Comparison of chlorpropamide and glibenclamide treatment of maturity-onset diabetes: control assessed by fasting plasma glucose concentrations

Problems and pitfalls of sulphonylurea therapy in older patients

The prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type II) increases with age, so that approximately half of all known patients in English-speaking countries are over 65 years of age. There is no reason to believe that the criteria for blood glucose control should be any less stringent for elderly patients unless they have a limited life expectancy. Sulphonylurea drugs remain an effective means of achieving blood glucose control after failure of dietary therapy alone in older patients. However, changes in normal metabolism of drugs with age and the development of other pathologies in elderly patients make it important that these drugs are prescribed with care. Severe symptomatic hypoglycaemia is the most serious adverse effect of sulphonylurea drugs and this becomes progressively more likely with increasing age, depending primarily on the substantial reduction of renal function with normal aging. Other adverse effects are much less commonly of clinical importance. To minimise the risk of hypoglycaemia, it is important that patients receive closely supervised dietary management with education about their disease for at least 3 months before sulphonylurea drugs are prescribed. In elderly patients a short-acting agent with no active metabolites should be used. As patients become older, those receiving long-acting agents can be changed to short-acting agents before problems arise. If blood glucose control appears satisfactory on treatment, then symptoms of hypoglycaemia should be sought. If control is poor, then the criteria for introduction of insulin, with appropriate education, do not differ from those in younger patients.

Oral hypoglycemic agents

The sulfonylureas remain the most important oral agents, although their chronic hypoglycemic actions are still unexplained and the evidence on their relative efficacy is inconclusive. Data on relative safety suggest that chlorpropamide is the most toxic sulfonylurea but glyburide causes dangerous hypoglycemia as often as chlorpropamide. For many patients, good blood glucose control will be achieved by taking tolbutamide or another sulfonylurea 30 minutes before breakfast and the main evening meal. The biguanide metformin, which is as safe as glyburide, is of use in treating overweight diabetic patients who do not have cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal dysfunction.

The relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of oral hypoglycaemic drugs

Oral hypoglycaemic drugs have widely differing pharmacokinetic properties. Possible pharmacodynamic benefits include greater efficacy and fewer adverse effects. In general, it has not been possible to demonstrate unequivocal differences in clinical efficacy between the sulphonylureas during long term use, although there are clear differences in potency. These differences have been emphasised to the extent that the term 'second-generation' has been used for the most potent sulphonylureas, but there is little to suggest that potency is of any therapeutic significance. Trials to study differences in efficacy have rarely been of acceptable design. They have often used fixed doses of drugs, begging the question of whether true potency ratios have been established for chronic treatment. They have rarely involved substantial numbers of patients in double-blind crossover studies with a suitable washout period. Trials which show that there is a clear relationship between drug concentrations in blood and drug effects (whether therapeutic effects or adverse effects such as severe hypoglycaemia) are generally lacking. Qualitative and semiquantitative analysis of adverse effects supports the concept that drugs with a long half-life (e.g. chlorpropamide), renally excreted active metabolites (e.g. acetohexamide) or unusual properties (e.g. glibenclamide, which accumulates progressively in islet tissue) are more likely to cause prolonged hypoglycaemia, which may be fatal. The major adverse effect of treatment with biguanides is lactic acidosis, and this probably occurs more commonly in patients treated with phenformin than those treated with metformin because of pharmacogenetic variation in phenformin metabolism. The available evidence therefore favours the use of drugs with a short elimination half-life which are extensively metabolised and which have no active metabolites.

Once-daily use of glyburide

Ideally, metabolic control with sulfonylureas should be maintained for 24 hours. To determine an optimal glyburide dosage schedule, the effects of glyburide once (every morning) or twice daily and chlorpropamide once daily (every morning) were compared in 18 men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in a randomized, double-blind fashion. After discontinuation of previous hypoglycemic agents for 10 days, patients were admitted to a metabolic ward for two weeks (Study A). Glycemic measurements were performed on Day 14. Subjects were readmitted after 12 weeks of outpatient therapy for another two weeks (Study B), and glycemic determinations were repeated. Weight was kept constant during and between Studies A and B. Effective hypoglycemic action of each drug regimen was demonstrated. When six glycemic parameters were compared, there was no significant difference between groups. Thus, over a 14-week period, both glyburide regimens were similar and as effective as chlorpropamide once daily.

Dual actions of sulfonylureas and glyburide. Receptor and post-receptor effects

Glyburide and other sulfonylureas consistently enhance receptor binding in cells from patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, whereas no effects and mixed effects have been demonstrated in cells from patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and in normal cells, respectively. These findings indicate that the experimental model may be critical in demonstrating sulfonylurea effects on receptor binding. Postbinding function studies have shown a definite enhancement of peripheral glucose metabolism by sulfonylurea drugs; such post-receptor changes have not clearly correlated with receptor binding alterations. Studies using mouse-cultured myocytes indicate that both glyburide and tolazamide have stimulatory effects on glucose uptake, whereas only glyburide caused an increase in receptor binding. The data suggest a major and widespread post-receptor function for the sulfonylurea drugs, particularly glyburide, possibly mediated through pathways similar but not identical to insulin pathways. The direct receptor effects, in contrast, are possibly more tissue-specific and/or disease-dependent. In non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, these drugs exert clinical efficacy by acting through both mechanisms.

Review of glyburide after one year on the market

After one year on the American market, glyburide, a second-generation sulfonylurea, seems well accepted by physicians. If the hyperglycemia of patients with type II diabetes mellitus is not corrected by diet and exercise, glyburide can be used as adjunctive therapy. The drug is comparable in efficacy to the first-generation sulfonylurea chlorpropamide, but it has fewer reported side effects. Additionally, glyburide does not appear to interact with other medications and is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Although the drug had been reported to produce hypoglycemia, increased clinical experience--along with use of judicious dosages in appropriate patients--has decreased the incidence of hypoglycemia. Although still in the investigational stage, combination insulin/glyburide therapy may also benefit subgroups of type II diabetic patients. Glyburide is a useful and rational addition to therapy in properly selected patients with type II diabetes mellitus.

Glyburide: a second-generation sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agent. History, chemistry, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, clinical use and adverse effects

Glyburide, a second-generation hypoglycemic sulfonylurea, is 200 times as potent as tolbutamide. This increase is due to greater intrinsic hypoglycemic potency of the molecule rather than to a prolonged biologic half-life. Glyburide is inactivated by the liver to 4-trans-hydroxyglyburide and 3-cis-hydroxyglyburide; 50% of these compounds is excreted in the urine and 50% in the bile. Although the serum concentration of glyburide can be measured by radioimmunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography, the importance of its serum concentration in the reduction of hyperglycemia is not yet established. Glyburide has a therapeutic effectiveness comparable to that of the first-generation sulfonylurea chlorpropamide; however, it has a lower frequency of adverse effects. To date it has a low frequency of clinically significant interactions with other drugs. Glyburide should not be prescribed for patients with liver disease or significant renal disease. Because glyburide is a potent hypoglycemic agent, it should be prescribed in small initial doses, particularly for elderly patients with diabetes. At the present time there is no definite evidence that it modifies the increased risk of cardiovascular disease of diabetic patients. Although glyburide is a potent stimulator of pancreatic insulin secretion after short-term administration, an additional mechanism of action during long-term administration is to decrease the resistance of muscle and liver to the action of insulin. It is a useful medication for patients with type II diabetes whose hyperglycemia is not adequately reduced by dietary management and exercise. It can be used as the initial drug in these patients or as the replacement drug for those with primary or secondary failure during therapy with first-generation sulfonylureas.

Patient-orientated metered capillary blood collection

A small collector bottle, with a precision-moulded top, allows capillary blood from a finger-prick to be automatically metered into a diluent for subsequent laboratory analysis. This device, which has been successfully used by patients to obtain full blood counts, glycosylated haemoglobin values and blood glucose measurements, may have wide application.

Concomitant insulin and sulfonylurea therapy in patients with type II diabetes. Effects on glucoregulation and lipid metabolism

Recent evidence suggests concomitant insulin and sulfonylurea therapy has a theoretical potential in the management of type II diabetes mellitus. In a long-term double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study of combination therapy, serum glucose, C-peptide, total cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were evaluated in insulin-treated patients with poorly controlled, type II diabetes mellitus after addition of either glyburide (n = 10) or placebo (n = 12). Oral glucose tolerance testing was performed at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Clinical characteristics and glycemic control (fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin values) were similar at week 0 in both groups. The placebo group had no change in any metabolic parameter throughout the study period. At week 4, glyburide significantly lowered fasting blood glucose and integrated glucose areas (p less than 0.01) compared with values at week 0 (fasting blood glucose 225 +/- 20 versus 286 +/- 27 mg/dl, p less than 0.02). Mean fasting, stimulated, and integrated C-peptide levels were significantly higher (p less than 0.02) at week 4 versus week 0. At week 16, mean fasting blood glucose values remained significantly lower compared with baseline values (252 +/- 25 versus 286 +/- 27 mg/dl, p less than 0.05). Glycosylated hemoglobin levels decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) at weeks 4 to 16 compared with the baseline values. Although glucose responses and integrated areas were no different after oral glucose tolerance testing, fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels were significantly higher (p less than 0.05) at week 16 versus week 0. Lipid and lipoprotein levels remained unchanged. In summary, combination therapy consisting of glyburide and insulin moderately improved glucose control in type II diabetes mellitus at the end of four weeks. Despite significantly lower fasting serum glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels after 16 weeks, combination treatment did not normalize glycemic control. Glucose tolerance decreased further after 16 weeks despite persistence of increased endogenous insulin secretion. The role of the combination therapy in the long-term care of patients with type II diabetes mellitus needs further investigation.

Oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update

Despite the availability of oral hypoglycaemic agents for nearly 30 years, their precise mode of action and role in the management of diabetes mellitus remains poorly defined and controversial. They are regarded by many, though not all, clinicians as helpful adjuncts in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes who have failed to respond satisfactorily to an adequate programme of dietary treatment. Their initial effectiveness is greatest in those patients who have had diabetes for less than 5 years, are overweight at the time of initiation of therapy, and whose fasting blood glucose levels are not unduly raised (less than 200 mg/dl). If they are receiving treatment with insulin and a shift to oral compounds is contemplated, success in the changeover is more likely if the daily dose has been less than 20 to 30 units daily. While their efficacy in maintaining adequate glycaemic control over the short term in responsive patients is unquestioned, the long term benefit of oral hypoglycaemic agents in reducing morbidity and mortality of late complications remains to be substantiated. In this regard, where long term efficacy is difficult to quantify, physician vigilance for chronic toxicity assumes a special importance. Notwithstanding the potential for interaction between sulphonylureas and numerous other drugs, significant adverse effects are uncommon. Hypoglycaemia is the major health concern associated with the use of sulphonylureas, and lactic acidosis has been the major problem with biguanides. Careful patient selection is thus the key to ensuring efficacy and avoiding toxicity. Recent evidence suggests that while the insulinotropic action of the sulphonylureas may explain the short term hypoglycaemic effect of these compounds, their reported action in enhancing insulin sensitivity, both at the receptor and post-receptor levels, more likely accounts for the long term maintenance of improved carbohydrate tolerance. The relatively new ('second generation') sulphonylurea compounds have not been shown to possess clearly defined advantages over the older preparations; the potentially beneficial effects of gliclazide on the microangiopathic changes of diabetes require considerable further evaluation.

General practice care of non-insulin-dependent diabetes with fasting blood glucose measurements

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes can be treated using two criteria, the fasting blood glucose concentration and body weight. The feasibility of this means of control, aiming for a fasting blood glucose concentration of less than 6 mmol/liter (108 mg/dl) has been investigated in 10 general practices. Eight practices now use the method routinely. A one-year follow-up in six practices is reported. The number of patients with a fasting blood glucose concentration of less than 108 mg/dl increased from 39 (26 percent) to 65 (59 percent). The mean fasting blood glucose concentration of all 112 patients was significantly (p less than 0.01) decreased from a mean of 148 to 113 mg/dl at three months, and subsequently increased to a still reduced (p less than 0.01) level of 126 mg/dl after one year. The mean hemoglobin A1c level was decreased (p less than 0.01). Six practices preferred to have special clinics at which fasting blood glucose meaurements were taken. Two practices achieved good results with the administration and tests being undertaken by a practical nurse, with supervision from the general practitioner. Assessment of control by four fasting blood glucose determinations a year is less expensive than regular urine tests, and may improve blood glucose control.