Basic studies on visible light-curing resin as a denture base--Part 4: Its strength in the repair of fractured parts of heat-curing denture base resin

Microtensile bond strength of resin-resin interfaces after 24-hour and 2-month soaking

Evaluate the bond strengths of denture base-repair materials to minimize recurrent failure rate. Use microtensile bond strength (muTBS) testing to evaluate the interfacial bonding strength of 6 commercial denture repair materials after 24-hour and 12-month soaking. Blocks of poly(methyl metacrylate) (PMMA) and Triad were fabricated, fractured, and repaired. Twenty bars (1 x 1 x 30 mm) per group were sectioned from each block parallel to the long axis and approximately 90 degrees to the resin-resin repair interface and stored before muTBS testing in a servo-hydraulic tensile-testing machine. Intact PMMA and Triad bars that had been soaked for 24 hours and 12 months were tested for reference. The 24-hour repair strengths for PMMA ranged from 52% to 84% of original strength. Soaking for 12 months resulted in a 20% decrease in strength for the PMMA control. The 12-month repair strengths for PMMA ranged from 43% to 74% of the 12-month soaked material strength. Triad repair tested 35% of original strength after soaking for 24 hours. Permabond (cyanoacrylate) to PMMA tested 47% of original strength after 24 hours of soaking and 26% of the 12-month soaked material strength. Permabond to Triad tested 30% of original strength after 24 hours of soaking. Permabond and Triad showed a 100% adhesive mode of failure. All other materials tested exhibited either an adhesive mode of failure at the denture base-repair-material interface or a complex cohesive failure within the repair-material interface. The muTBS approach can be used to analyze the resin-resin interface of repaired acrylics. The relatively small standard deviations make the muTBS approach attractive. In this study, muTBS was used to evaluate the repair strength of 6 denture repair materials enabling clinicians to make clinical judgments regarding the strongest repair bond available.

Fracture force, deflection at fracture, and toughness of repaired denture resin subjected to microwave polymerization or reinforced with wire or glass fiber

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The ultimate goal of denture repair is to restore the denture's original strength and avoid further fracture. The best materials and methods for repair have not been conclusively determined.

PURPOSE

This study investigated the fracture force, deflection at fracture, and toughness of a heat-polymerized denture base material repaired with heat-polymerized resin, autopolymerized resin alone, or autopolymerized resin with glass fiber or wire reinforcement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight groups were evaluated: 6 with autopolymerized resin repairs, 1 with heat-polymerized resin repairs, and a control group of intact specimens. The 6 autopolymerized resin groups included 1 group with no reinforcement, 1 treated with microwave irradiation after polymerization, 2 with monolayer or multilayer glass fiber reinforcement, and 2 with round or braided wire reinforcement. Each group consisted of 12 specimens. The experimental specimens were cut, and a 3-mm butt joint gap was repaired as indicated by the group assignment. A 3-point bending test was used to determine the fracture force, deflection at fracture, and toughness of the specimens. The data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post-hoc test (alpha=.05).

RESULTS

The fracture force (28.4 to 73.4 N), deflection (1.6 to 3.8 mm), and toughness (0.02 to 0.13 J) values for all repaired groups were significantly lower than those for the control group (82.79 N, 4.4 mm, and 0.16 J, respectively), with one exception: the mean fracture force of specimens reinforced with round wire (102.9 N). Failure mode was always adhesive, meaning that fracture occurred between the denture base and repair resin.

CONCLUSION

Among the repair treatments tested, the most effective was microwave-irradiated, autopolymerized resin reinforced with round wire or monolayer glass fiber ribbon.

Acrylic resin denture repair with adhesive resin and metal wires: effects on strength parameters

The fracture of acrylic resin dentures is an unresolved problem in prosthodontics. In this study one brand of denture base acrylic resin was used to make specimens in the form of strips and maxillary denture bases. The specimens were cut and repaired with one type of an autopolymerizing adhesive resin and metal wires. The mechanical properties of the repaired specimens were measured, and the efficiency of each method was evaluated. The statistical results of this study revealed that geometric characteristics of a maxillary denture combined with the shape and pretreatment of reinforcement were the controlling factors for the overall mechanical behavior. Furthermore this study revealed that data with clinical significance can only be obtained by testing specimens similar to the original items used in dental practice.

Repair of denture base resins using visible light-cured materials

Specimens of denture base resins were repaired with autopolymerizing and visible light-cured (VLC) repair materials. Flexural properties were measured and revealed that the highest strength and toughness of joint are obtained by the autopolymerizing repair material and are independent on the base resin. The VLC materials exhibited a lower repair strength (22% to 58%) and toughness (9% to 33%) than those of the autopolymerizing resin. No interaction between base and repair material was detected, which was attributed to poor adhesive bonding created at the interface.

Adaptation of acrylic resin dentures as influenced by the activation mode of polymerization

With the advent of newer methods of activation of the polymerization of denture base resins, there is a need to compare dentures constructed using various modes of activation such as heat, light, and microwave energy. This study compares the dimensional accuracy of a conventional heat-activated acrylic resin poly (methyl methacrylate) with a new pour resin, a visible light-activated resin, and microwave-activated acrylic resin, all polymerized for denture bases. All groups showed a processing contraction; the poorest-fitting group was processed in a brass flask and a water bath at 70-100 C, using a heat-activated resin (Acron); the relatively new light-activated resin (Triad) produced dentures of intermediate accuracy, as did Acupac 20, when either heat- or microwave-activated. The two best-fitting groups were prepared from an autopolymerizing resin (PERform) and the microwave-activated resin (Acron MC).