The role of autoregulation of the hepatic glucose production in man. Response to a physiologic decrement in plasma glucose

Modulation and lack of cross-talk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and Suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 in insulin and growth hormone signaling in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 5 and suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-3 in the cross-talk between growth hormone and insulin (INS) signaling in fat cells.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Fully differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were exposed to INS, growth hormone (GH), or both of these growth factors, and the activation of STAT5 proteins and mitogen-activated protein kinase was examined using phospho-specific antibodies. The induction of SOCS-3 mRNA was assessed by Northern blot analysis. INS-stimulated glucose transport was also measured.

RESULTS

We observed that GH, not INS, induced STAT5 activation in adipocytes in a manner that was independent of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation or new protein synthesis. GH strongly induced SOCS-3 mRNA expression, whereas INS had a much less potent effect on SOCS-3 mRNA expression. Because SOCS-3 has been implicated in the attenuation of GH and INS signaling, we examined the cross-talk between these signaling pathways. GH pretreatment of adipocytes inhibited GH signaling. Similarly, INS pretreatment inhibited INS signaling. However, INS did not block the GH-induced activation of STAT5, and GH did not block the INS induction of ERK activity or of increased glucose uptake. We observed that neither new protein synthesis nor activation of ERKs 1 and 2 were required for the inhibition of GH signaling.

DISCUSSION

These results demonstrate that blocking the induction of the SOCS-3 protein has no effect on the attenuation of GH signaling and support recent studies suggesting that SOCS proteins have additional functions. In addition, these studies demonstrate that GH-induced SOCS-3 expression is insufficient to inhibit INS-induced glucose uptake in adipocytes.

Hypoglycaemia in Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Achieving target glycaemic goals while avoiding hypoglycaemia is a major challenge in the management of elderly patients with diabetes mellitus. Repeated episodes of hypoglycaemia may cause extreme emotional distress in such patients, even when the episodes are relatively mild. Moreover, evidence is mounting that hypoglycaemia among elderly patients is a very real and costly health concern. The strongest predictors of severe hypoglycaemia in the elderly are advanced age, recent hospitalisation and polypharmacy. Education is the key to preventing recurrent or severe hypoglycaemia. As such, there should be close coordination of care between the patient, physician and all other healthcare providers in identifying the cause of hypoglycaemia in elderly patients, and appropriate steps should be taken to prevent further episodes. Prevention of hypoglycaemia has the potential to improve psychosocial aspects of elderly health, including enhanced quality of life, boosted confidence, improved compliance with antidiabetic regimens and avoidance of long-term complications. Since the elderly population represents a unique group, it is imperative to focus on the aetiologies that are exclusive to this group. Advanced age itself is a risk factor for hypoglycaemia, and elderly patients with comorbidities are at increased risk when they are hospitalised. Elderly patients with diabetes often have compromised renal function, which intereferes with drug elimination and thus predisposes them to prolonged life-threatening hypoglycaemia. In addition, patients on five or more prescription medications are prone to drug-associated hypoglycaemia. Although sulfonylurea-associated hypoglycaemia is common, drugs such as ACE inhibitors and nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists can also predispose patients to hypoglycaemia. Greater attention should be paid to the avoidance of hypgolycaemia in nursing home residents. Recurrent hypoglycaemia in elderly patients is not only detrimental to achieving good glycaemic control, it is also a substantial economic burden. Once the causes of hypoglycaemia have been identified, it is crucial to formulate and institute a prevention plan. Firstly, global evaluation of the patient should be carried out to identify possible predisposing risk factors. Secondly, target glycaemic goals should be tailored to each patient. Thirdly, selection of antidiabetic agents should be judicious, then patients and family should be educated to recognise and treat hypoglycaemia. Finally, coordinated care should be provided to identify, treat and prevent hypoglycaemia.

Hormone-independent activation of EGP during hypoglycemia is absent in type 1 diabetes mellitus

It has been suggested that insulin-induced suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) may be counteracted independently of increased epinephrine (Epi) or glucagon during moderate hypoglycemia. We examined EGP in nondiabetic (n = 12) and type 1 diabetic (DM1, n = 8) subjects while lowering plasma glucose (PG) from clamped euglycemia (5.6 mmol/l) to values just above the threshold for Epi and glucagon secretion (3.9 mmol/l). Individualized doses of insulin were infused to maintain euglycemia during pancreatic clamps by use of somatostatin (250 microg/h), glucagon (1.0 ng. kg(-1). min(-1)), and growth hormone (GH) (3.0 ng. kg(-1). min(-1)) infusions without need for exogenous glucose. Then, to achieve physiological hyperinsulinemia (HIns), insulin infusions were fixed at 20% above the rate previously determined for each subject. In nondiabetic subjects, PG was reduced from 5.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/l to 3.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l in the experimental protocol, whereas it was held constant (5. 3 +/- 0.2 mmol/l and 5.5 mmol/l) in control studies. In the latter, EGP (estimated by [3-(3)H]glucose) fell to values 40% of basal (P < 0.01). In contrast, in the experimental protocol, at comparable HIns but with PG at 3.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, EGP was activated to values about twofold higher than in the euglycemic control (P < 0.01). In DM1 subjects, EGP failed to increase in the face of HIns and PG = 3.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l. The decrease from basal EGP in DM1 subjects (4.4 +/- 1.0 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1)) was nearly twofold that in nondiabetics (2.5 +/- 0.8 micromol. kg(-1). min(-1), P < 0.02). When PG was lowered further to frank hypoglycemia ( approximately 3.1 mmol/l), the failure of EGP activation in DM1 subjects was even more profound but associated with a 50% lower plasma Epi response (P < 0. 02) compared with nondiabetics. We conclude that glucagon- or epinephrine-independent activation of EGP may accompany other counterregulatory mechanisms during mild hypoglycemia in humans and is impaired or absent in DM1.

Glucose counterregulation: prevention and correction of hypoglycemia in humans

The prevention or correction of hypoglycemia in humans is the result of both dissipation of insulin and activation of glucose counterregulatory (glucose-raising) systems. Whereas insulin is the dominant glucose-lowering factor, there are redundant glucose counterregulatory factors. Furthermore, there is a hierarchy among the glucoregulatory factors. The first defense against a decrement in plasma glucose is decreased insulin secretion; this occurs with glucose decrements within the physiological range at a glycemic threshold of 4.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l. However, biological glucose recovery from hypoglycemia can occur despite mild (approximately 2-fold) peripheral hyperinsulinemia and can occur in the absence of portal hypoinsulinemia. Thus additional (glucose counterregulatory) factors must be involved. Critical glucose counterregulatory systems are activated at glycemic thresholds of approximately 3.8 mmol/l (the level at which brain glucose uptake is first measurably reduced), well above the thresholds for symptoms of hypoglycemia (approximately 3.0 mmol/l) and those for cognitive dysfunction resulting from neuroglycopenia (approximately 2.7 mmol/l). Among the glucose counterregulatory factors, glucagon plays a primary role. Indeed, it may be that hypoglycemia does not occur if the secretion and actions of both glucagon and insulin, among the glucoregulatory hormones, are normal. Epinephrine is not normally critical, but it becomes critical to glucose counterregulation when glucagon is deficient. Because hypoglycemia develops or progresses when both glucagon and epinephrine are deficient and insulin is present, these three hormones stand high in the hierarchy of redundant glucoregulatory factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hypoinsulinemia is not critical to glucose recovery from hypoglycemia in humans

To test the hypothesis that glucose recovery from hypoglycemia can occur in the absence of decrements in insulin below baseline, we studied nine normal humans on six occasions. In a control study, saline was infused. In five experimental studies, insulin (0.6 mU.kg-1.min-1) was infused from 0 to 80 min, to produce hypoglycemia (approximately 3.3 mM). Then, from 80 to 180 min, insulin was not infused or was infused in four different doses 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mU.kg-1.min-1), and glucose recovery was assessed. In the recovery periods, approximately fourfold peripheral with approximately twofold portal insulin elevations prevented glucose recovery (glucose = 3.6 +/- 0.1 mM, counter-regulatory hormone levels elevated throughout). However, biological glucose recovery, documented by increments to 4.3 +/- 0.1 mM and decrements in all counterregulatory hormones (glucagon, epinephrine, growth hormone, and cortisol) to control levels, occurred despite nearly twofold peripheral hyperinsulinemia (54 +/- 4 vs. 32 +/- 4 pM, P less than 0.01) in the absence of portal hypoinsulinemia (58 +/- 4 vs. 68 +/- 8 pM). Thus we conclude that, although dissipation of insulin normally plays an important role in the correction of hypoglycemia, biological glucose recovery from hypoglycemia to glucose levels more than sufficient to disengage glucose counterregulatory systems and well above those required to produce symptoms of hypoglycemia can occur in the absence of decrements in portal insulin below baseline and despite mild peripheral hyperinsulinemia.

Decreased hepatic glucagon responses in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus

The effect of glucagon infusion on hepatic glucose production during euglycaemia was evaluated in seven Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients and in ten control subjects. In the diabetic subjects normoglycaemia was maintained during the night preceding the study by a variable intravenous insulin and glucose infusion. During the study endogenous insulin secretion was suppressed by somatostatin (450 micrograms/h) and replaced by insulin infusion (0.15 mU.kg-1.min-1). 3H-glucose was infused for isotopic determination of glucose turnover. Plasma glucose was clamped at 5 mmol/l for 2 h 30 min and glucagon (1.5 ng.kg-1.min-1) was then infused for the following 3 h. Hepatic glucose production and glucose utilisation were measured during the first, second and third hour of the glucagon infusion. Basal hepatic glucose production (just prior to glucagon infusion) was similar in diabetic (1.2 +/- 0.3 mg.kg-1.min-1) and control (1.6 +/- 0.1 mg.kg-1.min-1) subjects. In diabetic patients hepatic glucose production rose slowly to 2.1 +/- 0.5 mg.kg-1.min-1 during the first hours of glucagon infusion and stabilized at this level (2.4 +/- 0.5 mg.kg-1.min-1) in the third hour. In control subjects hepatic glucose production increased sharply to higher levels than in the diabetic subjects (3.4 +/- 0.3 mg.kg-1.min-1) during the first and second hour of glucagon infusion (p less than 0.05) and then gradually fell (2.9 +/- 0.4 mg.kg-1.min-1) during the third hour. In conclusion, when stimulated with glucagon at a physiologic plasma concentration diabetic patients had 1) an overall reduced hepatic glucose production response and 2) an abnormal sluggish response pattern.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Insulin, glucagon, and catecholamines in prevention of hypoglycemia during fasting

To dissect the mechanisms of the prevention of hypoglycemia during fasting, eight normal humans were studied after overnight and 3-day fasts. Prolonged fasting resulted in the expected decrements in base-line glucose production and plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide and increments in plasma glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, growth hormone, and cortisol. After the overnight and 3-day fasts, insulin restoration (0.2 mU.kg-1.min-1) alone resulted in transient decrements in glucose production and only 15 and 19% decrements in plasma glucose, respectively. Selective glucagon deficiency (somatostatin infusion with insulin and growth hormone replacement) resulted in transient decrements in glucose production and additional 24 and 29% decrements in plasma glucose, respectively. Notably, plasma glucose plateaued under both fasting conditions in both instances. Combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade (phentolamine and propranolol infusions) alone had no effect on glycemia under either fasting condition. However, progressive hypoglycemia developed during adrenergic blockade coupled with glucagon deficiency after the overnight fast (85 +/- 2 to 48 +/- 4 mg/dl, P less than 0.001) and after the 3-day fast (65 +/- 2 to 33 +/- 1 mg/dl, P less than 0.001). These were the result of both decrements in glucose production and increments in glucose clearance. Thus we conclude that during fasting 1) the prevention of hypoglycemia is not due solely to decreased insulin secretion. 2) Glucagon plays a primary counterregulatory role. Sympathochromaffin catecholamines are not normally critical but compensate and become critical when glucagon is deficient. Adrenomedullary epinephrine is probably the relevant catecholamine. 3) Other hormones, neurotransmitters, or substrate effects may, or may not, be involved; if they are, they appear to stand low in the hierarchy of glucoregulatory factors.

Glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems are higher than the threshold for symptoms

To define glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems and for symptoms of hypoglycemia, we measured these during stepped reductions in the plasma glucose concentration (in six 10-mg/dl hourly steps) from 90 to 40 mg/dl under hyperinsulinemic clamp conditions, and compared these with the same measurements during euglycemia (90 mg/dl) under the same conditions over 6 h in 10 normal humans. Arterialized venous plasma glucose concentrations were used to calculate glycemic thresholds of 69 +/- 2 mg/dl for epinephrine secretion, 68 +/- 2 mg/dl for glucagon secretion, 66 +/- 2 mg/dl for growth hormone secretion, and 58 +/- 3 mg/dl for cortisol secretion. In contrast, the glycemic threshold for symptoms was 53 +/- 2 mg/dl, significantly lower than the thresholds for epinephrine (P less than 0.001), glucagon (P less than 0.001), and growth hormone (P less than 0.01) secretion. Thus, the glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory systems during decrements in plasma glucose lie within or just below the physiologic plasma glucose concentration range, and are substantially higher than the threshold for hypoglycemic symptoms in normal humans. These findings provide further support for the concept that glucose counterregulatory systems are involved in the prevention, as well as the correction, of hypoglycemia.