine [MET], 18F-fluoroethyl-tyrosine [FET], 18F-fluoro-l-dihydroxy-phenylalanine [FDOPA], and 11C-alpha-methyl-l-tryptophan [AMT]) most commonly used for brain tumor imaging. First, we discuss and compare the mechanisms of tumoral transport and accumulation, the basis of differential performance of these radioligands in clinical studies. Then we summarize studies that provided direct comparisons among these amino acid tracers and to clinically used 2-deoxy-2[18F]fluoro-d-glucose [FDG] PET imaging. We also discuss how tracer kinetic analysis can enhance the clinical information obtained from amino acid PET images. We discuss both similarities and differences in potential clinical value for each radioligand. This comparative review can guide which radiotracer to favor in future clinical trials aimed at defining the role of these molecular imaging modalities in the clinical management of brain tumor patients.
Collapse
|