Trust and Glycemic Control in Black Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy: A Pilot Study

Community-Based Culturally Tailored Education Programs for Black Communities with Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Stroke: Systematic Review Findings

BACKGROUND

Community-based culturally tailored education (CBCTE) programs for chronic diseases may reduce health disparities; however, a synthesis across chronic diseases is lacking. We explored (1) the characteristics and outcomes of CBCTE programs and (2) which strategies for culturally appropriate interventions have been used in CBCTE programs, and how they have been implemented.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by searching three databases to identify empirical full-text literature on CBCTE programs for Black communities with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, or stroke. Studies were screened in duplicate, then data regarding study characteristics, participants, intervention, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Cultural tailoring strategies within programs were categorized using Kreuter and colleagues' framework.

RESULTS

Of the 74 studies, most were conducted in the USA (97%) and delivered in one site (53%; e.g., church/home). CBCTE programs targeted diabetes (65%), hypertension (30%), diabetes and hypertension (1%), cardiovascular disease (3%), and stroke (1%). Reported program benefits included physiological, medication-related, physical activity, and literacy. Cultural tailoring strategies included peripheral (targeted Black communities), constituent-involving (e.g., community informed), evidential (e.g., integrated community resources), linguistic (e.g., delivered in community's dialect/accent), and sociocultural (e.g., integrated community members' religious practices).

CONCLUSIONS

CBCTE programs may have beneficial outcomes, but a small sample size limited several. The strategies identified can be adopted by programs seeking to culturally tailor. Future interventions should clearly describe community members' roles/involvement and deliver programs in multiple locations to broaden reach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021245772.

Education, trust, and likelihood to vaccinate against COVID-19 among patients with diabetes in the American South

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explain the relationship among education, likelihood to vaccinate for COVID-19, and trust in healthcare providers among patients living with diabetes in the American South.

METHODS

Explanatory iterative sequential mixed methods design combined retrospective chart review, self-report surveys, and qualitative interviews.

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance revealed that severity of diabetes was not linked to vaccine acceptance. Overall, patients reported higher likelihood to vaccinate if their healthcare providers strongly recommend the vaccine. People with "some college" education reported lowest likelihood to vaccinate, before and after their healthcare providers' strong recommendation. Integrated analysis revealed the complexity of patient-provider trust and vaccination decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of COVID vaccination, particularly as conspiracy theories entered the mainstream, measures of trust in the system may be a clearer indicator of vaccine decision making than trust in personal physician.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The nonlinear relationship between education and likelihood to vaccinate challenges providers to talk to patients about knowledge and understanding beyond a superficial, quantitative screening question about education. Health systems and public health officials need to find strategies to build trusting relationships for patients across systems, such as community health workers.

The Influence of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Concordance on Care Among Non-Pregnant Women of Childbearing Age with Diabetes Mellitus: an Analysis of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2010-2019

INTRODUCTION

This study examined associations between patient-provider race/ethnicity concordance and gender concordance on overall healthcare ratings, self-efficacy, and diabetes care monitoring in non-pregnant women of childbearing age with diabetes mellitus before and after adjusting for sociodemographic factors.

METHODS

We analyzed longitudinal data from the 2010-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. The sample was limited to non-pregnant women of childbearing age (18-45 years) diagnosed with diabetes (unweighted n = 327; weighted n = 566,504). Bivariate analysis, logistic regression, and latent variable modeling were performed.

RESULTS

Few racially minoritized women reported racial/ethnic and gender concordance with their healthcare provider. Only 2.9% of Hispanic women reported having a Hispanic provider and 12.1% of non-Hispanic Black women reported seeing a non-Hispanic Black provider compared to 81.1% of non-Hispanic White women who reported seeing a non-Hispanic White provider (p < .0001). Among Hispanic women, 15.3% reported seeing a female provider compared to 25.2% of non-Hispanic Black and 53.5% of non-Hispanic White women. Patient-provider race/ethnicity and gender concordance were not statistically significantly associated with overall healthcare ratings, self-efficacy, or diabetes care monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a large disparity in race/ethnicity and gender concordance among minority women of reproductive age with diabetes compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts. There is a need for larger, more robust studies to examine the influence of provider and other healthcare characteristics on diabetes-related outcomes in this understudied population.

Interventions to promote access to eyecare for non-dominant ethnic groups in high-income countries: a scoping review

PURPOSE

People who are distinct from the dominant ethnic group within a country can experience a variety of barriers to accessing eyecare services. We conducted a scoping review to map published interventions aimed at improving access to eyecare for non-Indigenous, non-dominant ethnic groups residing in high-income countries.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health for studies that described an intervention to promote access to eyecare for the target population. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts followed by review of the full text of potentially relevant sources. For included studies, data extraction was carried out independently by two authors. Findings were summarised using a combination of descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We screened 5220 titles/abstracts, of which 82 reports describing 67 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in the USA (90%), attempted to improve access for Black (48%) or Latinx (28%) communities at-risk for diabetic retinopathy (42%) and glaucoma (18%). Only 30% included the target population in the design of the intervention; those that did tended to be larger, collaborative initiatives, which addressed both patient and provider components of access. Forty-eight studies (72%) evaluated whether an intervention changed an outcome measure. Among these, attendance at a follow-up eye examination after screening was the most common (n=20/48, 42%), and directly supporting patients to overcome barriers to attendance was reported as the most effective approach. Building relationships between patients and providers, running coordinated, longitudinal initiatives and supporting reduction of root causes for inequity (education and economic) were key themes highlighted for success.

CONCLUSION

Although research evaluating interventions for non-dominant, non-Indigenous ethnic groups exist, key gaps remain. In particular, the paucity of relevant studies outside the USA needs to be addressed, and target communities need to be involved in the design and implementation of interventions more frequently.

Emergency department visits in African Americans with mild cognitive impairment and diabetes

AIMS

Dementia, diabetes, and African American race are three factors that are independently associated with emergency department (ED) use. This study tested the hypothesis that ED use is associated with worse cognitive function in African Americans with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and poorly controlled diabetes.

METHODS

This study examined differences in ED use among African Americans with MCI and diabetes in a secondary data analysis of baseline data from a one-year randomized controlled trial (N = 101).

RESULTS

Over one year, 49/92 participants (53.3%) had at least one ED visit. At baseline, participants who had an incident ED visit had significantly fewer years of education; lower scores on neuropsychological tests assessing working memory, psychomotor speed, and complex scanning; higher diabetes-related interpersonal distress scores; lower adherence to a diabetes medication; and higher hemoglobin A1c levels compared to participants with no ED visits (p ≤ 0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified multiple risk factors for ED visits in older African Americans with MCI and diabetes. Targeted interventions may be necessary to reduce the need for ED care in high risk populations.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare Rating, Diabetes Self-efficacy, and Diabetes Management Among Non-pregnant Women of Childbearing Age: Does Socioeconomic Status Matter?

OBJECTIVE

Patient perceptions of healthcare ratings, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes management play a role in diabetes-related outcomes, particularly among women of childbearing age. Guided by a modified Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior framework, the objective was to compare differences in perceptions of health care ratings, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes management among non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White women of childbearing age.

METHODS

The sample comprised 7 years (2012-2018) of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. The sample was limited to women of childbearing age (18-45 years) who have ever been told they had diabetes (n = 691; weighted n = 932,426). Dependent variables were health care rating, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes care management. The key independent variable was race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic White). We adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and perceived health status using multiple linear and multivariable logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic Black women (41.6%) self-reported their health status as fair or poor (44.9%) compared to non-Hispanic White (33.3%) and Hispanic (37.6%). In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black women had 46% lower odds (95% CI = 0.31, 0.94) of reporting high health care ratings compared to non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic Black women had 43% lower odds (95% CI = 0.35, 0.95) and Hispanic women had 47% lower odds (95% CI = 0.34, 0.80) of reporting higher levels of diabetes care management than non-Hispanic White women.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides important information regarding diabetes health care ratings, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors. Because of the increasing prevalence of diabetes among women of childbearing age, it is important to improve health care particularly for racial/ethnic minority women with diabetes.