Long-term intensive therapy of IDDM patients with clinically overt autonomic neuropathy: effects on hypoglycemia awareness and counterregulation

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy does not impede improvement in hypoglycaemia awareness in adults: Sub-study results from the HypoCOMPaSS trial

AIMS

Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). IAH can be reversed through meticulous avoidance of hypoglycaemia. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) has been proposed as an underlying mechanism contributing to IAH; however, data are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) on IAH reversibility inT1DM.

METHODS

Participants with T1DM and IAH (Gold score ≥4) recruited to the HypoCOMPaSS (24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled) trial were included. All underwent screening for cardiac autonomic function testing at baseline and received comparable education and support aimed at avoiding hypoglycaemia and improving hypoglycaemia awareness. Definite CAN was defined as the presence of ≥2 abnormal cardiac reflex tests. Participants were grouped according to their CAN status, and changes in Gold score were compared.

RESULTS

Eighty-three participants (52 women [62.7%]) were included with mean age (SD) of 48 (12) years and mean HbA1c of 66 (13) mmol/mol (8.2 [3.3] %). The mean duration of T1DM was 29 (13) years. The prevalence of CAN was low with 5/83 (6%) participants having definite autonomic neuropathy with 11 (13%) classified with possible/early neuropathy. All participants, regardless of the autonomic function status, showed a mean improvement in Gold score of ≥1 (mean improvement -1.2 [95% CI -0.8, -1.6]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

IAH can be improved in people with T1DM, and a long duration of disease, with and without cardiac autonomic dysfunction. These data suggest that CAN is not a prime driver for modulating IAH reversibility.

The role of gastric emptying in glucose homeostasis and defense against hypoglycemia: Innocent bystander or partner in crime?

Maintenance of plasma glucose (PG) homeostasis is due to a complex network system. Even a minor fall in PG activates multiple neuroendocrine actions promoting hormonal, metabolic and behavioral responses, which prevent and ultimately recover hypoglycemia, primarily neuroglycopenia. Among these responses, gastric emptying (GE) plays an important role by coordinated mechanisms which regulate transit and absorption of nutrients through the small intestine. A bidirectional relationship between GE and glycemia has been established: GE may explain the up to 30-40 % variance in glycemic response following a carbohydrate-rich meal. In addition, acute and chronic hyperglycemia induce deceleration of GE after meals. Hypoglycemia accelerates GE, but its role in counterregulation has been poorly investigated. The role of GE as a counterregulatory mechanism has been confirmed in pathophysiological conditions, such as gastroparesis or following recurrent hypoglycemia. Therefore, it could represent an "ancestral" mechanism, highly conservative and effective in all individuals, conditions and clinical contexts. Recent guidelines recommend GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) either as the first injectable therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus or in combination with insulin. Considering the potential impact on GE, it would be important to study subjects on GLP-1 RAs during hypoglycemia, to establish whether a possible deceleration of GE impairs glucose counterregulation.

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy is associated with increased glycemic variability driven by hyperglycemia rather than hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes

AIM

Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) has been suggested to be associated with hypoglycemia and impaired hypoglycemia unawareness. We have assessed the relationship between CAN and extensive measures of glucose variability (GV) in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Participants with diabetes underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to obtain measures of GV and the extent of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia and cardiovascular autonomic reflex testing.

RESULTS

Of the 40 participants (20 T1DM and 20 T2DM) (aged 40.70±13.73 years, diabetes duration 14.43±7.35 years, HbA1c 8.85±1.70%), 23 (57.5%) had CAN. Despite a lower coefficient of variation (CV) (31.26±11.87 vs. 40.33±11.03, P=0.018), they had a higher CONGA (8.42±2.58 vs. 6.68±1.88, P=0.024) with a lower median LBGI (1.60 (range: 0.20-3.50) vs. 4.90 (range: 3.20-7.40), P=0.010) and percentage median time spent in hypoglycemia (4 (range:4-13) vs. 1 (range:0-5), P=0.008), compared to those without CAN. The percentage GRADE_Euglycemia (3.30±2.78 vs. 5.69±3.09, P=0.017) and GRADE_Hypoglycemia (0.3 (range: 0 - 3.80) vs. 1.8 (range: 0.9-6.5), P=0.036) were significantly lower, while the percentage median GRADE_{Hyperglycemia} (95.45 (range:93-98) vs. 91.6 (82.8-95.1), P=0.013) was significantly higher in participants with CAN compared to those without CAN.

CONCLUSION

CAN was associated with increased glycemic variability with less time in euglycemia attributed to a greater time in hyperglycemia but not hypoglycemia.

Protective and risk factors of impaired awareness of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the PR-IAH study

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with mortality and morbidity, especially when awareness of hypoglycemia is impaired. This study aimed to investigate the protective and risk factors for impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) in adults with T1D.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study enrolled 288 adults with T1D (mean age, 50.4 ± 14.6 years; male, 36.5%; diabetes duration, 17.6 ± 11.2 years; mean HbA1c level, 7.7 ± 0.9%), who were divided into IAH and non-IAH (control) groups. A survey was conducted to assess hypoglycemia awareness using the Clarke questionnaire. Diabetes histories, complications, fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes distress, hypoglycemia problem-solving abilities, and treatment data were collected.

RESULTS

The prevalence of IAH was 19.1%. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was associated with an increased risk of IAH (odds ratio [OR] 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-5.91; P = 0.014), while treatment with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and hypoglycemia problem-solving perception scores were associated with a decreased risk of IAH (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.22-0.96; P = 0.030; and OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78; P = 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in continuous glucose monitoring use between the groups.

CONCLUSION

We identified protective factors in addition to risk factors for IAH in adults with T1D. This information may help manage problematic hypoglycemia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center: UMIN000039475). Approval date 13 February 2020.

Glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia in people with and without type 1 diabetes: a systematic review

AIM/HYPOTHESIS

The physiological counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia is reported to be organised hierarchically, with hormone responses usually preceding symptomatic awareness and autonomic responses preceding neuroglycopenic responses. To compare thresholds for activation of these responses more accurately between people with or without type 1 diabetes, we performed a systematic review on stepped hyperinsulinaemic-hypoglycaemic glucose clamps.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was conducted. We included articles published between 1980 and 2018 involving hyperinsulinaemic stepped hypoglycaemic glucose clamps among people with or without type 1 diabetes. Key exclusion criteria were as follows: data were previously published; other patient population; a clamp not the primary intervention; and an inadequate clamp description. Glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and/or symptom responses to hypoglycaemia were estimated and compared using generalised logrank test for interval-censored data, where the intervals were either extracted directly or calculated from the data provided by the study. A glycaemic threshold was defined as the glucose level at which the response exceeded the 95% CI of the mean baseline measurement or euglycaemic control clamp. Because of the use of interval-censored data, we described thresholds using median and IQR.

RESULTS

A total of 63 articles were included, whereof 37 papers included participants with type 1 diabetes (n=559; 67.4% male sex, aged 32.7±10.2 years, BMI 23.8±1.4 kg/m²) and 51 papers included participants without diabetes (n=733; 72.4% male sex, aged 31.1±9.2 years, BMI 23.6±1.1 kg/m²). Compared with non-diabetic control individuals, in people with type 1 diabetes, the median (IQR) glycaemic thresholds for adrenaline (3.8 [3.2-4.2] vs 3.4 [2.8-3.9 mmol/l]), noradrenaline (3.2 [3.2-3.7] vs 3.0 [2.8-3.1] mmol/l), cortisol (3.5 [3.2-4.2]) vs 2.8 [2.8-3.4] mmol/l) and growth hormone (3.8 [3.3-3.8] vs. 3.2 [3.0-3.3] mmol/l) all occurred at lower glucose levels in people with diabetes than in those without diabetes (all p≤0.01). Similarly, although both autonomic (median [IQR] 3.4 [3.4-3.4] vs 3.0 [2.8-3.4] mmol/l) and neuroglycopenic (median [IQR] 3.4 [2.8-N/A] vs 3.0 [3.0-3.1] mmol/l) symptom responses were elicited at lower glucose levels in people with type 1 diabetes, the thresholds for autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms did not differ for each individual subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

People with type 1 diabetes have glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses at lower glucose levels than people without diabetes. Autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms responses are generated at about similar levels of hypoglycaemia. There was a considerable variation in the methodology of the articles and the high insulin doses in most of the clamps may affect the counterregulatory responses.

FUNDING

This article has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement no. 777460.

REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019120083).

Association between hypoglycaemic glucose variability and autonomic function in type1 diabetes with impaired hypoglycaemia awareness

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is suggested to underlie hypoglycaemic risk in impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH). We assessed the prevalence of CAN and the association between glucose variability (GV) and cardiovascular autonomic function in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and IAH. This study is a post-hoc-analysis of results obtained with the IN-CONTROL-trial, designed to assess the effects of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glycaemia. Forty participants (aged 46.4 ± 11.4 years, diabetes duration 29.1 ± 13.5 years, HbA1c 7.5 ± 0.8%(58.2 ± 8.8 mmol/mol)) underwent 2-week blinded CGM measurements to obtain GV indices. Standardized cardiovascular reflex tests were used to determine the presence of CAN. Cardiovascular autonomic function was assessed with heart rate variability (HRV) measures. 14(35%) participants were classified as having CAN. Participants with CAN had lower percentage time spent in hypoglycaemic range and low blood glucose index(LBGI). After correction for confounders, a significant positive association was found between the coefficient of variation (CV) or time spent in hypoglycaemic range and HRV measures SDRR or RMSSD, and between LBGI and RMSSD. In patients with T1DM and IAH, hypoglycaemic parameters were associated with better cardiovascular autonomic function and lower prevalence of CAN. This suggests that autonomic neuropathy does not seem to further deteriorate hypoglycaemic risk in patients with IAH.

Hypoglycemia unawareness in type 1 diabetes patients using intermittent continuous glucose monitoring: Identification of risk factors and glycemic patterns

BACKGROUND

Hypoglycemia unawareness designates failure to detect eminent hypoglycemia. Clarke's questionnaire is one of the most used systems to evaluate this problem.

AIMS

To relate Clarke's questionnaire (QQ) results with continuous glucose monitoring data.

METHODS

Application of the questionnaire in a sample of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients using intermittent continuous glucose monitoring (iCGM).

RESULTS

111 T1DM patients were evaluated, 56.8% female, mean age 35.0 ± 12.4 years and mean disease duration 18.8 ± 10.5 years. According to CQ, 13.5% had unawareness, 76.6% awareness and 9.9% indeterminate awareness to hypoglycemia. Those with unawareness had longer disease duration (25.1 ± 10.4 vs 18.2 ± 10.3 for awareness and 14.9 ± 9.9 for indeterminate awareness, p = 0.047), more time below range (10.3 ± 4.9% vs 6.3 ± 5.1 and 6.3 ± 4.8; p = 0.009) and higher mean duration of hypoglycemia (131.7 ± 38.6 vs 116.6 ± 49.6 and 131.7 ± 38.6; p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, mean duration of hypoglycemia was an independent predictor of CQ results. In a receiver operating curve (AUC 0.746; p = 0.004) a mean duration of hypoglycemia ≥106.5 min showed 84.6% sensitivity/64.4% specificity for unawareness.

CONCLUSIONS

Our sample had a significative prevalence of hypoglycemia unawareness which increased with longer diabetes duration. iCGM data can be indicative of this problem, with a mean hypoglycemia duration ≥106.5 min being suggestive, albeit unspecific.

Glucagon as a Therapeutic Approach to Severe Hypoglycemia: After 100 Years, Is It Still the Antidote of Insulin?

Hypoglycemia represents a dark and tormented side of diabetes mellitus therapy. Patients treated with insulin or drug inducing hypoglycemia, consider hypoglycemia as a harmful element, which leads to their resistance and lack of acceptance of the pathology and relative therapies. Severe hypoglycemia, in itself, is a risk for patients and relatives. The possibility to have novel strategies and scientific knowledge concerning hypoglycemia could represent an enormous benefit. Novel available glucagon formulations, even now, allow clinicians to deal with hypoglycemia differently with respect to past years. Novel scientific evidence leads to advances concerning physiopathological mechanisms that regulated glycemic homeostasis. In this review, we will try to show some of the important aspects of this field.

Awareness of hypoglycemia and spectral analysis of heart rate variability in type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To investigate the relationship of unawareness of hypoglycemia with spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) and clinical variables in type 1 diabetes (T1D) individuals.

METHODS

Participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (type 1 diabetes) were prospectively assessed for hypoglycemia awareness using the Pedersen-Bjergaard method and were classified as normal hypoglycemia awareness, impaired hypoglycemia awareness and hypoglycemia unawareness. Indices of HRV in frequency domain were evaluated and Ewing tests were used for the diagnosis of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN).

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants with T1D (mean age 26 years, average diabetes duration 13 years, and mean HbA1c 8.4%) were included in this study. The prevalence of hypoglycemia unawareness was 28%. No significant difference was observed on the prevalence of CAN among groups of different hypoglycemia awareness (p = 0.740). On regression analyses, abnormal results of HRV in frequency domain were not associated with unawareness of hypoglycemia. On univariable regression analysis, age, diabetes duration and estimated creatinine clearance were associated with unawareness of hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

CAN as assessed by Ewing tests and spectral analysis of HRV is not associated with unawareness of hypoglycemia. There is association of age, diabetes duration and renal deficit with unawareness of hypoglycemia.

The relationship between glycaemic variability and cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review

Rigorous glycaemic control-reflected by low HbA1c goals-is of the utmost importance in the prevention and management of complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, previous studies suggested that short-term glycaemic variability (GV) is also important to consider as excessive glucose fluctuations may have an additional impact on the development of diabetic complications. The potential relationship between GV and the risk of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN), a clinical expression of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, is of increasing interest. This systematic review aimed to summarize existing evidence concerning the relationship between GV and cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in T1DM. An electronic database search of Medline (PubMed), Web of Science and Embase was performed up to October 2019. There were no limits concerning year of publication. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Six studies (four cross-sectional and two prospective cohorts) were included. Methodological quality of the studies varied from level C to A2. Two studies examined the association between GV and heart rate variability (HRV), and both found significant negative correlations. Regarding cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs), two studies did not, while two other studies did find significant associations between GV parameters and CART scores. However, associations were attenuated after adjusting for covariates such as HbA1c, age and disease duration. In conclusion, this systematic review found some preliminary evidence supporting an association between GV and cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in T1DM. Hence, uncertainty remains whether high GV can independently contribute to the onset or progression of CAN. The heterogeneity in the methodological approach made it difficult to compare different studies. Future studies should therefore use uniformly evaluated continuous glucose monitoring-derived parameters of GV, while standardized assessment of HRV, CARTs and other potential cardiac autonomic function parameters is needed for an unambiguous definition of CAN.

Prevention and Management of Severe Hypoglycemia and Hypoglycemia Unawareness: Incorporating Sensor Technology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In addition to assisting in achieving improved glucose control, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor technology may also aid in detection and prevention of hypoglycemia. In this paper, we report on the current scientific evidence on the effectiveness of this technology in the prevention of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia unawareness.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have found that the integration of CGM with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy, a system known as sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy, very significantly reduces the occurrence of these conditions by providing real-time glucose readings/trends and automatically suspending insulin infusion when glucose is low (LGS) or, even, before glucose is low but is predicted to soon be low (PLGS). Initial data indicate that even for patients with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily injections, real-time CGM alone has been found to reduce both severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia unawareness. Closed loop systems (artificial pancreas) comprised of CGM and CSII without patient intervention to adjust basal insulin, which automatically reduce, increase, and suspend insulin delivery, represent a potential new option that is moving toward becoming a reality in the near future. Sensor technology promises to continue to improve patients' lives not only by attaining glycemic control but also by reducing hypoglycemia, a goal best achieved in conjunction with structured individualized patient education.

Roles of catechol neurochemistry in autonomic function testing

Catechols are a class of compounds that contain adjacent hydroxyl groups on a benzene ring. Endogenous catechols in human plasma include the catecholamines norepinephrine, epinephrine (adrenaline), and dopamine; the catecholamine precursor DOPA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), which is the main neuronal metabolite of norepinephrine; and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), which is the main neuronal metabolite of dopamine. In the diagnostic evaluation of patients with known or suspected dysautonomias, measurement of plasma catechols is rarely diagnostic but often is informative. This review summarizes the roles of clinical catechol neurochemistry in autonomic function testing.

Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy and Glucose Variability in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Is There an Association?

INTRODUCTION

The oxidative stress associated with glucose variability might be responsible for neuronal damage while autonomic neuropathy (AN) has a detrimental effect on metabolism. The aim of the study was to find relationship between AN and GV in type 1 diabetic patients and to identify further factors that affect GV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty type 1 diabetic patients were involved (age: 39.5 ± 3.4 years, duration of diabetes: 17.5 ± 2.5 years; HbA1c: 8.1 ± 0.2%, mean ± SE). AN was assessed by the cardiovascular reflex tests. The interstitial glucose levels were determined following insertion of a subcutaneous electrode during the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) method on six consecutive days. GV was characterized by calculation of four parameters.

RESULTS

SD of interstitial glucose values correlated positively with the overall AN score and the degree of the orthostatic reduction of systolic blood pressure (AN-score-SD ρ = 0.47, p < 0.05; orthostasis-SD: ρ = 0.51, p < 0.05). Mean absolute glucose (MAG) correlated with three parameters of AN (AN-score-MAG: ρ = 0.62, p < 0.01; 30/15 ratio-MAG: ρ = -0.50, p < 0.05; orthostasis-MAG: ρ = 0.59, p < 0.01). The HbA1c also correlated with two parameters of GV (HbA1c-continuous overlapping net glycemic action: ρ = 0.56, p < 0.05; HbA1c-MAG: ρ = 0.45, p < 0.05). The frequency of hypoglycemia did not exhibit any correlation with measures of GV.

CONCLUSION

Severity of glucose variability but not overall glucose load correlates with both parasympathetic and sympathetic dysfunctions in type 1 diabetes. Higher HbA1c is associated with more severe glucose variability. The observed correlation between increased glucose variability and the severity of AN necessitates the further exploration of this relationship.

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy

Diabetes mellitus is the commonest cause of an autonomic neuropathy in the developed world. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy causes a constellation of symptoms and signs affecting cardiovascular, urogenital, gastrointestinal, pupillomotor, thermoregulatory, and sudomotor systems. Several discrete syndromes associated with diabetes cause autonomic dysfunction. The most prevalent of these are: generalized diabetic autonomic neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy associated with the prediabetic state, treatment-induced painful and autonomic neuropathy, and transient hypoglycemia-associated autonomic neuropathy. These autonomic manifestations of diabetes are responsible for the most troublesome and disabling features of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and result in a significant proportion of the mortality and morbidity associated with the disease.

Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Is Not Associated With Autonomic Dysfunction or Peripheral Neuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) is a risk factor for severe hypoglycemia in people with insulin-treated diabetes; autonomic neuropathy has been suggested to underlie its development. The aim was to evaluate a putative association between IAH and autonomic dysfunction using novel and sensitive measures of autonomic neural function.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixty-six adults with type 1 diabetes were studied, 33 with IAH and 33 with normal awareness of hypoglycemia (NAH), confirmed by formal testing. Participants were matched for age, sex, and diabetes duration. Clinical and laboratory evaluations included extensive autonomic function testing, peripheral nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing. Composite abnormality Z scores were used for group comparisons.

RESULTS

The IAH and NAH group had similar median (interquartile range) age of 48 (14.5) vs. 47 (14.5) years, diabetes duration of 30 (13.5) vs. 31 (13.5) years, and mean ± SD HbA1c 7.8 ± 2.2% vs. 8.1 ± 1.9%, respectively. The autonomic composite Z score did not differ between the two groups (mean difference -0.15, 95% CI -0.46, 0.16; P = 0.33), nor did the thermal detection (mean difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.31, 0.61; P = 0.51) or nerve conduction scores (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.43, 0.49; P = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with type 1 diabetes, IAH was not associated with autonomic dysfunction or peripheral neuropathy.

Interventions That Restore Awareness of Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH) sixfold and affects 30% of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This systematic review and meta-analysis looks at the educational, technological, and pharmacological interventions aimed at restoring hypoglycemia awareness (HA) in adults with T1D.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception until 1 October 2014. Included studies described HA status at baseline. Outcome measures were SH rates, change in HA, counterregulatory hormone responses, and glycemic control.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies (18 randomized controlled trials, 25 before-and-after studies) met the inclusion criteria, comprising 27 educational, 11 technological, and 5 pharmacological interventions. Educational interventions included structured diabetes education on flexible insulin therapy, including psychotherapeutic and behavioral techniques. These were able to reduce SH and improve glycemic control, with greater benefit from the latter two techniques in improving IAH. Technological interventions (insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring, and sensor-augmented pump) reduced SH, improved glycemic control, and restored awareness when used in combination with structured education and frequent contact. Pharmacological studies included four insulin studies and one noninsulin study, but with low background SH prevalence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence for the effectiveness of a stepped-care approach in the management of patients with IAH, initially with structured diabetes education in flexible insulin therapy, which may incorporate psychotherapeutic and behavioral therapies, progressing to diabetes technology, incorporating sensors and insulin pumps, in those with persisting need.

Exercising with peripheral or autonomic neuropathy: what health care providers and diabetic patients need to know

Both peripheral and autonomic neuropathies are characterized by a progressive loss of nerve fiber function. Most peripheral neuropathy affects the extremities, particularly the lower legs and the feet, but also the hands, whereas damage to the autonomic nervous system may lead to imbalances between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers that innervate the heart and blood vessels, as well as abnormalities in heart rate control and vascular dynamics. To prescribe or engage in exercise that is both safe and effective, health care providers and patients with diabetes mellitus need to increase their understanding of the pathophysiological nature of neuropathies and the physical activity hurdles that may arise from the presence of a neuropathy. With proper care and preventative measures, patients with diabetes mellitus that experience either type of neuropathy can benefit from regular participation in mild to moderate aerobic, resistance, and balance activities, assuming they take any potential alterations into account to ensure that exercise is safe and effective.

Metabolic neuroimaging of the brain in diabetes mellitus and hypoglycaemia

Functional neuroimaging techniques can be used to study changes in regional brain activation, using changes in surrogate markers such as regional cerebral perfusion and rates of glucose uptake or metabolism. These approaches are shedding new light on two major health problems: the increasing burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is driven by the rising prevalence of insulin resistance and obesity; and recurrent intractable problematic hypoglycaemia, which is driven by the cognitive impairment that can occur in association with iatrogenic hypoglycaemic episodes. Some patients with diabetes mellitus lose awareness of being hypoglycaemic, which puts them at risk of severe hypoglycaemia as they are unlikely to take action to prevent the condition worsening. Involvement of corticolimbic brain and centres serving higher executive functions as well as the hypothalamus has been demonstrated in both situations and has implications for therapy. This Review describes the relevant principles of functional neuroimaging techniques and presents data supporting the notion that the dysregulation of central pathways involved in metabolic regulation, reward and appetite could contribute to problematic hypoglycaemia during therapy for diabetes mellitus and to insulin-resistant obesity and T2DM. Understanding these dysregulations could enable the development of novel clinical interventions.

Insulin therapy and hypoglycemia

Hypoglycemia is the most important and common side effect of insulin therapy. It is also the rate limiting factor in safely achieving excellent glycemic control. A three-fold increased risk of severe hypoglycemia occurs in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes with tight glucose control. This dictates a need to individualize therapy and glycemia goals to minimize this risk. Several ways to reduce hypoglycemia risk are recognized and discussed. They include frequent monitoring of blood sugars with home blood glucose tests and sometimes continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in order to identify hypoglycemia particularly in hypoglycemia unawareness. Considerations include prompt measured hypoglycemia treatment, attempts to reduce glycemic variability, balancing basal and meal insulin therapy, a pattern therapy approach and use of a physiological mimicry with insulin analogues in a flexible manner. Methods to achieve adequate control while focusing on minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia are delineated in this article.

Recent advances in the prevention of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes

Iatrogenic hypoglycemia is one of the chief barriers to optimal glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). As a common contributor to morbidity and mortality in T1D, severe hypoglycemia (SH) is also a major fear for people with T1D and their families. Consequently, fear of hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia-avoidant behaviors are predominant limiting factors in achieving euglycemia in people with T1D. Nocturnal SH and hypoglycemia unawareness are prevalent obstacles in the detection of hypoglycemia which further impair the prevention and treatment of SH. Various strategies and technologies have already been developed to help detect and prevent hypoglycemia, including improved patient education, frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, the use of rapid-acting and basal insulin analogs, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy, exercise-related insulin modifications, and continuous glucose monitors. The efficacy of these methods is well established, but further advances are still needed. The purpose of this review is to describe these currently available methods and to emphasize recent progress related to the prevention of hypoglycemia in T1D.

Methods of investigation for cardiac autonomic dysfunction in human research studies

This consensus document provides evidence-based guidelines regarding the evaluation of diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) for human research studies; the guidelines are the result of the work of the CAN Subcommittee of the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group. The subcommittee critically reviewed the limitations and strengths of the available diagnostic approaches for CAN and the need for developing new tests for autonomic function. It was concluded that the most sensitive and specific approaches currently available to evaluate CAN in clinical research are: (1) heart rate variability, (2) baroreflex sensitivity, (3) muscle sympathetic nerve activity, (4) plasma catecholamines, and (5) heart sympathetic imaging. It was also recommended that efforts should be undertaken to develop new non-invasive and safe CAN tests to be used in clinical research, with higher sensitivity and specificity, for studying the pathophysiology of CAN and evaluating new therapeutic approaches.

Neuroendocrine responses to hypoglycemia

The counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia is a complex and well-coordinated process. As blood glucose concentration declines, peripheral and central glucose sensors relay this information to central integrative centers to coordinate neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral responses and avert the progression of hypoglycemia. Diabetes, both type 1 and type 2, can perturb these counterregulatory responses. Moreover, defective counterregulation in the setting of diabetes can progress to hypoglycemia unawareness. While the mechanisms that underlie the development of hypoglycemia unawareness are not completely known, possible causes include altered sensing of hypoglycemia by the brain and/or impaired coordination of responses to hypoglycemia. Further study is needed to better understand the intricacies of the counterregulatory response and the mechanisms contributing to the development of hypoglycemia unawareness.

Antecedent hypoglycemia impairs autonomic cardiovascular function: implications for rigorous glycemic control

OBJECTIVE

Glycemic control decreases the incidence and progression of diabetic complications but increases the incidence of hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia can impair hormonal and autonomic responses to subsequent hypoglycemia. Intensive glycemic control may increase mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular complications. We tested the hypothesis that prior exposure to hypoglycemia leads to impaired cardiovascular autonomic function.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (age 28 +/- 2 years; 10 men) participated in two 3-day inpatient visits, separated by 1-3 months. Autonomic testing was performed on days 1 and 3 to measure sympathetic, parasympathetic, and baroreflex function. A 2-h hyperinsulinemic [hypoglycemic (2.8 mmol/l) or euglycemic (5.0 mmol/l)] clamp was performed in the morning and in the afternoon of day 2.

RESULTS

Comparison of the day 3 autonomic measurements demonstrated that antecedent hypoglycemia leads to 1) reduced baroreflex sensitivity (16.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 13.8 +/- 1.4 ms/mmHg, P = 0.03); 2) decreased muscle sympathetic nerve activity response to transient nitroprusside-induced hypotension (53.3 +/- 3.7 vs. 40.1 +/- 2.7 bursts/min, P < 0.01); and 3) reduced (P < 0.001) plasma norepinephrine response to lower body negative pressure (3.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.2 nmol/l at -40 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Baroreflex sensitivity and the sympathetic response to hypotensive stress are attenuated after antecedent hypoglycemia. Because impaired autonomic function, including decreased cardiac vagal baroreflex sensitivity, may contribute directly to mortality in diabetes and cardiovascular disease, our findings raise new concerns regarding the consequences of hypoglycemia.

Evaluation of treatment adherence in type 1 diabetes: a novel approach

BACKGROUND

Intensified insulin therapy requires outstanding compliance but no measure of therapy adherence has been agreed upon. The aim of the current study was to test the hypothesis that treatment adherence, as described by a novel multiple regression model, relates to glycosylated haemoglobin and hypoglycaemia frequency in type 1 diabetes. Furthermore, we sought to analyse the complex diurnal patterns of therapy adherence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty type 1 diabetes patients (20 females and 10 males), treated with intensified insulin therapy, were studied in a retrospective manner. Patients were trained to follow treatment algorithms for adjusting regular insulin dosage which took into account the actual blood glucose, food intake and the time of the day. By means of multiple linear regression analysis, with regular insulin dosage as the dependent variable, blood glucose and food intake as the independent variables, the insulin treatment algorithms actually used by the individual patient were retrieved. The correlation between prescribed and implemented insulin therapy served as a measure of adherence. Metabolic control was assessed by glycosylated haemoglobin and hypoglycaemia frequency.

RESULTS

Median glycosylated haemoglobin was 7.7% (range: 6.3-10.8); median monthly hypoglycaemia frequency was 3.8 (range: 0-9.8). Patients with good metabolic control (glycosylated haemoglobin < 7.7 and/or hypoglycaemia frequency < 3.8 per month) adhered to prescribed insulin dosing algorithms more frequently than those with poor metabolic control.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 1 diabetes on intensified therapy a positive relationship between adherence to the therapy prescribed and metabolic control exists.

Effects of insulin treatment without and with recurrent hypoglycemia on hypoglycemic counterregulation and adrenal catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes in diabetic rats

Untreated diabetic rats show impaired counterregulation against hypoglycemia. The blunted epinephrine responses are associated with reduced adrenomedullary tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA levels. Recurrent hypoglycemia further impairs epinephrine counterregulation and is also associated with reduced phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase mRNA. This study investigated the adaptations underlying impaired counterregulation in insulin-treated diabetic rats, a more clinically relevant model. We studied the effects of insulin treatment on counterregulatory hormones and adrenal catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes and adaptations after recurrent hypoglycemia. Groups included: normal; diabetic, insulin-treated for 3 wk (DI); and insulin-treated diabetic exposed to seven episodes (over 4 d) of hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemia (DI-hypo) or hyperinsulinemic-hyperglycemia (DI-hyper). DI-hyper rats differentiated the effects of hyperinsulinemia from those of hypoglycemia. On d 5, rats from all groups were assessed for adrenal catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme levels or underwent hypoglycemic clamps to examine counterregulatory responses. Despite insulin treatment, fasting corticosterone levels remained increased, and corticosterone responses to hypoglycemia were impaired in DI rats. However, glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and ACTH counterregulatory defects were prevented. Recurrent hypoglycemia in DI-hypo rats blunted corticosterone but, surprisingly, not epinephrine responses. Norepinephrine and ACTH responses also were not impaired, whereas glucagon counterregulation was reduced due to repeated hyperinsulinemia. Insulin treatment prevented decreases in basal TH protein and increased PNMT and dopamine beta-hydroxylase protein. DI-hypo rats showed increases in TH, PNMT, and dopamine beta-hydroxylase. We conclude that insulin treatment of diabetic rats protects against most counterregulatory defects but not elevated fasting corticosterone and decreased corticosterone counterregulation. Protection against epinephrine defects, both without and with antecedent hypoglycemia, is associated with enhancement of adrenal catecholamine-synthesizing enzyme levels.

Effects of diabetes and recurrent hypoglycemia on the regulation of the sympathoadrenal system and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis

Epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone responses to hypoglycemia are impaired in diabetic rats. Recurrent hypoglycemia further diminishes epinephrine responses. This study examined the sympathoadrenal system and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis for molecular adaptations underlying these defects. Groups were normal (N) and diabetic (D) rats and diabetic rats exposed to 4 days of 2 episodes/day of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia (D-hypo) or hyperinsulinemic hyperglycemia (D-hyper). D-hypo and D-hyper rats differentiated effects of hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. Adrenal tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA was reduced (P < 0.05 vs. N) 25% in all diabetic groups. Remarkably, mRNA for phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT), which converts norepinephrine to epinephrine, was reduced (P < 0.05 vs. all) 40% only in D-hypo rats. Paradoxically, dopamine beta-hydroxylase mRNA was elevated (P < 0.05 vs. D, D-hyper) in D-hypo rats. Hippocampal mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) mRNA was increased (P < 0.05 vs. N) in all diabetic groups. Hippocampal glucocorticoid receptor (GR), hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) GR and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), and pituitary GR and proopiomelanocortin (POMC) mRNA levels did not differ. We conclude that blunted corticosterone responses to hypoglycemia in diabetic rats are not due to altered basal expression of GR, CRH, and POMC in the hippocampus, PVN, and pituitary. The corticosterone defect also does not appear to be due to increased hippocampal MR, since we have reported normalized corticosterone responses in D-hypo and D-hyper rats. Furthermore, impaired epinephrine counterregulation in diabetes is associated with reduced adrenal TH mRNA, whereas the additional epinephrine defect after recurrent hypoglycemia is associated with decreases in both TH and PNMT mRNA.

Insulin therapy and hypoglycaemia: the size of the problem

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Hypoglycaemia is a fact of life for people with diabetes mellitus. Mild, asymptomatic episodes occur once or twice a week in insulin-treated diabetic subjects. Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia, including nocturnal hypoglycaemia, occurs in about 25% of diabetic subjects treated with insulin therapy. Mild hypoglycaemia, if recurrent, induces unawareness of hypoglycaemia and impairs glucose counterregulation, which in turn predisposes to severe hypoglycaemia. Even brief hypoglycaemia can cause profound dysfunction of the brain. Prolonged, severe hypoglycaemia can cause permanent neurological sequels. In addition, it is possible that hypoglycaemia may accelerate the vascular complications of diabetes by increasing platelet aggregation and/or fibrinogen formation. Finally, hypoglycaemia may be fatal. Hypoglycaemia induced by insulin as treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1 DM) is not the consequence of diabetes, but invariably of the non-physiological replacement of insulin.

RESULTS

A number of studies have demonstrated that by moving from non-physiological to more physiological models of insulin therapy, most of the hypoglycaemia problems may be overcome, the percentage of glycated hemoglobin (A1c) decreased, and the quality of life improved. Interestingly, in T1 DM with hypoglycaemia unawareness, prevention of hypoglycaemia reverses not only unawareness but also improves glucose counterregulation, primarily the responses of adrenaline.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to best prevent hypoglycaemia, insulin should preferably be given as continuous subcutaneous infusion via a minipump (the 'golden standard') or multiple daily insulin administrations with insulin analogues (basal insulin glargine, meal insulin rapid-acting insulin analogues) in T1 DM.

Cyotomedical therapy for insulinopenic diabetes using microencapsulated pancreatic beta cell lines

Current therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus involves a daily regimen of multiple subcutaneous or intramuscular injections of recombinant human insulin. To achieve long-term insulin delivery in vivo, we investigated the applicability of cytomedical therapy using beta TC6 cells or MIN6 cells, both of which are murine pancreatic beta cell lines that secrete insulin in a subphysiologically or physiologically regulated manner, respectively. We examined this therapy in the insulinopenic diabetic mice intraperitoneally injected with beta TC6 cells or MIN6 cells microencapsulated within alginate-poly(L)lysine-alginate membranes (APA-beta TC6 cells or APA-MIN6 cells). The diabetic mice treated with APA-beta TC6 cells fell into hypoglycemia, whereas those injected with APA-MIN6 cells maintained normal blood glucose concentrations for over 2 months without developing hypoglycemia. In addition, we also conducted an oral glucose tolerance test using these mice. The blood glucose concentrations of normal and of diabetic mice injected with APA-MIN6 cells similarly changed over time, although the blood insulin concentration increased later in the injected diabetic mice than in the former. These results suggest that cytomedicine utilizing microencapsulated pancreatic beta cell lines with a physiological glucose sensor may be a beneficial and safe therapy with which to treat diabetes mellitus.

Metformin does not adversely affect hormonal and symptomatic responses to recurrent hypoglycemia

Body weight gain and severe hypoglycemia are the major adverse effects of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Metformin has been shown to prevent insulin therapy-induced body weight gain when used in combination with insulin. However, the effects of metformin on hormonal and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia mediating hypoglycemia awareness have not been assessed to date. Fifteen young healthy men were treated with 850 mg metformin and placebo twice daily for a 16-d period in a double blind, cross-over design. On the last 2 d of the treatment period, the subjects underwent three hypoglycemic clamp experiments, with the first and the last performed with identical patterns of plasma glucose decrease. Differences between the effects of metformin and placebo (effect of metformin) as well as between first and last hypoglycemic clamps (effect of antecedent hypoglycemia) were assessed. Antecedent hypoglycemia significantly reduced epinephrine, ACTH, cortisol, glucagon, GH, and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia (P < 0.05 for all variables). There was no detectable effect of metformin on epinephrine, norepinephrine, ACTH, cortisol, glucagon, or autonomic symptomatic response to hypoglycemia (P > 0.05 for all comparisons), except that metformin slightly increased the response of GH to hypoglycemia (P = 0.039). The latter finding may be due to an IGF-I-reducing effect of metformin, as after 14 d of metformin treatment baseline levels of IGF-I were significantly lower than in the placebo condition (236.9 +/- 13.9 vs. 263.2 +/- 14.4 microg/liter; P = 0.015). The data indicate that metformin does not adversely affect hormonal and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia. This finding appears to be relevant with regard to the safety of the combination of metformin with insulin therapy.

Counterregulatory mechanisms to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in humans: relevance to the problem of intensive treatment of IDDM

Hypoglycemia unawareness is a condition of decreased/absent perception of specific symptoms which normally inform the subject that plasma glucose is decreasing to dangerous levels resulting in neuroglycopenia. This syndrome is frequent in IDDM. In the absence of warning symptoms, IDDM patients cannot take any measure (e.g. eating) to prevent severe neuroglycopenia (unconsciousness). Because hypoglycemia unawareness is associated with impaired glucose counterregulation, especially reduced adrenaline responses, hypoglycemia unawareness is a risky condition for severe hypoglycemia. A number of studies in animals and humans indicate that hypoglycemia unawareness is largely, if not fully, secondary to recurrent or chronic hypoglycemia. Meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia in IDDM largely recovers the symptoms of hypoglycemia and the responses of adrenaline. It is important that diabetologists and IDDM patients are familiar with the syndrome of hypoglycemia unawareness and learn how to prevent/treat it in programs of intensive therapy. Intensive therapy aiming strictly at normoglycemia may increase the frequency of hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia unawareness. On the other hand, if intensive therapy is combined with a program of prevention of hypoglycemia, the percentage of HbA1c can be maintained long-term below 7.0% (i.e. below values risky for onset/progression of complications), and at the same time the frequency of hypoglycemia is very low. Under these conditions, IDDM patients maintain the awareness of warning symptoms and adrenaline response to hypoglycemia, a vital back-up system for the safety of intensive therapy of IDDM.