Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Elevated Stroke Volume Variation Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Intervention Study

OBJECTIVES

The identification of potential hemodynamic indicators to increase the predictive power of stroke-volume variation (SVV) for mean arterial pressure (MAP) and stroke volume (SV) fluid responsiveness.

DESIGN

A prospective intervention study.

SETTING

At a single-center university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen patients during major vascular surgery with 125 fluid interventions.

INTERVENTIONS

When SVV ≥13% occurred for >30 seconds, 250 mL of Ringer's lactate were given within 2 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Hemodynamic variables, such as pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and dynamic arterial elastance (Edyn), were measured by pulse power-wave analysis. The outcomes were MAP and SV responsiveness, defined as an increase of at least 10% of MAP and SV within 5 minutes of the fluid intervention. Of the fluid interventions, 48% were MAP-responsive, and 66% were SV-responsive. The addition of PPV and Edyn cut-off values to the SVV cut-off decreased sensitivity from 1-to-0.66 to-0.82, and concomitantly increased specificity from 0-to- 0.65-to-0.93 for the prediction of MAP and SV responsiveness in the authors' study setting. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of PPV and Edyn for the prediction of MAP responsiveness were 0.79 and 0.75, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for PPV and Edyn to predict SV responsiveness were 0.85 and 0.77, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPV and Edyn showed good accuracy for the prediction of MAP and SV responsiveness in patients with elevated SVV during vascular surgery. Either PPV or Edyn may be used in conjunction with SVV to better predict MAP and SV fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

An Automated Hardware-in-Loop Testbed for Evaluating Hemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation Controllers

Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death, with early goal-directed fluid resuscitation being a pillar of mortality prevention. While closed-loop resuscitation can potentially benefit this effort, development of these systems is resource-intensive, making it a challenge to compare infusion controllers and respective hardware within a range of physiologically relevant hemorrhage scenarios. Here, we present a hardware-in-loop automated testbed for resuscitation controllers (HATRC) that provides a simple yet robust methodology to evaluate controllers. HATRC is a flow-loop benchtop system comprised of multiple PhysioVessels which mimic pressure-volume responsiveness for different resuscitation infusates. Subject variability and infusate switching were integrated for more complex testing. Further, HATRC can modulate fluidic resistance to mimic arterial resistance changes after vasopressor administration. Finally, all outflow rates are computer-controlled, with rules to dictate hemorrhage, clotting, and urine rates. Using HATRC, we evaluated a decision-table controller at two sampling rates with different hemorrhage scenarios. HATRC allows quantification of twelve performance metrics for each controller configuration and scenario, producing heterogeneous results and highlighting the need for controller evaluation with multiple hemorrhage scenarios. In conclusion, HATRC can be used to evaluate closed-loop controllers through user-defined hemorrhage scenarios while rating their performance. Extensive controller troubleshooting using HATRC can accelerate product development and subsequent translation.

Hydroxyethyl starch for perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy in 2020: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Perioperative fluid management - including the type, dose, and timing of administration -directly affects patient outcome after major surgery. The objective of fluid administration is to optimize intravascular fluid status to maintain adequate tissue perfusion. There is continuing controversy around the perioperative use of crystalloid versus colloid fluids. Unfortunately, the importance of fluid volume, which significantly influences the benefit-to-risk ratio of each chosen solution, has often been overlooked in this debate.

MAIN TEXT

The volume of fluid administered during the perioperative period can influence the incidence and severity of postoperative complications. Regrettably, there is still huge variability in fluid administration practices, both intra-and inter-individual, among clinicians. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT), aimed at optimizing flow-related variables, has been demonstrated to have some clinical benefit and has been recommended by multiple professional societies. However, this approach has failed to achieve widespread adoption. A closed-loop fluid administration system designed to assist anesthesia providers in consistently applying GDFT strategies has recently been developed and tested. Such an approach may change the crystalloid versus colloid debate. Because colloid solutions have a more profound effect on intravascular volume and longer plasma persistence, their use in this more "controlled" context could be associated with a lower fluid balance, and potentially improved patient outcome. Additionally, most studies that have assessed the impact of a GDFT strategy on the outcome of high-risk surgical patients have used hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions in their protocols. Some of these studies have demonstrated beneficial effects, while none of them has reported severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The type and volume of fluid used for perioperative management need to be individualized according to the patient's hemodynamic status and clinical condition. The amount of fluid given should be guided by well-defined physiologic targets. Compliance with a predefined hemodynamic protocol may be optimized by using a computerized system. The type of fluid should also be individualized, as should any drug therapy, with careful consideration of timing and dose. It is our perspective that HES solutions remain a valid option for fluid therapy in the perioperative context because of their effects on blood volume and their reasonable benefit/risk profile.