Reducing the Stigma of Diabetes in Medical Education: A Contact-Based Educational Approach

Impacts of Diabetes Stigma on Acute Health Care Utilization Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between diabetes stigma, patient activation, and acute health care use. It was predicted that greater diabetes stigma would be associated with lower patient activation and greater likelihood of acute health care utilization.MethodsPrimary data were collected cross-sectionally using a web-based panel of US adults with type 2 diabetes (N = 371). Participants were screened for eligibility by providing informed consent, reporting a type 2 diabetes diagnosis from a health care provider, and passing an end-of-survey check to corroborate participants' initial self-reported diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale, with its 3 subscales, assessed blame and judgment, perceived discrimination, and self-stigma associated with having diabetes. Patient activation was measured using the Patient Activation Measure. The frequency of diabetes-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations during the prior 12 months measured acute health care use.ResultsSelf-stigma was significantly associated with lower levels of patient activation, and blame and judgment and perceived discrimination were not. Perceived discrimination was also significantly associated with greater risk of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and self-stigma and blame and judgment were not associated with either indicator of acute health care use.ConclusionsResults suggest self-stigma is associated with lower levels of patient activation and that perceived discrimination is related to increased use of acute health care. Future research may examine avenues to reduce diabetes stigma and its effect on patient activation and acute health care utilization.

Diabetic foot ulcer care integrating Salmon White's model: the critical role of community nurses

Patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) often face significant challenges in receiving optimal care in the community. This condition can lead to serious complications if not addressed, including infection, delayed healing, amputation, decreased quality of life, financial burdens and mobility impairments. Community nurses are uniquely positioned to support DFU management, as they serve as the first point of contact for individuals managing this condition. They offer essential education on foot care and emphasise the importance of early intervention. In this context, using Salmon White's model can empower nurses to prevent these complexities effectively. However, there is a lack of nursing review studies in the literature that integrate Salmon White's model with a focus on community care for DFUs. This article, based on three case studies, proposes a paradigm of DFU care that community nurses can adopt to provide comprehensive support within the community.

Balancing the Scale: Weighing In on Communicating About Diabetes and Weight

Biases and stigma related to health, diabetes, and obesity are an obstacle to providing respectful, empathetic, holistic care. Recognizing explicit and implicit biases and understanding the detrimental consequences is key to the stigma that exists, and the impact that it has on patient care is key. Health care professionals have a responsibility to communicate with patients with respect, empathy, and honesty, ensuring the person is at the center of care. There are a multitude of ways to positively change the landscape in which biases exist.

Physicians' stigmatizing attitudes about individuals with type 2 diabetes: Associations with communication practices and perceived barriers to care

AIMS

The stigma of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has received growing attention in the healthcare setting. However, there has been almost no research examining how healthcare professional biases about diabetes relate to patient care. This cross-sectional study examined how physicians' self-reported biases, stereotypes, and attributions about diabetes and obesity were related to their patient care practices.

METHODS

Physicians treating T2D, specializing in internal medicine or endocrinology (n=205), completed a battery of online questionnaires.

RESULTS

Physicians who attributed poor patient compliance as the primary barrier to provision of diabetes care had worse perceptions of individuals with T2D and were less likely to use person-centered approaches with their patients. Physicians' stigmatizing attitudes about T2D were associated with less use of person-first language, while more positive perceptions of individuals with T2D were associated with greater use of motivational interviewing. Weight-related stigma was associated with less use of person-centered approaches to care and less confidence in their ability to provide care.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings reiterate the associations between weight stigma and poorer physician communication and suggest that similar patterns occur in the provision of care for individuals with T2D. Physicians who treat T2D may benefit from stigma reduction interventions for both diabetes and weight-related stigmas.

Reducing health-related stigma in adults living with chronic non-communicable diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the components of interventions that are aimed at reducing stigma among adults living with chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs). A secondary objective was to assess the effectiveness of interventions in reducing health-related stigma.

METHODS

A search was conducted on OVID MEDLINE, OVID APA PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central in July 2023 for articles that report the development and/or testing of health-related stigma-reduction interventions among adults with NCDs. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. Intervention components were narratively synthesized. The DerSimonian-Laird random effect model was used to pool standardized mean differences across studies.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were included in the review. Interventions addressed individual level (intrapersonal and interpersonal) and structural level stigmas. Components of intrapersonal interventions included cognitive exercises, stress reduction, promoting self-efficacy, developing communication skills, and listening to other patients' stories. Contact-based interventions were used in many interpersonal interventions. Structural interventions included mass media campaigns and training for healthcare professionals. Pooled intervention effects indicated a significant reduction in stigma levels post-intervention for both persons with NCD (Hedge's g = -1.13; 95% CI: 1.66, -0.60, I2 = 85%, N = 6 studies) and those without (Hedge's g = -2.45, 95% -4.84, -0.06; I2 = 97%, N = 2 studies).

CONCLUSION

Interventions to address NCD stigma, although multifaceted, are often not multilevel. Future studies are needed to design and test multilevel NCD stigma-reduction interventions.

Bringing an end to diabetes stigma and discrimination: an international consensus statement on evidence and recommendations

People with diabetes often encounter stigma (ie, negative social judgments, stereotypes, prejudice), which can adversely affect emotional, mental, and physical health; self-care, access to optimal health care; and social and professional opportunities. To accelerate an end to diabetes stigma and discrimination, an international multidisciplinary expert panel (n=51 members, from 18 countries) conducted rapid reviews and participated in a three-round Delphi survey process. We achieved consensus on 25 statements of evidence and 24 statements of recommendations. The consensus is that diabetes stigma is driven primarily by blame, perceptions of burden or sickness, invisibility, and fear or disgust. On average, four in five adults with diabetes experience diabetes stigma and one in five experience discrimination (ie, unfair and prejudicial treatment) due to diabetes, such as in health care, education, and employment. Diabetes stigma and discrimination are harmful, unacceptable, unethical, and counterproductive. Collective leadership is needed to proactively challenge, and bring an end to, diabetes stigma and discrimination. Consequently, we achieved unanimous consensus on a pledge to end diabetes stigma and discrimination.

Stigma perception and determinants among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iraq

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Stigma is a sign of social disgrace occurring within public relations, and it is linked with many health conditions including diabetes. Stigma could worsen the disease course, reduce treatment adherence, and affect the quality of life of diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of diabetic stigma among patients with type 2 DM.

METHODS

In this analytic cross-sectional study, data collection was performed from June 1, 2022, until November 1, 2022, et al.-Najaf City, Iraq. A consecutive sample of 429 patients with type 2 DM was interviewed using the Arabic version of the type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2), which is a validated tool. The total diabetic stigma score, treated differently score, self-stigma score, and blame and judgment score were estimated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the sample was 56.6 years, and males represented 61.8% of them. The total diabetic stigma score mean was 51.72. The question regarding people's judgment of food choices showed the highest rate (53%) among patients. Problematic stigma appeared in 24.71% of DM patients. Lower educational level, being divorced or widow, age above 50 years, being unemployed or housewife, and lower income showed significantly higher diabetic stigma scores.

CONCLUSION

One-quarter of type 2 DM patients showed problematic stigma. The mean diabetic stigma score was significantly higher among patients with lower education, divorced or widow status, older age, unemployment or housewife category, and low-income status.

Measuring public attitudes towards people living with chronic diseases in Arabic-speaking populations: adaptation and development of the Social Stigma Scale of Chronic Diseases (SSS-CD)

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of the population in Arab countries suffer from chronic diseases. According to the statistics by the Global Health Estimates, chronic illnesses contribute by 71% to total deaths in the Arab region. While chronic illnesses have been demonstrated to carry high levels of social stigma, it is only recently that little research attention has been given to this topic in the Arab world. It is well-established that the social stigma construct is culturally-dependent. Therefore, the lack of an Arabic measure highlighted the urgent need for developing a culturally adapted and valid instrument to assess social stigma toward people living with chronic diseases. In this study, we aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Arabic translation, adaptation and development of "the Social Stigma Scale of Chronic Diseases" (SSS-CD).

METHOD

Fifteen items derived from the literature and assessing social stigma towards chronic diseases have been administered to 570 Arabic-speaking adults from the Lebanese general population (aged 24.59 ± 6.75years; 68.6% women). Items were translated into Arabic using a forward-backward translation method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using a principal-axis EFA on the first split-half subsample, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested on the model extracted from the EFA on the second split-half subsample, were conducted to examine the construct validity of the SSS-CD. Fit indices were deemed adequate if the normed model chi-square (χ²/df) ≤ 3, the Steiger-Lind root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) ≤ 0.08, the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) and the comparative fit index (CFI) ≥ 0.90.

RESULTS

Findings revealed that the 10-item SSS-CD has a unidimensional factor structure, with the following fit indices: χ²/df = 92.95/34 = 2.73, RMSEA = 0.077 (90% CI 0.059, 0.096), SRMR = 0.062, CFI = 0.939, TLI = 0.919. A good internal consistency was demonstrated by a McDonald's omega value of 0.73 for the total score. Findings also supported invariance across gender, with men exhibiting higher levels of social stigma attached to chronic diseases than women. All three dimensions of stigmatization (social, psychological and evolutionary stigmatization) were positively correlated with SSS-CD scores (Social self-interest [r = .40; p < .001], Evolutionary self-interest [r = .37; p < .001], Psychological self-interest [r = .42; p < .001]), demonstrating relatively strong convergent validity.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the SSS-CD has robust psychometric qualities. We thus preliminarily suggest that the scale is valid, reliable and suitable for use among Arabic-speaking people from the general population to measure public attitudes towards people living with chronic diseases. Providing this psychometrically sound measure will hopefully enable to foster research in this area in order to draw a clear overview of the prevalence and characteristics of social stigma attached to chronic diseases in Arabic-speaking communities. However, given that this was the first study to examine the psychometric properties of the SSS-CD, the present findings and conclusions should be considered tentative pending future cross-national validation studies.

The influence of weight on psychosocial well-being in diabetes

BACKGROUND

Individuals with diabetes experience a wide variety of psychosocial responses to their illness due, in part, to the nature of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Variation in patient weight may play a central role in these differences, yet its influence on psychosocial variation is largely unknown. The current study investigates the relationship between patients' perceived weight status and aspects of psychosocial well-being among individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

Individuals who were diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were assessed via an online survey from the Diabetes, Identity, Attributions, and Health Study. Participants were categorized into a lower v. higher weight status group based on their self-reported perceived weight. Analyses of covariance were conducted to assess differences in measures of disease onset blame, diabetes stigma, and identity concerns among diabetes type and perceived weight status. Covariates included in our models were gender, age, education, and time since diagnosis. Bonferroni correction was used for post-hoc tests to assess any significant interactions found in our models.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that weight moderates multiple psychosocial outcomes pertinent to illness experience. Those with T2D and lower weight blamed themselves less for their disease onset, while those with higher weight felt blamed more for their disease onset by others, regardless of diabetes type. Individuals with T1D and higher weight were more frequently and more concerned about being mistaken for having the other disease type (i.e., T2D) compared to those with lower weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight is a key influence on the psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes, but it operates differently in type 1 versus type 2 diabetes. By further examining the unique interaction between disease type and weight status we may be able to improve psychological well-being among affected individuals of all sizes.

Measuring grit, self-efficacy, curiosity, and intolerance of uncertainty in first-generation college and first-generation osteopathic medical students

BACKGROUND

Medical school is a challenging time, with many medical students reporting symptoms of burnout, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and psychological distress during pre-clinical and clinical years. First-generation college and first-generation medical students may be two groups of students at increased risk for the negative psychosocial effects of medical school. Importantly, grit, self-efficacy, and curiosity are protective factors against the negative psychosocial effects of medical school, whereas intolerance of uncertainty is a risk factor. Thus, research examining the associations among grit, self-efficacy, curiosity, and intolerance of uncertainty in first-generation college and first-generation medical students is needed.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive study to assess medical students' grit, self-efficacy, curiosity, and intolerance of uncertainty. We conducted independent samples t-tests and regression analyses using SPSS statistical software version 28.0.

RESULTS

A total of 420 students participated in the study for a response rate of 51.5%. One-fifth of participants (21.2%, n = 89) identified as first-generation students, 38.6% (n = 162) participants reporting having a physician relative, and 16.2% (n = 68) reported having a physician parent. Grit, self-efficacy, and curiosity and exploration scores did not differ by first-generation college status, physician relative(s), or physician parent(s). However, total intolerance of uncertainty scores differed by physician relative(s) (t= -2.830, p = 0.005), but not by first-generation status, or physician parent(s). Further, subscale scores for prospective intolerance of uncertainty differed by physician relative(s) (t= -3.379, p = 0.001) and physician parent(s) (t= -2.077, p = 0.038), but not by first-generation college student status. In the hierarchical regression models, first-generation college student status and first-generation medical student status were not predictive of grit, self-efficacy, curiosity and exploration, or intolerance of uncertainty, although statistical trends were observed with students with physician relative(s) predicting lower intolerance of uncertainty scores (B= -2.171, t= -2138, p = 0.033) and lower prospective intolerance of uncertainty (B= -1.666, t= -2.689, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that first-generation college students did not differ by grit, self-efficacy, curiosity, or intolerance of uncertainty. Similarly, first-generation medical students did not differ by grit, self-efficacy, or curiosity; however, first-generation medical students showed statistical trends in higher total intolerance of uncertainty and higher prospective intolerance of uncertainty. Additional research needs to confirm these findings in first-generation medical students.

Using Contact-Based Education to Reduce Diabetes-Related Stigma Among Medical Residents in a Military Health System

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare provider-related stigma against patients with diabetes is associated with worse doctor-patient relationships and patient self-care. A previous feasibility study showed benefit in using a contact-based education approach to improve attitudes of medical students toward patients with diabetes. We hosted a panel of people who had personal experience with diabetes. The panel was attended by internal medicine residents in a military health system. We compared diabetes-related stigma among the residents before and after the panel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Panel participants included a Black male active duty service member diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a Black veteran with type 2 diabetes, and a White woman with two sons who have type 1 diabetes. During a 1 hour panel for medicine residents, these panelists were asked to discuss their personal experiences with diabetes, common misconceptions regarding diabetes, and what they wish healthcare providers understood about diabetes. The validated Diabetes Attitude Scale-3 (DAS-3) questionnaire, which assesses diabetes-related attitudes based on a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree = 5, strongly disagree = 1), was given to the trainees before and after the panel. The survey also collected demographic information and contained short-answer questions about personal experiences with diabetes and diabetes-related stigma. Survey responses were linked with identifier questions to preserve anonymity.

RESULTS

Twelve participants completed both the pre- and post-panel survey. Seven were female (58%), 10 were White (83%), and eight were from suburban communities (67%). Mean scores improved for all five DAS-3 subscales scores, with the largest improvement in the Patient Autonomy subscale (4.12 to 4.4), followed by Psychosocial Impact of Diabetes Mellitus (4.34 to 4.56), Seriousness of Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (4.27 to 4.44), Need for Special Training (4.52 to 4.68), and Value of Tight Control (4.07 to 4.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Contact-based education can be considered as a tool for reducing diabetes-related stigma among medical trainees.

Onge J, Ford H, Taldone S. Integrating Persons With Lived Experience in Opioid Use Disorder Education: A Small Group Exercise and Patient Panel

OBJECTIVES

Based on increasing drug overdose deaths and a shortage of healthcare professionals trained in the management of opioid use disorder (OUD), it is imperative to improve health professional education in addiction medicine. This small group learning exercise and patient panel was designed to provide first year medical students with insights into the lives of people with OUD-through a lens of harm reduction-and to connect biomedical knowledge to the core values and professional themes of their doctoring courses.

METHODS

Facilitators were assigned to each small group of 8 students for the harm reduction-centered Long and Winding Road small group case exercise. This was followed by a patient panel of 2 to 3 persons with OUD. The small group was conducted with first-year medical students as a virtual training session due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Students completed pre- and post-session surveys about agreement with statements pertaining to the learning objectives.

RESULTS

The small group and patient panel were delivered over 8 sessions and attended by all first-year medical students (N = 201). Survey response rate was 67%. Post-session, there was significantly greater agreement with knowledge on all learning objectives compared to pre-session. Two relevant multiple-choice questions on the medical student final exam were answered correctly by 79% and 98% of students.

CONCLUSION

Centering on people with lived experience, we completed small groups and patient panels to introduce concepts of OUD and harm reduction to first year medical students. Pre- and post-session surveys showed short-term achievement of the learning objectives.

Diabetes-Related Stigma among Adolescents: Emotional Self-Efficacy, Aggressiveness, Self-Care, and Barriers to Treatment Compliance

Recent studies indicate that over 60% of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience diabetes-related stigma (DRS). DRS may affect their emotional self-efficacy (ESE), behavior, and self-care while increasing barriers to comply with physical and mental health treatment. We examined differences in ESE, aggressiveness, self-care, and barriers to comply with treatment among 51 T1D youths (aged 12-17 years) with (G1; n = 35) and without (G2; n = 16) any history of DRS enrolled in a depression treatment study. Using a MANOVA followed by individual univariate analyses, we compared groups in continuous variables, and to conduct comparisons in categorical variables, we used Chi-square tests. MANOVA results were significant, F(5, 45) = 3.20, p = .015. G1 reported lower scores than G2 on ESE, perception of the potential therapeutic impact of group sessions, and family support to comply with insulin treatment. G1 caregivers perceived their offspring as more aggressive and affected by barriers to treatment adherence than their counterparts. G1 members showed a higher proportion of cases with body mass index problems, non-compliance with their meal plan, and multiple episodes of hypoglycemia. Compared to G2, a lower percentage of adolescents in G1 met the recommended glycemic control levels. Our findings support the relationship of DRS with a lower ESE, more behavioral problems, difficulties in food-related self-care, and more barriers to comply with the treatment of diabetes and emotional problems in adolescents. They suggest the need for large-scale education to prevent DRS and psychosocial interventions to combat its impact in adolescents.

Using contact-based education to destigmatize opioid use disorder among medical students

All first- and second-year (i.e., pre-clinical) medical students at a large, Midwestern medical school with three campuses were invited to participate in a two-arm, parallel educational study comparing the efficacy of two types of curricular interventions. Students at the main campus attended the modified contact-based education panel or the didactic lecture in person, while students at the two distance campuses attended the modified contact-based education or lecture remotely using the University's videoconferencing system. Impact: A total of 109 students participated in the study (average age 24.2 years (SD = 2.6), 64.2% female, 79.8% white, 56.0% second-year students, 67.9% attended on main campus, lecture = 52 participants, modified contact-based = 57 participants). Baseline responses were similar across groups. Following the session, participants in both interventions rated drug abuse (percent increase = 21.2%, p < .001) and prescription drug diversion (percent increase = 7.6%, p = .004) as more serious problems. Participants from both interventions expressed increased confidence in caring for patients with OUD (percent increase = 45.5%, p < .001) and increased interest in pursuing MAT training (percent increase = 21.5%, p = .04). Both curricular interventions were equally effective at reducing OUD stigma with a significant 8.2% decrease in total stigma scores and a large effect size (p < .001, η_p² = .34). Lastly, participants with lower post-assessment OUD stigma scores were more likely to indicate that they would pursue additional training to provide MAT (p = .02). Lessons learned: Exposure to opioid-specific education with a focus on MAT and recovery, regardless of education type, positively affected opioid-related postgraduate intentions and reduced OUD stigma. Notably, these findings suggest that there are multiple efficacious techniques to reduce OUD stigma during preclinical training.