Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation: coronary artery bypass grafting with versus without simultaneous treatment of the mitral valve

Should moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting? a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased risks of mortality and heart failure. However, the optimal management of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to appraise whether moderate IMR should be corrected during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 15 October 2022 for studies that assessed CABG alone versus CABG with mitral valve (MV) surgery in patients with moderate IMR. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials and three observational studies with propensity-matched data including 1209 patients assessing CABG alone (n = 598) versus CABG with MV surgery (n = 611) were included. Compared to CABG alone, the addition of MV surgery did not significantly increase perioperative mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.52-1.96; p = 0.98) and stroke (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 0.97-4.72; p = 0.06), whereas a longer cardiopulmonary bypass duration (MD, 54.91; 95% CI, 42.13-67.68; p < 0.01) and an increased incidence of renal failure were observed in the combined-procedure group. At follow-up, the addition of MV surgery was significantly associated with reduced rates of residual MR (RR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.51; p < 0.01) and NYHA class III-IV (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78; p < 0.01). However, there was no difference in either mid-term mortality (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-1.70; p = 0.82) or late mortality (RR, 91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.71; p = 0.78) between the CABG alone group and the combined-procedure group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate IMR, the addition of MV surgery to CABG did not increase perioperative mortality. Despite the reduced rates of moderate MR and NYHA class III-IV at follow-up, the addition of MV surgery did not translate in a reduction in mid-term or late mortality.

Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Combined With Mitral Valve Repair Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Alone in Patients With Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes between those who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone and CABG with mitral valve repair (MVR) in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. The present study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors performed a comprehensive search of international databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant studies published from inception to March 1, 2023. The search was performed again before the submission of the manuscript on March 20, 2023. Primary outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included early mortality and long-term mortality. Secondary outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) score from baseline, change in ejection fraction (EF) from baseline (%), and major cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 13 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Out of 13 included studies, four were randomized control trials (RCTs) and nine were retrospective cohort studies. The pooled analysis showed that early mortality was significantly lower in patients in the CABG group compared to the CABG+MVR group (risk ratio [RR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.70). Long-term mortality was also lower in patients who underwent CABG compared to patients in the CABG+MVR group. However, the difference was statistically insignificant (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.02). No significant differences were reported in the EF score between patients who underwent CABG and patients who underwent CABG plus MVR (mean difference [MD]: 0.40, 95% CI: -1.90, 2.69). NYHA score was significantly lower in patients in the CABG+repair group compared to the CABG alone group (MD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.72). In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that concomitant MVR during CABG may not improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate this intervention in more detail.

[Results of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients of different age groups]

BACKGROUND

Myocardial revascularization involves a wide range of invasive strategies aimed at treating ischaemic heart disease in patients of different age groups.

AIM

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients depending on age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 905 patients enrolled in our study were subdivided into groups based on age-related characteristics (young age, middle age, old age, senile age). The endpoints of follow up were as follows: myocardial infarction, acute impairment of cerebral circulation, death and haemorrhagic complications.

RESULTS

It should be mentioned that the groups were comparable by the majority of the parameters studied. No statistically significant differences in the frequency of the development of complications in the postoperative period were observed. However, amongst patients over 75 years old, revision of the mediastinum for haemorrhage was performed more often.

DISCUSSION

Patients of different age groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting are extremely heterogeneous by the clinical, anamnestic, instrumental and intraoperative characteristics. A high frequency of haemorrhagic complications amongst patients over 75 years old may be explained by a more aggressive approach to the regimens of anticoagulant/antiaggregant therapy resulting form the presence of atrial fibrillation. In its turn, this fact determines the probability of a high frequency of the development of adverse cardiovascular events. An individual approach to the choice and scope of the strategy of revascularization in patients of different age groups is the fundamental principle for an optimal outcome of coronary surgery.

CONCLUSION

The obtained findings and analysis of the statistical data are indicative of the necessity of personified selection of the technique of a surgical intervention for each particular patient, which will make it possible to decrease the rate of adverse cardiovascular events in the postoperative period.