The effect of blood glucose concentration on labile A1c in diabetic patients

Labile glycated hemoglobin: an underestimated laboratory marker of short term glycemia

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes mellitus is a major public health problem. Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) is a key laboratory parameter in the management of diabetes patients. However, in diabetes monitoring, interpretation of HbA_1c results is hampered by the important interindividual variation in red blood cell (RBC) life span. Furthermore, HbA_1c only slowly responds to changes in glucose metabolism. Besides HbA_1c, there exists a labile HbA_1c fraction (l-HbA_1c), exhibiting much faster kinetics. As both HbA_1c and l-HbA_1c are measured by modern standard chromatography, we explored the possibilities of using the l-HbA_1c fraction for monitoring glycemia.

METHODS

l-HbA_1c and HbA_1c fractions were simultaneously assayed on a Tosoh G8 analyzer and expressed as %. l-HbA_1c results were compared with serum glucose and HbA_1c. Concomitantly, RBC distribution width (RDW) was determined on a Sysmex SN analyzer as a marker for erythrocyte life span.

RESULTS

l-HbA_1c could be measured with between-run coefficient of variations (CVs) between 2.2 and 2.3%. l-HbA_1c correlated with both glycemia (r=0.80) and HbA_1c results (r=0.73). In a multiple regression model (r²=0.752), glycemia and HbA_1c were the most determining factors. To a lesser extent, RDW correlated with l-HbA_1c (r=0.158). Furthermore, the l-HbA_1c/HbA_1c ratio weakly positively correlated with RDW (r=0.247).

CONCLUSIONS

L-HBA_1c represents an additional marker for monitoring the rapid occurrence of glycemic disorders that escape detection when using only HbA_1c and blood glucose. RDW can be used as an indicator of atypical RBCs life span, in which the l-HbA_1c fraction may be helpful.

A labile form of hemoglobin A1c is higher in African-American youth with type 1 diabetes compared to Caucasian patients at similar glucose levels

BACKGROUND

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are higher in African-American (AA) individuals compared to Caucasians (EA) even after adjustment for blood glucose levels. To better understand the mechanism of this disparity we examined the relationship of an unstable (labile) form of HbA1c (L-HbA1c) with race and glucose.

METHODS

Samples for HbA1c were collected from pediatric patients self-identified as either AA (15F, 12M, age 13.4 ± 3.5 years) or EA (22F, 30M, age 14.6 ± 3.4 years) with type 1 diabetes at the time of a clinic visit. Clinic HbA1c (HbA1c) was performed by immunoassay. L-HbA1c equaled the difference in the HbA1c fraction by dynamic capillary isoelectric focusing before and after incubation in a low pH buffer. A capillary glucose (Clinic-BG) was measured at clinic visit. Mean blood glucose (MBG) was calculated from the last 30 days of the patient's glucose meter data. The influence of race on L-HbA1c was assessed in a multiple variable regression model adjusted for Clinic-BG.

RESULTS

The groups were similar for age and duration of diabetes. L-HbA1c was correlated with Clinic-BG, MBG, and HbA1c. The mean levels of L-HbA1c, HbA1c, MBG, but not Clinic-BG were higher in AA patients compared to EA. After adjustment for Clinic-BG, L-HbA1c was still higher in AA (2.8 ± 0.7% AA vs 2.1 ± 0.7% EA, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

L-HbA1c is correlated with Clinic-BG. At any given level of Clinic-BG, AA patients have higher levels of L-HbA1c than EA. This preliminary study suggests that early factors prior to the formation of stable HbA1c may contribute to the observed glucose-independent racial disparity.

Application of smoothed continuous labile haemoglobin A1c reference intervals for identification of potentially spurious HbA1c results

Aims

We aim to develop smoothed continuous 2.5th and 97.5th percentile values for labile glycated haemoglobin A1c to glycated haemoglobin A1c (LHbA1c:HbA1c) ratio against HbA1c, and apply them on our patient population for identification of potentially spurious HbA1c measurements.

Methods

The LHbA1c and HbA1c were measured using Bio-rad Variant II high-performance liquid chromatography system. We recorded the LHbA1c and HbA1c values of 1555 patients who had normal chromatograms. Using these results, the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile reference limits of the LHbA1c:HbA1c ratio were described by LHbA1c:HbA1c=−0.0072×HbA1c +0.2925 and LHbA1c:HbA1c=−0.0132×HbA1c +0.5327, respectively.

Results

When the reference intervals were applied on a separate 1000 patients, 34 and 29 of them had abnormally high and low LHbA1c:HbA1c ratios, respectively. Most of the observed high ratios were associated concurrently with elevated plasma glucose, anaemia, chronic liver and kidney diseases. A suppressed ratio was mostly associated with haemoglobin variants. Patients with heterozygous HbE or HbS variants tend to have lower LHbA1c:HbA1c ratios while the converse is true for heterozygous HbJ.

Conclusions

The continuous LHbA1c:HbA1c ratio may be used to detect confounding factors or spurious HbA1c results, but its performance is confounded and reduced by the ambient plasma glucose.

Short-term effect of a 75 g oral glucose load on glycohaemoglobin levels

Two hundred and twenty-three subjects out of a total of 347 with various degrees of glucose tolerance were recalled after a screening survey for diabetes. They were a randomly selected sample of people over the age of 40 and they underwent a formal 75 g glucose tolerance test in order to assess the effect of a glucose load on glycohaemoglobin levels measured by four different assay methods. Oral glucose loading was found to affect glycohaemoglobin levels only when these were measured by an agar-gel electrophoretic method that did not remove the labile aldimine-linked Schiff base fraction. The increase in glycohaemoglobin during the glucose tolerance test as estimated by this method was proportional to the 2 h blood glucose level. Glycohaemoglobin levels measured by agar-gel electrophoresis with elimination of the Schiff base, by affinity chromatography and by iso-electric focussing, were not affected by a 75 g oral glucose load. We conclude that blood samples for glycohaemoglobin assay may be collected at any time of the day, without regard to the subject's previous food intake, provided an assay method is used that removed the aldimine-linked labile fraction.